We pushed back.
That
is what is happening, and no, the "we" here has nothing to do with
innocent Americans taking to the streets to protest rampant government
craziness or misguidedly protesting Donald Trump as if he was "the"
problem.
Donald
Trump is on the receiving end of a situation that started during the
Obama Administration, so please, don't blame him for what he inherited,
and we will try to maintain the same mercy toward other politicians and
bureaucrats.
Including all the Federal and State of State and District Court justices and judges who are suddenly stepping down.
What
is actually happening is that these justices and judges are all running
Administrative Courts under colorable Admiralty Law. And they haven't
been administering justice; they've been administering foreign estate
trusts that shouldn't exist in most cases. On top of that, they've been
doing what they do incorrectly. And profiting from their "mistakes".
The
only other courts operating at this time are British Equity Courts that
shouldn't be addressing Americans, and our own American Common Law
Courts that are just now being restored at the State Assembly level.
These
Administrative Courts have been accepting cases and mis- administering
them, resulting in violations of trust law and aggravated identity theft
--- and not only are they bungling the administration of these cases
and taking part in the crimes, by not doing the accounting owed to each
one of these cases, they are the ones making it look like the creditor
is the debtor.
Then,
using this "lapse" on their part to: (1) front false claims in commerce
against the victim, they (2) evade their own tax debts for the unjust
enrichment they receive as a result of this criminal activity.
This
has been going on since 1865 and went into hyperdrive with the
Sixteenth Amendment (which was never ratified by our States of the
Union).
So
all these judges and justices have been acting as bankers and not doing
their jobs, is what it amounts to. Worse than that, they have been
promoting a form of fraud and racketeering.
When
they don't do their jobs, and instead promote property crimes against
the American people, they get fired, they get jail time, they are
looking at a career change big time, they are looking at the loss of
their pensions, and they and the courts and political subunits they work
for are looking at fines. Lots of fines. Big fines. Huge fines.
The
size of the fines coming back to us doesn't make us feel good, because
these yahoos are cutting the checks from our own trust funds and
managing a trust that shouldn't even exist.
That's another whole problem.
But
all these sudden departures from the bench? It has nothing to do with
Trump or his Administration. It has to do with them and the "judicial
courts" they run being caught racketeering and evading the IRS --- and
unlike the rest of us, these guys actually do owe Federal Income
Taxes.
You
will see a lot of District Attorneys disappearing, too. You will see a
lot of court cases being dropped, exonerated, and disappeared as the
rats try to cover their tracks and reduce the fines they owe.
None
of it has to do with Trump. He isn't bringing the actions against
them. They are just using him as a convenient scapegoat and excuse for
their own dishonesty and/or lack of competence.
As
we have and will put it to the government employees at all levels --
there are only two (2) choices: (1) you knew about the fraud and
pillaging and did nothing about it, becoming an accomplice to it, or (2)
you didn't know and you're incompetent.
They
are getting the same choice they have given us every two, four or six
years since they substituted the political party system for the public
elections we are owed --- would you like raspberry or chocolate @#$%3?
Given
that choice, and the likelihood that they will go to jail and/or be
bankrupted if they don't -- or even if they do, based on their past
performance -- they are stepping down.
We aren't sorry to see them go.
These
prosecutions of the judges and judicial courts and district attorneys
are part of why the Internal Revenue Service and the US Tax Court are
still around --- to assist us in prosecuting these crooked federal and
state-of-state court officers.
Expect
to see entire courts vacated and locking their doors, and then entire
administrative court systems vanishing like circus acts.
It's
okay. The only valuable service they were providing was renting space
in office buildings and we can use the space ourselves for our own
courts. And we can find other tenants.
This
country has suffered under the scourge of these "carpetbagger courts"
operated by British Crown commercial corporations since May of 1865.
Take
a deep breath. Try to imagine how much they have embezzled from average
people and from our legitimate government. Just try.
They
have only one choice -- do the accounting and do it right, so that the
living people occupy their rightful place as the creditor and are not
harmed by the charges brought by the administrative courts, or quit, go
back to England or the District of Columbia, and stay there.
Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents; Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger - Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
November 17th 2025
------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
International Public Notice: For the International Court of Justice About Armorica
By Anna Von Reitz
Yesterday
we explained the military history--- the relatively recent military
history--- of that part of North America known as The United States.
Once
the American Government (1776-1783) secured victory over the British
Empire, progress Westward was via a Territorial Government process set
forth in the Northwest Ordinance, with the British Territorial
Government taking the lead in exploration and initial settlement as a
result of treaty provisions mandating this arrangement.
The
Native Nations that were not conquered in the French and Indian War
were successively met in battle with the British Territorial Government
operating as the United States of America, Incorporated, a rogue service
vendor of the actual American Government.
Our American Government has been at peace since 1814 and flies the peacetime flag.
Anytime
that what appears to be the American war flag has been seen between
1814 and today, it was a Title IV flag being flow by the United States
Government. Not the American Government.
So, the Native Nations thought they were fighting us, when in fact they were fighting British Territorial Mercenary forces.
While
we are cleaning up these "mistaken identity" issues, let us also clear
up the genesis of the name "America" associated with our country and two
continents, both North and South America.
The
name "America" comes from "Armorica" a Celtic Kingdom of far western
France that has more generally come to be known as part of "Normandy".
See the map and flag photo attached.
Armorica
has played a central part in the Norman Conquest of Britain and the
trade and colonization of North and South America, but as Britain
desperately wanted to keep this role hidden, they have spread a popular
tale about the name, "America" coming from Amerigo Vespucci, an Italian
mapmaker -----and mum has been the word about the ancient and honorable
Kingdom of Armorica.
Armorica
is an actual and factual historical Celtic Kingdom and it should be
self-evident that this is the origin of the name "America".
British
attempts to avoid French claims superseding their own property claims
in England, Ireland, Scotland, and Wales, as well as North and South
America, notwithstanding, the claims are valid and they exist. They are
the basis for the Norman Conquest and the American Revolution, too.
The
Brits don't want to admit the Norman Conquest, either, but even long
prior to that, if anyone was paying attention, it should also be obvious
that the very name "Britain" is a transliteration of "Breton".
The
French Celts have an ancient and honorable claim to Britain and all
British property interests, which they enforced during the Norman
Conquest and the American Revolution. This is why Marquis de Lafayette
showed up and spent the equivalent of millions of dollars in support of
the Colonists.
The continents and the countries that bear the name "America" are named after "Armorica" one of the ancient Celtic Kingdoms.
So,
whether you look at it in terms of military conquest by the Americans,
or conquest by the British Empire, the Brits are owned by the French
Celts anyway, and James Clinton Belcher, "the" Belle Cher, is the
hereditary leader of the French Celts --- the Armoricans and thus, the
Americans, too.
This is why the Belcher family coat of arms is self-evidently the foundation of the Great Seal of this country.
Let
us all dispense with the lies and avoidance and childish
misinterpretations of fact and history, and simply admit what is true:
the French Celts have owned "Britain" since the Dark Ages; they owned it
again during the Norman Conquest, and on a different continent, they
owned it during the American Revolution.
It's
our Kingdom's name attached to this country. It's our Kingdom's name
attached to two world continents. It's our right by military conquest
to own Britain (Breton) and it's our name, "Armorica" that is the basis
of "America".
It's our Great Seal that stands among the nations.
All
this other craziness by the Brits trying to chisel and defraud everyone
is not something we condoned, and all their efforts to obscure the
actual history notwithstanding --- Armorica exists, it's one of our
ancient Kingdoms, and we claim it and all that exists in its name. We
have welcomed the Native Nations as brothers and we have Blood Treaties
going back centuries that we honor.
To be family should always be sufficient, and we believe it is.
Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents; Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger - Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
November 17th 2025
------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
International Public Notice: At Sea for 300 Years
By Anna Von Reitz
Britain,
which hasn't actually operated properly under its Constitutional
Government in 300 years, is suffering a "constitutional crisis".
In
order for Britain to operate under a Constitutional Monarchy it is
necessary for the Monarchy to be run as a lawful government and not as a
commercial corporation.
The
Constitution in Britain is framed under Land Law, and just as it has
done in America and throughout the Commonwealth, Westminster has been
operating under the Law of the Sea, instead.
So
it's rather silly to speak of any other "constitutional crisis" until
the British people wake up and realize that they have been cheated out
of a constitutional monarchy from the get-go and that is the more
important "constitutional crisis" ---- but the present situation is
worth
looking at.
Under
British law the Monarchy is to keep its paws off politics and not
engage in political influencing and debate. They've done a fairly good
job at that over the years, but the present situation pushed things over
the edge as the uber-liberal Labour Party government under Prime
Minister Starmer actually and openly promoted undermining the monarchy,
stripping it of its remaining powers, and beginning a process of
incremental seizure of Crown estate land.
This
is a serious breach of the quid pro quo allowing both the government of
Westminster and the Crown to co-exist. This was an open declaration of
intent to get rid of the monarchy entirely in favor of some ill-defined
"modern" government totally under the control of Parliament and the
political parties.
Starmer might as well have set off a grenade under his own chair.
At
last report, the Labour Party has lost more than half of its support in
the past 48 hours and the voters have not been migrating to the
conventional Conservative Party --- they've mostly skipped right over to
Nigel Farage's Reform Party.
Chaos
reigns. Starmer stepped down -- was forced to do so by circumstances
beyond his control, and the process is engaged to seat a new
governmental body. Most of Britain seems to be heaving a sigh of relief
and appears eager to put the Starmer Government in the rearview mirror,
with some kicks and boos on their way out.
Starmer
advocated stripping the monarchy of its remaining powers, replacing the
Privy Council with an elected body, dissolving the House of Lords, and
seizure of royal estates for development of things like cheap housing
projects.
The
Labour Party in Britain just committed suicide and did so with aplomb.
Leaked documents indicate that Starmer had a well-planned three-part
assault on the traditional government all worked out, but he wasn't
disclosing the complete destruction of the monarchy to the Public. He
was trying to sneak it incrementally using a bait-and-swap strategy.
If
Starmer had been successful all the guarantees of the Constitution and
all checks and back-ups on the power of Parliament would have been
erased. Britain would have switched its allegiance from a monarch to a
political party, instead.
Starmers'
move is widely interpreted as a violation of public trust and the
letter of the law. There's talk of bringing treason charges against
him, personally, and outrage that he had "nothing better to do" than
attack the Royals when the people of Britain face an overt invasion of
immigrants, rampant unemployment, lack of adequate affordable medical
care, and in many cases are going without adequate heat and lights and
food.
These
grim conditions are not overall being reported in the international
press but the cost of the political party system and the secretive
setting aside of the land jurisdiction government(s) and the
constitutional
monarchy along with them, is having its due effect --- funneling more
and more money into elite pockets at the expense of Britain's working
class and retirees has a cost.
The
British Government, like the United States Government, has not actually
been running under a Constitutional government framework, because it
hasn't been operating on the jurisdiction of the land.
We've
detailed exactly how successive monarchs have given the appearance of
upholding the Christian religion and operating as a Constitutional
Monarchy, while operating "the Firm" as the actual government and
profiting from an unholy trade in baptismal and birth certificates.
The
present "crisis" is, therefore, calling forth an effort to change the
color of lipstick on a pig, without dealing with the deeper and more
important malfunction of the overall government for the past 300 years.
Who
knows? Perhaps someone will finally notice that, hey, there's
something here that goes deeper and wider than Starmer and his Labour
Party allies. There's a dozen generations-worth of operating the
British Government outside its constitutional limits, an evasion of
contract, trust, and duty, that has decimated the population of the
British homelands, taxed the British people to death under False
Pretenses, and made a mockery of the justice system.
And
now, this has finally resulted in lack of heat and lights and food and
medical care for the British people, in the midst of an immigrant
invasion created by failed corporation policies.
The
owners of the Firm, the Royal Family and their Allies, the Committee of
300, have shown Starmer the butt end of the real power behind the
throne --- a commercial empire, not a constitutional monarchy --- which
has sacked the Labour Party in a single night.
We're
not sad to see Starmer go. He's like a mini-skirt in an era of
Edwardian hems, still trying to push the Globalist Agenda and seemingly
unaware that it's already dead.
The
British version of "free trade" --- free trade for Britain, that is,
everyone else pay through the nose --tamped down with plenty of lies and
new excuses to promote still more taxation via the Green New Deal, has
run its course.
We
are all left with a Britain that is confused and woozy and way off
course, solving the wrong problems and still failing to do anything that
can solve the actual problems.
Let's
all just observe one thing, one ineluctable, observable fact of great
importance to the people of the Home Islands: Britain as a whole --
England, Scotland, Wales, and even Ireland --- have been in a
free-spiraling population collapse since the Crimean War.
The
native populations of the British Isles have failed to replace
themselves for over a hundred years, thanks to declining health, severe
ravages of war, poor quality food, increased sterility, and other
factors brought about by corporate policies too insane and self-serving
to contemplate.
To
serve it off, the British public is being warned and harangued about
the dangers of overpopulation and suffering waves of de facto
repopulation via immigration, without which the housing market would
collapse along with the British domestic economy, because there simply
wouldn't be enough demand for houses and enough people to fill jobs
without all those immigrants.
The
British Government is now in the position of a farmer who has culled
and slaughtered its best and brightest and is left with a decimated
"herd" --- but instead of minding their business at home and caring for
the remainder and building back, they've launched off on the globalist
Quick-Fix of importing labor and using this artificial source of demand
for goods and services to limp a semblance of any economy along, at the
cost of a huge increase in public assistance payments.
The
only way that they've been able to sustain this has been via access to
the United States and Commonwealth welfare funds, which is causing a
domino effect in which they are, indeed, to paraphrase Margaret
Thatcher, "running out of other people's money" -- a dilemma that she
was able to foresee developing in the 1980's.
With
the political parties now turning on the monarchy and trying to
identify it as the problem, and the monarchy biting back on the
political parties, there is one other knotty domestic problem.
Lady
Diana Spencer had her own claim to the throne through Mary Tudor which
is why the anti-monarchy forces are spreading all these rumors to the
effect that the princes don't know who their Daddy or Mummy is. The
constant rumble in the British Press about "DNA tests" that always fail
full disclosure are the smoke from this fire, as Diana protected her
sons, both of them, and gave them a valid claim to the vacated throne
quite apart from their Father, there are continuing rumors that Diana
was not their Mother.
We
view it this way --- William and Harry have a valid claim through their
parents, period, however things sort out, and the Royal Family would do
best by just being honest and letting everything sort out according to
the truth --- and then, finally, sit down on the throne of England and
the throne of Scotland and the throne of Ireland and everybody occupy
their own land jurisdictions again. Finally.
Three hundred years away from home is long enough.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger - Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
November 17th 2025
------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
No comments:
Post a Comment