Russia gave UN 100-page report in July blaming
Syrian rebels for Aleppo sarin attack
This image provided by Shaam News
Network, which has been authenticated based on its contents and other AP
reporting, purports to show dead bodies after an attack on Ghouta, Syria on
Wednesday, Aug. 21, 2013. | Uncredited/AP
Share
on linkedin Share
on reddit Share
on stumbleupon Share
on tumblr Share
on delicious Share
on digg Share
on pocket Share
on instapaper Share
on evernote
More on this Story
- Story | Intercepted call bolsters Syrian chemical-weapons charge, Germans say
- Story | For members of Congress, war vote is wrenching
- Story | France won’t attack Syria if U.S. doesn’t, prime minister tells his Senate
- Story | Despite resistance, Senate panel passes Syria strike measure
- Graphic | Map locates Khan al Asal
- On the Web | More Middle East coverage from McClatchy
By Matthew Schofield |
McClatchy Foreign Staff
BERLIN — Russia says a deadly March
sarin attack in an Aleppo suburb was carried out by Syrian rebels, not forces
loyal to President Bashar Assad, and it has delivered a 100-page report laying
out its evidence to the United Nations.
A statement posted on the Russian
Foreign Ministry website late Wednesday said the report included detailed
scientific analysis of samples that Russian technicians collected at the site
of the alleged attack, Khan al Asal in northern Syria. The attack killed 26
people.
A U.N. spokesman, Farhan Haq, confirmed
that Russia delivered the report in July.
The report itself was not released. But
the statement drew a pointed comparison between what it said was the scientific
detail of the report and the far shorter intelligence summaries that the United
States, Britain and France have released to justify their assertion that the
Syrian government launched chemical weapons against Damascus suburbs on Aug.
21. The longest of those summaries, by the French, ran nine pages. Each relies
primarily on circumstantial evidence to make its case, and they disagree with
one another on some details, including the number of people who died in the
attack.
The Russian statement warned the United
States and its allies not to conduct a military strike against Syria until the
United Nations had completed a similarly detailed scientific study into the
Aug. 21 attack. It charged that what it called the current “hysteria” about a
possible military strike in the West was similar to the false claims and poor
intelligence that preceded the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003.
Russia said its investigation of the
March 19 incident was conducted under strict protocols established by the
Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, the international agency
that governs adherence to treaties prohibiting the use of chemical weapons. It
said samples that Russian technicians had collected had been sent to
OPCW-certified laboratories in Russia.
“The Russian report is specific,” the
ministry statement said. “It is a scientific and technical document.”
The Russian statement said Russian
officials had broken the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons’
code of silence on such probes only because Western nations appear to be
“preparing the ground for military action” in retaliation for the Aug. 21
incident.
A U.N. team spent four days late last
month investigating the Aug. 21 incident. The samples it collected from the
site and alleged victims of the attack are currently being examined at the
chemical weapons organization’s labs in Europe. U.N. Secretary-General Ban
Ki-moon has urged the United States to delay any strike until after the results
of that investigation are known. But U.S. officials have dismissed the U.N.
probe, saying it won’t tell them anything they don’t already know.
White House spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden
said U.S. officials were unmoved by the Russian report and held the Assad government
responsible for both the Khan al Asal attack in March and the Aug. 21 attack
outside Damascus.
“We have studied the Russian report but
have found no reason to change our assessment,” she said.
Independent chemical weapons experts
contacted by McClatchy said they were not familiar with the report and had not
read the Russian statement, which was posted as Secretary of State John Kerry
was appearing before the House Foreign Affairs Committee to make the Obama
administration’s case for a retaliatory strike on Syria as punishment for the
August attack. But they were cautious about the details made public in the
Russian statement.
Richard Guthrie, formerly project
leader of the Chemical and Biological Warfare Project of the Stockholm
International Peace Research Institute, said the Russian statement on the
makeup of the sarin found at Khan al Asal, which the Russians indicated was not
military grade, might reflect only that “there are a lot of different ways to
make sarin.”
He added: “The messy mix described by
the Russians might also be the result of an old sarin stock being used. Sarin
degrades (the molecules break up) over time and this would explain a dirty
mix.”
He also said there could be doubts
about the Russian conclusion that the rockets that delivered the sarin in the
March 19 incident were not likely to have come from Syrian military stocks
because of their use of RDX, an explosive that is also known as hexogen and T4.
“Militaries don’t tend to use it
because it’s too expensive,” Guthrie said. He added in a later email, however,
that it’s not inconceivable that the Syrian military would use RDX “if the
government side was developing a semi-improvised short-range rocket” and “if
there happened to be a stock available.”
“While I would agree that it would be
unlikely for a traditional, well-planned short-range rocket development program
to use RDX in that role, it is not beyond the realms of possibility that, as
the Syrian government did not seem to have an earlier short-range rocket
program, it may have been developing rockets with some haste and so using
materials that are at hand,” he wrote.
Jean Pascal Zanders, a leading expert
on chemical weapons who until recently was a senior research fellow at the
European Union’s Institute for Security Studies, questioned a Russian assertion
that the sarin mix appeared to be a Western World War II vintage.
“The Western Allies were not aware of
the nerve agents until after the occupation of Germany,” he wrote in an email.
“The USA, for example, struggled with the sarin (despite having some of the
German scientists) until the 1950s, when the CW program expanded considerably.”
The Russian Foreign Ministry posted the
statement shortly after Russian President Vladimir Putin had asked a Russian
interviewer what the American reaction would be if evidence showed that Syrian
rebels, not the Assad regime, had been behind a chemical weapons attack.
The report dealt with an incident that
occurred March 19 in Khan al Asal, outside Aleppo, in which 26 people died and
86 were sickened. It was that incident that the U.N. team now probing the Aug.
21 attack was originally assigned to investigate, and the Russian statement
noted that the investigation had been sidetracked by the sudden focus on the
later incident.
Haq, the U.N. spokesman, acknowledged
that the most recent attack “has pushed the investigation of the Aleppo
incident to the back burner for now.” But he said that “the inspectors will get
back to it as soon as is possible.”
The statement’s summary of the report
said that neither the munitions nor the poison gas in the Khan al Asal attack
appeared to fit what is possessed by the Syrian government. The statement said
Russian investigators studied the site, sent the materials they found to study
to the Russian laboratories of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical
Weapons, and followed agreed-upon United Nations investigation standards.
According to the statement, the report
said the shell “was not regular Syrian army ammunition but was an artisan-type
similar to unguided rocket projectiles produced in the north of Syria by the
so-called gang ‘Bashair An-Nasr.’”
The Russian analysis found soil and
shell samples contained a sarin gas “not synthesized in an industrial
environment,” the statement said. The report said the chemical mix did not
appear to be a modern version of the deadly agent but was closer to those “used
by Western states for producing chemical weapons during World War II.”
The statement said the Organization for
the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons team had examined Syrian soldiers injured
in the March attack and said that no reaction to the more recent alleged
chemical account should be considered without also considering that the rebels,
too, have used chemical weapons.
“It is obvious that any objective
investigation of the incident on Aug. 21 in East Ghouta is impossible without
considering the circumstances of the March attack,” the statement said. Ghouta
is the area near Damascus where the Aug. 21 attack took place.
(Lesley Clark contributed to this
report from St. Petersburg, Russia.)
Email: mschofield@mcclatchydc.com
Twitter: @mattschodcnews
Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2013/09/05/201268/russia-releases-100-page-report.html#.UikTaryE7yd#storylink=cpy
No comments:
Post a Comment