Removed Infowars.com article on SANDY HOOK BOOK BAN has been found
by Jim Fetzer
While it's one thing for amazon.com to ban NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK (2015), which proves that the events in Newtown, CT, on 14 December 2012 were an elaborate hoax--for which there was a rehearsal the day before--it is another for Infowars.com, Alex Jones' website (based on the premises that we are engaged in an information war for your mind) to pull an article that reports on a stellar instance of precisely that taking place. The hypocrisy of disappearing such an obvious example that proves the case for Infowars.com has stunned and astonished me.
Infowars.com has published about Sandy Hook before. It published "MASSIVE MEGA-COVER UP: RETIRED FBI AGENT INVESTIGATES SANDY HOOK. Retired Nave Seal Says Sandy Hook doesn't add up"
(7 July 2015), for example, where an article about banning NOBODY DIED
AT SANDY HOOK should have been an obvious development for Inforwars.com to cover. I want to share the article here and invite any comments or conjectures about why it was taken down.
Among our most important proofs that Sandy Hook was an elaborate hoax are photographs unearthed by Allan William Powell from Australia, where we published 50 of the furnishing of the Lanza home in Ch. 7, including one of the Nancy Lanza bedroom (where you can see red stuff on the bed--but it is not blood; a form used to record the furnishing on a wooden chest; and a blue moving pad beneath the left leg of the bed, which they forgot to remove) and another 50 of refurbishing the school for its use as the stage in Ch. 8, including Exhibit 26, where the SWAT team is already there, the windows of Classroom 10 are not shot out, crime scene tape is up for a crime that has yet to be committed and Wayne Carver, M.E., is standing awaiting the arrival of his tent:
We also included photos showing the windows of Classroom 10 BEFORE and AFTER the alleged shooting and of the perps drilling a series of holes in the window frame to simulate bullet holes, which make it obvious that the four windows which can be seen above the SWAT vehicle are not yet "shot out", which confirms that this photo was taken BEFORE the alleged shooting had taken place. These photos are all in Ch. 7:
These photos not only confirm that Exhibit 26 (above) was taken BEFORE the alleged shooting (since the windows of Classroom 10 are undamaged) but also demonstrate that the perps did there work too well by drilling those simulated bullet holes at 50* angles and parallel with one another, which would have been impossible in an actual shooting. I was therefore struck that the image corresponding to Exhibit 26 that was published by Inforwars.com http://www.infowars.com/ had a better version and an attribution to the CONNECTICUT STATE POLICE, which thereby verifies their participation in the scam:
There was more to the article, but nothing that seems to be to have been reason for it to have been taken down. That it provides "IMAGE CREDITS CONNECTICUT STATE POLICE", on the other hand, must have caused panic among the participants, since here is one of the web's major sites offering conclusive proof that the CONNECTICUT STATE POLICE were on the crime scene BEFORE the crime had been committed and were therefore participants in perpetrating an elaborate hoax on the American public. THAT had to be taken down!
This forces me to conclude that Alex Jones is an internet eunuch who doesn't have the balls to stand up against the powers that be when real issues are on the line. He could prove that I am wrong by restoring the article, but by taking the original down, he has already proven that I am right. This may come as a shock, but those of us who have followed him closely in the past have noticed that he does not mention Israeli complicity in 9/11, in spite of a mass of evidence, and that he has made no effort to bring me on to discuss the banning of NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK.
Here are a few articles by others who have had the balls to stand up about the book's ban:
While it's one thing for amazon.com to ban NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK (2015), which proves that the events in Newtown, CT, on 14 December 2012 were an elaborate hoax--for which there was a rehearsal the day before--it is another for Infowars.com, Alex Jones' website (based on the premises that we are engaged in an information war for your mind) to pull an article that reports on a stellar instance of precisely that taking place. The hypocrisy of disappearing such an obvious example that proves the case for Infowars.com has stunned and astonished me.
Among our most important proofs that Sandy Hook was an elaborate hoax are photographs unearthed by Allan William Powell from Australia, where we published 50 of the furnishing of the Lanza home in Ch. 7, including one of the Nancy Lanza bedroom (where you can see red stuff on the bed--but it is not blood; a form used to record the furnishing on a wooden chest; and a blue moving pad beneath the left leg of the bed, which they forgot to remove) and another 50 of refurbishing the school for its use as the stage in Ch. 8, including Exhibit 26, where the SWAT team is already there, the windows of Classroom 10 are not shot out, crime scene tape is up for a crime that has yet to be committed and Wayne Carver, M.E., is standing awaiting the arrival of his tent:
We also included photos showing the windows of Classroom 10 BEFORE and AFTER the alleged shooting and of the perps drilling a series of holes in the window frame to simulate bullet holes, which make it obvious that the four windows which can be seen above the SWAT vehicle are not yet "shot out", which confirms that this photo was taken BEFORE the alleged shooting had taken place. These photos are all in Ch. 7:
These photos not only confirm that Exhibit 26 (above) was taken BEFORE the alleged shooting (since the windows of Classroom 10 are undamaged) but also demonstrate that the perps did there work too well by drilling those simulated bullet holes at 50* angles and parallel with one another, which would have been impossible in an actual shooting. I was therefore struck that the image corresponding to Exhibit 26 that was published by Inforwars.com http://www.infowars.com/ had a better version and an attribution to the CONNECTICUT STATE POLICE, which thereby verifies their participation in the scam:
There was more to the article, but nothing that seems to be to have been reason for it to have been taken down. That it provides "IMAGE CREDITS CONNECTICUT STATE POLICE", on the other hand, must have caused panic among the participants, since here is one of the web's major sites offering conclusive proof that the CONNECTICUT STATE POLICE were on the crime scene BEFORE the crime had been committed and were therefore participants in perpetrating an elaborate hoax on the American public. THAT had to be taken down!
This forces me to conclude that Alex Jones is an internet eunuch who doesn't have the balls to stand up against the powers that be when real issues are on the line. He could prove that I am wrong by restoring the article, but by taking the original down, he has already proven that I am right. This may come as a shock, but those of us who have followed him closely in the past have noticed that he does not mention Israeli complicity in 9/11, in spite of a mass of evidence, and that he has made no effort to bring me on to discuss the banning of NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK.
Here are a few articles by others who have had the balls to stand up about the book's ban:
Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, "CENSORSHIP SHOCK: Amazon.com bans investigative book NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK because it disagrees with government version of what happened"
Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, "Amazon is the new Ministry of Truth: An interview with Jim Fetzer, editor of the Sandy Hook book BANNED by Amazon.com"
Glenn Candy, BeforeItsNews, "New Photos Prove Sandy Hook Staged: Amazon freaks out!"
The Government Rag, "Amazon Suppresses and Bans NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK"I have been interviewed by Jeff Rense, James F. Tracy, Dave Gahary of American Free Press, Joyce Riley of "The Power Hour", Michael Rivero, Pete Santilli, Mark Windows of "Windows on the World" (UK) and many other courageous journalists, but not by Alex Jones, who claims to be leading the fight for truth and freedom in the Western world.
No comments:
Post a Comment