Ferocious vaccine manufacturers are constantly on the move, looking
for new "demographics" to shoot with vaccines. If they could stick a
needle into a rock and get paid for it, they would find a reason to do
it.
But in this case, we're talking about pregnant women.
Protection, protection, protection---that's the cover the government keeps pushing.
Meanwhile, the vaccines they're foisting on pregnant women have a track record of damage.
Barbara Loe Fisher, head of the National Vaccine Information Center, has
the story, so I'll let her tell it. These are excerpts from her
testimony before the Nov. 13, 2015 "meeting of the FDA Vaccines &
Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) on proposed
changes to FDA requirements for licensure of vaccines intended for use
during pregnancy":
Fisher (
"FDA Prepares to Fast Track New Vaccines Targeting Pregnant Women," 11/17/2016):
"In 2006, CDC officials directed doctors to give all pregnant women a
flu shot and, in 2011, a Tdap shot during every pregnancy, no matter how
little time has elapsed between pregnancies. Prior to FDA licensure,
influenza, diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccines [Tdap and flu
shots] were not tested in or proven safe and effective for pregnant
women in large clinical trials when given during every pregnancy either
singly or simultaneously."
"Categorized by FDA as Pregnancy Category B and C biologicals because it
is not known whether the vaccines are genotoxic and can cause fetal
harm or can affect maternal fertility and reproduction, administering
influenza and Tdap vaccines to pregnant women is an off-label use of
these vaccines. It is a policy that assumes maternal vaccination is
necessary, safe and effective without proving it."
"...pertussis containing vaccine [Tdap] injuries and deaths are the most
compensated claim in the federal vaccine injury compensation program
(VICP) for infants and children, while influenza vaccine-related
injuries and deaths are the most compensated claim for adults. And yet,
in the absence of credible biological mechanism and epidemiologic
evidence pre-licensure proving these vaccines are safe for all pregnant
women, their fetuses and newborns, female health care workers are being
fired for refusing to be injected with them while they are pregnant."
"The National Vaccine Information Center is opposed to FDA retroactively
licensing influenza and Tdap vaccines for use in pregnant women and
fast tracking RSV [respiratory syncytial virus] and group strep B
vaccines to licensure..."
No evidence of safety, but so what? Reports of injuries and deaths, but so what?
Pregnant women are a "lucrative market," and that's all that counts.
Need a terrific target for further disabling the population? Pregnant women are ideal.
The FDA and its army of allies will assure you that these untested and
off-label uses for vaccines are perfectly safe, because all vaccines are
safe.
The FDA speaks for the pharmaceutical industry. Yesterday, today, and tomorrow.
It might be tempting to say the FDA is careless, is overlooking important factors---but it's much, much worse than that.
Here are excerpts from a 2012 piece of mine about an FDA drug reviewer,
and what happened to him when he went against the grain, and opposed his
bosses on judgments about what was safe medicine and what was dangerous
medicine:
---In a stunning interview with Truthout's Martha Rosenberg, former FDA
drug reviewer, Ronald Kavanagh, exposes the FDA as a relentless criminal
mafia protecting its client, Big Pharma, with a host of mob strategies (
"Former FDA Reviewer Speaks Out About Intimidation, Retaliation and Marginalizing of Safety," 7/29/2012).
Kavanagh: "...widespread [FDA] racketeering, including witness tampering and witness retaliation."
"I was threatened with prison."
"One [FDA] manager threatened my children...I was afraid that I could be
killed for talking to Congress and criminal investigators."
Kavanagh reviewed new drug applications made to the FDA by
pharmaceutical companies. He was one of the holdouts at the Agency who
insisted that the drugs had to be safe and effective before being
released to the public.
But honest appraisal wasn't part of the FDA culture, and Kavanagh swam
against the tide, until he realized his life and the lives of his
children were on the line.
What was his secret task at the FDA? "Drug reviewers were clearly told
not to question drug companies and that our job was to approve drugs."
In other words, rubber stamp them. Say the drugs were safe and effective
when they were not.
Kavanagh's revelations are stunning. He recalls a meeting where a
drug-company representative flat-out stated that his company had paid
the FDA for a new-drug approval. Paid for it. As in bribe.
***Kavanagh remarks that the drug pyridostigmine, given to US troops to
prevent the later effects of nerve gas, "actually increased the
lethality" of certain nerve agents.
Kavanagh recalls being given records of safety data on a drug---and then
his bosses told him which sections not to read. Obviously, they knew
the drug was dangerous and they knew exactly where, in the reports, that
fact would be revealed.
---end of excerpt---
No comments:
Post a Comment