Friday, December 23, 2022
3934-3935: Merry Christmas to All "Licensed" Professionals and Businesses from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
A license by definition is official permission to engage in activities that would otherwise be illegal.
Have
you stopped to consider --- what is illegal about driving, owning a
dog, conducting a business, providing health care services as a
physician, nurse, dentist, pharmacist, or other health care
professional, or acting as a Counselor of Law? What is illegal about
getting married???
It
should be obvious to anyone who stops and thinks about it for five
seconds that no such "licensing requirements" can apply to an American
in a free country. So what is going on here?
And
who are all these people running around carrying clip-boards and
claiming that you "must" have a license or permits for activities that
have never been subject to regulation since the founding of this
country?
The
only things that any Federal Subcontractor, Agency, or Franchise has
authority to regulate are: interstate sale, manufacture, or transport of
alcohol, tobacco, and firearms, interstate commerce (defined as
business between incorporated entities across state borders) -- and
their own internal affairs and citizenry, that is, their own employees.
These
people with the clip-boards and demands are all acting -- whether they
know it or not, as "Federal citizenry", and Federal Citizens are the
ones who have to be licensed and permitted and regulated. They are the
ones subject to "Administrative Law" ---statutes, ordinances,
regulations, codes -- as opposed to Public Law, and for regulating their
own business affairs and issuing permits and licenses among themselves,
according to the Public Policies of the corporations that employ them.
I
have a friend here in Alaska who I dearly cherish, an old War Horse in
this particular "War of Identities", and a new friend in the Cause who
both spontaneously, within 24 hours of each other, brought forward this
case citation:
“The acceptance of a license, in whatever form, will
not impose upon the licensee an obligation to respect or to comply with
any provision of the statute or with the regulations prescribed that
are repugnant to the Constitution of the United States.” [Emphasis added]
W. W. Cargill Co. v. State of Minnesota, 180 U.S. 452 (1901)
Or,
to put it another way, the rules, ordinances, statutes, codes,
regulations and mandates governing any corporation, together with those
Public Policies any corporation may impose on its employees or vendors
providing services to the corporation and its employees, is still
subject to the Public Law (in particular, the Constitution).
Whether
you are "licensed" or have a "permit" or not, you are never required to
say or do anything in conflict with (or trespassing against) the
guarantees owed to Americans.
So,
if Americans are owed the right to freedom of speech, for example,
whether they are licensed or not, no corporation's internal
administrative law can be invoked to censor them. Or invade their
privacy. Or dictate
Corporations,
including the American Medical Association, and the American Bar
Association, have to respect the Constitutional Guarantees owed to their
American employees, vendors -- that is, licensees, customers, and
agency subcontractors. And no "licensee" can be forced as a condition
of their licensing to violate any aspect of the Constitutions.
Doctors? Lawyers? Police? Code Compliance Officers of all kinds? CEO's of corporations large and small? Are you listening?
The
Constitutions limit the activities of these foreign Federal
Subcontractor corporations, aka, "persons" on our soil. And any licenses
issued by these corporations to their separate citizenry (employees) or
licensees (vendors) cannot be used to evade their limitations imposed
by the Constitutions.
You,
acting as a Licensee (Vendor supplying services to them or for them)
cannot be coerced in any manner to violate the Constitution by any
licensing agreement or regulation.
CEO's
who impose on their employee's financial privacy and collect taxes from
Americans under False Presumptions and who coerce their American
employees to obey mask mandates, etc., are in violation of the
Constitutions.
And
it's a far more serious offense to be in violation of the Constitutions
than to be in violation of Public Policy. And no Policy Maker can
subourne you to violate the limitations of the Constitutions.
Exercise your conscience with impunity and immunity.
Mask mandates? No can do.
Coercion, threats of losing employment? No can do.
Threats of losing your license? No can do.
Threats of "investigations"? No can do.
Rat Watch Call Out to All Patriot Researchers - Big Move 1927
By Anna Von Reitz
Folks, I know it's Christmas Week. I know you don't have time now, except for a few of us graybeards, perhaps, but....
We
have always known that something Big Happened in 1927, and we suspect
that we know what it is, however, being able to prove it has been quite
elusive. Unlike what happened with the Federal Reserve scheme, the Big
Move in 1927 hasn't been exhaustively documented --yet.
The First World War ended November 11,
1918, which was a catastrophe from the standpoint of the (largely)
American war suppliers and contractors. It was an even bigger disaster
for European "Defense Contractors", like Bayer and I.G. Farben and
Krupp.
They
would have immediately begun folding their tents and counting up their
losses due to cancelled orders, etc., and started to pull the plug on
their Holding Corporations, getting ready to bankrupt them--- and throw
their assets into peacetime production investments instead.
Seven
years later, 1925, the Internal Revenue Service came back ashore here
in America, a sure sign that another round of collections to pay for war
reparations was imminent.
The
Big Move in 1927 was obviously the settlement of the bankruptcy of the
major "U.S.Government" Holding Corporation that had been supplying all
the war equipment, food, medical supplies, etc., in receivership to the
Creditors. But which one was it?
This
is, by the way, how you can win the war and lose anyway -- by allowing
these corporations to abuse bankruptcy at the public expense.
Unlike
World War II, the main "American Group Supplier" didn't leave its
fingerprints on everything from canteens and soup cans to guns in World
War I. Its identity is much more apocryphal and relies mainly on rare
photos of personal equipment items--- for example:
So,
what did "U.S." mean in WWI in terms of the Government Corporation(s)
using these initials? We would suspect, as always, the British
Territorial United States family of commercial corporations, mainly
British Crown Corporations--- but exactly which one?
This
unresolved puzzle piece has nagged at me for years, and it's important
because the Big Move in 1927 set up the Bank Runs and the demolition of
the stock market in 1929.
We
need to definitively identify this commercial corporation and its
Creditors in order to nail down the history and provenance of the men
whose Grandsons and Great-Grandsons are putting the world through a more
modern version of the same debacle-for-profit now.
A piece of satire came across my desk today,
published by the venerable satire publication, The Onion, which relates
to this specific time and mystery. Reuter's, which has been owned by
Rothschild since they moved into the same building together back in the
1880's, promptly debunked the "news" article as satire, but there are
two funny things about it.
Satire
by its nature must be a commentary on life, on politics, on specific
events and situations, and there has to be an element of truth in satire
to make it stick. The Onion has a nasty habit of commenting on current
events because of this. Chances are, where there is smoke, there is
fire-- an underlying actual news story or event that The Onion is poking
at.
And
secondly, Reuter's response was not only quick and dismissive, but it
completely failed to address any underlying new story. Normally, when
and if the lofty Rothschild News Brand deigns to do a humble fact
checking, they give you the entire history complete with a Cliff Notes
edition and maps. Not this time.
So?
Have a few hours away from work, all you military history buffs? Want
to look at WWI equipment to see if you can spot the name of a "United
States" or "United States of America" Corporation stamped on things?
Maybe muster rolls? Medical forms?
Want to go wade around in the New York Times archives and the Wall Street Journal archives for July-August-September of 1927?
I can think of worse things to do, if you are sitting around alone on Christmas.
Here's a list of interesting occurrences from 1927 to get your little gray cells moving:
The
year starts with the BBC being incorporated; the British Broadcasting
Company receives a Royal Charter and becomes the British Broadcasting
Corporation. The Government now controls it and owns it.
In
February, "the United States" and Canada begin diplomatic relations---
but which "United States"? And since when hasn't Canada had "diplomatic
relations" with any version of the United States? Were they finally
settling the old grudge-match against the Municipal United States left
over from the so-called American Civil War? Canada would have been an
Ally to the British Territorial Government and the Northern
Confederation, against the Municipal United States which sided with the
South.
In
March, this same zephyr, "the United States", refused to sign the
League of Nations Treaty on Disarmament, and again the question--- which
"United States"? The incorporated Municipal Corporation doing business
as "the United States" couldn't sign a land jurisdiction Treaty, and
wouldn't want to, anyway. The actual Municipal Government couldn't sign a
land treaty, either, because they don't actually own the District of
Columbia nor the ground the Municipality sits on.
In
April, The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland was renamed
"the" United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland --- another
incorporation and name change, indicating that the roll-up to create
"the" incorporated UK has started.
In
May, in America, the U.S. Supreme Court allows forced sterilization of
"unfit" persons in Buck v Bell, which again shows a connection between
the Eugenists and the word "Buck" --- Buckingham, The Buck Act, and Buck
v Bell, are all infamous and have double meanings, related to another
famous word ending in "uck".
In July, also in America, the FDA was established as "the Food, Drug, and Insecticide Administration" --- FDIA.
Now,
doesn't that clear things up about the true nature of the FDA? --though
how they imagined that they had any granted authority to regulate
anything beyond alcohol, tobacco, and firearms remains a mystery.
In
September, the fifth, Paul Volcker, past Federal Reserve Chairman, was
born as Paul Vocker; why the name change? And the pen name Paul Volker,
too?
Also in September. CBS incorporates and the network goes on the air with 47 radio stations.
Finally,
and also in September, the League of Nations Slavery Commission signed
the Treaty outlawing all forms of slavery worldwide.
The League of Nations was formed as part of the Treaty of Versailles ending World War I and functioned from January 20, 1920 to April 19,
1946; it was reportedly disbanded for its failure to prevent WWII, but
in actuality, it ceased functioning because its members were land
jurisdiction governments, not corporations, and the corporations in the
form of the British Territorial Government/British Crown/and American
Mercenary Forces, were preparing to occupy most of the world---
purportedly to protect the land jurisdiction governments they were and
still are usurping upon and supplanting.
In
October, construction of Mount Rushmore started, and this inexplicable
monument, complete with four giant idols of Washington, Jefferson,
Abraham Lincoln, and Teddy Roosevelt, continued under construction until
1941. Ask yourselves--- why? And what did these four men have in
common? All four sold us out to the British. Jefferson was the only one
who was blackmailed. The other three did it for land and money.
Well, at least the British Crime Lords were grateful.
In
December, Iraq gained its freedom from Great Britain, but, curiously,
the British garrisons remained, indicating that Iraq's freedom was in
name only, and that the British Territorial Government aka The Raj,
continued to occupy the country behind a storefront popular government.
The
Big Move in 1927 saw the beginning of buying up, expanding, and overtly
controlling the media, the foundations being laid for the UK, the
expansion of the British Raj occupation in the Mideast, the attempt by
the League of Nations to outlaw slavery -- which probably caused its own
demise twenty years later, because we can see what has happened ever
since: the Defense Contractors and entities that traditionally made
their money on slave sales and slave labor combined forces.
And
they have been plundering, murdering, stealing, enslaving, lying, and
constructing their criminal matrix of corporate interlocking trust
directorates and monopolies and intelligence agencies ever since.
Help expose and put an end to this horror story. Dig, dig, dig.... and report back, please.
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
No comments:
Post a Comment