Are Elite Controllers a fantasy? Read this.
By Jon Rappoport
We rarely get a chance to see a smoking gun that proves elite controllers are running the show from behind the curtain.
That's why there is a curtain.
So I'm republishing a conversation between two members of the Rockefeller Trilateral Commission (TC) and a US reporter.
First, a bit of background:
In 1969, four years before birthing the TC with David
Rockefeller, Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote: "[The] nation state as a
fundamental unit of man's organized life has ceased to be the principal
creative force. International banks and multinational corporations are
acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political
concepts of the nation state."
Goodbye, separate nations.
Any doubt on the question of TC goals is answered by David Rockefeller himself, the founder of the TC, in his Memoirs (2003): "Some
even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best
interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as
'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to
build a more integrated global political and economic structure-one
world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am
proud of it."
Who is in charge of destroying national economies, in order to create a new international order?
Who keeps pushing new economy-destroying trade treaties?
Who demands that these treaties must be ratified?
Who is in the business of killing jobs and hope?
Who demands that more US jobs disappear overseas and never come back?
The Trilateral Commission (TC).
The original stated goal of the TC was to create "a new international economic order."
Here is a stunning piece of forgotten history, a 1978
conversation between a US reporter and two members of the Trilateral
Commission. (Source: Trilateralism: The Trilateral Commission and Elite
Planning for World Management; ed. by Holly Sklar, 1980, South End
Press, Pages 192-3).
The conversation was public knowledge at the time.
Anyone who was anyone in Washington politics, in media, in think-tanks, had access to it. Understood its meaning.
But no one shouted from the rooftops. No one used the conversation to force a scandal. No one protested loudly.
The conversation revealed that the entire basis of the US
Constitution had been torpedoed, that the people who were running US
national policy (which includes trade treaties) were agents of an elite
shadow group. No question about it.
And yet: official silence. Media silence. The Dept. of
Justice made no moves, Congress undertook no serious inquiries, and the
President, Jimmy Carter, issued no statements.
Carter was himself an agent of the Trilateral Commission in the White House.
He had been plucked from obscurity by David Rockefeller, and
through elite TC press connections, vaulted into the spotlight as a
pre-eminent choice for the Presidency.
The 1978 conversation featured reporter, Jeremiah Novak, and
two Trilateral Commission members, Karl Kaiser and Richard Cooper. The
interview took up the issue of who exactly, during President Carter's
administration, was formulating US economic and political policy.
The careless and off-hand attitude of Trilateralists Kaiser
and Cooper is astonishing. It's as if they're saying, "What we're
revealing is already out in the open, it's too late to do anything about
it, why are you so worked up, we've already won..."
Here we go:
NOVAK (the reporter): Is it true that a private [Trilateral
committee] led by Henry Owen of the US and made up of [Trilateral]
representatives of the US, UK, West Germany, Japan, France and the EEC
is coordinating the economic and political policies of the Trilateral
countries [which would include the US]?
COOPER: Yes, they have met three times.
NOVAK: Yet, in your recent paper you state that this
committee should remain informal because to formalize 'this function
might well prove offensive to some of the Trilateral and other countries
which do not take part.' Who are you afraid of?
KAISER: Many countries in Europe would resent the dominant role that West Germany plays at these [Trilateral] meetings.
COOPER: Many people still live in a world of separate nations, and they would resent such coordination [of policy].
NOVAK: But this [Trilateral] committee is essential to your
whole policy. How can you keep it a secret or fail to try to get popular
support [for its decisions on how Trilateral member nations will
conduct their economic and political policies]?
COOPER: Well, I guess it's the press' job to publicize it.
NOVAK: Yes, but why doesn't President Carter come out with it
and tell the American people that [US] economic and political power is
being coordinated by a [Trilateral] committee made up of Henry Owen and
six others? After all, if [US] policy is being made on a multinational
level, the people should know.
COOPER: President Carter and Secretary of State Vance have constantly alluded to this in their speeches. [a lie]
KAISER: It just hasn't become an issue.
This interview slipped under the mainstream media radar, which is to say, it was buried.
US economic and political policy run by a committee of the
Trilateral Commission---the Commission had been created in 1973 by David
Rockefeller and his sidekick, Zbigniew Brzezinski.
When Carter won the presidential election, his aide, Hamilton
Jordan, said that if after the inauguration, Cy Vance and Brzezinski
came on board as secretary of state and national security adviser,
"We've lost. And I'll quit." Lost---because both men were powerful
members of the Trilateral Commission and their appointment to key
positions would signal a surrender of White House control to the
Commission.
Vance and Brzezinski were appointed secretary of
state and national security adviser, as Jordan feared. But he didn't
quit. He became Carter's chief of staff.
Now consider the vast propaganda efforts of the past 40
years, on so many levels, to install the idea that all nations and
peoples of the world are a single Collective.
From a very high level of political and economic power, this
propaganda op has had the objective of grooming the population for a
planet that is one coagulated mass, run and managed by one force. A
central engine of that force is the Trilateral Commission.
How does a shadowy group like the TC accomplish its goal? One
basic strategy is: destabilize nations; ruin their economies; ratify
trade treaties that effectively send millions and millions of
manufacturing jobs off to places where virtual slave labor does the
work; adding insult to injury, export the cheap products of those
slave-factories back to the nations who lost the jobs and undercut their
domestic manufacturers, forcing them to close their doors and fire
still more employees.
And then solve that economic chaos by bringing order.
What kind of order?
Eventually, one planet, with national borders erased, under
one management system, with a planned global economy, "to restore
stability," "for the good of all, for lasting harmony."
If you were a young ambitious reporter for The New York
Times, if you read this astonishing Trilateral interview, wouldn't you
go to your editor and demand to be put on the story? Wouldn't you want
to dig deep and find out more details and names? Wouldn't you want to
blow the whole, yes, conspiracy, wide open? Wouldn't you want readers to
know the truth about who is running their country from behind the
scenes?
Well, yes, you might. But if you did, and if you wouldn't
back down after your editor told you to forget about it, you would end
up with no job, and eventually you would be covering picnics for some
small-town newspaper.
With the rise of independent media, however, reporters don't need to worry about Sunday picnics.
The truth suffices.
With the rise of independent media, reporters know some of
their stories will be linked and forwarded all over the world, and
people with curiosity and intelligence and alert minds will discover the
truth that major media have been hiding from them.
Hiding, for decades.
No comments:
Post a Comment