Can Affirmation Be Restored to American Mores?
Can Affirmation Be Restored to American Mores?
Paul Craig Roberts
Which is the most irresponsible organization on earth? The American media or the Democrat judges?
It is a difficult call, but I think the designation of most irresponsible goes to the presstitutes. The presstitutes are no longer confined to the print and TV media and NPR, but include many internet sites. There are plenty that are irresponsible independently of ideology and agendas, and there are many websites set up by liberal and leftwing foundations, as well as by USAID and National Endowment for the Humanities to support the narratives that further liberal-left agendas.
The temporary restraining orders issuing from Democrat judges are almost mandatory if a person or group files a request. A restraining order is only good for a few days until a hearing is held to determine if the complaint has any merit or standing. Seldom is such found, and therefore few restraining orders become preliminary injunctions. A preliminary injunction can actually prevent a policy from being implemented until the challenge to the policy is decided by the appeals court, and if that decision is challenged, by the Supreme Court. The process can take longer than a presidential term. Thus, invalid injunctions can be used to derail a president’s agenda.
It is the case that the Democrat judges should know by now that the many complaints filed to stop the effort of the Trump administration from converting the US budget from a grift operation into an efficient mechanism for serving the American people are nothing but expressions of political and ideological opposition to the Trump administration. But it is always a chance that one could be legitimate, so the judges have to follow the procedure and issue temporary restraining orders. The solution is for the Department of Justice to bring charges against those entities that bring illegitimate lawsuits, the only purpose of which is to freeze executive branch decisions.
The US and foreign media describe the temporary restraining orders as “judges block Trump’s presidential orders.” Only a preliminary injunction that is upheld on appeal can block Trump’s ability to manage his domain–the executive branch. Judges have zero authority to manage the executive branch, but an irresponsible media is creating the impression that executive decisions reside in the judiciary and not in the executive.
Another feature of the presstitutes’ irresponsibility is that the media intentionally misinforms the public about the intent and content of Trump’s decisions in order to cause alarm among the public and undermine voters’ confidence in the Trump administration. For example, DOGE discovered that about 40% of requests to change a Social Security recipient’s direct deposit bank to a different bank are scams operated in order to steal the recipient’s Social Security income. Of course, the theft could succeed only for the months it would take to identify and correct the problem, but in the meantime the recipient could not service any debt, pay any utility bills, and could have critical services, such as power and communication, cut off, and credit rating ruined.
To avoid these horrors and hardships on the elderly, Elon Musk said that changes in direct deposit instructions have to be made in person with ID. The idiot and dishonest liberal/left are up in arms over Musk’s “heartless treatment of the elderly” who will be so inconvenienced by having to present themselves at a Social Security office. Obviously, the idiot liberal/left think it is better for the elderly to be scammed and lose their benefits. The problem is the insecurity of the digital revolution that has been forced down our throats. This insecurity is permanent and is one of the reasons I have concluded that the digital revolution is, along with nuclear weapons, the worst mistake that has been made. We are now trapped in the horror of the digital revolutions, which means the total absence of privacy, and likelihood of stolen identity, bank account, investment account, Social Security, credit card, and a pile of debt.
What we see in the presstitute media is the intention to misrepresent every Trump decision as the blackest of the blackest intentions, and not as efforts to deal with real serious problems.
In other words, the entire media is acting politically, as a propaganda mechanism, and never as a reporter of news and facts. Why is this tolerated?
Recently, several people dependent on Social Security have asked me why Trump is taking away their Social Security? I asked them where did they get that idea. They said “the media.” I asked them why they believed an anti-Trump propaganda organization. It seems that even those who know that the media lies still fall for the lie if the lie makes them feel threatened.
The Trump people need to pay attention to this. It is correct that today few Americans have confidence in the media, but fear still works.
Enforcement of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act is long overdue. The six mega-media conglomerates are violations of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act and should be broken up and returned to independent hands. If no one wants the media or sees any future for objective news reporting, the media should be allowed to cease to exist rather than to continue as propaganda ministries.
As for Democrat judges, it should be understand that they are not judges. They are political operatives put on the bench for the sole purpose of advancing Woke, DEI, anti-white, anti-family policies and the legitimization of sexual perversity. No Democrat judicial appointee should ever be confirmed, not in this day and time. The Democrats’ idea of justice has no resemblance to justice.
Years of liberal domination have largely destroyed American mores, turned women into harlots who “sell their pussy on E-bay,” support themselves on income from their personal porn sites, and vie for who can have the largest number of sexual partners in a 24-hour period. What once was depraved behavior is today an accomplishment. Law schools have turned against the Constitution and teach lawyers that their function is not to apply law but to use law to overturn existing society. Wherever you look, we see denunciation of what was sacred and affirmation of what is Satanic. This is the problem that Trump’s effort to restore America faces.
The Deep State Has Used the NY Times to Announce Its Withdrawal from Washington’s Conflict with Russia
The Deep State Has Used the NY Times to Announce Its Withdrawal from Washington’s Conflict with Russia
Paul Craig Roberts
Last Saturday the New York Times completely abandoned the official narrative of the Ukraine Conflict, thus overturning the apple cart full of lies. Jeff Childers gives us the gist of the New York Times abandonment of the ruling lie. https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/narrative-whiplash-sunday-march-30?utm_campaign=email-post&r=15k3qo&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
What is the explanation? My guess is that the Deep State has decided to abandon the conflict and is most likely the author of the Times’ article. The purpose of the article is to set up Zelensky as the scapegoat who caused the war to be lost and to get rid of him so that the conflict can be brought to an end.
These paragraphs show the purpose:
It was going according to plan, the Times sadly said, “until it wasn’t.” The problem wasn’t the Russians, the Americans, or even the slowly draining numbers of trained Ukrainian military forces. No, the problem was one spotlight-hogging Vladimir Zelenskyy. With two y’s, for you’ve got to be kidding me, squared.
“Zelensky was hoping to attend the United Nations General Assembly,” the Times reported. “A showing of progress on the battlefield would bolster his case for additional military support. So the Ukrainians upended the plan at the last minute — a preview of a fundamental disconnect that would increasingly shape the arc of the war.”
Childers’ translation: Zelensky started making his own decisions —ones not approved by the Americans— and the war began unraveling.
A few of us have known from day one that the Ukraine conflict was Washington’s war run out of Wiesbaden. The questions are: Why didn’t Putin know, and if he did know why didn’t he do anything?
Now that the New York Times has admitted that the conflict in Ukraine was America’s war with Russia disguised as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, a war that, as I have often said, Trump has no stake in, Trump can end the conflict by ceasing to participate. There is no reason for bureaucrats and emissaries to hold endless negotiations. Trump simply declares the war is over.
Let’s hope Trump and Putin have the wits to see this.
No comments:
Post a Comment