“To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election,” Barr told the AP.
That’s
because he isn’t looking. Here are several sites, among hundreds, that
carry evidence of vote fraud on a continuing basis: American Thinker,
Infowars, Gateway Pundit, Revolver.news, the Air Vent blog.
Barr
has now appointed a special counsel, John Durham, to look
into…what? Russiagate? The man in the moon? Richard Nixon? I’m sure
we’ll get a report by 2026.
Slick
Willie Barr’s remark to AP sent a signal to judges and lawyers: the
Justice Department isn’t active, relax, no need to rush, feel free to
dismiss cases, you won’t be risking adverse consequences.
That, from the number-one law enforcement man in the nation.
Meanwhile,
if you visit those sites, I just mentioned, you’ll find all sorts of
evidence of fraud. Ballot stuffing. Invented ballots. Backdated
ballots. Failure to allow observers to monitor massive amounts of vote
counting. Statistical anomalies showing impossible vote results. Vote
switching. Electronic machine vulnerabilities. Software back
doors. Fractional vote counts instead of raw number counts. Dominion and
Smartmatic connections to foreign entities. The vote-count apparatus
connected to the internet and therefore vulnerable to switches in
numbers. Battleground states stopping the vote count on election night,
after which huge numbers of votes changed from Trump to Biden. Alarming
numbers of affidavits from poll workers attesting to fraud. Boarded up
windows to block observers from watching vote counts, even from a
distance. Observers intimidated and ordered to move away from vote
counting personnel. Reputable data analysts stating vote fraud was
occurring on a large scale.
Other than THAT, not a hint of impropriety. Nothing to see, forget about it.
And
Barr didn’t need to say he was sure the election was a fraud; he only
needed to say there was reason for the DOJ to do an immediate and
far-reaching INVESTIGATION.
But he wouldn’t even say that.
And
lest we forget, this election was CALLED BY THE NEWS NETWORKS. That’s
what “election result” MEANS so far. That’s all it means.
Some
of the networks take their election information from the Associated
Press. But the AP is a consortium OF those same networks.
In other words, the news networks take their election information from themselves.
And
on the strength of THAT, Attorney General Barr believes the result of
the election has been decided; and there is no reason to mount an
all-out investigation of the “result.”
Pundits
are worried that Trump’s attack on the outcome makes the US look like a
banana republic, in the eyes of the rest of the world.
Sorry,
too late for that concern. When news networks call the election based
on projections from themselves, we’re looking at a closed system, a
bubble, a banana 3000 miles long.
Barr is a banana plantation boss, protecting the terminally corrupt territory from prying eyes.
In an act of extreme kindness, he should be busted down to hosing off dust and sand from cop cars in Death Valley.
He’s
made himself into---or he already was---a double agent. While
professing support for the president, he was preparing to undermine him.
Trump,
throughout his term in office, has shown an uncanny ability to choose
key people who are actually out to destroy him. I believe he thought
Mike Flynn would be his main protector and buffer, and when Flynn was
taken down, Trump didn’t know where to turn. He was at sea. A CEO or
Commander-in-Chief is supposed to be better than that.
Barr’s
refusal to declare an all-out war on election fraud creates a gigantic
confusion. While court cases and state legislative hearings move along,
and evidence of fraud piles up, the DOJ stands aside, as if these
momentous events are of no more interest than a spring baseball game.
CRIMINAL CHARGES are at the bottom of this national disgrace. And there are no criminal charges.
Although
extreme dereliction of duty ought to be a felony, Barr has a built-in
protection. Prosecutorial discretion. It means a government lawyer can
pick and choose his cases. He can go to court or not go to court.
“Let’s
see. We have the murder weapon. The suspect’s prints are on the gun,
which the cops found in his hand as he was standing over the dead body
of the victim. We have surveillance video which shows the suspect
shooting the victim. But you know what? We’re going to pass on this
case. The killer has no previous record. He’s from a good family…”
For
readers, and for Slick Willie Barr, I want to describe one expert
witness to fraud who has already stepped forward. He is just one of a
number of such witnesses. Just one. But if he doesn’t sound alarm bells
for the Justice Department, indicating that an IMMEDIATE investigation
must be launched yesterday, nobody will sound those alarms.
Navid
Keshavarz-Nia. His credentials include extensive work for the US
intelligence community. This is not necessarily a positive
recommendation. However, such people are often cited as reliable by the
press and the government. They’re courted and coddled and quoted and
used to make cases.
Andrea Widburg, writing at American Thinker, headlines her piece, “The ‘smartest man in the room’ has joined Sidney Powell’s team”:
“Dr.
Kershavarz-Nia's name may not mean a lot to you, but it's one of the
weightiest names in the world when it comes to sniffing out
cyber-security problems.”
“We
know how important Dr. Kershavarz-Nia is because, just two and a half
months ago, the New York Times ran one of its Sunday long-form articles
about a massive, multi-million-dollar fraud that a talented grifter ran
against the American intelligence and military communities. Dr.
Kershavarz-Nia is one of the few people who comes off looking good”:
(Quoting
the Times) “Navid Keshavarz-Nia, those who worked with him said, ‘was
always the smartest person in the room.’ In doing cybersecurity and
technical counterintelligence work for the C.I.A., N.S.A. and F.B.I., he
had spent decades connecting top-secret dots…”
Widburg
continues at American thinker: “Not only does Dr. Kershavarz-Nia have
an innate intelligence, but he's also got extraordinary academic and
practical skills in cyber-fraud detection and analysis…”
“His
qualifications include a B.A., M.A., and Ph.D. in various areas of
electrical and computer engineering. In addition, ‘I have advanced
trained from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA), National Security Agency (NSA), DHS office of
Intelligence & Analysis (I&A) and Massachusetts Institution of
Technology (MIT)’."
“Professionally,
Dr. Kershavarz-Nia has spent his career as a cyber-security
engineer. ‘My experience,’ he attests, ‘spans 35 years performing
technical assessment, mathematical modeling, cyber-attack pattern
analysis, and security intelligence[.]’ I will not belabor the
point. Take it as given that Dr. Kershavarz-Nia may know more about
cyber-security than anyone else in America.”
“So what does the brilliant Dr. Kershavarz-Nia have to say? This:
1.
Hammer and Scorecard [an alleged package of CIA vote-hacking programs]
is real, not a hoax (as Democrats allege), and both are used to
manipulate election outcomes.
2.
Dominion, ES&S, Scytl, and Smartmatic [electronic vote-systems
companies] are all vulnerable to fraud and vote manipulation — and the
mainstream media reported on these vulnerabilities in the past.
3. Dominion has been used in other countries to ‘forge election results.’
4. Dominion's corporate structure is deliberately confusing to hide relationships with Venezuela, China, and Cuba.
5. Dominion machines are easily hackable.
6. Dominion memory cards with cryptographic key access to the systems were stolen in 2019.”
“Although
he had no access to the machines, Dr. Kershavarz has looked at
available data about the election and the vote results. Based on that
information, he concluded:
1.
The counts in the disputed states (Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan,
Arizona, Nevada, and Georgia) show electronic manipulation.
2.
The simultaneous decision in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Arizona, Nevada,
and Georgia to pretend to halt counting votes was unprecedented and
demonstrated a coordinated effort to collude toward desired results.
3. One to two percent of votes were forged in Biden's favor.
4. Optical scanners were set to accept unverified, un-validated ballots.
5. The scanners failed to keep records for audits, an outcome that must have been deliberately programmed.
6. The stolen cryptographic key, which applied to all voting systems, was used to alter vote counts.
7.
The favorable votes pouring in after hours for Biden could not be
accounted for by a Democrat preference for mailed in ballots. They
demonstrated manipulation. For example, in Pennsylvania, it was
physically impossible to feed 400,000 ballots into the machines within
2–3 hours.
8. Dominion used Chinese parts, and there's reason to believe that China, Venezuela, Cuba interfered in the election.
9.
There was a Hammer and Scorecard cyber-attack that altered votes in the
battleground states, and then forwarded the results to Scytl servers in
Frankfurt, Germany, to avoid detection.
10. The systems failed to produce any auditable results.”
“Based
on the above findings, Dr. Keshavarz-Nia concluded with ‘high
confidence that the election 2020 data were altered in all battleground
states resulting in a [sic] hundreds of thousands of votes that were
cast for President Trump to be transferred [sic] to Vice President
Biden’."
---end of quotes from American Thinker article---
Here’s a question: If you’re William Barr, what else do you want, in terms of qualifications, from an expert witness?
From all appearances, Navid Keshavarz-Nia is exactly the sort of person you would be looking for in serious cases.
Except,
perhaps, in THIS case. Because this case not only cuts across the
grain, it proposes a titanic refutation of the announced result of a
presidential election. And not only an election, but one in which the
sitting president is despised by the press, millions of Democrats,
untold numbers of government employees, foreign government leaders, and
rioters-in-waiting, who would stage mass destruction in cites, if the
election is resolved in favor of the sitting president.
So,
Mr. Barr, in this case, who qualifies as an expert witness, to whom
very close attention should be paid? Or does the qualification of a
witness come down to WHAT he will say?
Are you calculating which threat from which side of the political spectrum can visit the greater harm on you?
Have you already sold out? If so, to what or whom?
Your own fear?
“Yet
panics, in some cases, have their uses; they produce as much good as
hurt. Their duration is always short; the mind soon grows through them,
and acquires a firmer habit than before. But their peculiar advantage
is, that they are the touchstones of sincerity and hypocrisy, and bring
things and men to light, which might otherwise have lain forever
undiscovered. In fact, they have the same effect on secret traitors,
which an imaginary apparition would have upon a private murderer. They
sift out the hidden thoughts of man, and hold them up in public to the
world.” Thomas Paine, The Crisis, December 23, 1776.
Your move, Mr. Barr.
(The link to this article posted on my blog is here -- with sources.) 
No comments:
Post a Comment