A
few days ago, I republished my proof that the medical cartel has been
routinely killing millions of people, with its treatments, for at least
the past 20 years.
And when I say proof, I’m talking about clear mainstream research.
Virtually
no one has taken those research citations and run with them, despite
the fact that I’ve highlighted them for years. I’ve highlighted them in
articles and interviews.
Apparently,
even many “alternative” journalists and doctors are keeping a piece of
their souls in the official prison of fake medicine and fake science. On
purpose.
They want to hedge their bets. They want to go halfway, but not all the way.
They want to admit some things, but not other things.
So
today, I’m posting another one of my “too hot to handle” pieces. I’ve
published this article at least four times. Even doctors who oppose the
COVID vaccines won’t pick up on it.
Why?
It’s too REAL, because it proves the RNA injections were DESIGNED to fail, to be useless, from the get-go.
That’s right.
And if you expose THAT, you burn the whole house down.
The vaccine establishment collapses.
No one will believe anything the establishment says about vaccines. Nor should they.
And many journalists and doctors of all stripes want to “protect the public” from THE TRUTH.
I don’t want to bury the truth. I’m not settling for half.
Buckle up---
I
wrote and posted this piece while the clinical trials of the COVID
vaccine were in progress. It reveals how and why those trials were
constructed and designed to fail. They did fail.
The
vaccine makers DESIGNED a series of clinical trials that, even on their
own terms (“the virus is real, fear the virus”) were destined to be a
complete flop.
PART ONE
Peter
Doshi, associate editor of the medical journal BMJ, and Eric Topol,
Scripps Research professor of molecular medicine, have written a
devastating NY Times opinion piece about the ongoing COVID vaccine
clinical trials.
They expose the fatal flaw in the large Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Moderna trials.
September 22, 2020, the Times: “These Coronavirus Trials Don’t Answer the One Question We Need to Know”:
“If
you were to approve a coronavirus vaccine, would you approve one that
you only knew protected people only from the most mild form of Covid-19,
or one that would prevent its serious complications?”
“The answer is obvious. You would want to protect against the worst cases.”
“But
that’s not how the companies testing three of the leading coronavirus
vaccine candidates, Moderna, Pfizer and AstraZeneca, whose U.S. trial is
on hold, are approaching the problem.”
“According
to the protocols for their studies, which they released late last week,
a vaccine could meet the companies’ benchmark for success if it lowered
the risk of mild Covid-19, but was never shown to reduce moderate or
severe forms of the disease, or the risk of hospitalization, admissions
to the intensive care unit or death.”
BOOM. THE CLINICAL TRIALS WERE NOT DESIGNED TO SHOW THE VACCINE COULD PREVENT SERIOUS ILLNESS. OR HOSPITALIZATION. OR DEATH.
The
Times: “To say a vaccine works should mean that most people no longer
run the risk of getting seriously sick. That’s not what these trials
will determine.”
BOOM.
This means these clinical trials are dead in the water.
And I could stop this article right here and walk away. Done. Finished. Nothing more need be said.
And
you the reader could walk away. OK, done. The clinical trials of the
vaccine were never intended to prevent serious illness of any
kind. Never intended to prevent hospitalizations or deaths. End of
story.
Goodbye. Forget the vaccine. Why would anyone want to take it?
But
if you want to know WHY the clinical trials were designed this way, and
HOW the con was played, and why it was actually necessary to design the
clinical trials to be useless, read on.
The whole vaccine house is ALREADY burned down, but I’m going to say a lot more. I’m going to burn the ashes.
First
of all, make sure you understand the clinical trials of the RNA
vaccines were only designed to show effectiveness in preventing “mild
cases of COVID,” which nobody should care about, because mild cases
(cough, fever, chills) naturally run their course and cause no
harm. THERE IS NO NEED FOR A VACCINE THAT PREVENTS MILD CASES.
Now let’s go deeper. Read the next section from the Times piece, and then I’ll make comments.
“The
Moderna and AstraZeneca studies will involve about 30,000 participants
each; Pfizer’s will have 44,000. Half the participants will receive two
doses of vaccines separated by three or four weeks, and the other half
will receive saltwater placebo shots. The final determination of
efficacy will occur after 150 to 160 participants develop Covid-19…”
Now
pay close attention. Here’s how it works. The vaccine companies are
looking for a total of 150 mild COVID cases to occur, combined, in the
two groups--- those receiving the placebo and those receiving the
vaccine. How would that happen? The researchers believe “the coronavirus
is spreading everywhere” and it will pounce on some of the volunteers
during the clinical trial.
Let’s
say that, during the trial, 100 people receiving the placebo develop
mild COVID-19 (cough, chills, fever), and only 50 people receiving the
vaccine develop mild COVID.
The
vaccine companies would say, “We just proved the vaccine is 50%
effective in preventing COVID, and that’s all we need to do, in order to
win emergency authorization from the FDA. Release the vaccine. Inject
the world.”
The outcomes for ONLY 150 people equal “let’s shoot up seven billion people.”
That’s staggering.
But
it gets even worse. The magic number of 150 COVID cases? How is a COVID
case defined? The authors of the Times piece have the answer:
“In
the Moderna and Pfizer trials, even a mild case of Covid-19 — for
instance, a cough plus a positive lab test — would qualify and muddy the
results. AstraZeneca is slightly more stringent but would still count
mild symptoms like a cough plus fever as a case.”
But
wait. The NY Times itself recently published an article stating that up
to 90% of US COVID cases could very well be false positives---in other
words, not cases at all. Why? Because the diagnostic PCR test, as it is
performed by labs, is too sensitive. It registers “positive for COVID”
when it shouldn’t.
So,
in these vaccine clinical trials, the whole process of determining that
“150 people developed COVID-19” is completely unreliable, useless,
absurd, and nonsensical.
On
the one hand, a positive PCR test is unreliable and means nothing. On
the other hand, a cough and fever (“mild COVID”) are nothing to worry
about, and don’t require a vaccine at all. We’re talking about 150 cases
of “who cares.” That’s what the COVID vaccine is DESIGNED to prevent.
“So,
Doctor, the magic number is 150 ‘who cares’ mild cases? That’s the
number that will decide the immediate fate of the planet?”
“Of course.”
“And
these 150 people, who you say develop mild COVID-19…no one should care,
because those symptoms cure themselves, and no vaccine is needed.”
“Correct.”
“And
come to think of it, the people receiving the vaccine in the clinical
trials could develop symptoms indistinguishable from mild COVID-19, as a
result of the effects of the vaccine.”
“Yes, that’s right.”
“But you’re very confident in the success of the vaccine.”
“Indeed.”
“Why?”
“I
have to be confident. If we’re exposed as incompetent frauds, our
bottom line will take a huge hit. And we’ll wind up in prison.”
PART TWO: THE DEVIOUS TRICK
Now I’m going to go over the vital information again, but this time I’m going to show you how…
The vaccine companies can use the fatal flaw in their protocol design to…
Actually win approval of their COVID vaccine.
Stick with me. This is big.
Only 150 people are needed to make the major clinical trials of a COVID vaccine look like a success.
Out
of 30,000 volunteers in a trial, researchers are waiting for 150 people
to “come down with COVID-19.” MILD cases. They assume this will happen
because they believe the coronavirus is everywhere, and it’ll infect
some of their volunteers.
Of
course, their definition of a mild case of COVID-19 is
meaningless. Cough plus fever, and a positive PCR test. The test spits
out false positives like a rigged slot machine, and the visible mild
symptoms could result from flu, polluted air, or too many candy bars.
Nevertheless,
the researchers are waiting for a total of 150 people to “catch a mild
case of COVID.” When that number is reached, everything stops.
Now
comes the big moment. How many of those 150 COVID cases occurred in the
group that received the vaccine, and how many in the group that
received the placebo shot of salt water?
Let’s
say only 50 COVID cases occurred in the vaccine group, and 100 in the
placebo group. The researchers pop champagne corks. They say, “Look, the
vaccine is 50% effective at preventing COVID, and that’s all we need to
win emergency authorization from the FDA.”
BUT
suppose 75 cases occurred in the vaccine group and 75 in the placebo
group? No good. No good at all. No way to call the vaccine effective.
Now comes the “reshaping of the data.”
HERE WE GO.
The
researchers say, “Wait. Thirty of the COVID cases in the vaccine group
were REALLY just adverse reactions to the vaccine. They weren’t cases of
COVID. You see, the vaccine can cause symptoms that are
indistinguishable from mild COVID. Cough, fever, chills. ACTUALLY, there
were only 30 cases of COVID in the vaccine group. There were 75 in the
placebo group. That’s good enough. The vaccine IS effective. We’re
golden. We can get emergency authorization from the FDA right now to
shoot up everybody.”
Vaccine manufacturers HAVE KNOWN ALL ALONG that they could pull this trick.
Why leave things to chance?
Why
risk a few hundred billion dollars of profit on a random distribution
of mild COVID cases among the volunteers in their clinical trials?
The
definition of a mild COVID case is EXACTLY what the vaccine
manufacturers needed. It enabled them to hatch a plan, to make sure they
didn’t fail.
They
could pawn off a MILD case of COVID as a reaction to the vaccine. They
could fake that without causing ripples. The FDA would say, “The vaccine
reactions aren’t serious. All right, no problem. We’ll approve this
vaccine for emergency use.”
However…If
the manufacturers designed their clinical trial protocol to prevent
serious cases of COVID----very serious pneumonia---then first of all,
they would be waiting to see 150 cases of really sick people to occur
among the volunteers.
That might never happen. In 100 years.
And
second, if it did happen, and the manufacturers had to pull their
devious switcheroo trick and blame the vaccine for some of these SERIOUS
cases…
They
would have to tell the FDA that their vaccine was causing
life-threatening pneumonia; and the FDA, under a lot of scrutiny these
days, would find it very difficult to overlook that.
FDA: “We can’t approve this vaccine. It could cause a few million cases of dire pneumonia…”
The
vaccine companies didn’t make a titanic stupid mistake in their
protocol design. In gearing the protocol to prevent MILD COVID cases,
they did what they did on purpose. It allows them to “reshape their
data” and win FDA emergency approval for their vaccine.
These
companies have no intention of failing, starting over, and spending a
year recruiting 30,000 new volunteers. They want success and money
now. They want to win the race.
And they will win, if the truth isn’t known and shared widely.
The punchline:
Every
“expert,” in August 2021, is instructed to say the vaccine is
definitely protecting people against severe illness and
hospitalization. This is their promotional message to the world.
“Yes,
even if you’re vaccinated, you could become infected with the virus,
you could develop COVID, and you could pass the virus to other people,
BUT you must take the shot. It will protect you from becoming severely
ill.”
As you can see from what I’ve written above, this is a straight-out lie.
It
was always a fantastic lie, from the beginning of COVID vaccine
development, because the design of the clinical trials had nothing to do
with preventing serious illness.
---end of article---
OK, we’re back in the present now; 2022. Everything you’ve just read has been studiously ignored. Shoved to the side.
The
vaccine was only designed, at best, to prevent mild cough, fever,
chills. That’s it. A mild case of flu-like illness. Which cures itself.
That design was intentional. It allowed the vaccine makers to win approval for the injection.
If
they had to wait around for 150 volunteers in the clinical trials to
develop serious pneumonia, that could have taken years. Or forever.
The clinical trials proved nothing.
The vaccine, even in mainstream scientific terms, was worthless.
It was designed that way.
That’s a chunk of blockbuster news anybody with a half a brain should be shouting from the rooftops. Instead: SILENCE.
Why?
Again, because this blockbuster news burns the whole house down.
It takes down the whole vaccine establishment.
And there are lots of vaccine critics who DON’T WANT TO GO ALL THE WAY.
EVEN THOUGH THEY SHOULD.
They back away. They pretend they don’t know what they DO know.
They
could shoot down, overnight, the whole basis for these COVID shots, and
they would expose the vaccine that is maiming and killing of millions
upon millions of people.
But they stay silent.
Show them this information.
Get them to tell you what their problem is.
~~~
(The link to this article posted on my blog is here -- with sources.)
(Follow me on Gab at @jonrappoport)
No comments:
Post a Comment