"The bigger the lie, the bigger the truth it is concealing. The
truth is what people are afraid to accept." (The Underground, Jon
Rappoport)
The censored film,
Vaxxed,
has escaped the claws of the "protectors of all truth." It has been
showing to packed houses all over the country. It relates the specific
crime of scientific fraud at the CDC. A whistleblower, William
Thompson, confesses that he and his CDC colleagues lied and cheated and
omitted vital data, in order to give the MMR vaccine a free pass and
claim it had no connection to autism---when it did have a connection.
That's the purpose and meaning and focus of this astonishing film.
But there is more. There are other whistleblowers shining a light on
the MMR (mumps, measles, rubella) vaccine. Specifically, the mumps
component of the vaccine and its ineffectiveness.
Their names are Stephen A. Krahling and Joan A. Wlochowski. They're
former virologists at Merck. They're insiders. They've leveled
devastating charges against the company, which manufactures the MMR
vaccine and sells it to the federal government.
In 2010, the whistleblowers filed a suit against Merck. The suit drags on in court (
"UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al. v. MERCK & CO.," Case No. 2:10-cv-04374-CDJ).
The Huffington Post reports on the charges in the suit (
"Merck Has Some Explaining To Do Over Its MMR Vaccine Claims," 9/24/2014, updated: 11/27/2014):
"...former Merck scientists [claim] that Merck 'fraudulently misled the
government and omitted, concealed, and adulterated material information
regarding the efficacy of its mumps vaccine in violation of the FCA
[False Claims Act].'"
"According to the whistleblowers' court documents, Merck's misconduct
was far-ranging: It 'failed to disclose that its mumps vaccine was not
as effective as Merck represented, (ii) used improper testing
techniques, (iii) manipulated testing methodology, (iv) abandoned
undesirable test results, (v) falsified test data, (vi) failed to
adequately investigate and report the diminished efficacy of its mumps
vaccine, (vii) falsely verified that each manufacturing lot of mumps
vaccine would be as effective as identified in the labeling, (viii)
falsely certified the accuracy of applications filed with the FDA, (ix)
falsely certified compliance with the terms of the CDC purchase [of the
MMR vaccine] contract, (x) engaged in the fraud and concealment
described herein for the purpose of illegally monopolizing the U.S.
market for mumps vaccine, (xi) mislabeled, misbranded, and falsely
certified its mumps vaccine, and (xii) engaged in the other acts
described herein to conceal the diminished efficacy of the vaccine the
government was purchasing.'"
"These fraudulent activities, say the whistleblowers, were designed to
produce test results that would meet the FDA's requirement that the
mumps vaccine was 95 per cent effective. To the whistleblowers' delight,
the judge dismissed Merck's objections to the case proceeding, finding
the whistleblowers had plausible grounds on all of the claims lodged
against Merck."
The whistleblowers' charges include detailed specifics on how Merck
cheated, in order to produce the false conclusion that the mumps
component of the MMR vaccine was 95% effective. For example, Merck
placed rabbit antibodies into blood samples---pretending these were
human antibodies signaling a high level of immune response to the
vaccine.
It should be noted that this far-reaching charge of fraud covers years
during which Dr. Julie Gerberding was the president of Merck vaccines.
Why does this matter? Because Gerberding, before landing her
high-paying job at Merck, was the head of the US Centers for Disease
Control.
And while she was the head of the CDC, in 2004, William Thompson, the CDC whistleblower revealed in
Vaxxed, warned Gerberding that he had "sensitive" data about the MMR vaccine, and these data constituted a problem for the CDC.
Thompson was obviously talking about the vaccine's link to autism. Gerberding ignored Thompson.
You could say she doubled down. After leaving the CDC, she became
president of vaccines for Merck, the company that manufactures the MMR
vacccine, holds a monopoly on it, and sells it to the CDC.
---So when scientists, pundits, government officials, and other
"experts" ponder how, at Harvard, a recent mumps outbreak could have
affected previously vaccinated students, they're faking it. (See:
"Mumps Count Rises to 40, Concerning HUHS Director," 4/26/2016)
Even within the (false) conventional view of how vaccines work and what
they do, the mumps component of the MMR is a dud. It's been an open
secret for a long time.
No comments:
Post a Comment