A Republican Form of Government: Section 21 — Capacity of the People from Anna Von Reitz
Section 21 — Capacity
of the People
While the subject
matter of a case will often immediately determine the correct jurisdiction and
court to hear it, the issue of “capacity in which the Parties act” is by no
means as clear-cut, and requires due diligence.
Consider the sentence:
“Marc is one of the people who built the Cross River Bridge.” “Marc” is
obviously a man who helped build a bridge and he did so in an
unincorporated capacity, because the word “people” was used.
If we said, “Marc is
one of the persons who built the Cross River Bridge.” we would have an entirely
different flavor and meaning. This would imply that “Marc” is the name of a
corporation or business of some kind that was involved in building the bridge.
It’s the same name, but
different capacities are indicated. This applies all across the board: Marc
Allen Jones is a member of our football team. [Unincorporated Capacity].
Marc Allen Jones is
American. [Corporate Capacity — International Trade — International Land
Jurisdiction]
Marc Allen Jones, Inc.
provides tax accounting services. [Incorporated Capacity — International
Commerce — International Jurisdiction of the Sea]
We, too, can choose to
act in the capacity of one of the people (our national soil jurisdiction) or
one of the People (our international land jurisdiction) or as a Person
—(international sea jurisdiction or municipal jurisdiction).
When we act as one of
the People standing on our international land jurisdiction, we use a Trade
Name, like “John Michael Downing”. We use the same “style” of Proper Name while
operating as a “United States Person” in the international jurisdiction of the
sea.
It’s the same name, but
two different jurisdictions, two different capacities.
The entire Great Fraud
which has been worked against us and our country has hinged on that fact and
our employees accidentally-on-purpose misunderstanding the capacity in which we
are acting.
“John Michael Downing”,
one of the People of Minnesota, standing
“John Michael Downing” “U.S. Citizen”, acting in the capacity of a Person adrift on the international jurisdiction of the sea without a declared permanent domicile, has no guarantees, no treaties, and is presumed to be a Ward of the Territorial State of Minnesota or the Municipal STATE OF MINNESOTA. He has no constitutional guarantees or protections at all.
Those intent upon plundering and pillaging us have, of course, chosen to interpret the capacity in which we are acting to suit themselves and their purposes. They have been eager to mis- characterize us as “U.S. Citizens” living in Territorial “States of States” or Municipal STATES OF STATES instead of as Americans living in actual States of the Union — and to abuse us accordingly.
Updated: May 22, 2019 Table of Contents Page 89 of 209
The Jural Assembly Handbook By: Anna Von Reitz
When you knowledgeably take exception to this
self-interested presumption and rebut it with pre-established evidence and join
your State Jural Assembly, these foreign British Territorial and Municipal
Courts are in a bind to excuse their predatory actions against their actual
Employers and Hosts.
The shameful and
criminal nature of their activities becomes apparent — but it only becomes
apparent when you educate yourselves and formally declare your identity and
capacity as a State Citizen, one of the People of your State, and of The United
States of America.
Many Americans are fond
of spouting off about “We, the People...” but they fail to recognize the
jurisdiction and capacity that the “People” are operating in. There have been
many arguments about the use of a capital “P” on the word “People” — but it is actually
very simple.
One of the oddities of
international jurisdiction, both land and sea, is that it is populated entirely
by legal fiction entities — businesses, corporations, and the officers and offices
of such businesses and corporations.
So, when the people of
this country occupy their international land jurisdiction, and inhabit their
States of the Union, they act in the capacity of Jurors or occupy other Offices
of their State and as a group, act as the People of their States and as The
People of The United States of America — a lawful unincorporated Federation of
their States.
The State itself is a
Corporate entity — but it is unincorporated. We see this concept whenever we
encounter a small independent business — “Jake’s Dog Wash”, for example, is
“corporate” in that it is a legal fiction with a Proper Name, but it is not
“incorporated” — it did not ask any other corporation to adopt it or give it
privileges and doesn’t function under a charter granted by any other
corporation.
Our own Given Names are
naturally in the same status as our States — and operate in the same Corporate,
but unincorporated capacity as our States of the Union and Jake’s Dog Wash.
Unfortunately, the same
style of Proper Name can be applied to Persons operating in the international
jurisdiction of the sea as incorporated franchises of foreign Territorial and
Municipal corporations, such as the British Territorial “State of Minnesota” or the Roman (Catholic)
Municipal “STATE OF
MINNESOTA”.
And it is up to you to
declare and provide evidence of the capacity in which you are choosing to act.
Our Forefathers sought
to cut through this conundrum and avoid the possible attendant abuses of our
people by the simple device of allowing us no other citizenship apart from State
Citizenship. We either is or we ain’t.
Once you become a Juror
and Member of the your State Jural Assembly you are operating as a State
Citizen and by definition no longer operating in any capacity as a “U.S.
Citizen”, voluntary or otherwise. This is because the States do not allow Dual
Citizenship, and this stands as a safeguard for you against usurpation, false
claims in commerce, and other evils that can otherwise be “presumed” against
you by their foreign corporate tribunals.
You can operate as a State
National or as a State Citizen, but you cannot at the same time operate as a
U.S. Citizen or Citizen of the United States. The terms are mutually exclusive
for our purposes.
Updated: May 22, 2019 Table of Contents Page 90 of 209
The Jural Assembly Handbook By: Anna Von Reitz
Understandably, those who have benefited by
mis-characterizing us and being able to abuse us by presuming that we are
“voluntarily” acting in the capacity of “U.S. Citizens” are loathe to give up
their pretenses and eager to obstruct our progress.
Our runaway Employees
do not want to submit to the yoke of their Employers and do not want to respect
and fulfill the binding treaties and constitutional service contracts that they
have with our States of the Union. The tail has been wagging the dog for a long
time and they want to continue spending our money and hypothecating debt
against our assets “for” us.
Many Americans and
other people around the world have complained that “the world is upside down”,
that those we employ to protect us are abusing us instead, that our courts
provide anything but justice, that our medical care has been commandeered by
Big Pharma, that our churches have become incorporated businesses more
concerned with managing their investments than teaching any moral precepts.
You are not imagining
things. The world is upside down. It is upside down because the employees are
running the employers ragged. So it is up to you to assert your natural
birthright capacity and political status, to accept your responsibilities as an
American — not as a “U.S. Citizen” — and to set things to right in this
country.
Nobody can object to
this, as nobody has standing to object. Nobody can accuse you of being in
“insurrection” nor “rebellion” once you firmly and clearly and knowledgeably
declare your political status and the capacity in which you are acting.
In fact, it is our
“federal employees” — both Territorial and Municipal — who have flirted with
insurrection and trespassed against the people of this country.
It is now your role and
responsibility to act in the capacity of State Jural Assembly Members — as
Jurors and as other Officers of the State and County Courts that the people of
this country are owed, to put an end to any false and self-interested claims
that we have “abandoned” our country, and act to enforce the Public and Organic
Law.
—Posted: Tuesday,
February 5, 2019
Updated: May 22, 2019 Table of Contents Page 91 of 209
The Jural Assembly Handbook By: Anna Von Reitz
Section 22 — Overcoming Indoctrination
No comments:
Post a Comment