Part 3 – How the CIA created a fake Western reality for ‘Unconventional Warfare’
By Paul Fitzgerald and Elizabeth Gould
“The Evil Spirits of the Modern Day Press”. Puck US magazine 1888
But in both theory and its practice the title of founding-father of the neoconservative agenda of endless warfare that rules the thinking of America’s defense and foreign policies today might best be applied to James Burnham.
His writings in the 1930s provided a refined Oxford intellectual’s gloss to the Socialist Workers party and as a close advisor to Communist revolutionary Leon Trotsky and his Fourth International he learned the tactics and strategies of infiltration and political subversion first hand. Burnham reveled in his role as a “Trotskyist intellectual” pulling dirty tricks on his political foes in competing Marxist movements by turning their loyalties and looting their best talent.
Burnham renounced his allegiance to Trotsky and Marxism in all its forms in 1940 but he would take their tactics and strategies for infiltration and subversion with him and would turn their method of dialectical materialism against them. His 1941 book The Managerial Revolution would bring him fame and fortune and establish him as an astute, if not exactly accurate political prophet chronicling the rise of a new class of technocratic elite.
His next book, The Machiavellians, would confirm his movement away from Marxist idealism to a very cynical and often cruel realism with his belief in the inevitable failure of democracy and the rise of the oligarch. In 1943 he would put it all to use in a memo for the U.S. Office of Strategic Services the OSS in which his Trotskyist anti-Stalinism would find its way into the agency’s thinking. And in his 1947 book, The Struggle for the World, Burnham would expand his confrontational/adversarial dialectic toward the Soviet Union into a permanent, apocalyptic policy of endless war.
By 1947, James Burnham’s transformation from Communist radical to New World Order American conservative was complete. His Struggle for the World had done a French Turn on Trotsky’s permanent Communist revolution and turned it into a permanent battle plan for a global American empire. All that was needed to complete Burnham’s dialectic was a permanent enemy and that would require a sophisticated psychological campaign to keep the hatred of Russia alive for generations.
*
The rise of the Machiavellians
In 1939, Sidney Hook, Burnham’s colleague at NYU and
fellow Marxist philosopher had helped to found an anti-Stalinist
Committee for Cultural Freedom as part of a campaign against
Moscow. During the war Hook too had abandoned Marxism and, like Burnham,
somehow found himself in the warm embrace of the right-wing of
America’s intelligence community during and after World War II. Hook was
viewed by the Communist Party as a traitor and “counter-revolutionary
reptile” for his activities, and by 1942 was informing on his fellow
comrades to the FBI.Selling impoverished and dispossessed European elites on the virtues of American culture was essential to building America’s empire after the war and Burnham’s early writings proved the inspiration from which a new counter-culture of “Freedom” would be built. As veterans of internecine Trotskyist warfare, both Burnham and Hook were practiced at the arts of infiltration and subversion, and with Burnham’s The Machiavellians: Defenders of Freedom as their blueprint, they set out to color anything the Soviets did or said with dark intent.
As Burnham articulated clearly in his Machiavellians, his version of Freedom meant anything but intellectual freedom or those freedoms defined by America’s Constitution. What it really meant was conformity and submission. Burnham’s Freedom only applied to those intellectuals (the Machiavellians) willing to tell people the hard truth about the unpopular political realities they faced.
These were the realities that would usher in a brave new world of the managerial class who would set about denying Americans the very democracy they thought they already owned. As Orwell observed about Burnham’s Machiavellian beliefs in his 1946 Second Thoughts, “Power can sometimes be won or maintained without violence, but never without fraud, because it is necessary to use the masses…”
By 1949, the CIA was actively in the business of defrauding the masses by secretly supporting the so called non-Communist left and behaving as if it were just a spontaneous outgrowth of a free society.
By turning the left to the service of its expanding empire, the CIA was applying a French Turn of its own by picking the best and the brightest, and the creation of the National Security State in 1947 institutionalized it. Assisted by Britain’s Information Research Department the IRD, the CIA recruited key former Soviet disinformation agents trained before the war who had managed non-Communist front groups for Moscow and put them to work.
As Frances Stoner Saunders writes in her book, The Cultural Cold War,
“these former propagandists for the Soviets were recycled, bleached of
the stain of Communism, embraced by government strategists who saw in
their conversion an irresistible opportunity to sabotage the Soviet
propaganda machine which they had once oiled.”
By its own admission, the CIA’s strategy of promoting the
non-Communist left would become the theoretical foundation of the
Agency’s political operations against Communism for over the next two
decades. But the no holds barred cultural war against Soviet Communism
began in earnest in March 1949, when a group of 800 prominent literary
and artistic figures gathered at New York’s Waldorf Astoria Hotel for a
Soviet sponsored “Cultural and Scientific” conference that would sue for
peace. Both Sydney Hook and James Burnham were already actively
involved in enlisting recruits to counter Moscow’s Communist Information
Bureau’s (Cominform) efforts to influence Western Opinion. But the
Waldorf conference gave them an opportunity for dirty tricks they could
only have prayed for.Demonstrators organized by a right-wing coalition of Catholic groups and the American legion heckled the guests as they arrived. Catholic nuns knelt in prayer for the souls of the Communist atheists in attendance. Gathered upstairs in a tenth floor bridal suite a gang of ex-Trotskyists and Communists led by Hook intercepted the conference’s mail, doctored official press releases and published pamphlets challenging speakers to admit their Communist past.
In the end the entire conference became a twisted theatre of the absurd and Hook and Burnham would use it to sell Frank Wisner at the CIA’s Office of Policy Coordination on taking the show on the road.
*
The Congress for Cultural Freedom: By Hook or by Crook
Drawing on the untapped power of the Fourth International, the coming out party came on June 26, 1950 at the Titania Palace in occupied Berlin. Named for Hook’s 1939 concept for a cultural committee, The Congress for Cultural Freedom’s fourteen-point “Freedom Manifesto” was to identify the West with freedom. And since everything about the West was said to be free, free, free then it went without saying everything about the Soviet Union wasn’t.
Organized by Burnham and Hook, the American delegation represented a who’s who of America’s post war intellectuals. Tickets to Berlin were paid for by Wisner’s Office of Policy Coordination through front organizations, as well as the Department of State which helped arrange travel, expenses and publicity. According to CIA Historian Michael Warner, the conference’s sponsors considered it money well spent, with one Defense Department representative calling it “unconventional warfare at its best.”
Burnham functioned as a critical connection between Wisner’s office and the intelligentsia moving from the extreme left to the extreme right with ease. Burnham found the Congress to be a place to inveigh not just against Communism but against the non-communist left as well and left many wondering whether his views weren’t as dangerous to liberal democracy as Communism. According to Frances Stoner Saunders, members of the British delegation found the rhetoric coming out of the Congress to be a deeply troubling sign of things to come.
“Hugh Trevor-Roper was appalled by the provocative tone… ‘There was a speech by Franz Borkenau
which was very violent and indeed almost hysterical. He spoke in German
and I regret to say that as I listened and I heard the baying voices of
approval from the huge audiences, I felt, well, these are the same
people who seven years ago were probably baying in the same way to
similar German denunciations of Communism coming from Dr. Goebbels in
the Sports Palast. And I felt, well, what sort of people are we
identifying with? That was the greatest shock to me. There was a moment
during the Congress when I felt that we were being invited to summon up
Beelzebub in order to defeat Stalin.’”
The Congress for Cultural Freedom didn’t need Beelzebub, it already
had him in the form of Burnham, Hook and Wisner and by 1952 the party
was just getting started. Burnham worked overtime for Wisner
legitimizing the Congress as a platform for the Machiavellians alongside
ex-Communists and even Nazis, including SS General Reinhard Gehlen and his German Army intelligence unit which had been brought into the CIA after the war, intact.
E. Howard Hunt,
Watergate “plumber” famous as a CIA dirty trickster remembered Burnham
in his memoirs, “Burnham was a consultant to OPC on virtually every
subject of interest to our organization… He had extensive contacts in
Europe and, by virtue of his Trotskyite background, was something of an
authority on domestic and foreign Communist parties and front
organizations.”
In 1953 Burnham was called upon again by Wisner to
reach beyond Communism to help overthrow the democratically elected
Mohammed Mossadegh in Teheran apparently because Wisner thought the plan
needed “a touch of Machiavelli.” But Burnham’s greatest contribution as
a Machiavellian was yet to come. His book The Machiavellians: Defenders of Freedom
would become the CIA’s manual for displacing Western culture with an
alternative doctrine for endless conflict in a world of oligarchs and in
the end open the gates to an Inferno from which there would be no
return.………………………………………………………………………………………………Join us next as we reach beyond Soviet Communism and into the creation of a sophisticated doctrinal campaign that would neutralize any political opposition (Communist or not) to the “planners” designs and make the world safe for the rise of the Machiavellian elite.
Copyright © 2017 Fitzgerald & Gould All rights reserved
(Part 1) – Abandon hope all ye who enter here – Dante’s Divine Comedy
(Part 2) – How Neocons Push for War by Cooking the Books
Paul Fitzgerald and Elizabeth Gould are the authors of Invisible History: Afghanistan’s Untold Story, Crossing Zero The AfPak War at the Turning Point of American Empire and The Voice. Visit their websites at invisiblehistory and grailwerk.
*
No comments:
Post a Comment