BREAKING: 51 Million-Person Study Finds COVID-19 “Vaccines” Increase Risk of Respiratory Infections by up to 559%
Scroll down for the AI transation of the article by Nicolas Hulscher into Korean entitled
BREAKING: 51 Million-Person Study Finds COVID-19 “Vaccines” Increase Risk of Respiratory Infections by up to 559%
Nicolas Hulscher의 기사를 한국어로 AI로 변환하기 위해 아래로 스크롤하세요.
속보: 5,100만 명에 대한 연구에 따르면 COVID-19 “백신”은 호흡기 감염 위험을 최대 559%까지 증가시킵니다.
***
An enormous landmark study published in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases, covering every single resident in South Korea — all 51.6 million people — has delivered a striking population-level signal suggestive of vaccine-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (VAIDS).
This massive dataset shows a consistent dose-dependent pattern: the more COVID-19 “vaccines” a person received, the higher their risk of developing the common cold and upper-respiratory infections. Increases in pneumonia and tuberculosis were identified in stratified analyses by age and infection status. Children ages 0-19 suffered the most.
.
.
Study Overview
- Population: Entire national cohort of South Korea (N = 51,645,564).
- Analytic cohort: 39,447,030 individuals with complete vaccination + infection records.
- Observation period: June 1 2023 – September 30 2024.
- Exposure: Total number of COVID-19 doses.
- Outcomes: Seven major respiratory diseases — upper-respiratory infection (URI), pneumonia, influenza-like illness (ILI), common cold, scarlet fever, pertussis, and tuberculosis.
- Covariate adjustments: age, sex, income level, Charlson comorbidity index, prior COVID-19 infection and severity, epidemic phase, and time since last vaccination.
Critical note: the “unvaccinated” reference group included individuals who had received one dose, inflating its infection rate and making the true vaccine-associated risk likely far higher than reported.
Common Cold
Children (ages 0–19) showed the strongest dose-response pattern:
- After the second dose, risk increased by 299 % (aHR 3.99 [3.78–4.21]).
- After the third dose, risk increased by 391 % (aHR 4.91 [4.62–5.22]).
- After the fourth dose or more, risk increased by 559 % (aHR 6.59 [6.00–7.23]).
Older adults (≥ 65 years) followed the same trend:
- Second dose → +9 % (aHR 1.09 [1.06–1.12]).
- Third dose → +33 % (aHR 1.33 [1.29–1.37]).
- Fourth or more doses → +58 % (aHR 1.58 [1.53–1.64]).
Among COVID-positive participants, the same pattern held:
- Second dose → +5 % (aHR 1.05 [1.03–1.06]);
- Third dose → +12 % (aHR 1.12 [1.10–1.14]);
- Fourth or more doses → +36 % (aHR 1.36 [1.34–1.39]).
Even in the pooled population-wide model, common cold incidence rose sharply with each additional dose (aHR 1.23 [1.21–1.25] after the third dose and 1.65 [1.56–1.75] after the fourth or more), confirming the trend across the entire cohort.
Interpretation: Across every analytic layer—pooled, pediatric, geriatric, and COVID-positive—common-cold incidence climbed steadily from dose 2 through dose 4+, showing a clear, monotonic relationship between cumulative vaccination and ordinary viral infection risk.
Upper-Respiratory Tract Infections
Children (0–19 yrs):
- Second dose → +62 % (aHR 1.62 [1.58–1.66]).
- Third dose → +67 % (aHR 1.67 [1.62–1.71]).
- Fourth or more doses → +83 % (aHR 1.83 [1.75–1.92]).
Older adults (≥ 65 yrs):
- Second dose → +7 % (aHR 1.07 [1.06–1.09]).
- Third dose → +32 % (aHR 1.32 [1.30–1.34]).
- Fourth or more doses → +57 % (aHR 1.57 [1.54–1.59]).
COVID-positive subgroup:
- Second dose → +2 % (aHR 1.02 [1.01–1.03]);
- Third dose → +12 % (aHR 1.12 [1.11–1.13]);
- Fourth or more doses → +32 % (aHR 1.32 [1.30–1.34]).
The pooled model also showed a consistent upward trend—aHR 1.14 after the second dose and 1.48 after the third—indicating that the dose-dependent rise in upper-respiratory infection risk persists even without stratification.
Interpretation: the rise was consistent across all groups and persisted even after adjustment for age, sex, income level, comorbidities, prior infection severity, infection phase, and time since last vaccination.
Tuberculosis
- General population: overall aHRs hovered near 1.0 (no significant change) across all dose groups.
- COVID-positive subset: clear upward trend with dose number:
- Second dose → aHR 1.24 (1.01–1.52) (+24 % risk).
- Fourth or more doses → aHR 1.35 (1.02–1.77) (+35 % risk).
Interpretation: a measurable increase in post-infection or reactivation tuberculosis among those previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 who went on to receive multiple boosters.
Pneumonia
Among COVID-negative participants, pneumonia incidence rose consistently with additional vaccine doses:
- Second dose → +34 % (aHR 1.34 [1.31–1.38])
- Fourth or more doses → +91 % (aHR 1.91 [1.84–1.99])
Interpretation: This clear dose-response pattern suggests impaired respiratory defense or susceptibility to secondary bacterial infection following repeated mRNA exposure.
Influenza-Like Illness (ILI) and Pertussis — the “Protective” Mirage
Regression models appeared to show lower adjusted hazard ratios for these two conditions—approximately 0.55 for ILI and 0.06 for pertussis after the fourth or later dose—which would suggest a protective effect.
In context, however, these apparent reductions are almost certainly statistical artifactsdriven by healthy-user bias, diagnostic-coding overlap, and case misclassification. Many mild respiratory infections that might have been coded as influenza-like illness or pertussis before 2020 were likely recorded as “COVID-19” during the post-vaccine era, artificially deflating their apparent incidence in vaccinated groups.
Crucially, the study’s national ARIMAX time-series revealed a 46-fold surge in confirmed pertussis cases across Korea during 2023, directly contradicting any notion of real-world protection.
.
.
When both the main and supplementary analyses are considered together, the dose-dependent increases are clear for the common cold and upper-respiratory infections across nearly all age and infection strata, with smaller but directionally similar trends for pneumonia and tuberculosis. From the second dose onward, risk ratios rise almost linearly through the fourth and higher doses, revealing a consistent pattern of heightened susceptibility to non-COVID respiratory infections.
While the pooled models already showed increases for upper-respiratory infections and the common cold, the full extent of risk—including the rises in pneumonia and tuberculosis—only becomes clear in the stratified analyses presented in the supplementary tables. By averaging across all ages and infection groups, the main text effectively diluted these signals—creating the impression of neutrality.
This pattern represents a serious population-level signal suggestive of VAIDS. Clinically, such immune dysregulation may present as a heightened incidence of upper respiratory infections and common colds, in clear dose-dependent correlation with repeated mRNA vaccination.
We are now advancing a landmark investigation into VAIDS using thousands of real-world patient records to evaluate long-term immune function across four key exposure groups—vaccinated/infected, vaccinated/uninfected, unvaccinated/infected, and unvaccinated/uninfected controls. These data allow precise comparison of lymphocyte profiles, antibody class switching, and T-cell exhaustion markers to determine how repeated mRNA vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection have reshaped human immunity. Preliminary signals point to immune exhaustion, IgG4 dominance, and secondary immunodeficiency, consistent with the observed surge in chronic infections and dose-dependent vulnerability to common respiratory illness.
You can support that effort here.
Conclusion
Across an entire national dataset, each additional COVID-19 “vaccine” dose corresponded to a higher probability of non-COVID respiratory infection — most severely among children.
Because the “control” group included single-dose recipients, the true increase relative to the completely unvaccinated population is likely even greater than reported.
This study reveals that COVID-19 “vaccines” have eroded immune function across an entire country — and likely the entire globe.
*
Click the share button below to email/forward this article. Follow us on Instagram and X and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost Global Research articles with proper attribution.
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator, McCullough Foundation
Featured image source
The Worldwide Corona Crisis, Global Coup d’Etat Against Humanity
by Michel Chossudovsky
Michel Chossudovsky reviews in detail how this insidious project “destroys people’s lives”. He provides a comprehensive analysis of everything you need to know about the “pandemic” — from the medical dimensions to the economic and social repercussions, political underpinnings, and mental and psychological impacts.
“My objective as an author is to inform people worldwide and refute the official narrative which has been used as a justification to destabilize the economic and social fabric of entire countries, followed by the imposition of the “deadly” COVID-19 “vaccine”. This crisis affects humanity in its entirety: almost 8 billion people. We stand in solidarity with our fellow human beings and our children worldwide. Truth is a powerful instrument.”
Reviews
This is an in-depth resource of great interest if it is the wider perspective you are motivated to understand a little better, the author is very knowledgeable about geopolitics and this comes out in the way Covid is contextualized. —Dr. Mike Yeadon
In this war against humanity in which we find ourselves, in this singular, irregular and massive assault against liberty and the goodness of people, Chossudovsky’s book is a rock upon which to sustain our fight. –Dr. Emanuel Garcia
In fifteen concise science-based chapters, Michel traces the false covid pandemic, explaining how a PCR test, producing up to 97% proven false positives, combined with a relentless 24/7 fear campaign, was able to create a worldwide panic-laden “plandemic”; that this plandemic would never have been possible without the infamous DNA-modifying Polymerase Chain Reaction test – which to this day is being pushed on a majority of innocent people who have no clue. His conclusions are evidenced by renown scientists. —Peter Koenig
Professor Chossudovsky exposes the truth that “there is no causal relationship between the virus and economic variables.” In other words, it was not COVID-19 but, rather, the deliberate implementation of the illogical, scientifically baseless lockdowns that caused the shutdown of the global economy. –David Skripac
A reading of Chossudovsky’s book provides a comprehensive lesson in how there is a global coup d’état under way called “The Great Reset” that if not resisted and defeated by freedom loving people everywhere will result in a dystopian future not yet imagined. Pass on this free gift from Professor Chossudovsky before it’s too late. You will not find so much valuable information and analysis in one place. –Edward Curtin
ISBN: 978-0-9879389-3-0, Year: 2022, PDF Ebook, Pages: 164, 15 Chapters
Price: $11.50 FREE COPY! Click here (docsend) and download.
You may also access the online version of the e-Book by clicking here.
We encourage you to support the eBook project by making a donation through Global Research’s DonorBox “Worldwide Corona Crisis” Campaign Page.
Global Research is a reader-funded media. We do not accept any funding from corporations or governments. Help us stay afloat. Click the image below to make a one-time or recurring donation.
No comments:
Post a Comment