Continuing my "greatest COVID hits" articles. To read my introduction to this ongoing series, go here. To support my work and get value for value, order my Matrix collections here and subscribe to my substack here.
February 6, 2020
I
repost this story now because, in the rush to develop a vaccine against
the China coronavirus in the next 90 days, public health officials are
mentioning several experimental technologies---never before released
openly for public use.
One of those technologies is: DNA insertion.
The reference is the New York Times, 3/10/15, “Protection Without a Vaccine.”
It describes the frontier of research. Here are key quotes that
illustrate the use of synthetic genes to “protect against disease,”
while changing the genetic makeup of humans. This is not science
fiction:
“By
delivering synthetic genes into the muscles of the [experimental]
monkeys, the scientists are essentially re-engineering the animals to
resist disease.”
“’The sky’s the limit,’ said Michael Farzan, an immunologist at Scripps and lead author of the new study.”
“The
first human trial based on this strategy --- called immunoprophylaxis
by gene transfer, or I.G.T. --- is underway, and several new ones are
planned.” [That was nearly five years ago.]
“I.G.T.
is altogether different from traditional vaccination. It is instead a
form of gene therapy. Scientists isolate the genes that produce powerful
antibodies against certain diseases and then synthesize artificial
versions. The genes are placed into viruses and injected into human
tissue, usually muscle.”
Here
is the punchline: “The viruses invade human cells with their DNA
payloads, and the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s
own DNA. If all goes well, the new genes instruct the cells to begin
manufacturing powerful antibodies.”
Read that again: “the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA.”
Alteration of the human genetic makeup.
Not just a “visit.” Permanent residence.
The Times article taps Dr. David Baltimore for an opinion:
“Still,
Dr. Baltimore says that he envisions that some people might be leery of
a vaccination strategy that means altering their own DNA, even if it
prevents a potentially fatal disease.”
Yes, some people might be leery. If they have two or three working brain cells.
This is genetic roulette with a loaded gun.
And
the further implications are clear. Vaccines can be used as a cover for
the injections of any and all genes, whose actual purpose is
unannounced.
The
emergence of this Frankenstein technology is paralleled by a shrill
push to mandate vaccines, across the board, for both children and
adults. The pressure and propaganda are planet-wide.
The freedom and the right to refuse vaccines has always been vital. It is more vital than ever now.
What
does wall to wall propaganda about an “ominous epidemic” achieve? You
have one answer. If it doesn’t immediately pop into your head, read this
article again.
~~~
(The link to this article posted on my blog is here -- with sources.)
(Follow me on Substack, Twitter, and Gab at @jonrappoport) |
No comments:
Post a Comment