With
the release of COVID vaccines, and then the mandates, we’ve seen a new
resurgence of people attempting to gain religious exemptions.
Many of these attempts focus on fetal tissue obtained through abortion.
Cardinalli
details the collection of fetal tissue for the cell line named HEK
293. This cell line was used for “testing” the Moderna and Pfizer
vaccines.
Cardinalli
writes: “We know that the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines do not use any
cells derived from abortion in the production process. That is, we know
that we are not being directly injected with fetal cells or their
engineered descendants (though this fact differs with other
manufacturers). We hear that the abortion-derived cell lines were only
used in testing, which should somehow comfort us, though it still means
that the vaccines from which we seek to benefit depend on the
involvement of abortion. We are told that the cell line used in testing
came from one abortion, which took place decades ago. These things are
all true, but they do not serve to inform us fully.”
“What
we may not know follows. The most prominent cell line, called HEK 293,
comes from an abortion performed in the 1970’s. It’s labeled 293 because
that’s how many experimental attempts the researchers needed to get a
working cell line. Therefore, though the abortion-to-experiment ratio is
not precisely one-to-one, hundreds of abortions went into the project,
even if they didn’t result in the working line.”
“HEK
stands for human embryonic kidney. To harvest a viable embryonic kidney
for this purpose, sufficiently healthy children old enough to have
adequately-developed kidneys must be removed from the womb, alive,
typically by cesarean section, and have their kidneys cut out. This must
take place without anesthesia for the child, which [anesthesia] would
lessen the viability of the organs. Instead of being held, rocked, and
comforted in the time intervening between their birth and their death,
they have organs cut out of them alive.”
“There
is no way that a spontaneous abortion could result in the cell line (as
the kidneys cannot remain viable past the brief window in which they
must be harvested) or that some brilliant researcher found a way for
great good to come out of a rare tragedy by making use of a child’s body
donated to science after it was aborted. The deliberate killing of an
unwanted child (a little girl, in the case of HEK 293) took place in the
tortuous manner it did precisely to obtain her organs for research. The
harvest of her organs was the direct cause of her death, prior to
which, she was a living child, outside the womb.”
“I
fear that Pope Francis and Pope Emeritus Benedict may not have had this
information when they received the vaccines. If we re-examine the
Vatican statement that ‘it is morally acceptable to receive COVID-19
vaccines that have used cell lines from aborted fetuses in their
research and productions process,’ we see that it does not apply here.
It does not imagine this scenario. To approve of the currently-available
vaccines, it would have to read ‘it is morally acceptable to receive
COVID-19 vaccines that have used cell lines from living persons, killed
by the harvest of their organs for use in medical research and
productions processes,’ but the Church’s moral teachings could never
truly bend so far.”
“Similar
to the human rights abuses exposed by international tribunal in today’s
China, where unwanted individuals such as religious and political
dissidents are executed by the harvest of their organs for profit, the
little girl whose cells gave rise to the COVID-19 vaccines was brutally
sacrificed for the purpose, as were all the children whose cell lines
failed before her.”
If
Cardinalli is correct in her analysis, not only is the granting of
religious exemptions a foregone conclusion; the whole field of fetal
tissue research, going back many years and involving many pharmaceutical
products should be put on trial.
The
people who have been carrying out the murders, the people who have been
using the harvested tissue, the companies---all of them---on trial.
I
hope many medical professionals will take Cardinalli’s article as a
springboard, and weigh in on what she is very clearly stating.
And not just doctors. All people who are shocked by her conclusions.
So far, I see two counter-claims to Cardinalli’s assertions.
One:
In the fetal cell line HEK 293, the number does not stand for the
number of live-birth abortions performed, in order to obtain a
functioning cell line. The number 293 refers to the number of “passages”
of the one cell line obtained from one abortion. This difference
doesn’t concern me. It’s not central to the fact of murdering
babies. And of course, many such live abortions are performed all over
the world with the goal of obtaining cells lines for research.
Two:
Cardinalli’s claim that the kidneys of the aborted baby must be
harvested very quickly is false. The kidneys can survive for a longer
period.
On that score, I refer you to a devastating video interview
conducted by Robert Kennedy Jr. His guest was SOUND CHOICE
PHARMACEUTICAL INSTITUTE “President and Founder, Dr. Theresa Deisher
Ph.D., [with] over 30 years of pharmaceutical research and leadership
experience. She discovered adult cardiac derived stem cells, has worked
on their therapeutic uses as an alternative to human fetal DNA, and
leads a team of scientists at AVM Biotechnology dedicated to changing
what a diagnosis of cancer, autoimmunity, or chronic infectious disease
means to patients and their loved ones. As a result of this work, Dr.
Deisher is named as an inventor on over 47 patents.”
In
the first 15 minutes of the interview, Deisher makes it quite clear
that infants in the womb are taken out alive, with their blood supply
functioning (essential) and then killed by cutting out their hearts or
their brains. This is what is done in order to obtain tissue that will
be turned into fetal cell lines.
Since
this act of murder is standard practice, it would appear it was
committed against the live baby whose kidney cells became cell line HEK
293, used in testing the COVID vaccines. (More evidence coming in future
articles.)
At
the top of the interview, Kennedy said he didn’t want to get into the
moral aspect of fetal cell lines. But after listening to Deisher, he was
shaken. He said so. He said they would have to cover the moral aspect.
The whole world has to.
~~~
(The link to this article posted on my blog is here.)
(Follow me on Gab at @jonrappoport)
No comments:
Post a Comment