First
of all, very high praise goes to Christine Massey, for her work in
exposing the coronavirus fraud. In a half-sane world, she would have
received many awards by now.
Her latest communication reads: “Freedom
of Information reveals Public Health Agency of Canada has no record of
'SARS-COV-2' isolation performed by anyone, anywhere, ever"
I
urge readers to visit Massey’s site and read her new article and follow
all the links. Her findings are stunning. She and her team have made
about 40 FOI requests to public health agencies in various countries,
requesting proof that SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated. You’ll see from the
responses that not one agency has records demonstrating isolation.
This means exactly what it seems to mean: the virus has not been proven to exist.
As
for the people who keep chanting that the virus has been isolated, I
can keep explaining why this is not so. I can do this forever.
Whether
it’s a scientist, a gaggle of scientists, a government official, a
person waving a study around like a newspaper with a hot headline from
an old movie, my response is the same, and I make it knowing that some
people will intentionally refuse to understand it:
ONE: SAYING the virus has been isolated is not the same thing as proving it’s been isolated.
TWO: Researchers routinely twist the meaning of the word “isolated” to mean its very opposite.
Isolation
is absurdly taken to mean: “We have the virus in a soup in a dish in
the lab. It is not separated out (isolated) from the soup. The soup
contains various cells---human, monkey---and an array of (toxic)
chemicals and drugs. We know the virus is there, because it is infecting
and killing some of the cells.”
A reasonably bright junior high school student would immediately realize this is not a description of isolation.
A
reasonably bright high school student would point out that there is no
proof the virus is infecting and killing cells, because the toxic
chemicals and drugs in the soup are sufficient to do the
cell-killing. He might also mention the cells in the soup are being
starved of nutrients, and this alone could cause their death.
Therefore, there is no evidence that “the virus” is actually in the soup.
Therefore, there is no evidence in this situation for claiming the virus exists at all.
On
to the next factor: the ever-present claims of having “sequenced the
genetic structure of the virus.” Again, SAYING the sequencing has been
achieved is not the same thing as proving it.
And
proving it is impossible, if you don’t already have the virus in a
purified and isolated state. Instead of proof, you have shady inference
and assumption and guesswork and deception.
How can you sequence something you don’t have? You can’t.
I’ve used several analogies to explain this nonsense. Here is another one:
An art restorer, conservationist, and historian is called to the home of a well-known mob enforcer.
The
enforcer tells him he has something to show him in the attic. On the
way, they pass through the living room, where several open suitcases are
sitting on the floor. They’re spilling over with stacks of
cash. Automatic weapons and boxes of ammo are laid out on a long
table. In an open closet, the art expert sees a row of jackets with
designations indicating: FBI, BATF, Federal Marshal, sheriff, local
police.
In the attic, the mob enforcer points to a small pile of tiny chips on the floor.
“These
are from a lost Rembrandt self-portrait,” he says. “Collect them, go to
work on them, give me a favorable report. Or else.”
Back
in his lab, the obedient art expert quickly divides the chips into
three groups. The first group is water-color chips from a child’s toy
set. The second group is mid-20th-century acrylic chips. The third group
is lead white chips, used for a hundred years on either side of the
rough date when Rembrandt could have painted the lost self-portrait.
The art expert finds that Rembrandt (and hundreds of other painters) used this general type of lead white.
The
expert constructs, from other scholars’ work, an essay claiming there
was and is a lost Rembrandt self-portrait. He excludes commentary that
denies the existence of this painting.
He
“sequences” all this information and conjecture and guesswork (and con)
into a convincing report, which points to the small pile of chips in
the mob enforcer’s attic.
(It turns out the enforcer intends to accuse a rival mob boss of stealing the “lost Rembrandt self-portrait.”)
The
existence of the self-portrait is thus “established,” which is to say,
it is put together, cobbled from various sources, concocted, smoothed
out by ignoring counter-information---employing a vast generality about
lead white paint.
Of
course, in all this ridiculous invention, the self-portrait itself is
not there, it is not in hand, its existence has not been demonstrated,
it is a story, THERE IS NO ISOLATION OF IT from surrounding assumption
and gimcrackery.
So
it is with SARS-CoV-2. Pieces of data that reference prior supposed RNA
sequences in libraries are all strung together, to resemble what is
claimed to be a new and unique coronavirus---without having the actual
virus, without having shown it exists at all.
In
past articles, I’ve quoted two key documents, one from the CDC, and one
from “the Drosten group.” These documents were describing how to
perform the PCR test for the new virus---and in both documents, the
authors state they don’t have the virus.
So…a test for what? The virus you don’t have.
All
claims that these authors eventually DID obtain the virus are based on
the crooked definition of “isolated” I’ve explained above.
Yes,
they got hold of “isolated virus,” meaning the soup in the dish in the
lab---and we’re back where we began. Isolation meaning non-isolation.
I’ve
explained all this several times, in detail, in past articles, and of
course people here and there continue to send me studies claiming
isolation.
I can do this forever.
People
can say, “Well, we know from photos of Martian soil samples that on the
second Tuesday in March, 1843, there was a picnic on Mars attended by
three virologists from the Martian Institute of Epidemiology, and they
ate baloney sandwiches on rye toast and drank Miller Lite.”
I
enjoy these fictional tales in a vacuum. I would leave them alone,
except that the failure to prove the existence of SARS-Cov-2 is at the
bottom of all the lies that have been used to steal the freedom and
assets and livelihoods from at least a billion people.
I won’t leave that alone.
Neither should you.
“…but
wait, Mr. Rappoport, here is a study from Outer Mongolia that states
the virus has been isolated. This seems to settle the science on this
issue, once and for all.”
Sure. Sure it does. And the sun sets every day at noon in Cincinnati.
(The link to this article posted on my blog is here -- with sources.) 
No comments:
Post a Comment