Adam
Crabb, Australian journalist (The Crazz Files): “…the Australian
government is now plunging the country into the darkest period in its
history. The coronavirus is not the cause of this darkness. The Regime’s
use of the coronavirus as a pretext to establish a totalitarian system
of control over the Australian people is the cause of this darkness.”
An
Australian woman advocated freedom. Freedom from lockdowns and
mandates. So she was criticized on social media? She was censored?
Her name is Monica Smit. She’s sitting in jail.
The fascist authorities agreed to release her on bail, if she renounced everything she stood for.
Does that sound familiar? The USSR. Show trials. The massive power of the State coming down on an individual.
Monica Smit refused the deal.
She clings to her faith, her courage, her vision, her ideals, against the scum of the earth.
The very least we can do is spread her story far and wide.
Here are the details.
The
Age, September 1, 2021: “A woman charged with incitement and accused of
urging people to attend anti-lockdown protests remains in custody
despite being granted bail, because she has refused to agree to
conditions imposed by a magistrate.”
[Incitement? Is that what demanding freedom now means? In Australia, yes.]
“Monica
Smit, the founder of activist group Reignite Democracy Australia –
which opposes the Victorian government’s handling of the COVID-19
pandemic – remained in custody at a Melbourne police station on
Wednesday over her refusal to sign a bail consent form.”
“Ms
Smit was granted bail on two charges of incitement and three of
breaching the Chief Health Officer’s directions, but after a 10-minute
conversation with her lawyer to clarify the conditions she had to accept
to get bail, defence counsel Marcel White told Melbourne Magistrates
Court the 33-year-old did not want to sign the consent form.”
“Magistrate
Luisa Bazzani responded: “’It’s a matter for her. I am not about to
sweet talk her into bail if she wants to stay in custody’.”
[Monica Smit doesn’t want to stay in custody. She wants to keep her right to advocate for freedom in Australia.]
“Ms
Smit was arrested on Tuesday and was to stay in custody at Dandenong
police station on Wednesday night. The only way she could be released on
bail was by agreeing to the magistrate’s conditions and signing the
consent form, or by taking her bail application to a higher court.”
“Police
allege Ms Smit incited people on social media to attend two
anti-lockdown protests in Melbourne last month, including the violent
August 21 event where at least 4000 people demonstrated and where at
least nine police officers were injured.”
[I
see. Telling people to attend a protest, where it turns out that police
are injured, equals telling people to attack the police? Is that what
you’re saying? Apparently so. Are you listening to your own lies?]
“Prosecutor
Anthony Albore said Ms Smit used the messaging app Telegram to
encourage people to attend the protests. Ms Smit’s group has 18,000
followers on Telegram, the prosecutor said, as well as 67,000 followers
on Facebook and an email list of 63,000 people.”
“Court
documents state that in the lead-up to the August 11 protest, Ms Smit
posted that ‘lockdowns take lives’ and urged people to demonstrate.”
[So? Lockdowns
DO take lives. Many, many lives. And urging people to DEMONSTRATE? Is
that suddenly a crime? Are protestors supposed to stand silent with
their heads bowed for a few hours, praying to the Prime Minister to set
them free?]
“She
[Smit] also posted numerous messages before the August 21 protest, the
documents allege, including: ‘The more they lock us up, the more people
will have nothing left to lose ... and that’s when Australia stands
up!’”
[Nothing
left to lose---that’s another true statement. And for making the
statement, SHE is now locked up. In jail. Obviously, Monica should have
written, “and that’s when Australia lies down…let’s go out into the
street and demand our enslavement…”]
“Other
posts encouraged people to wear masks while travelling to the protest
but to take them off once in central Melbourne. Another message said:
‘Stand up Melbourne’.”
[Ooo. Take off your masks. Another incitement to mayhem. People who show their faces are terrorists.]
“Prosecutors did not oppose Ms Smit getting bail as long as it was subject to conditions.”
“After
legal argument over the conditions, Ms Bazzani ruled that if Ms Smit
was to get bail she had to abide by a 7pm curfew, abide by the Chief
Health Officer’s directions and not incite anyone to breach those
directions or publish anything that might incite breaches. She also had
to remove any material previously published online that might incite
people, not attend protests, and had to wear a mask when outdoors unless
she had a medical exemption.”
[USSR
tactic. Perhaps Monica should appear in court, in chains, before
television cameras, and read a prepared statement confessing to capital
crimes.]
“The
magistrate refused to include two conditions proposed by police: a call
for Reignite Democracy Australia’s social media accounts to be
deactivated, and an order which would have prohibited online discussions
about lockdown measures. Ms Bazzani said those two proposals would
‘overstep the mark’.”
[Thank God for the merciful State. They love us, they really do.]
“Ms
Smit, a self-described journalist, was arrested in Brighton on Tuesday,
not long after filming herself talking about small-scale anti-lockdown
protests.”
[She’s
a self-described journalist, whereas talking news head puppets on
television are described as journalists by their bosses. Yes, that’s a
crucial difference. Of course. Let’s make it a crime for people to
describe themselves as journalists.]
“She
faces a further two charges of breaching the Chief Health Officer’s
directions by attending a protest in Melbourne on October 31 last year.”
[More
charges. The Chief Health Officer has all the rights of a
dictator. Naturally. And the sheep should kneel before him. Does he wear
a ring? Can we kiss it? I have an idea. Let’s tell him to kiss THIS.]
---end of The Age article---
JUDGE:
So Mr. Madison, I understand you and your friends are composing a
document called THE CONSTITUTION. I’m also told this founding document
declares FREEDOM the preferred state of affairs in our new nation.
JAMES MADISON: Yes, your honor. That’s right. Why are you asking? Is there a problem?
JUDGE: There most certainly is. Freedom is a flexible concept. It must be given and taken away by those who have wisdom.
MADISON: Who are these wise ones?
JUDGE:
The men who are running things. They can assess issues of safety and
danger as they arise and measure the amount of freedom allowed to the
people at any given moment.
MADISON:
Really. Well, once the new nation is founded, I assure you you’ll be
removed from your position of power. You’ll be seen as a felon.
JUDGE: I doubt that.
MADISON: Then you’re not only a criminal, you’re a moron.
~~~
(The link to this article posted on my blog is here -- with sources.)
(Follow me on Gab at @jonrappoport)
No comments:
Post a Comment