ABOUT THAT HURRICANE IN JAMAICA…
Well... someone has finally said it. I did not want to because we've all seen the pictures of the horrid destruction in Jamaica, and heard of the loss of life. But I was certainly thinking it, and so were many others: if this storm was natural, then in the aftermath we have a typical example of disaster capitalism at work as "developers" move into pick up the ruined property at pennies on the dollar, in order to build out whatever kooky globalist agenda they have in mind there (which, in this case, is to turn the island into a "smart city'). If the storm was to any degree modified and manipulated technologically, the result is the same. For my part, I'm leaning definitely to the "modified and manipulated" side.
But according to this "X" post shared by V.T., there are now more and more people thinking along these lines. Normally, such thoughts would be entertained by people like Catherine Austin Fitts, or me, or Jerry Smith or Elana Freeland, or anyone else who has written or spoken over the years about the dangers of weather modification technologies. The ability to steer a storm like a tornado or a hurricane, to stall a storm over and area to create floods or droughts, and even to create such storms, or even to steer lightning may sound like the crudest and most sensationalistic science fiction, but a short glance at the technologies patents of things like ionospheric heaters mention such things in their patent filings, as a quick glance at the HAARP (High Altitude Auroral Research Program) reveals. And that patent was taken out in the 1980s. Do the math, and the speculation...
And that brings us to the "X" post:
Now, before we get to this post, let me remind the regular readers here of a basic "method" that I and others who argue that many of these disasters are not "acts of God" or of "nature" at all, but rather are planned events enabled by the covert deployment and operation of such weather modifying technologies. Our method may be boiled down to two essential steps: (1) prior political and/or financial activity to such an event, and (2) the event itself, which enables the political/cultural and/or financial activity and agenda. Thus, as examples, I have often pointed out the warnings to the Japanese
government prior to the Fukushima earthquake and tsunami, and the resulting reactor meltdown, that were given by the then US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates. The warnings were essentially a threat to the Japanese government not to pursue its demands to shut down the American base on Okinawa, and not to pursue a state visit of the Japanese Emperor to China. The Japanese government continued on course, and then the Fukushima event happened. The Japanese government abruptly changed course. Similarly, Catherine Austin Fitts has recounted on numerous occasions her mystification over a sudden sell-off of Indonesian sovereign securities that made no sense... until about a week later when the infamous Indonesian tsunami of 2004 occurred. The sell-off indicated prior knowledge, and the prior knowledge implied either a very sophisticated (and hidden) geophysical knowledge, or a technological capability, or both (after all, the technological knowledge would itself be based on a more sophisticated knowledge of geophysics).So with that template in mind, examine the following statements in the "X" post:
New aerial footage shows entire towns completely erased. Homes flattened, roads gone, 80% of the island still without power. The Prime Minister calls it “the worst destruction in our history.” Months before the storm, government leaders were already pushing Vision 2030 “Smart City” blueprints across Jamaica. Now the island’s in ruins… and those same plans are suddenly being fast-tracked. Paradise destroyed. Smart City approved. The worst storm in Jamaica’s history didn’t just destroy the island, it cleared the way for their new agenda. (Emphasis added)
In other words, the same patten is in evidence: prior agenda, and "enabling disaster".
Were this the only thing in evidence, however, we could all nod our heads sadly, and agree. But what is quite significant about this post is that it does not originate with any of us in the alternative research community - the Freelands, the Fitts's, the Nick Begiches or Jerry Smiths - who have been trying to warn about weather modification and manipulation technologies. This post is apparently originating from someone who simply has observed the same pattern, and drawn his (or her) own conclusions.
And that's a good thing, because it means more and more people are beginning to wake up and ask the right questions...and noticing the same agendas and people behind them. As we know from history, the phase that usually follows the phase of enlightenment, when the torchlights are lit, is usually the pitchfork phase...
See you on the flip side...
(If you enjoyed today's blog, please share it with your friends.)
No comments:
Post a Comment