Saturday, May 7, 2016
American Academic Freedom in Jeopardy
Professor James Tracy vs. Florida Atlantic University (FAU)
American
academics will soon realize that their jobs are in jeopardy, if they
don’t know it already. Not only their jobs, but their right to think,
say, and write what they wish – and to engage in the pursuit of truth,
wherever it may lead them.
A
battle of epic proportions is about to begin, over the firing of Dr.
James Tracy, for alleged infractions against Florida Atlantic University
(FAU) in Boca Raton. Tracy contends that his First Amendment right to
free speech was abridged, along with his rights to due process and
academic freedom.[1]
Tracy
was dismissed from his tenured position as Associate Professor of
Multimedia Journalism at FAU on January 6, 2016. On April 25, he filed a
civil rights suit against the university, including the President,
Provost, and other top officials, as well as members of the Board of
Trustees and representatives of the faculty union. His complaint calls
for reinstatement with back pay, compensatory and punitive damages, and a
declaration that FAU’s controversial “Conflict of Interest/Outside
Activities” policy is unconstitutional.[2]
Ostensibly terminated for not filing university forms regarding his
“outside activities,” Tracy was actually fired for research and writing
connected with his popular blog www.memoryholeblog.com,
which he runs privately – and which includes the disclaimer that the
views expressed “do not reflect the opinions or positions of any
institution or entity…No information on this blog will be understood as
official.”
The outcome of this lawsuit will affect all areas of education in the
USA – not only regarding tenured professors. If Tracy does not prevail,
constitutional rights will also be curtailed for non-tenured regular and
adjunct professors, who have no job security and are already pressured
to toe the line politically and academically. Not only will college
professors be affected but also teachers in state public schools, who
are under assault regarding tenure policies in California, New York, and
elsewhere.[3] Florida has already eliminated tenure for K-12
instructors.
The case for academic freedom
The idea of “academic freedom” is widely embraced by American colleges
and universities, which routinely assert that freedom of inquiry and
expression are essential for their effective operation. The concept is
outlined in the “1940 Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and
Tenure,” by the American Association of University Professors (AAUP),
which is followed by most institutions of higher learning in the USA.
Amendments of 1970 further protect the rights of professors.[4]
According to the AAUP document, “Teachers are entitled to full freedom
in research and in the publication of the results, subject to the
adequate performance of their other academic duties.” In terms of
“outside activities,” the document includes the following:
College and university teachers are citizens, members of a learned
profession, and officers of an educational institution. When they speak
or write as citizens, they should be free from institutional censorship
or discipline…they should at all times be accurate, should exercise
appropriate restraint, should show respect for the opinions of others,
and should make every effort to indicate that they are not speaking for
the institution.
This was amended in 1970 so as to coordinate with a 1964 AAUP “Committee
A Statement on Extramural Utterances,” which states as follows:
The controlling principle is that a faculty member’s expression of
opinion as a citizen cannot constitute grounds for dismissal unless it
clearly demonstrates the faculty member’s unfitness for his or her
position. Extramural utterances rarely bear upon the faculty member’s
fitness for the position.
These protections are embedded in policies on academic freedom by the
University of California,[5] the University of Pennsylvania,[6] Harvard
University,[7] and many other institutions. Such policies do not
guarantee that the rights of professors are always respected, however,
and the AAUP has carried out numerous investigations and censured
institutions for infringements.
Freedom from outside influence
In 2011, the AAUP issued a report, “Ensuring Academic Freedom in
Politically Controversial Academic Personnel Decisions,” regarding
controversial cases relating to disputed events and policies:
…the need for faculty members to contribute their expertise to public discourse and policy debates has increased. The protection of their unfettered expression, including the ability to espouse highly controversial and unpopular views, is an essential social responsibility of universities and colleges…political restrictions on academic expression must not be countenanced…
“Political intrusion” arising out of controversies may come from inside the university community or from outside interests:
It may also come from outside the university when, for example, private corporations or public officials seek to persuade universities to terminate particular research activities, programs, or the services of the faculty members involved.[8]
Such outside intrusion precipitated the termination of James Tracy. This took the form of a media blitz by the Florida Sun Sentinel, a division of Tribune Publishing Co., which also owns the Los Angeles Times, the Chicago Tribune, and the Hartford Courant. The Sun Sentinel published
a letter of December 10, 2015, written by Lenny and Veronique Pozner,
publicized as the only Jewish family to have lost a child in the alleged
Sandy Hook shooting. The letter, “Sandy Hook Massacre 3rd Anniversary:
Two Parents Target FAU Conspiracy Theorist,” was reprinted in the Forward on December 14.[9] This was followed by numerous articles and editorials in the Sun Sentinel, such as “Tenure Be Damned, Professor James Tracy Embarrasses FAU” and “Tenure: A Concept Whose Time Has Passed?”
The Pozners’ accusations were false, as has been shown repeatedly, but
nonetheless they were picked up by other media outlets and used to bash
Dr. Tracy in the US press.[10] The content of the letter is not the
issue here – it is the use of the corporate press to coerce the
university to fire a tenured professor who was exercising his right to
free speech as a citizen, in “extramural” work that he is entitled to
pursue.
Outside influence has played a role in several high profile academic
cases, notably that of Norman Finkelstein, a brilliant speaker and
prolific writer known for his research on the Holocaust and support of
Palestinian rights. While Jewish himself, he has been labeled an
“anti-Semite” because of his criticism of Israel – and castigated for
his allegations of fraud and plagiarism in the writing of others. One of
those named was Alan Dershowitz, who tried, successfully, to get DePaul
University to deny Finkelstein tenure, even though his faculty
colleagues had voted in his favor.[11] DePaul insisted that outside
pressure had played no role in the decision. Finkelstein’s university
career was destroyed, while Dershowitz was given the Mortimer Zuckerman
Award in 2014 for “promoting Israel’s … relentless pursuit of peace” –
an honor marred only slightly by an investigation of Dershowitz over
accusations of sexual misconduct with underage girls the following
year.[12]
Academic freedom at FAU
FAU also has a commitment to academic freedom, as affirmed in official
university documents. The Collective Bargaining Agreement between the
Board of Trustees and faculty union (UFF) states as follows:
5.1 … The Board, the University, and the UFF are committed to maintaining and encouraging full academic freedom. Academic freedom and academic responsibility are twin guardians of the integrity of institutions of higher learning. This integrity is essential to the preservation of a free society and explains the willingness of society historically to accept the concept of academic freedom and, in addition, to protect it through the institution of academic tenure.5.2 … The principal elements of academic freedom include the freedom to:(a) Present and discuss academic subjects, frankly and forthrightly, without fear of censorship…(b) Engage in scholarly and creative activity, and to publish results in a manner consistent with professional obligations.(c) Speak freely on, and seek changes in, academic and institutional policies.(d) Exercise constitutional rights without institutional censorship or discipline.[13]
Tracy was officially reprimanded for questioning a vague and restrictive
policy on “Conflict of Interest/Outside Activities,” which he was fully
entitled to do (5.2, above). He had declined to submit “outside
activities” forms until the policy had been clarified, on the advice of
the union. As of 2015, the policy required the faculty to report “any
outside activity” (compensated or uncompensated) to the University. As
all academics know, outside independent research and its dissemination
are not only a right of faculty, but a requirement, affecting decisions
on tenure and promotion. Who among us could (or would) report all
“outside activities”? This policy was clearly devised as a rationale for
Tracy’s termination.
FAU policy on academic freedom is also enshrined in the Board of Trustees’ Board Operations Policies and Procedures:
The Florida Atlantic University Board of Trustees supports the principle of academic freedom and is committed to the search for new knowledge… [and] will defend the right of faculty and students to pursue their academic goals free from constraints that hinder lawful intellectual inquiry and discourse, and will protect the freedom of faculty to teach and of students to learn from ideas that might be unpopular or not in the mainstream of accepted thought.[14]
However they did not defend the right of James Tracy to pursue his
academic goals free from constraints – to the contrary, they fired him.
This is not the first time Tracy has been harassed by FAU at the behest
of the press. In 2013 he was reprimanded over his blog, whereupon he
removed any mention of FAU as his employer. This was occasioned by a
letter written by three of his colleagues, “Why James Tracy, FAU’s
Conspiracy Theorist, Should Resign,” published on April 29, 2013, in thePalm Beach Post.[15] This constituted outside influence, from within the university community, also condemned by the AAUP.
Open season on academics
Far from being protected, American academics can now be thrown to the
wolves, with unsubstantiated stories in the press leading to a ruined
reputation and loss of employment – with no concern for academic freedom
or due process. Tracy has been characterized as a “tenured truther” and
“cruel and possibly deranged” (Chronicle of Higher Education) and a “conspiracy theorist” many times over (New York Times, New York Daily News,
et al.). He has been called “a virus,” “crazed,” “twisted,” and “a
never-ending embarrassment to the university and its community” (Sun Sentinel), “kooky,” “nutty,” and “sicko” (New York Daily News), and said to “spin tall tales out of nothing” (Palm Beach Post). In addition he has received obscene cards and threatening e-mails.
Noah Feldman, a professor of Constitutional and International Law at
Harvard, called Tracy a “crank” and a “terrible person,” in his recent
article, “Free Speech for Bad People.”[16] While ostensibly on the right
side of the academic freedom debate, Feldman flogs the same old
“conspiracy theory” meme, as well as the false story promoted by the
Pozners. Still, he does recognize that a professor should not be fired
for extramural research and writing.
Actually, Tracy is a deeply intelligent thinker, a sharp investigator, a
talented writer – and an impeccably honest, ethical person. None of
this gets any airplay, however, with political forces trying to silence
him via the corporate media. This should bring out the academics in
force. So gear up, colleagues, and support James Tracy. Stand up for
your principles, and for your rights – or be prepared to lose them.
Vivian Lee is the nom de plume of a tenured professor at an east coast university.
Notes
[1]
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to
assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
Article I, U. S. Bill of Rights.http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights_transcript.html#text
[2]
“Professor James Tracy Files Civil Rights Lawsuit against Florida
Atlantic University and Faculty Union,” Press Release, April 25, 2016. https://memoryholeblog.com/2016/04/26/professor-james-tracy-files-civil-rights-lawsuit-against-florida-atlantic-university-faculty-union/#more-27575
[3] “Closely Watched Fight over California Teacher Tenure Moves to Appeals Court,” New York Times, February 25, 2016. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/26/us/closely-watched-fight-over-california-teacher-tenure-moves-to-appeals-court.html
[4] “1940 Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure,” AAUP. http://www.aaup.org/report/1940-statement-principles-academic-freedom-and-tenure
[5]
“Academic Freedom,” General University Policy Regarding Academic
Appointees, University of California, revised September 29, 2003. http://www.ucop.edu/academic-personnel-programs/_files/apm/apm-010.pdf
[6]
“Academic Freedom and Responsibility,” Handbook for Faculty and
Academic Administrators, University of Pennsylvania, revised as Article
11, Statutes of the
Trustees, November 2, 2001. http://provost.upenn.edu/policies/faculty-handbook/faculty-policies/ii-a
[7] “Free Speech Guidelines,” Harvard University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences,” adopted February 13 and May 15, 1990. http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic847338.files/FS_Guidelines_1990.pdf
[8] “Ensuring Academic Freedom in Politically Controversial Academic Personnel Decisions,” AAUP (Executive Summary, 2011). http://www.aaup.org/report/ensuring-academic-freedom-politically-controversial-academic-personnel-decisions?PF=1
[9] http://www.sun-sentinel.com/opinion/commentary/sfl-on-sandy-hook-anniversary-two-parents-target-fau-professor-who-taunts-family-victims-20151210-story.html. And “Time to Crack Down on Newtown ‘Truthers’ Who Tarnish Memory of Noah Pozner.” http://forward.com/opinion/327111/time-to-crack-down-on-shameless-sandy-hook-rampage-truthers/
[10] “Sandy Hook: The Hounding of Prof. James Tracy,” Fellowship of the Minds, February 17, 2016.https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2016/02/17/sandy-hook-the-hounding-of-prof-james-tracy/
[11] “Harvard Law Professor Works To Disrupt Tenure Bid of Longtime Nemesis at DePaul U.,” Chronicle of Higher Education, April 5, 2007. http://chronicle.com/article/Harvard-Law-Professor-Works-to/122347
[12] “Civil Rights Attorney Alan Dershowitz Hailed by Pro-Israeli Group,” New York Daily News, November 24, 2014.http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/civil-rights-attorney-alan-dershowitz-hailed-pro-israel-g-article-1.2021336. “Lawyer Denies Suit’s Allegations of Sex with a Minor,” New York Times, January 7, 2015.http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/07/us/alan-dershowitz-denies-allegations-of-sex-with-minor.html
[13]
Florida Atlantic University Board of Trustees and the United Faculty of
Florida Collective Bargaining Agreement 2012-2015 (ratified September
21, 2015). http://www.fau.edu/provost/files/CBA-2012-2015-Oct2015-edits-ab.pdf
[14] Florida Atlantic University Board of Trustees, Board Operations Policies and Procedures, updated November 19, 2013. https://www.fau.edu/bot/files/Revised%20BOT%20Policies%20and%20Procedures%2011-19-13_APPROVED.pdf
Vivian Lee, Ph.D., the nom de plume of
a tenured professor at an American university whose research interests
include war, psyops, and propaganda, with a current focus on false flag
terrorism and shootings along with the media’s role in these staged
events.
No comments:
Post a Comment