The Illuminati goal of abolishing private property: reborn in Globalism | |
(To read about Jon's mega-collection, Exit From The Matrix, click here.)
|
|
The Illuminati goal of abolishing private property: reborn in Globalism
By Jon Rappoport
There is a direct line from Adam Weishaupt's secret society,
the Illuminati, which he formed in Bavaria in 1776, to Karl Marx, and
onward to the modern Globalist agenda.
One of the key shared ideas: the abolition of private property.
Many people hold a negative view of Weishaupt, the
Illuminati, and especially Marx, and so it fell to Globalists to couch
their ideas about property in more acceptable terms.
That feat (one of many attempted) was expressed, in 1976, by
Carla Hills, US Trade Representative and a key member of the Rockefeller
Trilateral Commission. Hills is credited as the principal architect of
the Globalist NAFTA Treaty, which has destructively affected the US and
Mexican economies.
Patrick Wood, author of the classic, Technocracy Rising,
unearthed Hills' brief statement on private property. I've broken it up
into three parts, so I can comment after each mind-bending point.
Carla Hills: "Land, because of its unique nature and the
crucial role it plays in human settlements, cannot be treated as an
ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures
and inefficiencies of the market."
Her use of the term "human settlements" is curious, as is her
reference to "crucial role it [land] plays." Is she trying to take us
back to an ancient period in human history, when people were first
abandoning nomadic existence and turning to agriculture and fixed
communities? It appears so. She wants us to think of land in terms of
"oh, look, we can stop wandering and live here, and this space of soil
will play 'a crucial role' in our future." It's been centuries since
private ownership of land became a reality. But Hills doesn't like
acknowledging that. And through her use of "human settlements," she also
wants us to believe that the ancient concept of an entire community
moving on to land to live is the only valid view. An individual staking a
claim to land or buying it is verboten. It's a corruption of the
natural order. I assume Hills wasn't living on a kibbutz or in a commune
when she wrote her statement, but we'll leave that problem for another
time.
Hills asserts that private ownership of property isn't
ordinary and can't be thought of that way. Individuals shouldn't
"control it." And the free market causes problems. Well, of course, the
free market causes problems, if you assume that no one should own more
land than anyone else. And yes, private ownership, based on hard work,
is inefficient, if that means some super-government can't take land away
"for the public good."
Hills stops short of saying government should own all land, but that's where she's going.
She continues: "Private land ownership is also a principal
instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore
contributes to social injustice; if unchecked, it may become a major
obstacle in the planning and implementation of development schemes."
Social injustice, that familiar theme. Some people might own
more land than others. That's not right. That's unjust. There should be
no reward for hard work and intelligence. No. Instead, there is only
planning from above. The wise demi-golds, who have our best interests at
heart, can decide all the uses to which land is put. They can own huge
tracts of land themselves, because they are gods. But the rest of us
must submit to the development schemes they lay out. Only bitter
clingers, who actually work for a living and strive and make their own
way in the world, believe in private property. They're for social
injustice. They don't want to give way to Greater Sharing.
Finally, Hills states: "Social justice, urban renewal and
development, the provision of decent dwellings and healthy conditions
for the people can only be achieved if land is used in the interests of
society as a whole."
Kinder and gentler vision. Just launch a plan to give
EVERYONE a decent dwelling and healthy conditions. That's how land
should be used and thought of. No more private property. EVERYONE, of
course, includes people (in unlimited numbers---no ceiling) who come
here from anywhere in the world. And they come because here they get
justice. They should get free housing. They should get "healthy
conditions." No problem. Everyone gets a 20-foot by 20-foot square box
to live in.
What could go wrong?
Carla Hills is couching her statement to avoid the heavy
philosophy and militant threat and totalitarian thrust of the Illuminati
and Marx, but she's on the same page. She's "sustainable" and "green"
and "kind" and "thoughtful" and "caring." She's perfect for self-styled
liberals and the virtue-signaling Clueless.
She's part of the tradition that wants to take down the individual spirit and stuff it in the collective.
I know many people (and I'm sure you do, too) who have worked
hard, bought land, built a home, raised children, who would
nevertheless applaud Carla Hills' statement. They've succeeded in
compartmentalizing their minds. It never occurs to them that if the
Globalist dream came true, they would wake up one day with their homes
and property ripped out from under them. If they think about it at all,
they think they can have it both ways. They can continue to live as
they've been living, but somehow, at the same time, social justice will
be served.
They're in a dream. It's so pretty.
There is no iron hand, no Lenin, no Marx, no Stalin. All 400
million or so people in the US have lovely little free cottages nestled
in valleys, and it's spring, and the trees are flowering.
Down a country road, in his wheelchair, comes arch-Globalist
George Soros, cackling and humming and talking on the phone to his
broker. He's flanked by bodyguards. Perched on nearby hills, snipers are
in position, just in case a threat develops.
|
|
| |
Use this link to order Jon's Matrix Collections.
|
|
| |
Jon Rappoport
The
author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM
THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US
Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a
consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the
expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he
has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles
on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin
Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and
Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics,
health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.
|
|
| |
You can find this article and more at NoMoreFakeNews.com.
|
Fluoride Information
Fluoride is a poison. Fluoride was poison yesterday. Fluoride is poison today. Fluoride will be poison tomorrow. When in doubt, get it out.
Tuesday, April 11, 2017
The Illuminati goal of abolishing private property: reborn in Globalism by Jon Rappoport
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment