US Attorney General: Mickey Mouse with a gun; our nation has been infiltrated by soccer mom terrorists/There is still no “hundred-employee” vaccine mandate

 

US Attorney General: Mickey Mouse with a gun; our nation has been infiltrated by soccer mom terrorists

by Jon Rappoport

(To read about Jon's mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

John Taylor Gatto: “Our form of compulsory schooling is an invention of the State of Massachusetts around 1850. It was resisted — sometimes with guns — by an estimated eighty percent of the Massachusetts population, the last outpost in Barnstable on Cape Cod not surrendering its children until the 1880s, when the area was seized by militia and children marched to school under guard…” I was there last week. I saw 13 vicious soccer moms sail through the door into a Podunk school board meeting in an old WW2 PT-Boat and kidnap three glowing angels of mercy from the heavens (board members) and take them away to their Moonshine Militia base in the hills of Tennessee. You would think this sort of thing is actually happening, because US Attorney General Merrick Garland has ordered the FBI to investigate a “‘disturbing spike in harassment, intimidation, and threats of violence’ against school administrators, teachers and school board members,” the NY Post reports. Garland has offered no details corroborating this “spike.” The Post also mentions: “Attorney General Merrick Garland is under scrutiny after a parents group revealed that his daughter is married to the co-founder of an education company funded by Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg that allegedly employs critical race theory in its work, according to a report.” Parents across America ARE entering school board meetings and protesting against: the teaching of critical race theory (‘all white people are racists’), the use of books that contain overt descriptions of sex acts, and mandatory masks and vaccines. US Attorney General Garland is viewing these parent protests as borderline terrorism. Well, sure. Why do parents think they have the right to say a word about how their children are educated and indoctrinated? These children belong, first and foremost, to the State. Right? How dare the parents try to meddle. Controlling young minds is a delicate and sophisticated process, and to obtain the desired result, parents have to be kept at a considerable distance. The parents are only there to begin with, because the State doesn’t possess the facilities to house, feed, and train all the children. Public education is MKULTRA for the kiddies, and Merrick Garland is Mickey Mouse waving around a gun to ensure the program moves forward. For gain and glory, I myself am submitting a report to the Department of Justice titled: In Keeping with Current Progressive Trends Celebrating Favored Groups, Positions Vacated by the Resignations of Harassed Teachers Should Be Filled by Non-White Pedophiles Who Are Vaccinated. A mere hour of home-school a day would be much safer than the fare offered by the US Department of Garland Education. All right, let’s get down to brass tacks. American public education is a training ground. That’s how it’s built. Currently, the basic themes are: All whites are devils, all blacks are victims; Gender and sexuality are fluid, all sexual practices are permitted, and young children must be immersed in that river; Medical dictates are paramount and must be obeyed, particularly if they lead to harmful destructive health effects. Putting aside how these themes benefit special-interest groups, the overall outcome is the mental, emotional, physical, and spiritual collapse of generations of the young. And that goal is fundamental to bringing about the collapse of the country. This is called a clue, to anyone paying attention. As I’ve been saying for the last 20 years, a Globalist Elite views America as the last outpost of resistance against the installation of one governance-system for the whole planet. Therefore, America must be taken apart and taken down. We urgently need thousands more parents entering school board meetings across the country, come hell or high water, and exposing these themes of education-mind-control and revolting against the school boards and replacing them. Replacing them with sane parents whose children attend these warped schools. And we need thousands and thousands more parents who home school their children. Honest FBI agents must stand up publicly and resist the orders of Merrick Garland. ~~~ (The link to this article posted on my blog is here.) (Follow me on Gab at @jonrappoport)

Use this link to order Jon's Matrix Collections.

Jon Rappoport The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.

You can find this article and more at NoMoreFakeNews.

 

There is still no “hundred-employee” vaccine mandate

by Jon Rappoport

(To read about Jon's mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

First, the broad strokes. Just over a month ago, Biden directed the Department of Labor and OSHA to develop the details of a COVID vaccine mandate for all US companies with 100 or more employees.

It appears (but it is not certain) that this mandate will allow several escape hatches: medical and religious exemptions, and weekly testing as a substitute for vaccination.

If there are exemptions, we don’t know under what terms they’ll be permitted.

The Department of Labor has not yet issued the regulations framing and detailing this mandate.

Indeed, as the law firm Eckert Seamans states on its website: “The President did not give a deadline or timeframe for the New COVID ETS [Emergency Temporary Standard], but it is likely to take weeks or months to be issued. Though it is a simple directive on its face, there are complex issues that OSHA will have to work out in preparing the ETS. Moreover, even though it is an emergency standard, OSHA still must build a basis for meeting the statutory criteria for emergency standards, and that takes time.”

“Recall that in January the President directed OSHA to issue a COVID ETS…and he imposed a March 15 deadline for action on that. However, OSHA did not issue the First COVID ETS until June, and even then, it applied only to healthcare settings…”

“However, if the New COVID ETS toes the line the President has drawn, it will be considerably broader and certainly more heavy handed, so it is more likely to draw court challenges from employers and others who already are declaring their opposition to such a broad mandate---and that could mean further delay.”

So we don’t yet have a set of rules for this 100-employee mandate, a month after Biden made his speech, and perhaps we won’t have those rules for some time.

Therefore, the question is: Right now, does the mandate exist?

The Eckert Seamans law firm has an answer: “The President’s statement [on September 9] itself imposes no immediate legal obligations or penalties as far as private employers under the OSH Act. It is simply an announcement that he has directed OSHA to promulgate the New COVID ETS, and provides a few details of what he expects it to contain.”

There is no mandate now. There is only an announcement that there will be a mandate.

There will be a mandate when the Department of Labor issues its regulations.

If an employer went to court now, to challenge the mandate, the judge (assuming competency and honesty) would say, “Your challenge has no merit, because there is no mandate yet.”

And if there is no mandate yet, no employer with 100 or more employees is under obligation to order his employees to take the vaccine.

Note: I’m not talking about the Biden order that all federal employees and contractors must be vaccinated. That is a different situation.

Right now, all employers with 100 or more employees who are ordering their employees to take the vaccine are doing so voluntarily.

If they are ordering their employees to take the vaccine “because we have to, because the federal government is ordering it,” they are making a factually incorrect statement.

This possibly opens the door to an employee filing an action against his employer: “I was told to take the vaccine under false pretenses…”

I’m not saying such a charge would stand up in court, but it’s worth thinking about.

On September 10, Biden Press Secretary Jen Psaki took questions from reporters. She couched the 100-employee mandate this way:

“So, Congress passed a law in 1970 — the Occupational Safety and Health Act. And the reason the Department of Labor and OSHA is able to take the strong step to protect Americans from COVID [with the new mandate] is that Congress passed that law. Yesterday’s announcement by the Department of Labor is proceeding under that law. And the law basically requires the Department of Labor take action when it finds grave risk to workers. And certainly a pandemic that killed more than 600,000 people qualifies as ‘grave risk to workers’.”

“And so, if the Secretary determines workers are in grave danger, he has an obligation to issue an emergency temporary standard [ETS]. That’s exactly what he did.”

I believe this is incorrect. Psaki is implying the 100-employee mandate already exists. Her words can certainly be taken that way. But the mandate doesn’t yet exist, because the Department of Labor hasn’t issued the regulations which CONSTITUTE the mandate.

Again: ALL EMPLOYERS WITH 100 OR MORE EMPLOYEES WHO ARE ORDERING THEIR EMPLOYEES TO TAKE THE VACCINE, OR ARE FIRING THOSE WHO REFUSE, ARE DOING SO VOLUNTARILY.

They’re caving in. They’re issuing orders to their employees before the regulations are issued, and before the many legal challenges against those regulations pile up---challenges which, if they chose to, they could help spearhead.

~~~

(The link to this article posted on my blog is here.)

(Follow me on Gab at @jonrappoport)