Collective Intelligence, Corruption, Cultural Intelligence, Government, IO Deeds of War, Peace Intelligence
20 July
2018
Mr. President,
According to The 9/11 Commission Report (2004), American Airlines Flight 77, a
Boeing 757, was flown into the Pentagon at around 400 mph barely skimming the
ground and taking out a series of lampposts on its approach. As a pilot and
aeronautical engineer, however, that cannot be correct: high-speed flight in relatively close proximity to
the ground is virtually impossible – in any fixed-wing aircraft.
An exception would be cruise-type
missiles, whose flying surfaces are more akin to horizontal fins than wings,
and thus have extremely high wing loadings (lbs/sf) — much higher even than of
ground-attack fighter-bombers.
Commonly invoked photos of aircraft
in flight close to the ground do not depict flight at anywhere near maximum
speed; they are photos taken of craft flying at greatly reduced throttle
settings – which is what actually happens during any landing!
An aircraft’s wing, basically,
is an air deflector. As an aircraft moves forward, the wing essentially
deflects the resultant airstream downward. This downward deflection of air
causes an equal and opposite reaction upward. This upward reaction (equal to
the weight of the aircraft when in level flight) is what is termed ‘Lift.’
This downward deflection of air,
which occurs along the entire span of the wing, is also what constitutes downwash. This downwash ‘sheet’ has a vertical
component that is normal (I.e., at a right angles) to the direction of flight.
When an aircraft flies in close
proximity to the ground, it is this vertical component of Downwash that causes
the ‘cushion’ of air between the wing and the ground.
This “cushion,” when sufficiently
energized (by an aircraft’s high speed), behaves much like a pneumatic
“spring,” and tends to resist any action against it — such as that caused by a
pilot trying to force the
aircraft down against it.
In the case of a Boeing 757, given
its wingspan of 124 feet, this would equate to roughly 62 feet AGL. Sixty-two
feet is a theoretical minimum; a practical minimum would actually be
considerably higher.
In a
real-world situation (such as allegedly at the Pentagon), a pilot — especially
one as demonstrably inept as Hani Hanjour who could barely fly a trainer —
probably could not have come within 100 feet of the ground in a Boeing 757
flying at 400 mph.
This means that the “official
account” of the Pentagon hit cannot possibly be correct because it violates the
laws of aerodynamics. The 9/11 Commission has been playing the American people
for saps.
Reference:
DOC (1
Page): 911 POTUS AeroEng No Boeing 757
Hit Pentagon
Phi Beta
Iota: The author desires to remain anonymous to the public. He
is known by name and reputation to our team.
See Also:
Posted by Jim Fetzer at 8:51
AM 0
comments
No comments:
Post a Comment