Video: America! Some Assembly Required Episode 07

 Anna and Lisa will finish the discussion on the Committees of the General Assembly. Come! Bring your questions.

157. The Machine Gun Builds Hotchkiss: The Underground History of American Education by John Taylor Gatto from archive.org

 

157. The Machine Gun Builds Hotchkiss: The Underground History of American Education by John Taylor Gatto from archive.org

 

 

The Machine Gun Builds Hotchkiss  

 

    The widow of the man who perfected the machine gun founded the Hotchkiss School; a  Lowell and a Forbes funded Middlesex; the DuPonts were the patrons of Kent; St.  George's was underwritten by the Brown family whose name graces Brown University;  Choate looked to the Mellon family for generous checks; J. P. Morgan was behind  Groton. Over 90 percent of the great American private boarding schools issued from that  short period just after Herbert Spencer's American visit in 1882 and just before the  indirect edict to the National Education Association that it must play ball with the de-  intellectualization of public schooling, or it would be abandoned by America's business  leadership.  

 

     Elite private boarding schools were an important cornerstone in the foundation of a  permanent American upper class whose children were to be socialized for power. They  were great schools for the Great Race, intended to forge a collective identity among  children of privilege, training them to be bankers, financiers, partners in law firms,  corporate directors, negotiators of international treaties and contracts, patrons of the arts,  philanthropists, directors of welfare organizations, members of advisory panels,  government elites, and business elites. 

 

      Michael Useem's post-WWII study showed that just thirteen elite boarding

 

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more Video of Oral Arguments 11/14/2024 in Beaudoin vs Massachusetts School of Law Vote in the Comments How You Think It Went Coquin de Chien Nov 14   READ IN APP   Upgrade to paid Share Share The Real CdC’s Newsletter Here is a link to the oral arguments from Beaudoin v Bhasin, Coyne, and Massachusetts School of Law. It should begin at the right point, but if it does not, then please go to 1:58:30 to begin. Be sure to listen to both sides of the argument. First, the plaintiff, John Beaudoin, Sr. (I am he), speaks. Then Attorney Malaguti speaks for the defendants. I will not write anymore here. Feel free to comment or vote as to the likely outcome, the just outcome, or whatever you want to wrote. I generally don’t have time to read all the comments on my substack articles. I get to some, but not all. I promise to read all of these. God bless you all John 14:6 TRUTH

Chapter Ten PRO-ISRAEL PRESSURE ON GENERAL ASSEMBLY by Alison Weir

 Chapter Ten
PRO-ISRAEL PRESSURE ON GENERAL ASSEMBLY
MEMBERS
When it was clear that, despite U.S. support,[220] the partition recommendation did not have the
two-thirds support of the UN General Assembly required to pass, Zionists pushed through a delay in
the vote. They then used this period to pressure numerous nations into voting for the recommendation.
A number of people later described this campaign.
Robert Nathan, a Zionist who had worked for the U.S. government and who was particularly
active in the Jewish Agency, wrote afterward, “We used any tools at hand,” such as telling certain
delegations that the Zionists would use their influence to block economic aid to any countries that did
not vote for partition.[221]
Another Zionist proudly stated:
“Every clue was meticulously checked and pursued. Not the smallest or the remotest of nations,
but was contacted and wooed. Nothing was left to chance.”
Financier and longtime presidential advisor Bernard Baruch told France it would lose U.S. aid if
it voted against partition. Top White House presidential aide David Niles organized pressure on
Liberia through rubber magnate Harvey Firestone, who told the Liberian president that if Liberia did
not vote in favor of partition, Firestone would revoke his planned expansion in the country. Liberia
voted yes.[222]
Latin American delegates were told that the Pan-American highway construction project would be
more likely if they voted yes. Delegates’ wives received mink coats (the wife of the Cuban delegate
returned hers); Costa Rica’s President Jose Figueres reportedly received a blank checkbook. Haiti
was promised economic aid if it would change its original vote opposing partition.
Longtime Zionist Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter, along with ten senators and Truman
domestic advisor Clark Clifford, threatened the Philippines (seven bills on the Philippines were
pending in Congress).

 

Idaho Health Department Bans Giving COVID-19 Shots

• by Rishma Parpia

• Published November 11, 2024
• Vaccines

+ Share This Article

In Idaho, the Southwest District’s Board of Health has voted to prohibit COVID-19 shots from being administered in its medical facilities, a regional public health department in Idaho, has been prohibited from administering COVID shots to residents in six counties along the Idaho-Oregon border.¹ The regional public health department serves Adams, Canyon, Gem, Owyhee, Payette and Washington counties in the state.²

Board Votes to Remove COVID Shots Following Public Testimonies

In a public meeting on Oct. 22, 2024, the Southwest District’s Board of Health voted 4-3 to remove COVID shots from its facilities following approximately 290 public comments requesting the decision. The vote came after presentations by several medical doctors who have been criticized for questioning the safety and efficacy of the COVID shots.

Doctors presenting evidence that there are significant risks associated with COVID shots included Idaho pathologist Ryan Cole, MD, whose medical license was restricted in Washington after state regulators accused him of sharing misinformation about COVID-19.³

Other presenters, who participated via teleconference, included Peter McCullough, MD, a Texas cardiologist. Dr. McCullough’s whose medical credentials were challenged by the American Board of Internal Medicine in 2022.

 

Pharmaceutical Companies Pay Billions of Dollars to Influence Medical Journal Reviewers

• by Natasha Hobley

• Published November 11, 2024
• Bioethics

+ Share This Article

More than half of peer reviewers for four of the top medical journals received $1.06 billion in payments from the pharmaceutical industry during 2020-2022 alone, according to a research letter published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). The payments went to peer reviewers for four of the leading scientific journals—JAMA, the British Medical Journal (BMJ), The Lancet, and the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM).¹

The job of peer reviewers is a large part of what is designed to make a journal article reputable. Individuals who perform the task assess the integrity and quality of the articles, research, methodology, and findings to ensure that only the highest quality of work is published.

Payments to the peer reviewers included $1 billion to individuals or institutions for their research and $64.18 million in general payments including travel and meals. Consulting feeds accounted for $34.31 million and speaking compensation totaled $11.8 million.¹

Statistics for the report were gathered from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Open Payments database from 2020 to 2022, demonstrating that peer reviewers were paid over $1 billion during the height of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout.

From 2013 to 2022, physicians in the United States received $12.1 billion from pharmaceutical companies.

 

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more Nature paper shows the COVID "vaccines" increased your risk of getting COVID To prevent infection of SARS-CoV-2, increasing IgA RBD mucosal antibodies is necessary. The COVID shots DECIMATED these key protective antibodies. Nobody noticed! WTF is going on? Steve Kirsch Nov 12   READ IN APP   Figure 1 of this paper has the all important graph in 1h. I will show you how devastating that plot is. Executive summary Any competent virologist will tell you that if you want to reduce the risk of infection of a respiratory virus, increasing the level of mucosal IgA antibodies is required. And you want to increase the receptor binding domain (RBD) antibodies especially because these antibodies prevent the virus from attaching to the entry point receptors (ACE2) on your cells.