InPower: A Mass Action of Liability by Dr. Mercola
InPower: A Mass Action of Liability
September 09, 2017 • 98,884views
The InPower team is allowing a full and FREE viewing of Episode #1. Sign up to watch Episode #2 for free by CLICKING HERE and show your support by purchasing their 2-DVD combo by CLICKING HERE (use coupon code MERC30 to save 30%).
The
smart grid is part of a clandestine surveillance network that violates
privacy rights. Following the installation of smart meters, many also
report devastating health problems, and there have been numerous fires
and explosions
“InPower
Episode #1: A Mass Action of Liability” reveals a new method of how you
can take back your power, “balance the scales” and prevent or reverse
the installation of a smart meter in your home
Phase
1 involved 200 homeowners in three cities. Having achieved strong
results, phase 2 is a call to mass action, with the goal of stopping the
smart meter agenda and ensuring safe, noninvasive technology
By Dr. Mercola
Last month I published an article discussing the documentary "Take
Back Your Power," directed by Josh del Sol Beaulieu, in which he
investigated some of the many problems associated with smart meters —
including the devastating health effects they're having on some people,
and how these meters are part of a much larger covert surveillance
system designed to spy on and track users, and to profit from the sale
of user data.
"InPower Episode 1: A Mass Action of Liability" is the follow-up to
that film, released August 26. In this film, del Sol Beaulieu reveals
how people are using commerce to leverage their power against
politicians and corporations to ensure the right and ability to refuse
smart meters.
As revealed in "Take Back Your Power,"
many feel powerless in the face of government and large corporations
that seem to dictate the rules without regard for an individual's
safety. But there are a wide variety of actions you can take to protect
yourself and your family. This strategy, used in three communities in
the United States and Canada, has already produced results indicative
of a huge potential.
Smart Meters Linked to Chronic Health Problems
I've warned about the hazards of microwave radiation from
cellphones, routers, portable phones, smart meters and other wireless
technology for decades. Now, armed with the mechanism of harm presented
by Martin Pall, Ph.D., in a series of papers1,2,3,4 I'm more convinced than ever that excessive exposure to electromagnetic fields
(EMFs) are a significant health hazard that needs to be addressed —
especially if you struggle with heart, brain or reproductive issues.
In a nutshell, nonionizing microwave exposures are a major source of mitochondrial dysfunction,
and we've now come to appreciate that this is at the heart of
virtually all chronic disease. It's no wonder, really, that so many are
reporting serious health problems after having a smart meter installed
in their home.
What Pall discovered is that microwaves emitted from devices
such as cellphones, Wi-Fi routers, computers and tablets — when not in
airplane mode — increase intracellular calcium through voltage gated
calcium channels (VGCCs), and the tissues with the highest density of
VGCCs are your brain, the pacemaker in your heart and male testes.
Once these VGCCs are stimulated they trigger the release of
neurotransmitters, neuroendocrine hormones and highly damaging reactive
oxygen species (ROS) that significantly raise your risk for health
problems such as anxiety, depression, Alzheimer's,
brain cancer, arrhythmias and infertility, just to name a few. Anyone
struggling with any of these conditions would be wise to take EMF
exposure very seriously, and take steps to limit exposure to wireless
technology.
Simple measures include eliminating Wi-Fi in your home or at least
turning it off at night. It is also helpful to keep your phone in
airplane mode most of the time. This will radically increase your
battery life and keep you safe.
My phone is in airplane mode
nearly the entire day as I discovered that it provided high levels of
radiation up to 30 feet away, even though it was not on a call —
especially when the signal strength is only one or two "bars."
Obviously keep your phone in airplane mode when you are carrying it on
your body. I actually take another step and put my phone in a Faraday
bag.
When it comes to smart meters, many find they're not given a choice
in the matter. As shown in "Take Back Your Power," utility company
employees have literally broken into homes to forcibly install the
meters. So, what can you do? That's the focus of the InPower Movement, a
new Indiegogo-funded project from Beaulieu and his team.
The Power of Liability
According to Beaulieu, social justice can be obtained by exercising
the power within the body of rules and principles codified in modern
commerce, which is a descendant of what's known as "Law Merchant." This
can offer a highly effective lawful strategy to prevent and reverse
the installation of a smart meter in your home and community.
It involves holding corporate executives and government agents
financially accountable for their decisions. Cal Washington, co-founder
of the InPower Movement, is an "empowerment advocate" who has spent
several years fighting for justice for people who have been abused by
corruption within the justice system.
Is it possible to hold corporate individuals accountable for their
actions? Yes, it is, "and this has the potential to change everything,"
del Sol Beaulieu notes, within his Episode 1. "The next 40 minutes is
an overview of how this works." Washington summarizes the Notice of
Liability action he's developed, which del Sol Beaulieu is sharing with
the world through their film and website, as follows:
"It's basically a counter-offer [to the] contract that is being
implemented to put a device on everybody's house. They've got us into a
tacit agreement. This [Notice of Liability document] clarifies and
expresses the counter-offer in such a way that those who don't want the
meter can say 'I don't want a meter,' and if [the power company] does
put a meter on the house it's going to cost [them] X amount of dollars
per day … in order for you to carry out this contract."
In other words, you are currently in a contract with your power
company. By changing your analog meter to a smart meter, they are
changing the contract and you have to agree to this change in terms.
However, codified in commerce there's something known as tacit agreement
— an agreement that is implied or understood without being directly
expressed. Unless you object, you have tacitly agreed to this change in
terms. As noted by Washington, "If you don't say no, you've said yes."
By understanding that the installation of smart meters is a
commercial contract issued to you by your utility company, you level
the playing field. All you're doing is entering into a contract
negotiation. "All the tricks they use against you, we use against them,"
Washington says.
Notice of Liability
According to Washington, anyone can issue a Notice of Liability at
any time, whether you still have an analog meter or have already
received a smart meter and/or have tacitly agreed to the new meter. The
"Notice of Liability" generally applies worldwide, as it is based on
the system of commerce that governs corporate commerce everywhere. This
is a system that virtually none of the general public is aware of,
"and now you can actually use it," Washington says. "You're now playing
the proper game in the proper court."
Importantly, the Notice of Liability lays accountability at the feet
of an individual. Corporate employees and agents can no longer hide
behind their corporate post where they have no personal accountability.
This includes government employees as well, because the U.S.
government is actually run as and functions as a corporation. As noted
in the film, the U.S. code defines the United States as a federal
corporation, and Canada is listed as a company located in Washington
D.C. on the U.S. securities and exchange.
Understanding Corporate Jurisdiction
In the film, Washington explains a key misunderstanding relating to
jurisdiction. To explain the crux of the problem, he offers the
following analogy: You're hired as an employee in the auto department
at Walmart. When hired, you agree to a basic contract that stipulates
that you will work a certain number of hours for a certain pay. One
day, your manager asks you to come in to work at 2 a.m. — a time when
the store is closed.
While the auto department manager has jurisdiction over you, he's
under the jurisdiction of the store manager. Hence, you can file a
complaint with the store manager, notifying her that what you're being
asked to do goes against company policy.
Walmart, in turn, has to obey the rules of the city in which it is
located. In this example, the store is in Detroit, and must therefore
follow employment rules and regulations of the city. Detroit, in turn,
is under the jurisdiction of Michigan, and all businesses in Detroit
must obey state laws. Next you have the United States, and this is what
most people don't know — the United States is functioning as a
corporation UNDER the jurisdiction of The United States of America, the
country. While they sound the same, they are not identical.
Courts operate under the corporation of the United States. In other
words, according to Washington, the court system can be likened to a
corporation within a corporation. Importantly, Americans believe
they're under the jurisdiction of the country called the United States
of America, but in reality, you're operating your day-to-day life under
the jurisdiction of a corporation called the United States (or U.S.),
and you've tacitly agreed to this, whether you realize it or not.
Lastly, the corporate United States is under the jurisdiction of Law
Merchant, which governs commercial law, which in turn is under the
jurisdiction of Common Law — which is where you find the Constitution
of the United States of America (the republic). Both the United States
of America and Canada were founded on the Common Law — the highest laws
of the land — and still operate under their jurisdiction, "but you
have to know how to invoke them," Washington says.
There will no doubt be some who are resistant to what Washington and
InPower are revealing. But I find it highly interesting that even
before addressing the smart meter problem, he produces evidence of an
extraordinary long list of people in high-level positions resigning from
office, shortly after he sent them certain documentation.
Invocation of Personal Liability Is a Powerful Tool
The above example illustrates corporate jurisdiction. Even if a
company allows their employees to work around the clock, they cannot
force you to do so if it violates the laws of the city, state or the
corporation of the U.S. In this case, the notice of liability action
takes advantage of the fact that the corporation of the U.S. is under
the jurisdiction of merchant and common law. Hence, by invoking these
laws you supersede all others.
How does this make government officials personally liable, though?
Government officials swear an oath to uphold the Constitution of the
United States of America. Their oath is a contract. So, if they do not
honor your constitutional rights, then they are not protected by their
position within the corporation of the United States — they are
personally liable because they've overstepped their role, just like the
Walmart auto department manager did in the hypothetical illustration.
He did not have jurisdiction to tell you to clock in for work at 2
a.m., and a government official does not have the authority or
jurisdiction to negate or violate the Constitution, merchant or common
law. The only way they can practically get away with it is by your
tacit agreement — you must actually waive your rights. The notice of
liability that Washington created explicitly invokes your rights.
Phase 1 Results
Phase 1 of the InPower project involved three "seed" groups with a
total of 200 participants who sent out liability notices. Similar to
Washington's previous experiences, a number of officials who received
liability notices resigned from their posts. del Sol Beaulieu clarifies
that, "while there's no saying for certain what factors are involved
in each resignation," respondents are indeed resigning.
For example, on January 30, 2015, Brett Hodson, CEO of Corix Group,
which installs smart meters, received more than 100 notices from
residents in Kelowna, BC, Canada. On February 4, he received a separate
Notice of Default from Washington. Hodson announced his resignation
that same day.
Kelowna was one of the three seed groups. Groups in Seattle and
Detroit also launched Notice of Liability actions. In Seattle, after
receiving 21 Notices of Liability, three of the nine City Council
members announced they would not seek reelection, including one who
resigned before the end of her term.
"In Detroit, it is all-out war," del Sol Beaulieu says. "The utility
DTE has cut electricity to several homeowners who have refused smart
meters." However, after receiving 21 default notices (a later stage of
the liability action), the Michigan attorney general suddenly began
calling for free opt-out. Four of the eight officers in the Michigan
Public Service Commission who are being held liable appear to have
resigned — though it is yet unconfirmed by the utility.
Phase 2 Plan of Action and Summary
While del Sol Beaulieu states the focus of Phase 1 was to prove that
the concept works, Phase 2 is a call to mass action across North
America and Canada, with the goal of stopping the smart meter agenda
completely and reversing back to safe, noninvasive technology. In
summary, the Notice of Liability is part of a contractual negotiation
process between you and your utility company. A contract has four basic
components:
1. An offer. In this
case, your utility may mail you a notice or post a notice on its
website, telling you they are upgrading your meter. Unless you say no,
you're saying yes (tacit acceptance)
2. Negotiation/meeting of the minds.
Whenever you present a contract to someone, they have the right and
ability to negotiate the terms. (On a side note, to be valid, a
contract must include full disclosure of relevant facts and terms, or
else the contract is null and void. One could argue that since utility
companies are not providing full disclosures about the potential health
effects of the meters, they've voided the contract) 3. Unconditional acceptance.
In this case, by sending out a notice of liability, you are issuing a
counter-offer to their initial offer. You're giving conditional
acceptance, and to be valid, a contract must be unconditional. This
means your conditions must either be met or removed.
As above, consent to conditions can be gained tacitly. This means if
they do not reply to your notice of liability, and ratify the contract
by installing the meter, they've accepted your terms — including the
financial liability spelled out in your counter-offer.
For example, your notice may state that "If you put a meter on my house,
I shall charge you $10,000 per week." If they install a smart meter,
or fail to remove the smart meter, your terms are deemed accepted, and
the individual to whom you sent the notice is personally liable for
this financial obligation. Within your legal rights are the use of
liens, collection agencies and more.
They cannot fight you in court, because your notice restricts the
jurisdiction — it's part of the negotiation process of a personal
agreement or contract between you and the individual. It's no different
than purchasing their house. Since they put the offer out, they cannot
back out of the deal — your notice is part of the negotiation and
these are your terms to their contract 4. Money exchange or performance ratifies the contract.
"Performance" is the action of doing something based on the contract,
which in this case is the installation or non-removal of the smart
meter. By performing the act, the contract — entered into with your
conditional acceptance — goes into effect and the individual is
financially liable per your counter-offer
Join the InPower Movement
I am extremely excited about this project as it can serve as a
template for not only removing smart meters, but wireless technology in
schools. It is important to understand that children are at much
higher risk of EMF damage. As noted in the InPower trailer,5 this strategy may also be used to stop deployment of 5G, forced vaccinations and other problems of "profits before people."
On a call with del Sol Beaulieu and Washington last week, they
explained to me how this process differs from others because it
comprehensively lays the groundwork for the actual enforcement of the
liability. "This isn't the only possible solution," del Sol Beaulieu
said. "But we feel strongly about addressing the problem at its root,
which is how money has corrupted social governance."
"Those who get it, get it — and they will be enough," Washington
said. "There's a certain percentage of people who have been waiting for
this, and who can see through propaganda — for example from the
utilities and lawyers, who will try to convince you that using commerce
is bunk, even though it's THEIR system."
"This is about correcting the system which has become extremely out
of balance. It's to the point where the imbalance will threaten life as
we know it, if allowed to continue. We can actually help to restore
balance, and make big changes, when enough people catch onto this."
To learn more and participate, go to InPowerMovement.com
and sign up free. Once you're signed up, you'll receive Episode 2,
which has step-by-step instructions on how to proceed, and additional
support.
Shocking Admission Reveals How Smart Meters Are Used for Clandestine Surveillance
Last but not least, even if you do not believe smart meters have any
ill health effects, I urge you to join the movement to eliminate them,
if for no other reason than to block the global rollout of these
clandestine surveillance devices. There can be little doubt that they
are infringing on personal privacy, and indeed were designed with that
in mind.
Rights advocate Jerry Day came across the following video, which del
Sol Beaulieu calls "the most startling admission I have seen regarding
in-home surveillance as the real focus of smart meters." The video is a
marketing video for Onzo, a large data aggregator that works with over
100 utilities globally. In this video, they explain what your power
usage data is really used for:
"We then use this characterized profile to give the utility… the
ability to monetize their customer data by providing a direct link to
appropriate third-party organizations based on the customer's
identified character."
In 2015, the director of grants and research at the National
Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners also stated that, "I
think the data [harvested by 'smart' meters] is going to be worth a lot
more than the commodity that's being consumed to generate the data."6
About the Directors
I believe in bringing quality to my readers, which is why I wanted
to share some information about the directors, Josh del Sol Beaulieu
and Cal Washington, from the InPower Docuseries and movement. We sat
down with del Sol Beaulieu and Washington to learn a little more about
what goes in to making these films. Thank you both for sharing with us.
What was your inspiration for launching the InPower Movement?
Washington: Through a long process of learning the hard way, I had
managed to go from a life tormented by the “system” to total freedom,
and was left alone to live my life, which I was doing. Josh knew of my
journey, and asked if anything I had learned could be used to stop the
“smart” meter implementation. Based on my experiences over a 10- to
12-year period, we then put together the liability action, used it in
three different cities, and got some results.
We have since become inspired to make it as simple as possible for
people to do together. So our Phase 2 plan is to offer a website with
semiautomated document completion, print and video resources, and a hub
to create a community experience.
del Sol Beaulieu: Seeing how so many well-intentioned people trying
to preserve their rights and keep their families safe were getting
just steamrolled by their utilities. I wanted to provide another option
to restore accountability within the utilities and commissions — a
process to which I am fully committed.
And I believe that it's going to happen, as more people get
connected with tools like what Cal's bringing forward, because
relatively it's really only a few people who want a lawless
corporatocracy.
What was your favorite part of creating this video series and solution?
Washington: I would have to say watching eyes light up when
something was said. I saw many people have epiphanies and heads
nodding, when things were explained from a different point of view. "It
all makes sense now," was a comment I heard a lot.
del Sol Beaulieu: Watching how people respond at live presentations
and group meetings. I believe at our core we all recognize truth. And
for better or worse, we are actually now forced to go deeper in order
to access a tangible solution.
I really enjoyed the process of people walking through these shifts
in groups, because as we take a stand it brings out the best in us.
When I did the first liability action document with a group in Seattle,
it felt like a new energy was created amongst us.
Where do the proceeds of your Indiegogo campaign and DVD go?
del Sol Beaulieu: Expanding the InPower Movement, and making it
super easy for people to participate in community. Phase 2 will
simplify, add support and expand the Liability Action with a
feature-rich community website which makes it easy to do and manage your
own process.
That's what is needed for the numbers; and the numbers will drive
the major change. We've had amazing support so far on our IndieGogo
campaign, though we've got a ways to go with two weeks left.
We want to continue our plan to give free
as many resources as we possibly can, because we feel this solution
needs to go viral. If you're inspired by our mission, come stand with
us as a founder!
No comments:
Post a Comment