Graphenea[dot]com: “Graphene -- What Is It?
...Graphene is the thinnest compound known to man at one atom thick,
the lightest material known... the strongest compound [ever]
discovered... the best conductor of heat at room temperature... the best
conductor of electricity known... potentially an eco-friendly,
sustainable solution for an almost limitless number of applications.
Since the discovery...of graphene, applications within different
scientific disciplines have exploded, with huge gains being made
particularly in high-frequency electronics, bio, chemical and magnetic
sensors, ultra-wide bandwidth photodetectors, and energy storage and
generation.”
On
May 28, I wrote and posted an article about toxic graphene-containing
face masks. Since then, the subject of graphene has blown up across the
Internet.
There are now claims that COVID test swabs and even vaccines contain the substance.
A
group of Spanish researchers report they’ve analyzed a vial of COVID
vaccine and found it’s virtually nothing but graphene oxide---98-99%.
I’m
reserving my opinion about that. If true, it would mean the vaccine
criminals were asking for their crime to be discovered. They weren’t
trying to hide the graphene in the vaccine; they were parading it for
anyone to see.
I hope another independent research group analyzes another vial of COVID vaccine and reports their findings.
Meanwhile,
we are suddenly living in a graphene world. The substance is
everywhere. This reminds me of the massive introduction of GMO farming
in the 1990s. The strategy is familiar in industry: flood the market
with a new “miracle” product; when doubters start reporting on serious
health risks and damage, claim they’re crazy, while preparing to combat
law suits that will drag on for decades.
Actually, that’s been the strategy of the COVID vaccine makers; except in their case, they’re legally exempt from liability.
I strongly recommend reading the whole release. The first paragraph:
“INBRAIN
Neuroelectronics, a company at the intersection of medtech, deeptech
and digital health dedicated to developing the world’s first
GRAPHENE-BASED INTELLIGENT NEUROELECTRIC SYSTEM, today announced a
collaboration with Merck, a leading science and technology company. The
aim of the collaboration is to co-develop the next generation of
graphene bioelectronic vagus nerve therapies targeting severe chronic
diseases in Merck’s therapeutic areas through INNERVIA Bioelectronics, a
subsidiary of INBRAIN Neuroelectronics.” (emphasis is mine)
They’re
not just talking about “vagus nerve therapies.” This enterprise is an
attempt to create a whole new frontier for global medical
experimentation and treatment, in order to “cure diseases that are
presently incurable.” At the center is graphene.
The
phrase “intelligent neuroelectric system” suggests the corporations are
planning to superimpose their own automatic nerve inputs and responses,
in the body, on top of the body’s natural nervous system. To put it
another way, they want to replace “deficiencies and errors” in the
natural nervous system with their own catalog of preferred stimuli and
responses. If the extreme dangers of this reprogramming aren’t obvious
to you, think it through. Take a prime natural physical system that is
already automatic and sideline it in favor of a new ironclad automatic
system. And you have a running start on an AI Pavlovian human.
“Doctor, we rang the bell and the patient drooled. It’s marvelous.”
Graphene
toxicity requires a great deal of attention from independent
investigators. Among the many topics needing clarification---the
different forms of graphene, their relative toxicities, and their
relative tendencies to detach from synthetic materials and enter the
body.
Here is my original May 28 graphene article about masks (with new edits):
As
my readers know, for the past year I’ve been demonstrating that the
SARS-CoV-2 virus has never been proven to exist. Therefore, face masks
are nothing more (or less) than a mind-control ritual.
However, much has been written about the harm the masks cause.
And
now we have an official declaration. On April 2, 2021, Health Canada
issued an advisory, warning people not to “use face masks labelled to
contain graphene or biomass graphene.”
Andrew
Maynard covers this issue in a medium[dot]com article, “Manufacturers
have been using nanotechnology-derived graphene in face masks---now
there are safety concerns.”
Those concerns? Masks could create lung problems.
Of
course, since COVID-19 is claimed to be a lung disease, you can see
where that leads: the remedy turns out to cause what it’s supposed to
prevent. I could write a book detailing how many times this
“coincidence” pops up in the field of medicine.
Maynard’s
article traces the safety concerns to a Chinese mask manufacturer,
Shandong, but points out that millions of graphene-containing masks are
in use around the world, produced by a whole host of companies.
Yesterday,
I saw a mask sold to a customer. It was sealed in a plain plastic
bag. No manufacturer’s name, no list of materials in the mask, nothing
but a bar code. Does the mask contain graphene? No way to know.
So far, it’s not clear whether the nanoparticles of graphene in the masks also contain highly destructive metals.
The
mainstream literature on graphene is ambiguous and far from reassuring:
‘yes, it’s probably toxic to the lungs; perhaps not seriously so;
perhaps only temporarily; there are more questions than answers.’
Why
have these masks been certified anywhere in the world for public use?
Why haven’t the CDC and the WHO made definitive statements about safety
concerns? Why didn’t public health agencies, long ago, run/demand
definitive tests to see whether, and to what extent, the nanoparticles
of graphene detach themselves from various types of masks and enter the
body?
At materialstoday[dot]com, we have, “Is graphene safe?”
“But,
it is the very nature of graphene that might be cause for concern: thin
and lightweight, yet tough and intractable particles are notoriously
worrisome in terms of the detrimental effects they can have on our
health, particularly when breathed in…”
“Ken
Donaldson is a respiratory toxicologist at the University of Edinburgh
and he and his colleagues are among the first to raise the warning flag
on graphene, at least for nanoscopic platelets of the material. It is
not too great a leap of the imagination to imagine how such tiny flakes
of carbon might be transported deep within the lungs similar to asbestos
fibres and coal dust. Once lodged within, there is no likely mechanism
for the removal or break down of such inert particles and they might
reside on these sensitive tissues triggering a chronic inflammatory
response or interfering with the normal cellular functions.”
Does this make any sane person feel safe about wearing a mask containing graphene particles?
“We
have a new idea and a new product. It’s designed to force you to
breathe in nanoparticles of graphene. Who knows what’ll happen? Try it
and see.”
Yes,
try it. And if you then develop a lung infection, since that is called a
cardinal pandemic symptom, you could hit the jackpot and earn a
diagnosis of COVID-19.
At
which point the fun really begins, as you try to explain to your doctor
that the cause isn’t a virus, but rather nanoparticles of graphene in
your mask. If you play your cards right, you could end up in the psych
ward with other “conspiracy theorists.”
“Can
you believe it, nurse? I had this guy a few hours ago coughing and
dripping mucus all over the place. Inflamed lungs. Classic COVID case.
But he tells me he’s breathing in NANOPARTICLES. I gave him a sedative
and sent him to the Crazy Pen. Where do these people get these stories?
Have you ever heard of graphene? That’s what they put in pencils,
right?”
“I don’t know, Doc. My cousin thinks she’s breathing in these nanos, too. I told her she needs a Thorazine drip.”
The
masks are COVID-diagnosis promoters. Step one: breathe in nanoparticles
of graphene. Step two: therefore develop a so-called major COVID
symptom---lung infection. Step three: test false-positive on the PCR
test (happens millions of times, as I’ve documented). And boom, you’re a
COVID case.
In
keeping with local laws, I’ve applied for a license to own a mask as a
weapon. If I gain approval, I plan to seal it in a glass box and mount
it on the wall next to my grenade launcher and Civil War cannonball.
~~~
(The link to this article posted on my blog is here -- with sources.)
(Follow me on Gab at @jonrappoport)
No comments:
Post a Comment