Editorial Bias
If You’re Whitewashing Autism, You’re Part of The Problem
Published September 14, 2017 | Media, Editorial Bias
Last month, The Wall Street Journal reported that insurance claims for dangerous allergic reactions to peanuts, dairy, and eggs have increased nearly 500% across the past decade. Between 2002 and 2013, the rate of Type 1 diabetes in children soared by 60%. Meanwhile, our nation’s children are doing so poorly psychologically, emotionally, and behaviorally that the Boston Globe reported that 500 school children in Massachusetts were arrested last year in what is being called a national trend. Between 2001 and 2009, asthma rates in black children rose by nearly 50%. Between 2011 and 2015, the Denver public school system found itself increasing spending on elementary school therapy services by 244%.
Like the disconcerting increases in autoimmune diseases and allergies, the increasing rates of autism are real too. If you have any true familiarity with autism, you know that there is no way these children would have passed as typically developing before autism became an epidemic. That idea is about as ludicrous as assuming that just a generation ago, parents, teachers, and doctors were too stupid to notice anaphylaxis, diabetic neuropathy, and asthma attacks.
Professing that there has been no alarming increase in autism benefits a number of individuals, companies, and groups, but it certainly doesn’t benefit people with autism. Would pretending there has been no increase in peanut allergies and distributing peanuts on every airplane and sending peanut butter into every classroom like we did in 1980 benefit those anaphylactic to peanuts? Do we have to refer to anaphylaxis as a beautiful variation of food tolerance to be deemed supportive of the peanut-allergic?
The whitewashing of autism comes not only in the delusional declaration that it has always been here, but also the claim that the autistic brain is simply wired differently. Clearly our children with autism are beautiful human beings who should be valued, but not for the reasons the neurodiversity crowd suggests. While they hammer on the unfounded theory that autism is a unique variation of healthy neurological function, there is a growing body of science that is much more grim and sobering.
Immune dysfunction and brain inflammation in autism are implicated in study after study like these:
- Brain inflammation a hallmark of autism, Johns Hopkins analysis shows
- Clinical clues for autoimmunity and neuroinflammation in patients with autistic regression
- Autoimmunity, Autoantibodies, and Autism Spectrum Disorder
- Inflammatory Activity in Autism Spectrum Disorder
- Neuro-Inflammatory Mechanisms in Developmental Disorders Associated with Intellectual Disability and Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Neuro- Immune Perspective
- Cerebral folate receptor autoantibodies in autism spectrum disorder
- Brain autoantibodies in autism spectrum disorder
- Detection of autoantibodies to neural cells of the cerebellum in the plasma of subjects with autism spectrum disorders.
- Systemic auto-antibodies in children with autism
- Serum antinucleosome-specific antibody as a marker of autoimmunity in children with autism
- Autoimmunity in autism
- N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antibodies encephalitis mimicking an autistic regression
- Reduced levels of immunoglobulin in children with autism correlates with behavioral symptoms
Inflammation of the brain, of course, is no less serious.
In contrast to inflammation of the kidneys, appendix, or spleen, we are told that there is no reason for concern over brain inflammation. That even if our kids are spending the entire day crying, the entire night fighting insomnia, all the moments in between trapped in ritualistic compulsions, and locked helplessly within their own minds, that we need to accept it. And that it is normal. And it has always been here. And that it is part of a wide continuum of healthy neurological functioning that should be embraced.
Excuse me?
I believe most people assume that I feel supported and my son feels accepted when they share articles and videos highlighting the beauty, creativity, and genius of autism. They, along with the neurodiversity movement, including many parents of children with autism and adult autistics themselves, don’t realize they’re pawns in a scheme much bigger than promoting acceptance of people with autism.
Alas, pretending autism is a gift doesn’t demonstrate acceptance any more than pretending a peanut allergy is a gift. Calling brain inflammation and immune dysfunction beautiful isn’t support. Acceptance of people with autism, who are each inherently valuable and beautiful in their own right, means acknowledging the actual research, not mindlessly parroting whitewashed folklore.
Note: This article was reprinted with the author’s permission. It was originally published at Walking In Quicksand.
No comments:
Post a Comment