There
are a number of badly informed scientists who believe current “animal
models” prove SARS-CoV-2 is infectious. They’re wrong.
First
of all, I’ve been demonstrating that no one has proved the virus
exists. But putting that aside for the moment and assuming it does
exist, for the purposes of argument only…what is an animal model?
Researchers
take a group of animals and inject them with a serum which contains a
purported virus. Then the researchers see whether the animals develop
symptoms and (supposed) markers of the disease in question.
So far, I have only found evidence that researchers are using mice and, perhaps, another similar species for their model.
Yet they claim, because of the mice’s reactions, that, yes, the virus is infectious.
This is absurd.
The
whole point of animal models is: you work your way up the tree of
species, from mice, rabbits, dogs, cats, and so on, until you arrive at
the species which most closely resembles humans, which would be
chimps. The reactions of chimps are what you’re looking for.
After
all, the entire enterprise is geared to estimate whether the virus will
infect humans. Since injecting humans with a virus is verboten, you
work with chimps.
So, asserting that infecting mice is proof of anything is a gross lie.
Any conventional scientist would know that.
Another
issue: quite often, you’ll find that the mice in these experiments have
been genetically altered. Why? Why can’t researchers work with ordinary
wild mice?
Obviously,
because they want to prep the mice in a way that would make them more
vulnerable to viruses. Another absurdity. In that case, the researchers
are not really working with animals at all. They’re working with
artifacts modified in the lab.
Using a mouse model of SARS-CoV-2 to prove the virus is infectious is a con. A farce.
Back
in 1988, when I was writing my book, AIDS INC., I looked into HIV
experiments using chimps. I spoke with the man who was monitoring all
the facilities in the US where groups of these chimps were held.
Keep
in mind, this was four years after HIV had been announced as the cause
of AIDS. So the chimps had been in cages for a while. Cut off from their
companions and families, in a completely alien environment, imprisoned,
isolated. These circumstances alone would have contributed to a grossly
reduced state of immune-system capability. And yet…
The
chief monitor over all these chimp facilities told me that, thus far,
none of the injections of HIV (assuming the virus actually exists) had
caused any symptoms which could be aligned with the wide-ranging
definition of AIDS.
This
utter failure deterred no mainstream AIDS scientist. In other words, if
the animal model fails, ignore it. Claim the virus is infectious
anyway.
Welcome to big-time research.
---Oh, and one other thing. Newsflash: Chimps are not humans. ALL animal models are false.
Other than that, the system is perfect.
(The link to this article posted on my blog is here.)
No comments:
Post a Comment