How often do US police officers discharge their weapons?
By Jon Rappoport
In recent years, the police have been blamed for a variety of very serious problems in American inner cities.
This is an intentional campaign, designed to distract the
public from the chronic conditions that have actually been dooming
residents of inner cities for decades:
Crime rate. Gangs. Drugs. The export of jobs overseas,
exacerbating poverty. A hostile refusal, from many quarters, to support
local leaders who exemplify self-sufficiency of the individual and the
community.
No one at the federal level actually aims to eradicate
life-sapping chronic conditions in inner cities. Rather, the plan is to
expand the number of people who are dependent on government for the
length of their lives.
The cover story and the massive distraction? Blame the police for everything.
Here are bare-bones statistics from New York City, perhaps
the only big city in America that issues a detailed annual report of
police "firearms discharges." You may be shocked.
Population of NYC: 8.3 million.
Police officers: 35,000.
2013 incidents of "intentional [police weapon] discharges during an adversarial conflict": 40.
In those discharges, number of people injured: 17.
Number of people killed: 8.
Source: NYPD 2013 Annual Firearms Discharge Report.
In that same year, according to the New York State Division
of Criminal Justice Services, there were 7,462 "violent crimes by
firearm" in New York City.
Who was the busier class of people in 2013? Cops or
criminals? Which group caused, by far, the greater amount of human
destruction?
Philly.com has reported on several other American cities.
"Philadelphia's rate of police shootings [2012], when
compared against the number of violent crimes, was 2.90 per 1,000
incidents."
"The rate of [police] shootings in Houston for 2012 was 1.25 [per 1000 violent crimes]."
"In 2012, the rate of police shootings in Dallas was 2.39 [per 1000 violent crimes]."
"In 2011, the rate of police shootings in Las Vegas stood at 1.66."
"Baltimore's rate [2011] was 1.58."
Again, I ask: in those cities, who was the busier class of people? The cops or the criminals?
Media outlets don't ask and answer this simple question. They
parse and evade and blow smoke. They trumpet small increases in the
rate of police shootings and, therefore, obscure the chronic inner-city
conditions I listed above.
And as long as they keeping doing that, the public will continue to be distracted, and nothing will change.
Police brutality? The increasing militarization of police
forces? The program to federalize all local police forces? These are
clear and present dangers. But they don't explain the decades-long
plummet of quality of life in inner cities. Once again, these conditions
explain it:
Crime rate. Vicious gangs. Drugs. The export of jobs
overseas, exacerbating grinding poverty. The hostile indifference to
local leaders who exemplify the self-sufficiency of the individual and
the community.
Look over the vacuous promises of Presidents, who have
launched "programs" to turn around inner cities. The results have been
nil. The intention was never real. From Lyndon Johnson to Barack Obama,
deception has been the only success.
Let me now make a sharp turn and move away from problems to solutions. Rearrange your head for a moment.
Here is an illustration of what I mean by "self-sufficiency"
in inner cities---surely a worthwhile goal. In Chicago, and this is a
very partial list, we have the Chicago Lights Urban Farm, the 62nd and
Dorchester Community Garden, the Chicago Patchwork Farms, the City
Farms, the Growing Power Chicago Farms. These projects involve local
citizens growing and eating their own fresh and nutritious food.
This is a real and profound revolution, make no mistake about it.
Instead of the estimated $2 trillion that has been spent by
government in the failed War on Poverty since 1966, for 20 or 30 million
dollars there could be 5000 urban farms in inner cities across America.
And those farms would, in turn, give birth to more such food-growing
operations. And local life would radically change.
Any American President with a few working brain cells could understand that. And could launch such a plan.
If he wanted to.
If he really wanted to begin to solve the chronic conditions in inner cities.
That's a big if.
There is no evidence that, since 1966, the "if" has materialized.
It's much easier (and more deceptive) to blame everything on
police shootings. People can read about them and hear about them and nod
and say, "Yes, this is why inner cities are destitute. This is THE core
reason."
Some people are happier in their delusions.
No comments:
Post a Comment