Monday, December 12, 2022
3919-3920: Practical Banking Issues That Everyone Needs to Know About from Lincoln Count Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
Did you know that it is against Christian doctrine to loan money at interest?
The
Followers of Yeshuah are supposed to lend freely and give to all who
ask out of need; similarly, the Jews living under the provisions of the
Old Testament are not supposed to charge usury to other Jews, but can
charge usury when they lend to non-Jews.
It is this little bit of religious difference which has led to Jews being a predominant force in the business of banking.
The
"Christian" Kings wanted the profits from usury without getting their
hands dirty, so they pressed Jews living within their dominions to serve
as "Middlemen", "Agents", or "Mediums" (yes, catch the spiritual
dimension) to lend out their money "for" them, and of course, charge
usury "for" them, --- but all under the table, under private contract,
so that the Kings could further glut themselves and profit from the
poverty of the common people who were deemed more virtuous under the
"Doctrine of Scarcity" than the Kings who ruled over them.
True enough, but of little comfort.
The Commoners
would have to wait for their rewards until after death, which was very
convenient for the Kings and the Church, because they never had to worry
about paying up in the here and now. Convenient also that these
poobahs and pundits have imagined that God's Justice has no eyes and
does not see their infamy.
So
the Jews, like the Rothschilds, became Middlemen between the
Governments and the people who needed loans. The Kings made the coins or
bills of exchange. The Jews ran the banks, made the investments,
collected the usury--- and over time, they naturally found various ways
to chisel a bit for themselves.
Fast forward.
One
of the chief worries of all modern bankers has always been -- what if
they lose their large depositor/shareholders? What if the people who
own the actual assets underwriting the banks take their money
elsewhere? What if Chase Bank or Paribas is showing better profits and
everyone takes their assets over to them?
Then
you've got a real problem because the bank has extended 7 to 10 times
the value of all its deposits as credit loaned at interest under the
"fractional reserve system". It's already skating on a very thin margin
and if you take the actual assets out before they make the principal
and interest back, they have nothing standing between them and
disaster.
The
Rothschilds and others doing the banking "for" the Governments and
Underwriters (major trusts acting as Donor-Beneficiaries and
Shareholders in the banks) had it in their power to make these decisions
about leaving assets on deposit or moving assets, with the result that
they acquired tremendous coercive power over the banks.
This
became a real pain in the butt for the governments and the banks, who,
whether they were mistreated or not, worried constantly about the
"growing influence" of the Jewish bankers, based on their ability to
move assets around in the banking system.
Whether
they knew it or not-- and it really is a "Chicken or Egg?" scenario--
Jewish bankers were playing the same game as J.D. Rockefeller played
with oil supply transfers. They were playing commodity rigging games,
only the commodities being rigged were different assets-- precious
metals and credit generated by these assets. J.D. and his progeny were
only attracted to this new opportunity to rig commodities because of
their experience doing the same in the oil business.
Of
course, just like J.D.'s money mill, Standard Oil, the banks can be
charged with monopoly practices and commodity rigging schemes and they
can be dismembered and liquidated, too, but everyone's abject dependence
on banks was even more absolute than their dependence on oil, and the
entire globe is a bigger playing field.
They
figured they could get away with it a bit longer in the banking venue,
and indeed, they have done so -- another 111 years, 1911 until now.
Finally,
a young man named John Fletcher started pitching a solution to the
bank's need for "Asset Retention Guarantees" that would not only ease
these concerns about bank "stability" and "early asset withdrawals".
His solution had the added benefit of generating credit (not money) for
philanthropic projects.
It
appeared to solve a long-standing problem for the banks and potentially
do some good, so, everyone signed on. Trading Platforms were born.
In
a "Platform Trade" someone having considerable assets (usually in the
billions of dollars in amount) agrees to "block" these assets and not
move them anywhere for a stipulated period of time in exchange for some
very pretty rewards.
Let's walk through an example.
I
have a hundred billion in gold sitting in a bank. I don't need it for
anything, so I agree to block it and leave it where it is for three
years.
In
exchange, the platform traders guarantee that I will receive an amount
of credit equal to the value of my entire asset --- so, I still have my
hundred billion sitting safe in the bank, but I also have a hundred
billion in credit to spend.
The
platform trader gets a cut of the credit, usually around 30%, the
platform operator gets around 10%, and then, via a series of credit
swaps and trades within trades, I, the asset owner, get the rest of the
credit. When all costs and chiseling of side profits are accounted for,
it usually amounts to about another 140-150% profit realized as credit,
with no risk to me beyond leaving my asset parked in a specific bank for
three years.
Of
course, everyone went hog-wild with this, and shortly there were
platform-affiliated organizations offering short, medium, and long term
notes based on these "blocked fund transactions", and the banks began
buying these "notes" to bulwark and guarantee the amount of actual hard
assets they could claim as the basis of their lending activities.
Being
able to cut up these large blocks of actual assets into "notes" that
the banks could hold in much smaller amounts was a great convenience and
viewed as yet another benefit of the Platform Trading idea.
Inevitably,
however, things got corrupted. People forgot what credit is and started
thinking of it as an asset in-and-of-itself. As General Colin Powell
famously commented, "It spends the same as gold, so who cares?"
The problem is that credit doesn't really spend "the same as gold".
Credit,
unless it is prepaid with actual assets, has to be paid back. It's
essentially a loan and it bears interest that is owed back to the asset
owners who blocked their assets and created the credit in the first
place.
Put another way, you can't really "pay" anything with credit, you can only pass the buck.
That's what Harry Truman meant when he said, "The buck stops here."
In
2011, Giovanni Baptista Richello (yes, Richelieu), the Senior Trustee
for the Department of the Federal Treasury Trust within the Bank of
International Settlements had an argument with the Generals on precisely
this topic. Somehow the dunderheaded military thought that credit was
the equivalent of free money, and that they didn't really owe it back to
anyone.
Richello argued the plain fact: the assets generate the credit, so the asset-owner also owns the credit.
The
Generals argued that because of Constitutional constraints they could
only operate on credit and that whatever credit was due to Americans was
due to them, because they were left in charge of the Government by
Lincoln.
Colin
Powell had already been knighted eighteen years before for squeezing
yet more benefit for the British Empire out of a hundred and fifty
year-old con game, aka, improving "British and American Foreign
Relations".
We, the actual asset owners, objected to this nonsense.
Lincoln
had no authority to suspend the Constitutions and leave our employees
in charge of anything. He was just an employee himself.
Their
need for our credit would have been simple enough to resolve, simply by
informing their Employers what was going on, instead of adopting a
"cloak of secrecy" and trying to hide what they were doing to purloin
our credit like so many credit card hackers.
And
as for our Government being "absent" and "missing, presumed dead", we
were able to find representatives of our American Government in all
fifty States of the Union within two weeks of calling for them.
Clearly,
glutting on our credit was to their advantage, and they dishonestly
chose to pat us on the shoulders and say, "There, there...." while they
illegally confiscated our assets and made False Claims about our
political status.
That
includes False Claims about the political status of Julius Shiva, a
proud South Carolinian, and myself, a daughter of Wisconsin.
The
CIA/DIA snatched Julius from his home country and dumped him on our
doorstep and claimed that he was a "permanent resident of the United
States" without bothering to define which "United States".
This
muddied the waters enough for them to make False Claims against his
assets and to promote further False Claims that he was voluntarily
adopting the political status of a British Territorial U.S. Citizen --- a
ward of the then-Queen and a British Territorial Subject.
Please note that is a capital crime of unlawful and illegal political conversion under both the Geneva and Hague Conventions.
This
is how the rats have been able to hold the whole world captive and
dominate banking and asset deployment throughout the world by
commandeering the assets belonging to the American people, including
Julius Shiva and V.K. Durham and many, many others, who could make no
reply for themselves for lack of disclosure.
It
is now clear that we are the Asset Holders and Presumed Donors, the
Heirs and Assigns, to whom the Trustees of the Department of the Federal
Treasury within the Bank of International Settlements owe obedience.
Any
military officer pretending otherwise, needs to have his rump kicked,
because neither he nor Abraham Lincoln have any authority related to the
American people based on the outcomes of an illegal commercial
mercenary conflict we didn't even participate in.
Our
contracts with the Principals remain unaltered and we are Grandfathered
- in and are owed the Guarantees of the Federal Constitution (1787) and
all attendant Treaties.
This
remains true no matter whether the Federation runs the Federal Republic
or the Confederation is reconstructed to run it or both those
instrumentalities are left in the dustbin where they have been for the
last 162 years.
As
we have observed and proven, the Federation conducted all external
business for this country for a period of five years before the
Confederation was created to oversee business in the Maritime
Jurisdiction, and the Confederation ran all the Maritime business for a
period of six years prior to the creation of the Federal Republic.
The
Federation delegated the powers to the Confederation which delegated
some of its powers to the Federal Republic. When both of these later
instrumentalities failed because of the illegal Mercenary Conflict
deceitfully called "The American Civil War" those powers returned by
Operation of Law to the Delegator, our unincorporated Federation of
States. And we are still here.
We
have our proven provenance, standing, and political status well-cured
on the Public Record of the courts and the State Assemblies, on the
Records of the Holy See and the Vatican Chancery Court and the Divine
Province, on the Records of the High Courts and British Parliament, even
on the records of the Uniform Commercial Code.
There
can be no reasonable doubt about who we are and from whence we came and
what we are owed; whereupon, we have called upon the Trustees to honor
their duty and observe the same facts that Giovanni Baptista Ricchello
observed eleven years ago:
The owner of the assets is owed the credit generated by the assets.
It
is time for the Generals to stand aside so that the actual owners can
straighten this mess up, establish humane priorities for the Global
Collateral Accounts, distribute the prepaid credit we are owed, bring
justice for the people of this world, put an end to coercive taxation in
keeping with the 1941 Initiative, stop the illegal occupation and
impersonation of national governments by British Crown Corporations, and
take whatever actions are necessary to convince the miscreants of the
hopelessness of their position.
Fighting to the death over this is not only not the answer, it is counterproductive for everyone concerned.
Despite
the severity of their crimes misrepresenting and defrauding their
Employers, we do not propose prosecuting millions of people with the
crimes they have unwittingly committed while under the misdirection and
delusions promoted by the British Crown.
Ignorance
of the law may be no excuse, but the lack of disclosure and fraud
involved in this instance is such that people have not known the law.
This ignorance is not of their own making. It is the result of
deliberately engendered deceit and obfuscation, an admitted "Cloak of
Secrecy" such that the right hand has not known the actions of the left
hand.
The
perpetrators have even colluded to replace "Law" with the "Rule of Law"
which is something quite different. With the experts and professionals
all run amok and despoiling their own trade, to what standard can an
average man be held?
Only the mercy seat can prevail.
We
have offered amnesty to our erring brethren and acted in the cause of
peace to sort wheat from chaff, and we clearly discern the difference
between deliberate knowing criminality, and the acts of honest men who
have been misinformed and misdirected to perform criminal acts.
So
the soldiers can come home and the Jewish bankers can breathe a sigh of
relief. The actual owners of the assets understand how this situation
came about and we are ready to set aside the past offenses, so that we
can all focus our attention on this one blessed moment called "now" and
make the corrections which must be made for the benefit of all
Mankind.
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
And Now, My Two Cents, Anita
By Anna Von Reitz
The
individual decision to create a private Credit Union, Anita, was taken
by you and others who chose to join and invest in a Private Membership
Association, an action that I never recommended at all. And which has
nothing to do with the Blue Dot Bank System. Underline the word "Bank"
and check to see if "Bank" and "Credit Union" equal the same thing in
whatever mental world you are living in.
Let's go over the brass tacks, Anita. You want specifics? Here they are:
International
Trade Banks operate in international jurisdiction, both land and sea,
and deal in physical assets and asset-backed money.
Commercial Banks operate in Global jurisdiction and serve incorporated entities.
Credit Unions operate in States and form networks to serve people in National Jurisdiction.
Have you got that all firmly envisioned now?
So
how is it that such a purportedly knowledgeable person as you, don't
know these simple facts and accuse the Blue Dot Banking System of having
anything whatsoever to do with any private "Hunter Prosperity Programs"
or Credit Unions?
How
is it that you never talked to me about a Credit Union or any
"Prosperity Programs" you were involved in and which you were involving
others in?
And
why would you assume that those activities were in any way related to
the Blue Dot Bank System? That's just nuts, Anita. Completely
unsupportable. By definition.
As
for commingling of funds, if you were such a big time bank regulator
type person, you would know that commingling of funds isn't illegal, and
is in fact beneficial when the organization is acting from one specific
jurisdiction and currency (all USD in Maritime Jurisdiction) and then
dividing funds into multiple jurisdictions and currency holdings using
separate account structures.
The
reason that we had to start with one base account denominated in USD is
that that is all anyone in this benighted country has to trade with ---
a borrowed military scrip that doesn't even stand for credit, one
that evidences credit owed in the form of a debt note, instead.
What
value do you or any other genius imagine these debt notes have? The
good faith and credit of Congress? Really? You want to stake your
retirement on that?
You
bring us debt, we issue you credit, and then, if you ask for the credit
to be denominated as lawful money, we do that for you, too.
Well, that's just terrible, isn't it? My bad.
Contrary
to your blather, nobody's debt notes were converted into actual lawful
asset-backed money (gold and silver coinage or gold-bearing American
Federation Dollars (AFD)) unless they asked for that to occur--and
endorsed their checks properly to do that, too. So, we have the proof
in terms of endorsements, clearly demonstrating how you or anyone else
denominated any funds that entered our banking system.
But
it appears that you didn't even enter the banking system that you are
complaining about and casting doubts and aspersions upon --- instead,
you and your pals set up a Credit Union, apparently without knowing what
a traditional Credit Union is or does, or even being aware of the fact
that our Credit Unions are State-based organizations and have nothing
whatsoever to do with the Federation's Blue Dot Banking System.
Is
this gaslighting for you? Some tricky "deflection"? Do I sound like I
am avoiding you and your pals and your puerile "concerns"?
Why
on Earth would I be involved and concerned in you guys setting up a
State-level Credit Union in California? And why would I be responsible
for doing any kind of "audit" on something that you built for
yourselves, apparently as a corporate Credit Union for members of a
Private Membership Association (PMA)?
Do you not understand the difference between Public and private? Between my responsibility and yours?
All
that happened to your precious USDs in any system of ours was that you
were issued credit for them. You were given pre-paid credit in exchange
for your debt notes --- and you want to claim that you were harmed by
this? Alarmed by this?
You don't know how pre-paid credit works, as opposed to a legal tender I.O.U.?
I
have explained it, in print, and video, repeatedly. And even if I
hadn't the popular and common use of prepaid gift cards and phone cards
should surely have given you a clue.
Prepaid
credit doesn't have to be paid back, ever. It's not taxable, either.
But if you want to keep your debt notes and stand there and watch
inflation eat any value they have into oblivion, instead of being out of
that lose-lose situation, fine by me. It's your life.
If
what you want in your pocket is USD, you are welcome to it, and you can
just use any commercial bank you like to service your accounts and you
can "go long" betting on the prospects of a currency that even the
owners of the currency are openly destroying.
Did
you know that JPMorgan is up for sale? Have you read Joe Biden's
Executive Order 14067? Did you see that he is hiring 87,000 new IRS
Agents and surveilling all transactions of $600 or more? Have you seen
the projected inflation figures for January --- next month? 25% losses
of value (a hidden tax) due to inflation, and Joe Biden's spending on
the Ukraine, coming to everyone who is holding USD?
This
was all happening while the rest of us have been setting up actual
lawful money currency for the entire country to use for purposes of
international trade --- ordering gold coinage and yes, new gold-bearing
bills, so that people have actual wealth in their own hands. Not some
ditzie cypto BS digital "currency" like FTX, that some Snooper Pooper
"Agency" Goon can turn on and off like a water tap..
Also
for your edification, Anita, someone has to own the banks in a Banking
System --- because the meaning of "own" in the law is something quite
different than you ignorantly suppose. It means that we act as
custodians of the banks. We underwrite them. We hold them accountable
under the Public Law of this country which everyone, including you, can
read.
If
we are underwriting these banks and providing the pre-paid credit and
the gold coins and gold-bearing bills (AFD) then we have an interest in
their proper performance. Banks are private enterprises regulated by
governments and certain international and global conventions. We are
being very up front about the fact that any disputes these banks have,
will be settled under American Public Law, so that all the banks in the
Blue Dot System worldwide are on the same page, and functioning under
the same rules. This is why it is called a Bank System and not just
another bank.
Everyone
can read what the Universal Bank Charter (which is a contract) says in
plain English. Ditto the one-page Bank Treaty. Both are public and
posted and that is all there is to it. No mysteries. No extra hidden
hooks or sweetheart deals or sidebars for "special" clients. All
transparent as crystalline glass. Nobody has to wonder what kind of
agreement anyone else got, and you have no excuse for pretending that
you didn't have access to those documents or don't know what they say.
So
how any of this is being presented as any arcane mystery worthy of
doubt and suspicion is a wonder to me. And exactly how and why and when
and where I became responsible in any capacity for a state-level Credit
Union based on membership in a Private Membership Association (PMA) is
another cause for amazement. I didn't charter your Credit Union and
couldn't even if I wanted to.
Maybe
that's why I haven't been forthcoming? And haven't got on my white
horse and taken time away from the developments that actually are my
responsibility?
I
also haven't given any particular credence to your suspicions since
none of you have produced a shred of evidence. Did you cheat
yourselves? Have you harmed yourselves? Like a Mother with errant
children, I'm concerned, but it's your knees.
The
members of a Credit Union own it and I am not even a member of the PMA,
much less the Credit Union. As a traditional Credit Union it exists at
the State-level and in the National Jurisdiction, not the International
and Global Jurisdictions I operate in.
The
whole "narrative" you and your friends are trying to spin is like
blaming a Deep Sea Captain for your own mismanagement of a salt mine in
Idaho. And no, for your information and for Darla's and for Yvonne's, I
don't regulate salt mines in Idaho.
I
didn't charter your Credit Union or check out your PMA. I doubt very
much that you contacted the California Assembly and got them to issue a
charter for you, which means you have been operating a Credit Union in
the State of California with all the rules and regulations that apply.
It
also means you haven't heard a word I have said or learned anything I
have tried to teach you, so I don't know why I am wasting my breath now,
except to set the record straight.
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
No comments:
Post a Comment