Fluoride Information

Fluoride is a poison. Fluoride was poison yesterday. Fluoride is poison today. Fluoride will be poison tomorrow. When in doubt, get it out.


Monday, May 8, 2017

Israel’s New Cultural War of Aggression by Richard Falk from CounterPunch

Israel’s New Cultural War of Aggression

A few weeks ago my book Palestine’s Horizon: Toward a Just Peace was published by Pluto in Britain. I was in London and Scotland at the time to do a series of university talks to help launch the book. Its appearance happened to coincide with the release of a jointly authored report commissioned by the UN Social and Economic Commission of West Asia, giving my appearances a prominence they would not otherwise have had. The report concluded that the evidence relating to Israeli practices toward the Palestinian people amounted to ‘apartheid,’ as defined in international law.
There was a strong pushback by Zionist militants threatening disruption. These threats were sufficiently intimidating to academic administrators, that my talks at the University of East London and at Middlesex University were cancelled on grounds of ‘health and security.’ Perhaps, these administrative decisions partly reflected the awareness that an earlier talk of mine at LSE had indeed been sufficiently disrupted during the discussion period that university security personnel had to remove two persons in the audience who shouted epithets, unfurled an Israeli flag, stood up and refused to sit down when politely asked by the moderator.

In all my years of speaking on various topics around the world, I had never previously had events cancelled, although quite frequently there was similar pressure exerted on university administrations, but usually threatening financial reprisals if I was allowed to speak. What happened in Britain is part of an increasingly nasty effort of pro-Israeli activists to shut down debate by engaging in disruptive behavior, threats to security, and by smearing speakers regarded as critics of Israel as ‘anti-Semites,’ and in my case as a ‘self-hating,’ even a self-loathing Jew.
Returning to the United States I encountered a new tactic. The very same persons who disrupted in London, evidently together with some likeminded comrades, wrote viciously derogatory reviews of my book on the Amazon website in the U.S. and UK, giving the book the lowest rate possible rating, This worried my falkpalestinepublisher who indicated that how a book is rated on Amazon affects sales very directly. I wrote a message on my Facebook timeline that my book was being attacked in this way, and encouraged Facebook friends to submit reviews, which had the effect of temporarily elevating my ratings. In turn, the ultra-Zionists went back to work with one or two line screeds that made no effort whatsoever to engage the argument of the book. In this sense, there was a qualitative difference as the positive reviews were more thoughtful and substantive. This was a new kind of negative experience for me. Despite publishing many books over the course during this digital age I had never before had a book attacked in this online manner obviously seeking to discourage potential buyers and to demean me as an author. In effect, this campaign is an innovative version of digital book burning, and while not as vivid visually as a bonfire, its vindictive intentions are the same.
These two experiences, the London cancellations and the Amazon harassments, led me to reflect more broadly on what was going on. More significant, by far, than my experience are determined, well-financed efforts to punish the UN for its efforts to call attention to Israeli violations of human rights and international law, to criminalize participation in the BDS campaign, and to redefine and deploy anti-Semitism so that its disavowal and prevention extends to anti-Zionism and even to academic and analytic criticism of Israel’s policies and practices, which is how I am situated within this expanding zone of opprobrium. Israel has been acting against human rights NGOs within its own borders, denying entry to BDS supporters, and even virtually prohibiting foreign tourists from visiting the West Bank or Gaza. In a remarkable display of unity all 100 U.S. senators recently overcame the polarized atmosphere in Washington to join in sending an arrogant letter to the new UN Secretary General, António Guterres, demanding a more friendly, blue washing, approach to Israel at the UN and threatening financial consequences if their outrageous views were not heeded.
Israel’s most ardent and powerful backers are transforming the debate on Israel/Palestine policy into a cultural war of aggression. This new kind of war has been launched with the encouragement and backing of the Israeli government, given ideological support by such extremist pressure groups as UN Watch, GO Monitor, AIPAC, and a host of others. This cultural war is implemented at street levels by flame throwing militants that resort to symbolic forms of violence. The adverse consequences for academic freedom and freedom of thought in a democratic society should not be underestimated. A very negative precedent is being set in several Western countries. Leading governments are collaborating with extremists to shut down constructive debate on a sensitive policy issue affecting the lives and wellbeing of a long oppressed people.
There are two further dimensions of these developments worth pondering: (1) In recent years Israel has been losing the Legitimacy War being waged by the Palestinians, what Israeli think tanks call ‘the delegitimation project,’ and these UN bashing and personal smears are the desperate moves of a defeated adversary in relation to the moral and legal dimensions of the Palestinian struggle for rights. In effect, the Israeli government and its support groups have given up almost all efforts to respond substantively, and concentrate their remaining ammunition on wounding messengers who bear witness and doing their best to weaken the authority and capabilities of the UN so as to discredit substantive initiatives; (2) while this pathetic spectacle sucks the oxygen from responses of righteous indignation, attention is diverted from the prolonged ordeal of suffering that has long been imposed on the Palestinian people as a result of Israel’s unlawful practices and policies, as well as its crimes against humanity, in the form of apartheid, collective punishment, ethnic cleansing, and many others. The real institutional scandal is not that the UN is obsessed with Israel but rather that it is blocked from taking action that might exert sufficient pressure on Israel to induce the dismantling of apartheid structures relied upon to subjugate, displace, and dispossess the Palestinian people over the course of more than 70 years with no end in sight.
Richard Falk is Albert G. Milbank Professor Emeritus of International Law at Princeton University and Visiting Distinguished Professor in Global and International Studies at the University of California, Santa Barbara.
More articles by:
zen economics
May 08, 2017
Richard Falk
Israel’s New Cultural War of Aggression
Daniel Read
History and Hypocrisy: Why the Korean War Matters in the Age of Trump
Jonathan Feldman
Police Shootings, Neoliberal Scarcity Regimes and the Left: Behind the Balch Springs, Texas Murder
Ron Jacobs
Housing for People, Not for Profit
An Opening to Challenge Abu-Jamal’s Conviction
Patrick Cockburn
The Great Division: the Return of Nationalism
Paul Bentley
Kalaratri Appears: Indigenous Women Take-Up Arms in India
Kenneth Surin
With Theresa “Goody Two Shoes” May, What You See on TV Won’t be What You Get
Murray Dobbin
As B.C. Election Approaches, Greens Get Cozy With Liberals 
John Feffer
Trade Offs: Why Trump Changed His Position on Trade Policy
Dean Baker
What Trump’s Idea to Break Up the Big Banks Could Mean to Average Americans
Alvaro Huerta
President Trump: the Hustler 2.0
Jack Random
Surviving the Trump Presidency
Susan Babbitt
May Day Marches Against Trump: Confusion or Worse?
Colin Todhunter
A Victory for Theresa May Will See Britain Dragged Further Towards War with Russia
Cesar Chelala
Malawi Memories
Weekend Edition
May 05, 2017
Friday - Sunday
Paul Street
Why Study History?
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: The End of the Age of Protest
Richard Moser
The Sanders Campaign, Greater Appalachia and Young Workers
Ted Hamilton – Bill Quigley
Do Climate Activists Have a Legal Justification for Civil Disobedience?
Paul Atwood
War and Empire: the American Way of Life
Jason Hirthler
Washington’s Blind Ambition: the Monster in the Mirror
Nick Alexandrov
What Was the Liberal International Order?
Ken Levy
Why the Right is Morally Wrong
Patrick Cockburn
The Fall of Mosul and Raqqa Won’t Spell the End of ISIS
John Davis
Horror Story
Brian Cloughley
Human Rights and the Arrogance of Power
Robert Fantina
Abbas on a String
David Jaffe
Political-Economic Correctness: Neither the ‘N’ Nor the ‘F’ Word Shall be Spoken
Tighe Barry
Convicted for Protesting Jeff Sessions is No Laughing Matter
Ryan LaMothe
Trump’s Leadership: the Apotheosis of a Neoliberal Imperial Culture
Russell Mokhiber
Nader Rips Sanders and Democrats for Putting Single-Payer on Back Burner
Kathy Kelly
In Yemen, Shocked to His Bones
David Rosen
Melania Trump: Another First Lady as Good Wife?
John Laforge
United States Says ‘Yes’ to Nuclear Weapons Tests, ‘No’ to a Treaty Ban
Chris Gilbert
History Repeats Itself? Venezuela’s New Constituent Assembly
Jeremy Harding
French Elections: Whose Republican Front?
Mark Ashwill
Just Because the Golden Arches are in Vietnam Doesn’t Mean the US Won the War
Alexandra Isfahani-Hammond
The Crazy Cat Lady Speaks
Andre Vltchek
The Pope and I
Josh Hoxie
Fighting an Unfair System
Cesar Chelala
Bachar Azmeh: A Syrian Photographer’s Artistic Lens
Norman Solomon
Killer Drones in the Empire State
Chuck Jones
How Trump Could Stop Off-Shoring With a Stroke of His Pen
Victor Grossman
Curiouser and Curiouser

No comments:

Post a Comment