U.S. Intelligence Agencies Mock America in 9/11 Trial
Last year, it was discovered that the FBI had attempted to infiltrate the legal defense
team of a Guantanamo Bay prisoner. The defendant is charged, along with
four others including Khalid Sheik Mohammed (KSM), of conspiring to
commit the 9/11 attacks. As a result, the military trial was moved out
for approximately one year to allow for an investigation into the FBI’s
offense. Recently, Al-Jazeera reported
that the trial has been moved out yet again because the Department of
Justice team leading the investigation (of its own bureau) needs more
time to complete its secret report. These delays highlight the absurdity
of the case against these men and the contemptible abuse of justice
that the military trial represents.
Apparently, it has been difficult for the Justice Department to explain why the FBI approached a member of defendant Ramzi bin al-Shibh’s legal team to “create a relationship with him that he was forbidden from disclosing.” That explanation became more difficult when it was learned that another member of Bin al-Shibh’s defense team had been cooperating with the FBI since late 2013.
The
FBI infiltration of the Bin Al-Shibh defense team is just the tip of
this anti-justice iceberg, however. In February, it was revealed that a
translator assigned to help defend the accused was a CIA operative.
That’s one way to ensure that the official account of 9/11, created
entirely through torture testimony and secret evidence provided by the
CIA ad FBI, would not be contradicted by defendant testimony. More was
needed, however, as previous disclosures showed that the CIA was
controlling audio feeds from the courtroom, bugging the rooms where the
accused met with their lawyers, and censoring the lawyers. Additionally,
hundreds of thousands of confidential defense team emails were provided to the prosecutors.
The military trial of these men was never expected to bring justice. But the absurd actions taken by the CIA and FBI have made the whole thing seem ludicrous, mocking the U.S. justice system. Why would these measures be needed and tolerated if the defendants were actually involved in 9/11? The reasons include that:
At the same time, the press never notices that such an obviously fake trial would not be needed if there were actually any legitimate evidence against the accused. All things considered, this trial is not only a travesty of justice, it makes a mockery of 9/11 and brings shame upon the American people.
Apparently, it has been difficult for the Justice Department to explain why the FBI approached a member of defendant Ramzi bin al-Shibh’s legal team to “create a relationship with him that he was forbidden from disclosing.” That explanation became more difficult when it was learned that another member of Bin al-Shibh’s defense team had been cooperating with the FBI since late 2013.
The
FBI infiltration of the Bin Al-Shibh defense team is just the tip of
this anti-justice iceberg, however. In February, it was revealed that a
translator assigned to help defend the accused was a CIA operative.
That’s one way to ensure that the official account of 9/11, created
entirely through torture testimony and secret evidence provided by the
CIA ad FBI, would not be contradicted by defendant testimony. More was
needed, however, as previous disclosures showed that the CIA was
controlling audio feeds from the courtroom, bugging the rooms where the
accused met with their lawyers, and censoring the lawyers. Additionally,
hundreds of thousands of confidential defense team emails were provided to the prosecutors.The military trial of these men was never expected to bring justice. But the absurd actions taken by the CIA and FBI have made the whole thing seem ludicrous, mocking the U.S. justice system. Why would these measures be needed and tolerated if the defendants were actually involved in 9/11? The reasons include that:
- The charges against the defendants were largely established based on torture testimony, the records of which were destroyed by the CIA. That was after the agency misled the 9/11 Commission about the existence of the records.
- Bin al-Shibh and KSM were both originally identified by the first torture victim, Abu Zubaydah. However, the government now says that Zubaydah was never associated with al Qaeda at all and therefore he could not have known what the government previously said he knew. In other words, the arrest and torture of Bin al-Shibh and KSM were initiated by way of a fictional account attributed to Zubaydah.
- 9/11 Commission leader Lee Hamilton suddenly can’t recall anything about these torture victims or his use of their testimony (441 times) in the 9/11 Commission Report.
- KSM’s behavior prior to 9/11 was reported to be very different from that of a Muslim. He enjoyed go-go dancers and drinking parties and was said to be dangerous to nothing but his own bank account. The playboy lifestyle of KSM was similar to that of alleged hijacker ringleader Mohamed Atta, who seemed to be protected by U.S. authorities and might have been an intelligence asset.
- One of the defense team lawyers resigned from the Army in protest of what was happening. He accused the U.S. government of “stacking the deck against the defense” and conducting a “show trial.”
- There are many examples of (admitted) government-sponsored terrorism.
- It is known that the FBI manufactures terrorism.
- FBI director Louis Freeh is a 9/11 suspect.
- CIA director George Tenet facilitated the 9/11 crimes.
- U.S. intelligence agencies continue to lie about their “response” to 9/11.
At the same time, the press never notices that such an obviously fake trial would not be needed if there were actually any legitimate evidence against the accused. All things considered, this trial is not only a travesty of justice, it makes a mockery of 9/11 and brings shame upon the American people.
No comments:
Post a Comment