Sunday, August 19, 2018
1205-1210: Indigenous --- What? from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
I hate the way native tribes are running around mindlessly claiming to be "indigenous" as if this is the new buzz-word for reality.
Where do we all come from, but the Earth?
Do you seriously think that white people and black people and yellow people come from some other "source"?
Do you think that my body was not built from atoms gleaned from the soil of Wisconsin, the same as any Indian from Wisconsin?
Those touting the "indigenous" horn
are just trying to find some other, new excuse to claim that they are
different and "special" and "better" and "more equal" than everyone
else.
This, after spending six generations in a subjugated second-class "citizenship" status themselves?
Their continued attempts to claim
"special" status and to lord it over other people just proves again that
Hannah Arendt was right: we become what we hate.
After suffering generations of
injustice, today's "indigenous leaders" can't wait to hop on the gravy
train and promote the same exact kind of injustice against other
people.
There are very few "indigenous
leaders" with the vision and true humanity to get past "the Past" and
embrace what is possible now. Most of them are concentrating on
"getting theirs" and subjugating others under some new malarkey "system"
that idolizes "the indigneous" without honoring Mankind as a whole.
Sorry. My Shinola Sensor went off
the first time I heard this and it is still going off, and though being
"indigenous" may be fashionable now, that fad will change tomorrow ----- and then what? Then will you enjoy being demonized as "savages" and whatever other new labels might be applied?
Don't you get it, yet? That labeling yourself leads to your own destruction, as well as the destruction of other people?
The moment you label yourself
"indigenous" you label everyone else "non-indigenous" (though in fact
they are just as "indigenous" as you are) ---- and there are a lot more
of them? I mean --- a LOT more of them?
The odds were 9 to 1 against in
1862. The odds are now more than 40 to 1. Hello? "Indigenous"
leaders? You still want to go on with this game, trying to benefit
yourselves instead of benefiting the whole human race? Trying to
settle old scores with and for people who are long, long dead?
You come back to the fact that as
long as you abuse Mankind for your own advantage, you abuse all of
Mankind, including yourselves.
It simply isn't possible to draw
these distinctions and apply these labels without getting caught in your
own deceit, just like it isn't possible to stub your toe really, really
hard without hurting the rest of you.
Wake to hell up. Everyone. Please. Now.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
Cancellation of All Powers of Attorney
By Anna Von Reitz
Many people have been asking me, "Well, how do I
cancel Powers of Attorney that I may or may not even know exist?" You record
your Cancellation of all such Powers and make it another Extension of your Deed
of Re-Conveyance.
Here is a bare-bones example of how it needs to be
set up and what it needs to say:
"All prior Powers of Attorney granted by Anna Maria
Riezinger are removed, cancelled, and permanently revoked effective June 6,
1956.
Anna Maria Riezinger is Attorney-in-Fact for all
purposes related to the administration of her estates and all correspondence
should be addressed to: Anna Maria Riezinger, c/o Box 520994, Big Lake, Alaska
99652."
by:___________________________
Public Notary Witness
Alaska
Matanuska-Susitna County
I____________________, a Public Notary, was visited
today by the woman known to me to be Anna Maria Riezinger, and she did affirm
and sign this Cancellation of All Powers of Attorney in my presence for the
purposes stated.
by:___________________________
______________________________
To my readers--- notice that the place this notary
function is taking place in is "Alaska" --- the sovereign State, and also that
it is taking place in "Matanuska-Susitna County", both of which are
unincorporated entities.
Not the State of Alaska, not County of
Matanuska-Susitna, Not a Borough. Not a City. Or any other incorporated entity.
And also note, that because this is taking place in
the land jurisdiction "State" and in the land jurisdiction "County", this is a
Public Notary function and not a "Notary Public" function.
See the PDF version of this here and see the editble version .docx in the documents at article 928 at www.annavonreitz.com
----------------------------
See this article and over 1200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
To Be Clear About the Paperwork
By Anna Von Reitz
Destry Payne did not do the paperwork I recommend that every American do.
(See Article 928 on my website: www.annavonreitz.com.)
Bruce Doucette didn't do the paperwork I recommended, either.
Neither did Stephen Nalty.
Neither did Ammon Bundy.
Neither did the Hammonds.
Neither did LaVoy Finicum.
Neither did Steve Curry.
I could go on all day long listing
all the people who have listened with only half an ear to what I am
saying, and who have paid the price for not doing a few hours of due
diligence and maybe a half-day chore of recording some paperwork.
All these men thought they knew
better. They all went their own way. They all trespassed into Federal
Jurisdiction. They all suffered the consequences.
Rain falls from the sky. Water runs downhill.
We are living in a bogus state of
manufactured political "war", which is considerably more phony than any
$3 bill, but until you realize what is being promoted against you and by
whom and what, it is not possible to gain control of the situation or
take any action to correct it.
Now, some people have done the paperwork and have still been arrested by highway patrolmen and so on.
Best be aware that there is no
automatic computer-generated connection between what you have on file at
the Recorder's Office and what the police have on their screens. You
not only have to record it, you have to bring it forward. (Someday,
hopefully quite soon, there will be a database connection, but not
yet.)
When people do this and
knowledgeably defend their position as landlubbers, miracles are
happening. Mortgages are being set-aside and "paid off". People are
leaving jails, set free because they are not subject to statutory law.
The Indemnity Bond is being honored.
The police, the judges, and the
"Machine" are slowly waking up along with the rest of America, and
beginning to come to heel, but these are early days and these atrocities
against our States and our People have been going on for a long time.
Imagine that you are at the helm of a
Supertanker far out at sea and you are trying to execute a 180 degree
turn around and reversal? Even at "Full Speed" that kind of change
takes time.
So is the paperwork a Silver Bullet?
Yes, so long as you don't murder,
rape, steal or do other things that damage actual people and property.
And so long as you get it on the Public Record prior to running afoul of
THEIR law. The Truth will set you free, so long as you establish what
your truth is and provide proof of it.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
The Fetid Stench From Benghazi
By Anna Von Reitz
I wept in anger when General Carter Ham was "arrested" by his sneaky
little gobber-faced "UN Shadow" and removed from command for trying to
rescue Ambassador Stevens and the other brave men at the compound in
Benghazi.
I knew for sure that those men --- including General Ham --- had been grossly betrayed.
And they were betrayed, all of them, those who were killed by the mob
and those who were supposed to rescue them, by some grimy little
criminals in political offices--- criminals who have yet to face
justice.
For all of those who have wondered -- WTF happened at Benghazi? --- here it is, with thanks to Benjamin for reminding me:
----------------------------
See this article and over 1200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
Lions, and Tigers, and Bears....and oh, my! World Trusts!
By Anna Von Reitz
First, there was the "Unum Sanctum" --- "One Sacred" Trust, published in 1302. It gradually gained traction and assets and network connectivity that spanned the Globe. Like most human endeavors, it had its upsides and its downsides....
Upsides include a global postal and
banking system which allows us to communicate and to trade on a global
scale. Those strawberries from Ecuador that you are eating in January
would not be possible without the work of the Unum Sanctum Trust.
The idea of public hospitals and
public charities and public schools for the masses are all the work of
the Unum Sanctum Trust. The idea of foundations devoted to things like
Public Broadcasting and Art Museums and Public Libraries---- all from
the Unum Sanctum Trust.
In fact, much of the modern world as
we know it, and much of the good that has been accomplished, has in one
way or another been guided or implemented or expedited or planned by
the Unum Sanctum Trust and we take this all for granted as it things
like the Postal Service just sprang up out of the ground like mushrooms
in the fall.
Not so. It took many generations of
sacrifice and inspiration and donations by --- largely Catholic
supporters --- to make all this possible.
And now for the downside..... over
many generations, things got out of control and the power and
connectivity and wealth of the Unum Sanctum Trust began to be abused for
political and criminal purposes. The so-called "Middle Crown" of the
Trust, the Romanus Pontifex was dissolved in 2011 as a result.
And then we had the ill-fated One
People's Public Trust --- the OPPT, organized as a result of the work of
the Paradigm Project --- an attempt to "take over" the assets and
resources of the Unum Sanctum Trust and redefine it and garner political
support by giving away little dribs and drabs of assets while retaining
the vast bulk of the "foreclosed upon" assets for purposes unknown.
This is in common terms known as
"rolling over" a trust. When one trust ends, another begins. Or so that
theory and means of dealing with the situation has it.
It is one of the great ironies of
the world that Bar Attorneys are generally speaking the only ones who
know how to foreclose assets, but they also have no standing as owners
with respect to the assets they foreclose. They are the eternal
middlemen, foreclosed themselves from entering into the Kingdom.
Well, according to some of the most ancient texts on Earth, somebody had to be the Gatekeepers.
And then, there is "Manna World
Holding Trust" that has been making a bid to take over and control all
the assets of the world.
Same story as OPPT, different day, more sinister provenance.
Some hackers at MIT in concert with
certain loose canons in the so-called "defense community" developed a
means to transfer information from the current banking system and lock
down accounts all over the world. They have since been thumping
themselves on the back for their illegal acts and touting their own
horns as if they have done a great thing.
Not.
We expect that when the dust settles
they will all be tracked down and scrutinized and while they may make
some claims that they did it for "national security", I believe that a
very different motive will emerge. They are trying to roll over the
World Trust Assets, just like OPPT. Only they serve their own masters
and their own peculiar agendas.
Apparently, our simple idea that the
assets need to go back to the countries and to the people to whom the
assets naturally belong is too hard for all these power-hungry
genius-types to grasp.
And in cases where nobody knows any
longer who the owners are, simply put the unclaimed assets into an
investment fund and use the proceeds to fund infrastructure in
underdeveloped countries and to provide aid to those affected by natural
catastrophe or war?
Once they deal with the fact that
the American assets --- as in our assets --- are not "unclaimed" and
that our government isn't in any kind of "abeyance", the larger part of
all the land and other assets they were planning to divide among
themselves disappears from the table and the whole issue gets cut down
to size.
And the World Trust is no longer a
single juggernaut poised to destroy all national governments and impose a
single world government administered by some kind of global
"meritocracy", either. It dissolves like a paper tiger in the rain,
melting back into the National Trusts that are owed to the people of
every country.
Sometimes going forward means going
back, retracing and rethinking. A single World Trust --- or even half a
dozen such trusts -- is a bad idea, because it concentrates too much
power in the hands of too few people, who then become subject to the
corrupting nature of such power.
Instead of universal brotherhood it resulted in universal enslavement.
So scratch that one. Erase the drawing board. Start over.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
The Department of Injustice
By Anna Von Reitz
I am re-posting this seminal article from "Four Winds" for all those who need to know the nature and status of the "Department of Justice" --- and the fact that it's an Executive Branch entity not connected with the Judicial Branch of government at all.
This makes the "Department of Justice" an instrumentality of political
policy and executive power and divorces it (from inception no less) from
any actual role vaguely related to ensuring any kind of justice for
anyone, including the President of the United States.
This is why you are continuing to see the DOJ Witchhunt in the national
media: it is a political organ, and always has been. Ironically, as you
will see, DOJ is also meant to be a creature under the thumb and
forefinger of the President, and a means for him to exercise Executive
power.
Always remember that your actual land jurisdiction government, The
United States of America, [Unincorporated] has never been at war, never
been bankrupt, and is not subject to any form of martial law. And when
you reclaim your birthright, neither are you affected by any of this
drama.
All this "reconstruction" --- is within and a function of the Federal
Government operating under Delegated Powers. And now that the Delegated
Powers have
reverted by Operation of Law to the Delegators of those "Powers" it is time for us to settle this hash once and for all.
It is left to us, those who are awake and alive, to determine the fate
of the "Federal Government" and finish not only its reconstruction, but
determine its role in the modern world. Read on--- and all our many
thanks to the original "Four Winds" who dedicated many years of worthy
scholarship to the effort:
U.S. Under Martial Law Since The Civil War
Please
be aware that what you are about to read will be very difficult to
digest. All our life we have been living under a lie to keep us
enslaved. The truth is now known. The problem is, what do we do now?
Like you, I became aware of this same truth today and I don’t where to
go from here.
I learned judges in California are not “public officials” I wanted to know why, if they are elected by the people.
Now I know why, and so will you after reading this information.
It will take many educated and creative minds to solve our problem. I pray you are up to the challenge.
Further
proof that martial law remained in effect after the Civil War can be
found in the “Congressional Globe” (now called the “Congressional
Record”). The following are excerpts from the April 20th through 29th,
1870 “Congressional Globe” concerning H.R. 1328 which established the Department of Justice to CONTINUE TO CARRY OUT MARTIAL LAW nearly five years after the end of the Civil War:
“The
following bureaus shall be established in this department [the
Department of Justice]: a Bureau of International Law, a Bureau of
Revenue Law, a Bureau of Military and Naval Law, a Bureau of Postal Law,
a Bureau of Land Management Law.”
Congressman Lawrence then said in the record:
“This
Bill, however, does transfer to the Law Department, or the Department of
Justice as it is now called, the cognizance of all subjects of martial
law, and the cognizance of all subjects of military and naval law,
except that portion of the administration of military justice which
relates to military court martial, their proceedings, and the
supervision of records.
“If a
question of martial law is to be determined by the law officers of
government, it will now belong to the Attorney General, or to this
Department of Justice. It will not belong to the Judge Advocate General
of the Army. He will not be called upon for any opinion relating to
martial law or military law except as to that portion of the
administration of military law which relates to military justice.
“In
other words, the Judge Advocate General, instead of giving legal
opinions to the Secretary of War relating to the status of the states of
the union, their right to call upon the government for military
protection, or military aid, and other grave Constitutional questions,
will be limited. The Judge Advocate General will perform duties
administrative in their character and almost exclusively so.
“But I
will state to the House why, in my judgment, no transfer of the Judge
Advocate General or of his duties to the Department of Justice has been
proposed in this Bill. If this had been done, the Bill would have
encountered the opposition of some of the officers of the Bureau of
Military Justice and their friends, and so great is the power of men in
office, so difficult is it to abolish an office, that we were compelled
in the consideration of this subject to leave officers in this Bureau
untouched in their official tenure in order that this Bill might get
through Congress.
“But so
far as the Solicitor and Naval Judge Advocate General is concerned, he
is transferred with all his supervisory power over naval court partials
and the records and proceedings of such courts, so that to that extent,
this Bill accomplishes the great purpose which it has in view of
bringing into one department the whole legal service of the government.
It is misfortunate that there should be different constructions of the
laws of the United States by different law officers of the United
States.”
WHAT IS THIS ALL ABOUT:
These traitors knew they would have encountered opposition from the military with the provisions of H.R. 1328,
so they decided to leave the military officers untouched during their
tenure, and transfer them to supervisory positions over court partials.
This appeased the military leaders, who didn’t have the foggiest idea
as to what was really going on.
Had
the traitors fleeced the military of all their powers during their
tenure in office, the military would have realized and possibly taken
some military action. But as nothing was happening at the hen house,
they slept through this entire situation which resulted in an overthrow
of the Constitution — an overthrow under which government pretended to
operate in 1933, and under which it continues to pretend to operate
today.
The
traitors were now faced with a very serious problem, namely, what to do
with the powers of the Office of the Judge Advocate General when their
tenure in office expired. And they solved this dilemma by adding the
following amendments, detailed in that same “Congressional Globe”:
Congressman Jenks: I move to amend Section 3 by inserting the word “naval” before the words “Judge Advocate General”.
The amendment was agreed to and later Congressman Finkelburg stated:
I would
suggest the propriety of amending the third section of this Bill by
inserting after the words “the Naval Solicitor and Naval Judge Advocate
General” the words “who shall hereafter be known as Naval Solicitor”.
Mr. Jenks: I have no objection to that amendment.
This amendment was also agreed to, and the Office of the Judge Advocate General became known as the Naval Solicitor. Thus,
when the existing tenure was over, the new office would have a
different set of rules and regulations so that the Bill accomplished the
great purpose which it had in view of bringing into one department the
whole legal service of the government without the power of the Office of
the Judge Advocate General getting in their way.
This was a necessary step to bring the President into the position of dictator over America.
But they
had one other problem facing them, namely, DIRECT ACCESS to the
Treasury for the Department of Justice without interference. They
accomplished this by the following three sections of the Bill:
“…The
Eighth Section provides that the Attorney General is hereby empowered to
make all necessary rules and regulations for the government….
“…The
Eleventh Section provides that all monies hereafter drawn out of the
Treasury upon requisition of the Attorney General shall be dispersed by
such one of the clerks herein provided for the Attorney General as he
may designate, and so much of the First Section of the Act, making
appropriations, past March 3rd, 1859, as provides that money drawn out
of the Treasury upon requisition of the Attorney General shall be
dispersed by such dispersing officer as the Secretary of the Treasury is
hereby repealed….
“…The
Fifteenth Section provides that the supervisory powers now exercised by
the Secretary of the Interior over the accounts of the district
attorneys, marshals, clerks, and other officers of the courts of the
United States, shall be exercised by the Attorney General….”
It is important here to remember that under the Trading with the Enemy Act, the District Courts of the United States are:
“…hereby given jurisdiction to make and enter all such rules as to
notice and otherwise and all such orders and decrees and to issue such
process as may be necessary and proper in the premises to enforce the
provisions of this Act.”
It is
here that we find out that the district attorneys, marshals, clerks and
other officers of the courts are under the Department of Justice. That
seems an obvious statement, given the state of the nation today. But
the REAL PROBLEM — given the broad scope of powers granted the District
Courts under the Trading with the Enemy Act — is that the Department of
Justice is *NOT* a part of the Judicial Branch of Government!
According
to Section 101 of Title 5 of the United States Code, the Department of
State, the Department of Treasury, the Department of Defense, the
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, the Department of the Interior, the Department of
Agriculture, the Department of Commerce, the Department of Health,
Education and Welfare, the Department of Housing and Urban Development,
the Department of Transportation, the Department of Energy, the
Department of
Education, and the Department of the Veteran Affairs are *ALL* under the Executive Branch of Government.
All of
the above departments are under the Executive Branch–which raises quite a
few questions about the balance of powers between the Executive,
Judicial, and Legislative branches of government.
How can
this be? There is no balance of power under a declared state of
emergency. And we’ve been living under a declared state of emergency
ever since the Civil War began, and have been living under a declared
state of martial law ever since the Reconstruction Act.
This
overthrow of the Constitution occurred long before the War Powers Act,
and if we are going back in history to find our roots of legality — and
if we stop our search when we reach the War Powers Act — we are NOT
going to succeed in this venture.
Where
is the separation of powers if the Department of Justice is under the
Executive branch? Shouldn’t it be part of the Judiciary? The answer, of
course, is yes; but it’s not. Again, just check Section 101 of Title 5
of the United States Code. There is no Judiciary!
If only
Congress has the power to regulate Commerce, under Article 1, Section 8,
of the Constitution, why are the Department of Commerce and the
Department of Transportation under the Executive branch and not under
the Legislative branch?
And if
only the Congress has the power to coin money, according to the
Constitution, why is the Department of Treasury under the Executive
branch?
The Commerce Department (from Title 5):
“…part
of the Executive branch of federal government, headed by a Cabinet
member, the Secretary of Commerce, which is concerned with promoting
domestic and international business and commerce.”
To
further illustrate the take-over by the Executive branch of government
via martial law rule, the following offices, bureaus, divisions, and
organizations are under the Department of Justice. And remember, the Department of Justice is under the Executive branch — NOT under the judicial branch.
The Office of Solicitor General
The Federal Bureau of Investigation
The Drug Enforcement Agency
The Bureau of Prisons
Immigration and Naturalization
United States Marshal Service
Office of Justice Program
United States Parole Commission
United States National Central Bureau
The Office of the Pardon Attorney
Executive Office of the United States Attorney
Criminal Division
Civil Division
Anti-Trust Division
Civil Rights Division
Tax Division
Environmental and Natural Resource Division
Community Relations Services
Foreign Claim Settlement Division
Executive Office of United States Trustees
Executive Office for Immigration Review
Justice Management Division
Office of Legal Counsel
Office of Policy Development
Office of Legislative Affairs
Office of Public Affairs
Office of Liaison Services
Office of Intelligence and Policy Review
Office of International Affairs
Office of the Inspector General
Office of Professional Responsibility; and
Interpol — (Note: Interpol is a private corporation, yet it comes under (in this country) the Executive branch of government.)
In my
opinion: if the matter of the repeal of the Reconstruction Act and the
old H.R. 1328 are not addressed, we will remain in a state of declared
martial law. But few people do any research anymore, and even fewer
read the results of research done by others. Yes, we are already, and
have been all our lives, living under declared martial law.
The source of this law is from 1875.
‑CITE‑ 2 USC Sec. 118
‑EXPCITE‑
TITLE 2
CHAPTER 4
‑HEAD‑
Sec. 118. Actions against officers for official acts
‑STATUTE‑
In any
action brought against any person for or on account of anything done by
him while an officer of either House of Congress in the discharge of his
official duty, in executing any order of such House, the United States
attorney for the district within which the action is brought, on being
thereto requested by the officer sued, shall enter an appearance in
behalf of such officer; and all provisions of the eighth section of
the Act of July 28, 1866, entitled ‘An Act to protect the revenue, and
for other purposes’, and also all provisions of the sections of former
Acts therein referred to, so far as the same relate to the removal of
suits, the withholding of executions, and the paying of judgments
against revenue or other officers of the United States, shall become
applicable to such action and to all proceedings and matters whatsoever
connected therewith, and the defense of such action shall thenceforth be
conducted under the supervision and direction of the Attorney General.
‑SOURCE‑
(Mar. 3, 1875, ch. 130, Sec. 8, 18 Stat. 401; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, Sec. 1, 62 Stat. 909.)
‑REFTEXT‑REFERENCES IN TEXT
The
provisions of section 8 of act July 28, 1866, ch. 298, 14 Stat. 329,
referred to in text, were contained generally in R.S.Sec. 643, which was
incorporated in the former Judicial Code, Sec. 33, and was repealed by
act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, Sec. 39, 62 Stat. 992. See
sections 1442, 1446, and 1447 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial
Procedure. Other provisions referred to were contained in R.S. Sec. 771,
989, which were also repealed by act June 25, 1948. See sections 509,
547, and 2006, respectively, of Title 28.
‑CHANGE‑
CHANGE OF NAME
Act June 25, 1948, eff. Sept. 1, 1948, substituted ‘United States attorney’ for ‘district attorney’. See section 541 of Title
28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
‑CROSS‑
FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Judgment against certain public officers, satisfaction of, see Rule 69, Title 28, Appendix, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
‑SECREF‑
SECTION REFERRED TO IN OTHER SECTIONS
This section is referred to in section 118a of this title.
‑END‑
Statutes Relating to Commissions, Appointments, etc.
Sections
in this file relate to required commissions, oaths, etc., for officers
and employees of United States government and the government of the
District of Columbia. All sections have been pasted directly from the
1996 CD-ROM edition of the United States Code produced and distributed
by the Government Printing Office. Notes in Italics that follow the sections list regulations for each section listed in the Parallel Table of Authorities and Rules.It is significant that the “Seal
of the United States” is no longer affixed to commissions of “judicial
officers” appointed by the President with advice and consent of the
Senate; commissions are filed with the Department of Justice under the
D.O.J. seal, which is an executive seal. This is suggestive that there
are no longer any Article III[constitutional] judges in the United
States.
-CITE-
4 USC Sec. 41 01/16/96
HERE’S THER REAL KICKER
THIS IS WHAT ENSLAVES US AS 14th AMENDMENT CITIZENS
The Insurrection Act (enacted in 1807) delegates
authority to the President to federalize and deploy the National Guard
domestically during an insurrection or civil disturbance (10 U.S.C.
Sections 331-335). Section 331 authorizes the President to use federal
military forces to suppress an insurrection at the request of a state
government. Section 332 authorizes the President to use armed forces in
such manner as he deems necessary to enforce the laws or suppress a
rebellion. Section 333 authorizes the President to use federal military
forces to protect individuals from unlawful actions that obstruct the
execution of federal laws or which impede the course of justice under
federal laws. Section 333 was enacted to implement the Fourteenth Amendment and does not require the request or consent of the governor of the affected state.
No comments:
Post a Comment