- Real power is achieved when the ruling class controls
the material essentials of life, granting and withholds them from the masses
as if they were privileges; as George Orwell reflected:
-
- "From the moment when the machine first made its
appearance it was clear to all thinking people that the need for human
drudgery, and therefore to a great extent for human inequality, had disappeared.
If the machine were used deliberately for that end, hunger, overwork, dirt,
illiteracy, and disease could be eliminated within a few generations But
it was also clear that an all-around increase in wealth threatened the
destruction... of a hierarchical society. In a world in which everyone
worked short hours, had enough to eat, lived in a house with a bathroom
and a refrigerator, and possessed a motorcar or even an air-plane, the
most obvious and perhaps the most important form of inequality would already
have disappeared. If it once became general, wealth would confer no distinction.
Such a society could not long remain stable. For if leisure and security
were enjoyed by all alike, the great mass of human beings who are normally
stupefied by poverty would become literate and would learn to think for
themselves; and when once they had done this, they would sooner or later
realize that the privileged minority had no function, and they would sweep
it away. In the long run, a hierarchical society was only possible on a
basis of poverty and ignorance... It is deliberate policy to keep even
the favoured groups somewhere near the brink of hardship because a general
state of scarcity increases the importance of small privileges and thus
magnifies the distinction between one group and another... The social atmosphere
is that of a besieged city, where the possession of a lump of horseflesh
makes the difference between wealth and poverty. "
-
- Introduction.
-
- In this second part in the series, I will show that around
the turn of the 20th Century, manufactured deep-rooted changes occurred
primarily in two quite separate realms; those of money and intellect, and
how this alliance formed a `Nexus Of Evil,` which in it's service of the
darkest forces of magic, has in this the first decade of the 21st Century,
built a global control grid around our lives. And how by using what is
nothing less than sorcery disguised as `New Age Metaphysics,` it has achieved
complete hegemony over money, politics, religion, the media, big business,
and education. It has subverted culture, rewritten history, falsified science,
and by the expert use of the dialectical trap, has manipulated and coerced
humanity into abject acquiescence and compliance, and is now preparing
to deliver it's final blow which will plunge our world into a global conflagration
of hitherto unimagined ferocity.
-
- The precursors to this are the current financial crisis
and quite probably, the expected `Swine flu` outbreak, which will, if informed
forecasts and predictions are correct, open up the `Quarantine Camps,`[7]
for those citizens who refuse the jab, and cause untold suffering for those
who don't.
-
- The Storm Centre.
-
- So, continuing on, let us begin with an examination of
the great change which took place in the world of money. It is highly significant
that during the first years of the 20th century, a phenomenon appeared,
that was to remain a conspicuous feature of the ensuing age of conflict,
namely the concentration camp, a symbol of an expanded savagery in which
civilians were joined with soldiers in the front line of every major conflict.
-
- Towards the end of the 19th century, money began to acquire
a new role and meaning in human affairs as economics began to prevail over
politics. The two need to be clearly distinguished as sources of value,
motivation and control at the elite level of leadership. Politics in its
pure uncorrupted form, is a social function concerned with the welfare
of a community, long-term as well as short-term, in which the requirements
of economics, although always important, play only a supportive or secondary
role.
-
- Economic thinking, a mere department of political thinking,
is concerned exclusively with the requirements of economic prosperity and
progress. It assumes automatically that whatever is good for business is
good for the community as a whole, an attitude of mind that excludes virtually
all other considerations, and which today, to the detriment of humankind,
can be witnessed to be the primary consideration for all governments.
-
- What happened towards the end of the 19th century was,
therefore, not a sudden occurrence; rather, it should be seen as a crucial
stage, having been reached in a process which had continued slowly during
most of the preceding century. Not only did the Anglo-Boer War signal the
beginning of the end of the British Empire, it also marked the beginning
of the end of national financial sovereignties across the Western world,
a process that would culminate in the 1930s, when the `great` American
pioneering families, headed by J.P. Morgan, were finally squeezed out of
their dominating position on Wall Street.
-
- In the relationship between politics and high finance,
there subsisted a very complex state of affairs until shortly before the
commencement of World War II, which can be briefly explained as follows:
-
- There had existed for centuries within the national states
of the Western world families or dynasties of bankers, like the Rothschilds,
Warburgs, Montefiores, etc. who lent to governments and specialised in
transactions across national frontiers, but these were never fully integrated
as a system capable of controlling politics on an international scale.
These concentrations of high finance, although always influential, lacked
the power wholly to control the politics of the national states, but each
remained an important part of a nationally oriented `constellation` of
financial power.
-
- This situation suited them well enough in the circumstances
prevailing until the turn of the 20th Century. Yes, they were able to exert
enormous influence, both nationally and internationally, but nothing like
the almost omnipotent power they would later acquire. Paradoxically, despite
the enormous lead which the Jewish banking dynasties had gained in international
commerce, it was initially the `gentile` financiers with their ownership
and access to the `cornucopia` of new wealth, plus their control of national
politics, who first established high finance on a fully internationalized
basis. The facts are supplied by Dr. Carroll Quigley:
-
- "The apex of the system was to be the Bank of International
Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled
by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations.
Each central bank, in the hands of men like Montagu Norman of the Bank
of England, Benjamin Strong of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, Charles
Rist of the Bank of France, and Hjalmar Schacht of the Reichbank, sought
to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury bonds, to
manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity
in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by sub-sequent
economic rewards in the business world." (Tragedy and Hope).
-
- Quigley explains further that the Rothschild's had been
pre-eminent during much of the 19th century, but at the end of that century
"they were being replaced by J.P. Morgan", whose central office
was in New York, although it operated as if it were in London "Where
it had indeed originated as George Peabody and Company in I838."
-
- The process by which the separate national concentrations
of financial power were finally absorbed into a global concentration was
not completed until the 1930s. This `Coup d'Etat` of money being the prime
motor which produced among other consequences, the rise of the Third Reich
in Germany, the outbreak of World War II, the subsequent involvement of
the United States and Japan, and the construction up of a Marxist-Leninist
People's Republic of China.
-
- Professor Quigley[6] supplies many of the facts about
the final shift in the centre of gravity of financial power, and his story
begins with these ominous words:
-
- "The third stage of capitalism is of such overwhelming
significance in the history of the twentieth century, and its ramifications
and influences have been so subterranean and even occult, that we may be
excused if we devote considerable attention to its organization and methods."
-
- The `story,` which has been assembled from a vast accumulation
of documented facts, is one of a process of change in the United States,
beginning before World War I, which Wilmot Robertson was later to describe
as the "dispossession of the American majority", culminating
in what Quigley calls "a shift on all levels, from changing tastes
in newspaper comic strips . . . to profound change in the power nexus of
the 'American Establishment'"
-
- Since the 1880s the United States had been ruled from
behind the scenes by a plutocracy supported by the fortunes of the American
`bloodline` families; [8] Rockefeller, Carnegie, Vanderbilt, Mellon, Duke,
Whitney, Ford, Du Pont, etc. - a power constellation with J.P. Morgan as
its banking centre. This `Eastern Establishment` is described by Quigley
as "high Episcopalian, Anglophile, internationalist, Ivy League, and
European-culture-conscious", and was matched with a similar establishment
on the other side of the Atlantic with Montagu Norman as its banking head.
The two worked closely together and came to be known as the "Anglo-
American Establishment."
-
- Quigley documents the "decline of J.P. Morgan itself
from its deeply anonymous status as a partnership (founded in 1861) to
its transformation into an incorporated public company in 1940 to its final
disappearance by absorption into its chief banking subsidiary, the Guaranty
Trust Company, in 1959". Quigley writes "the less obvious implication
of the shift in Wall Street was the realization by the Morgan group that
it no longer had the votes on the Board of Trustees of Columbia University
to nominate a successor to Dr. Nicholas Murray Butler, the retiring president."
-
- The control of American higher education had by stealth
been taken out of the hands of America's `Eastern Establishment` families,
described by Quigley in the paragraph above, in a manner indicating that
they were not Jewish, as Wall Street subsequently fell into the hands of
the international financiers like a ripe plum. The battle having been fought
and won in the realm of parliamentary politics by methods which are still
standard practice in the Western world; these include the financing of
party politics, the manipulation of public opinion through the medium of
newspapers, radio, the cinema, the book trade, etc., plus the penetration,
financing and manipulation of trade union movements.
-
- This was a take-over exercise in which America s emerging
secret rulers could draw on many centuries of accumulated expertise and
experience as a nation struggling to survive in dispersion. The eclipse
of the power of the great American Families first took the form of taxation
laws, beginning with the graduated income tax in 1913 and culminating in
the inheritance tax, which drove all the great family fortunes into the
refuge of tax-exempt foundations. Morgan and his circle lost control of
the Federal Government as one `money-and-intellect alliance` was subtly
replaced by another. And the fact that a money-and-intellect alliance behaves
in much the same way no matter who controls it made the change all the
more difficult to detect.
-
- The Morgan group dabbled in the politics of the radical
left and lost no time in trying to get a foothold in Russia after the Bolshevik
Revolution. But at this game they were no match for their Jewish rivals.
The rival Wall Street elites may have been fuelled by the ideal and ambition
of a `New World Order` but there the similarity ended.
-
- The original American establishment, like its British
opposite number, was for containing the Soviet Union and its socialist
rulers, with a view to the ultimate absorption of the Russian empire into
a New World Order to be raised on the foundations of the British Empire
and which they, as inheritors of the Rhodes dream, would control. The other,
the new Eastern Establishment. was for building up the Soviet Union as
an industrial and military giant which would replace the British Empire
as the foundation of a New World Order. These developments in the realm
of finance capitalism and power politics came to a climax towards the end
of the 1930s, coinciding with a considerable eruption all over the Western
world of a social phenomenon misleadingly described as `anti-Semitism.`
-
- In his book, `This Age Of Conflict,` Ivor Benson quotes
Professor Hannah Arendt, who writes:
-
- "Twentieth century political developments have driven
the Jewish people into the storm centre of events . . . the Jewish question
and anti-Semitism . . . became the catalytic agent first for the rise of
the Nazi movement and the establishment of the organizational structure
of the Third Reich . . . then for a world war of unparalleled ferocity.
"`The Origins of Totalitarianism.`
-
- Henry Ford, who for many years had been a fierce critic
of the big bankers as being the natural enemies of private enterprise industry,
was quick to draw a clear distinction between the house of Morgan, which
he described as "constructive", and its rivals, whom he described
as "warmongers". Morgan himself, like his opposite number in
London, Montagu Norman, was known to dislike the Jews. The talks of Father
Coughlin and writings of Father Denis Fahey, the frantic efforts of Charles
Lindbergh to keep America out of the war, and the activities of Oswald
Mosley and his Blackshirts in Britain, were all reactions to the appearance
of the Jewish people in "the storm centre" of 20th century politics.
What all these alarming developments mean is that a highly concentrated
Jewish financial power was suddenly seen to be gaining ascendancy in the
West.
-
- The English Idea:
-
- Another crucial aspect of the prevailing political reality
evident during the last decades of the l9th century must now be more closely
studied - namely, the thoughts about the future that were then circulating
in the English ruling classes. Cecil John Rhodes [4]was one of the most
potent men of action in all of English history, but he was also a visionary
and dreamer, pictured by friend and foe as a Colossus bestriding the continent
of Africa. Rhodes possessed an ability to inspire activity and loyalty
in others which was in every manner proverbial. In the realm of pure thought,
however, the unifying and energising agent was not Rhodes but John Ruskin,[5]
a one time Slade Professor of Fine Arts at Oxford University, who had armed
a generation of young Englishmen with an ideology of service having as
its object the creation of a better and happier world. This was to be imagined
as an extended application of the civilizing and humanizing concept of
the British Empire; it was to be a fellowship of free and independent states
held together by an abstract principle which came to be labelled the `English
idea.`
-
- The numinousity, or sense of magic, evoked by these ideas
can be traced to a single cause: the ideology of a `Brave New World,` with
ostensible order and welfare for all mankind, offered as a alternative,
even replacement for a religious orthodoxy that had long since begun to
crumble under the impact of a scientific `enlightenment;` there was in
this ideal, something to restore to the existence of the intelligentsia
class and its energetic scholars, a renewed sense of meaning, ideology,
purpose and direction, and which moreover, quite ominously sanctified British
imperial expansion and the personal advancement of all its servants.
-
- So potent was this ideology as a secular religion that
it won converts all over the Western world; even former leaders of the
conquered Boers, including General Louis Botha, who was to be South Africa's
first Prime Minister, and General Jan Christian Smuts, yielded to its psychic
charm.
- Practical measures to give effect to this political idealism
took the form of a range of operations including the Rhodes Scholarship
Trust, the semi-secret Round Table movement, the Royal Institute of International
Affairs, the American Council on Foreign Relations, etc.
-
- This was definitely a `White Supremacist` affair, invoking
on both sides of the Atlantic a racial response. Ralph Durand, in a book
about Oxford University published in 1909, wrote of "Cecil Rhodes
of Oriel, the dreamer of great dreams ... Believing that the preservation
of the peace of the world lay in the hands of men of Teuton blood, he made
provision in his will for the founding at Oxford of scholarships that would
be open to citizens of the British Empire, the German Empire and the United
States"- OXFORD: ITS BUILDINGS AND GARDENS, published by Grant Richards,
London.
-
- The fatal flaw in this ideology does not belong to the
art or science of politics, nor to that of high finance, but to an area
of knowledge less readily accessible to exploration and discussion, namely,
`Metaphysics` or more correctly, `Magic.` Quigley puts his hand on the
key to that riddle: each of the central banks in the different national
states, he says, "sought to dominate its government" and to "influence
co-operative politicians by subsequent rewards in the business world".
-
- What this means is that something had already gone awry
in the West's national power structures all of which had by this
time incorporated a system of money creation and debt, a devilishly corrupting
influence with implications of infinite complexity. Money had become progressively
the measure of all things, with a `bloodline` ruling elite drawn less and
less from the land and more and more from commerce and banking. Western
nations had, in reality, become plutocracies, capable of maintaining themselves
in power with a public opinion no longer sought nor consulted as before,
but which was manufactured and manipulated as required by newspapers, patronage
and other `rewards in the business world.`
-
- Just such a conversion of money into public opinion and
support was accomplished in Britain by Rhodes and Milner and their `gold
bug` partners, having a total disregard for all or any moral considerations.
Money had shown what money could do. There was, thus, an iron inevitability
about the outcome of a struggle which the gentile financiers did not even
see as a struggle.
-
- An Alien High Finance.
-
- Firmly united by long-range political aims, increasingly
influenced the politics of the different national states and finally displayed
the gentile financiers as managers of the new international banking structure.
Those `educated` minds, conditioned by John Ruskin's secular ideology which
called for a `new world` to be raised on the foundations of the British
Empire, seem to have had no problems transferring their attachment and
enthusiasm to the new ideology as set out by Marx and Engels.
-
- Antony Sutton's trilogy, `Wall Street And The Bolshevik
Revolution,` [1] Wall Street And The Rise Of Hitler,[2] and Wall Street
And FDR,[3] contains a vast quantity of information but is more remarkable
for what it omits. For that Which is omitted is precisely what Professor
Hannah Arendt correctly describes as the "catalytic agent" in
the "storm centre of events", namely, the role of the Jewish
people in 2Oth century power politics.
-
- Sutton maintains there is and always was only one "Wall
Street Establishment", which he blames for the financing of the Bolshevik
Revolution and later Hitler's rise to power in Germany. But this over-simplification
is very misleading.
-
- During the two preceding decades Wall Street had assumed
a species of split personality, one half symbolized by Morgan and the other
by Warburg. It is undeniable as alleged, that `Wall Street` aiding in the
financing of the Bolshevik Revolution, but in this, it was the Warburg
faction (Jacob Schiff in particular) which took the initiative, with the
Morgan faction eventually being on the receiving end of most if not all
the adverse publicity as they belatedly tried to get in on the action.
Furthermore, there is a wealth of evidence which supports the contention
that it was the Morgan interests on Wall Street which supported Hitler's
rise to power. But at the same , it was the internationalists who were
funding the German Communist Party in those crucial elections in 1930,
in which the communists gained such spectacular successes?
-
- When one understands the prevailing dynamics of the times,
it becomes elementary to recognise that the fiercest political struggles
occurring all over the West during the 1930s, can now be more clearly seen
as being just so many proxy battles on behalf of rival concentrations of
financial power, culminating in World II and the triumph of the internationalists.
-
- An American Fascist Coup d'Etat.
-
- In Britain opposition to World War II came from what
remained of the British end of the original Anglo-American establishment,
labelled the `Cliveden set`; Cliveden being the name of the home of Lord
Astor. This interpretation will also help to explain one of the most mysterious
episodes in American history; a reported attempt, with the assistance of
the American Legion and armed forces, to set up a `fascist ` dictatorship
in America.
-
- News of the plot was given brief front-page treatment
in the NEW YORK TIMES on November 21, 1931; a congressional committee was
set up to investigate the allegations; but then all news of the plot faded
out of the press. Those involved included a few leading personalities in
the American Legion and another organization known as Liberty League, which
together seem to have undertaken to make available a force of 500,000 men.
Leadership of the operation was offered to Major-General Smedley D. Butler,
a much decorated military hero, but there is no real evidence that he ever
agreed to go along with the plotters.
-
- Significantly, it is exclusively the gentile power -wielders
of big finance and big business who were identified as the culprits behind
the scene, all linked in one way or another with J.P. Morgan: Grayson Murphy,
a director of the Guaranty Company; Jackson Martindell, associated with
Stone and Webster, allied to the Morgans; the DuPont Company; the Remington
Arms Company, controlled by DuPont; and the Morgan-Harriman financial interests.
It would seem, therefore, that the Morganite financiers and industrialists,
finding themselves at last outmanoeuvred and out gunned in Wall Street,
were tempted to take desperate measures against the international financiers
- as had been done with some success in Italy and Germany.
-
- As the rivalry of separate national constellations of
financial power gave rise to the 19th century's scramble for colonial possessions,
so the consolidation of financial power on a global basis in the 20th century
required the dismantling of all the colonial empires and their replacement
with innumerable new states over which the separate nations of the West
would be able to exercise little or no influence..A clear distinction must,
thus, be drawn between the pace and quantity of change and conflict in
the world up until l939, when the new imperium was still in the process
of being established, and the pace and quantity of change and conflict
after the new imperium had emerged as the only real victor in World War
II.
-
- In Part Three, we will examine the part played by Western
`Intellect` in the `Nexus Of Evil` and identify it's manipulation and exploitation,
and the role it has subsequently played in in the furthering of the Illuminati's
Luciferian Agenda.
-
- Comments to : http://righteousalliance.blogspot.com/
-
-
- Ref:
-
- 1] http://reformed-theology.org/html/books/bolshevik_revolution/
-
- 2] http://www.reformed-theology.org/html/books/wall_street/index.html
-
- 3] http://www.voltairenet.org/IMG/pdf/Wall_Street_and_FDR_by_A_Sutton.pdf
-
- 4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cecil_rhodes
-
- 5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Ruskin
-
- 6] http://sandiego.indymedia.org/media/2006/10/119975.pdf
Tragedy And Hope
-
- 7] http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=8134
-
- 8] http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/bloodlines/index.htm
|
No comments:
Post a Comment