Vision of Journalism
|
This is another in my series on writing and writers---and it ties in with my mega-collection, Power Outside The Matrix, which you can also read about and order here.
Speaking
from my own 40 years of journalism work and my preferences on the
subject, yes, of course I have a bias, but it’s not narrow. It’s wide
open, and it lets anyone in, as long as they think about FACT and
IMAGINATION together.
Some
would call what I’m talking about here STYLE, but it’s more than
that. It’s how a writer decides to present information with twists and
turns and flashes and cloudbursts and attacks…
They’re the raw material.
You could wake up one very good day and realize you’re writing satire. Comedy. Even poetry.
You’re
also, in the process, exploding the mind of the reader, because it
needs to be exploded and rescued from the sober drear of “here are the
data, goodbye.” I mean, really. That has to go. Away.
As
a writer, do you want a fact to be a martial arts instructor toiling
away at a small gym teaching the same moves over and over, or do you
want a fact to be a Bruce Lee, who invented new moves from his core and
imagination every day to fit the situation he was facing?
If
you know you want to use a fact to make a point, you’re on the right
track. How do you make the point? There are an infinity of ways, and you
invent them. Mostly, as you go along.
You
teach yourself to be a chef with no recipe book. Your book is
DESIRE. The desire to overturn official reality. So OVERTURN IT. Don’t
be shy.
Read
what bad journalists write. See what they’re doing. I’m not just
talking about lies. I’m talking about how they tell them. Drained of
juice and color. These people should be pumping gas and collecting
tumbleweed in Death Valley.
As
a writer, fear is not your friend. You can tell the truth and never
move the needle, because you’re timid. (If you’re irretrievably timid,
you’ve already stopped reading this.)
Listen. There
are millions and millions of readers out there who are unsure about
what they’re supposed to do. They’re in strait jackets. They don’t know
whether to shit or go blind. They read a line you write and they start
to smile and then they stop.
They
ask themselves, “Am I supposed to laugh? That line was pretty
funny. But the subject he’s writing about is serious. I’m confused. He
just took that fact and used it like a hammer and banged my head. If I
laugh, am I committing some kind of code violation? Is a patrol car
going to show up? Will I turn into a person my friends won’t
understand? Suppose I miss the meaning of a joke and laugh in the wrong
place? I’d look stupid.”
The
solution here is: keep pounding away. Sooner or later, people are going
to catch on to what you’re doing. And here’s the capper. They’ll find
the buried place in themselves where they’re doing it, too.
That’s
what you want. You want THEM to see THEY intend to upset apple carts,
too. That intent has been trained out of them. By all sorts of
people. Dead people who still manage to walk and talk.
It’s the deadness you want to overcome.
Facts
are weapons you deploy to achieve that. You don’t want gray readers
digesting facts you present as gray corpses…because in that case,
nothing really happens.
Yes,
I’ve read Hunter Thompson. I’ve read PJ O’Rourke. And Jonathan Swift
and Lewis Carroll. And Thomas Paine, who was a journalist and an
essayist and caller to action and a poet all at the same time. They knew
how to use facts to their own advantage. You can learn from them, and
then cook up your own dishes.
Beware
of ideological humor. These are dud jokes the writers THINK are
funny. They’re sadly mistaken. The jokes rely heavily on the prior
ideology, and only rubes and yokels enjoy them. “Ha-ha, he [writer]
proved God is wonderful.” No he didn’t. He wrote something lame, and God
shook his head, swore, turned away, and went off to play 18 holes at
George Carlin’s miniature golf course on the corner of Paradise and
Cackle.
Suppose
God Himself wants you to laugh your way out of a strait jacket? Suppose
He knows how to turn the screw with any fact in the book? Suppose He
can make a fact into a sword and wave it and drive you screaming into
the night---where you recover your sanity.
Why can’t you as a writer do that, too?
Because He’s the Only One? You really think His ego is that large?
Doesn’t your experience tell you it’s the most isolated, indifferent, cold sons of bitches who have the biggest egos?
-- Jon Rappoport
No comments:
Post a Comment