How Much Damage Has Mass Vaccination Done to Society?The data that shows the less appreciated and forgotten consequences of vaccination.Story at a Glance: •A
long history exists of a wave of severe injuries following new
vaccinations being introduced to the market. In most cases, those
injuries were swept under the rug to protect the business.
As fate would have it, my wish came true, and without knowing me, Steve Kirsch gave me the opportunity to begin introducing that forgotten history to the world. This happened after he chose to publish an article I wrote illustrating how the trucker protests were identical to smallpox protests that had happened more than a century before and then for reasons I still do not understand, encouraged his readers to subscribe to me so I would start writing here. Note: At the time I chose the username “A Midwestern Doctor” (for the smallpox article), I did not put much thought into it as I was never expecting to use it again. Over the years, I’ve noticed again and again that a vaccine disaster happens which injuries many in a very similar way, it gets swept under the rug (often by officials who are quite conflicted in their decision to do so), and then the same thing happens again a few decades later. Given that we give dozens of vaccines to each member of society, this raises an obvious question—what is that doing to society? A Brief History of Vaccine DisastersIn 1798, the smallpox vaccine hit the market. Once it hit the market, it was observed to frequently cause smallpox outbreaks (rather than prevent them) and to cause a wide range of debilitating and complex injuries that many of the doctors had never seen before (and many of which I believe were examples of “blood stasis”).
Curiously, rather than recognizing this was a mistake, most of the
medical profession endorsed the smallpox vaccine, and governments around
the world mandated it as cases kept on increasing, leading to a
downward spiral that was eventually broken by mass public protest
against those mandates. Having looked at it extensively, I am of the
opinion the smallpox vaccine reshaped the trajectory of humanity’s
health and was an inflection point in the era of chronic illness. •First, in addition to sometimes being directly contaminated with the disease causing organism (e.g., yellow fever or tuberculosis) and causing the illness, vaccines would often cause a temporary immune suppression which lead to disease outbreaks in those vaccinated (discussed here). However, each time this happened, rather than it being seen as a sign we needed to dial back vaccination, it was interpreted as not enough people being vaccinated and harsher and harsher vaccine mandates being instituted to enact that policy or new vaccines being created to address the existing damage of vaccination (e.g., the DPT vaccine frequently caused polio outbreaks). •Second,
public health officials and vaccine designers were well aware of the
injuries vaccines were causing, but since no other treatments existed
for the disease, regrettably deemed this to be a necessary sacrifice for
the greater good and hence covered the injuries up so the public would
continue to vaccinate. However, while I understand their perspective, it
rested on a faulty premise—effective treatments did exist for the
illnesses (e.g., in 1920 it was known IV hydrogen peroxide could treat severe infections and in 1928 it was known that ultraviolet blood irradiation could treat many otherwise incurable infections). In
the 1940s-1950s, the original pertussis vaccine (DPT) entered the
market. This vaccine excelled at causing brain inflammation and a
variety of concerning differences were seen in the generations born
after its mass adoption in America. Note: since this time other vaccines (e.g., RSV and annual COVID vaccinations) were also added to the childhood schedule (but fortunately MAHA managed to recently do the impossible and remove COVID from it). In
1990, an experimental anthrax vaccine was deployed upon the military to
prepare them for invading Iraq. While the war was non-eventful (Saddam
did not use anthrax and it was likely the most one-sided conflict in
history), the anthrax vaccine severely injured over 100,000 servicemen
(leading to what was known as Gulf War Syndrome). Despite these issues,
individuals within the Department of Defense who were committed to
funding their bioweapons defense program mandated it—leading to severe injuries throughout the military and widespread rebellion against this edict. In 2021, the COVID vaccine hit the market and caused an unprecedented amount of injury (e.g., many noticed healthy adults dying “suddenly” and large polls showed 34% of vaccine recipients reported minor side effects while 7% reported major ones severely impacting their quality of life). Fortunately or unfortunately, the rate of injuries from it was so high that unlike the past disasters, the mass media could no longer sweep it under the rug, which eventually culminated in MAHA ascending as a political force and RFK Jr. being put in charge of the agency which has orchestrated the vaccine disaster for decades. In my eyes, one of the most important points to take from this history is that at the time each of these happened, the medical profession and public were struck by the explosion of these new diseases (and their immense social cost) but before long, became acclimated to them and forgot they had ever emerged in the first place. The Harms of VaccinationThere is a large body of evidence suggesting vaccines are either solely responsible for, or one of the primary things responsible for the tsunami of chronic illness which has followed their ever-increasing adoption. Unfortunately, while there is a great deal of evidence suggesting a problem exists, the effects of the vaccine schedule have never been formally studied and instead concerns are simply dismissed by a chorus that echoes “vaccines are safe and effective.” This has naturally led to calls for the vaccines to be formally tested, but this is always rejected under the argument that vaccines are “so safe and effective” it would be ‘unethical’ to withhold them from trial participants who need to receive a placebo and expose them to the severe harm vaccine preventable diseases could cause (despite the fact very few of the vaccines on the market are for life-threatening diseases which still exist within the United States). As
such, to get around this embargo, a variety of independent studies
(which all faced stiff opposition) have been completed that compared
unvaccinated populations to vaccinated ones, all of which show profound
harm results from vaccination. However, rather than be listened to,
these studies are all dismissed because they “have no placebo” (despite
placebo trials being impossible to conduct). In lieu of placebo trials, we are instead told large databases can be relied upon to monitor for vaccine injuries. However, with the exception of VAERS (which is continually discredited by the media, government and medical profession), all of those databases are secret to the point the government has fought for years in court to protect their release (e.g., “to protect patient privacy”) and told us to trust their assessments of them. Note: through a series of lawsuits, we were able to get access to some of the CDC’s V-Safe data on the COVID vaccines. In addition to this showing massive harm from the COVID vaccines, access to the raw data also showed that the Lancet summary of V-Safe’s data had distorted it to provide an illusion of safety not shown by the data. Access to the CDC’s vaccine injury database (the VSD) hence has been a longstanding goal of the vaccine safety community and one of the things RFK pledged to do if he ever assumed office. Remarkably however, right before he got access to it “rouge” H.H.S. employees decided to delete it to prevent this from happening. All of this hence suggests that either: •The existing evidence shows that vaccines are incredibly dangerous to the point it is an existential threat to the vaccine program and hence all measures possible have been taken to prevent it from being disclosed. As you might guess, I believe the latter is the most probable, particularly since: 1. There have been documented instances of the CDC altering studies to cover up evidence of vaccine harm (e.g., autism). 3.
Despite relentless attempts to keep them from emerging, there are
numerous retrospective studies of large medical datasets which each show
vaccination results in a significantly increased incidence of chronic
disease results from vaccination. For example, a recent study
of 99 million people showed the COVID vaccines were 2-7 times more
likely than a typical vaccine to cause a variety of life-threatening
illnesses and we now have large datasets linking to the COVID vaccines
to many conditions like myocarditis, cognitive impairment, along with many autoimmune, musculoskeletal and psychiatric disorders. 5. I periodically learn of medical practices that have low rates of vaccination and also have much lower rates of chronic illness in their patients. 6. Many colleagues and I frequently observe what we believe to be the harms of vaccination in our patients. Vaccine Injury DatasetsDespite the embargo on conducting or publishing studies demonstrating evidence of vaccine harm, a few still have been done. They are as follows: Paul ThomasPaul
Thomas MD, an Oregon pediatrician had a practice with a large number of
unvaccinated or under-vaccinated children, and (like many of the other
practices with similar patient populations) noticed that the
unvaccinated children had dramatically better health. He thus decided to
compare their medical records to those of variably vaccinated children
and published the data in a study (which, as you are not supposed to violate that embargo, cost him his medical license and resulted in the study being retracted for spurious reasons). In his study, to compare the health of 2763 vaccinated children and the 561 unvaccinated children born into his practice, he plotted how many total visits each group had for a variety of issues as their age increased (e.g., how many visits for asthma in total had occurred in vaccinated children who were 1000 days old or younger) and then compared the two (with the unvaccinated group’s visits being equalized by multiplying them by 4.9 [2763/561]). This data in turn suggested vaccinations were the primary agent responsible for the epidemic of chronic diseases in our society. Likewise, when Thomas compared how likely a child was to come in for an office visit for a variety of health concerns, he found the greater the number of total vaccines a child received (which varied widely in his practice), the more likely they were to require an office visit for a variety of conditions. Note: the full size version of this chart can be viewed here. In this chart, pay special attention to the fact these charts include ADHD (which was not found in any of the unvaccinated patients), behavioral issues, speech issues, social issues, learning delay and developmental autism. Brian Hooker and Neil MillerHooker and Miller performed a similar study to Paul Thomas. However, in their study, they evaluated data from 3 different pediatric practices, and analyzed the 2,047 who had been born within the medical practice between November 2005 to June 2015 that had not received one of the selected diagnoses prior to their 1st birthday. They found: Note: the above chart only compares the children within the sample who were at least 5 years old. When younger children were compared to each other, smaller increases were seen in the rates of each of these chronic diseases as there had been less time for the chronic effects of repeated vaccinations to manifest (which helps to explain why vaccines studies stop monitoring for side effects shortly after vaccination). The
stark differences in the rates of adverse injuries (and lack of chronic
illness in groups like the Amish who do not vaccinate) have also
inspired a variety of independent surveys to be commissioned which
assessed if this link indeed exists. It should also be noted that there
is a viable mechanism that ties almost every condition listed in this
section to vaccination. The 2007 Generation Rescue surveyIn 2007, Generation Rescue (GR), an organization that is trying to alert Americans that vaccines cause autism, hired a third party polling firm (SurveyUSA) and paid them $200,000 to do a survey of 17,674 children (991 of whom were completely unvaccinated). It found: The Homeschool SurveyIn 2017, a survey of mothers of homeschooled children from Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi and Oregon was carried out and then published. Since there are a significant number of unvaccinated children who homeschool, it was possible to compare 261 unvaccinated children to 405 fully or partially vaccinated children. Its results were as follows: Note: since the three illnesses vaccination were supposed to prevent decreased (whereas the others increased), that data supports the validity of this survey. The Control Group SurveyBetween April 2019 to June 2020, the Control Group attempted to locate as many unvaccinated as possible to survey their health. Ultimately, they received 1544 completed surveys (1482 were from the US and represented 48 states). Once this data was obtained it was published in an easy to read 21 page set of charts that compared the rates of these events to their general occurrence in the population and a more detailed 85-page report. Like the previous groups, they found a massive increase in chronic illness following vaccination, and additionally, demonstrated that vaccinating while pregnant or a newborn receiving the vitamin K shot (about half of which contain aluminum) is not entirely safe. Steve KirschMany people in tech believe the solution to all of humanity’s problems is more data. This echoes the belief of the founder of evidence-based medicine (which has become the current dogma of modern medicine), who argued that having medical practice guided by the best available scientific evidence was essential as it would eliminate bad medical practices that had become entrenched medical dogmas and replace them with evidence-based approaches that saved lives. While he was correct, like those in Silicon Valley, this approach was also incredibly naive as it failed to account for the obvious loophole—burying any data that provided inconvenient conclusions. As such, “the best available evidence” typically ends up being the best funded evidence, not the best evidence and at this point, trillions are spent each year to monopolize that evidence. To
illustrate: our electronic medical records which doctors are forced to
spend a significant amount of each day entering data into collect an
absolutely massive amount of medical data. Yet—despite countless pleas
to, we almost never mine that data to determine what constitutes the
best medical practice (e.g., which drug produces a better outcome for a
condition or which pharmaceuticals are more likely to harm than help a
patient). Over the last few years, I’ve gotten to know Steve Kirsch and would argue the following traits hold true for him: Note:
I am sure many of you know someone like this. Steve however is unique
because I don’t know anyone else in this movement like that who has also
been anywhere near as successful in the professional sphere as he has. I
am hence incredibly grateful he decided to pick up the vaccine issue as
we’d been waiting for decades for someone like him to do that (which is
essentially why I’ve worked so hard to support him much in the same way
we’ve helped Ron Johnson—the first US Senator in history to fight for vaccine safety). Additionally, he has also leveraged his large following to conduct numerous surveys on vaccine injury. While the initial ones were targeted at the COVID-19 vaccines, as he became aware of the scope of the problem we were facing, he also chose to do the same for the childhood vaccines. From this, he found similar results to the previously mentioned parties. For example in his first survey of ~10,000 people, he again demonstrated the dose-response relationship between vaccination and chronic illness: Recently, Kirsch completed a larger survey of ~13,000 people which had similar results to his previous survey and the ones mentioned above. Note: Steve Kirsch let me extensively examine his raw data and recently had an outside statistician assess and affirm the validity of the above survey’s data. Hopefully, this shocking data provides some context to why many are so ardently opposed to vaccination and why there is such a strong embargo on ever letting any of this data get out. Instead we’ve allowed an ever increasing number of vaccines to enter the market which in turn has led to us needing to spend trillions of dollars each year “treating” the complications of those vaccines. What I believe is the most important to understand about these statistics is that they only represent the tip of the iceberg, as the surveyors were only looking for the easy to observe conditions most obviously linked to vaccination (the “significant reactions”), much in the same way conventional vaccine studies only assess for a few “rare” conditions linked to vaccination. This, in turn, is reflective of a fundamental principle in toxicology—extreme reactions to a toxin (sudden death) are much rarer than minor ones. In the next section, we will consider the middle of this bell curve—the moderate reactions that are rarely linked to vaccination.
Note: in this article, I reviewed the evidence showing autism is a form of encephalitis with many accompanying neurological injuries. Remarkably, while vaccines “don’t cause autism” one of the only injuries acknowledged by the 1986 Vaccine act was MMR (the vaccine linked to autism) causing encephalitis. Minimal Brain DamageThe 1985 Book, DPT: A Shot in the Dark is arguably the most influential book ever written for the vaccine safety movement (e.g., it was responsible for rallying Congress to do something about the epidemic of sudden deaths and brain damage being created by the original DPT vaccine). What is less known is that in 1990, one of its authors, Harris Coulter, then published a book that alleged that vaccines were responsible for the widespread increase in crime sweeping the nation. Note: I consider this book to be one of the most eye opening and disturbing books I’ve ever read (e.g., as a child, I saw what it described happen in people I knew quite well). Since some of its content is quite graphic (and because the book is hard to find) I am including a copy of it at the end of this article for those who would like to read it (which I would strongly encourage you to do). As there are too many references to list here, to locate them, please consult the book’s bibliography. The author (who as his obituary shows was a lovely human being and gifted researcher) in this book argued that: 3. That it was very easy to miss that this was happening. For example, Coulter cited two different authorities on this subject who said:
4. Many of complications of encephalitis (e.g., a myriad of learning disabilities or psychiatric and neurologic illnesses such as autism) became dramatically more common in our society starting in the 1940s and 1950s, a rise which paralleled increased vaccinations and increased vaccine injuries (predominantly as a result of DPT—the vaccine most associated with brain injury) and could be directly observed rippling through society as these children grew up. For example:
5. Autism (a condition which follows vaccination and first emerged after DPT entered the market), has a strong association with many of the consequences of encephalitis (e.g., cognitive disability and cranial nerve paralysis). 8. In the 1950s, a condition termed “minimal brain damage” [MBD] was coined (with the defining characteristic of it being hyperactivity), which before long became “perhaps the most common, and certainly one of the most time-consuming problems in current pediatric practice”. The symptoms of MBD (as defined by America’s Public Health Service and the American Psychiatric Association) have a significant overlap with what was seen after encephalitis, DPT injuries, and what was associated with autism.
Note: as a point of clarification, autistic children typically do not demonstrate cruel or sadistic behaviors (as that is only one possible outcome of brain damage). However, they do share many of the other traits found in post-encephalitic individuals. 9.
There was a wide range of consequences of encephalitis. Many of these
were subtle and insidiously altered the child’s personality, commonly
making them hyperactive, hypersexual less empathetic, and generally
uncomfortable with their environment. Many of these traits in turn were
also seen in violent criminals and disruptive children (who frequently
then went on to become violent criminals). 12. Coulter cited numerous statistics showing a small minority of the population committed a majority of the violent crimes that occurred and evidence showing the crimes in the post DPT era were often much more brutal and sociopathic. The traits commonly associated with MBD in turn were as follows: •Hyperactivity (this was by far the most commonly associated trait with MBD). •Hypersexuality.
Often this sexuality was detached from having any type of connection to
the other person and sometimes gave rise to a variety of unusual sexual
fetishes or preferences. •Headaches (which sometimes necessitated banging their head against a wall). •Appetitive
disturbances (e.g., anorexia or bulimia). It was noted that this
complication of encephalitis far more frequently affected females,
whereas hyperactivity more frequently affected males. •Being highly disruptive and violent from a very young age. Note: in the second half of this series (which can be read here), I discuss the changes in personality which specifically affect human relationships (e.g., the ability to emotionally connect with one’s partner or one’s gender identity) as there seems to be a fairly profound effect here that has real life data to substantiate it. A Vaccinated SocietyAssuming Coulter’s thesis is correct, the implications are sobering, and in turn, many readers here (who recognized witnessing what I described unfold in their own lives) felt the same way. As so much could be said about this subject, I will only share a few of my most pertinent thoughts. I then conducted a poll (to a readership which was much smaller at the time) that found: •I
believe the gravest violation of medical ethics is if the
pharmaceutical harms those who never consented to taking it. This is why
I have put such a heavy focus on both the COVID-19 vaccine shedding and the frequent tendency of SSRI antidepressants to cause episodes of mass violence (e.g., school shootings).
•There is presently no incentive to stop this as so much money can be made selling treatments for these diseases (which are often very harmful), while if the mistake is ever admitted, far too many people have too much to lose. This in turn is why we keep on having worse and worse vaccine tragedies inflicted upon the world. •All
of the data here shows why ACIP has not only a moral obligation but
also a societal obligation to consider if the vaccines they approve are
beneficial and necessary enough to outweigh the real harm each one can
cause, particularly as more and more of them are given in succession.
Put differently, I have full confidence that if all vaccines were
banned, while some vaccine preventable illnesses would increase, the
overall health and rate of illness in the country would dramatically
decrease. For this reason, if mass vaccination continues it must be
shifted only to the illnesses where the best argument exists for it
(which I reviewed here) rather than ones where the harms of a (lucrative) vaccine greatly outweigh any possible benefits it can offer. Subtle Signs of Vaccine InjuryWhen I first entered the medical field, a variety of holistic doctors (and other healers) told me they could typically tell if a child had been vaccinated. While I believe this is often possible to do, it requires utilizing a variety of more subtle signs most people would not agree with (excluding say the parents who noticed “something” changed in their child after vaccination). Note: once you start becoming able to see how vaccine injuries are and how shocked or traumatized many infants look, it gets really depressing (whereas in contrast people are often drawn to unvaccinated babies and comment on how vibrant they are). In turn, many have asked me what the signs of vaccine injury are. The challenge with this topic is that subtle injuries are dramatically more common than severe injuries (as reactions to toxins tend to follow a bell curve, with the most severe reactions being the rarest). Thus, the more subtle signs are harder to recognize (or prove resulted from vaccination) but simultaneously are by far the most common. Some of the most common signs we use are: In addition to these changes, they are some more subtle “spiritual” changes, which are amongst the most frequent changes observed (and what many of my colleagues eventually default to using to identify vaccine injuries). Given that these signs, while very apparent, are “spiritual” in nature, I went back and forth on if I wanted to discuss them, and eventually felt it needed to be to a limited audience... Continue reading this post for free in the Substack app |














No comments:
Post a Comment