“My
brother’s cousin, who works at Harvard studying snails, says OF COURSE
they’ve isolated SARS-CoV-2, and they’ve sequenced its genetic structure
many times…”
I have written several articles documenting the fact that the COVID virus is missing in action.
And
when I say missing, I’m talking about two MAJOR confessions, from both
the CDC and a group of study-authors in Europe…and in each case, these
people were in the process of assembling instructions on how to perform
the diagnostic PCR test for that very virus. The virus they said they
didn’t have.
They didn’t have it because they couldn’t get it.
They couldn’t get it because no one had it.
In other words, the existence of the COVID virus is unproven.
Now,
I want to point out three factors that produce a hypnotic effect. Even
in the absence of the virus, these factors seem to indicate the virus
“must exist.” I’m not talking about government or media pronouncements,
which are obvious.
ONE: Scientists and public health agencies claim they’ve ISOLATED the virus.
There
is no reason to believe them. The term “isolation” is thrown around
like a politician throws around the term, “the people.”
Isolation
of a virus SHOULD mean it is separated out from all the genetic,
cellular, microbial, and waste material that surrounds it. But don’t
assume, when professionals are talking or writing, that this is what
they DO mean. Do not assume that.
For
example, they often mean: “We have the virus in a dish in the lab. The
soup in the dish contains human cells, animal cells, chemicals, toxic
drugs, and other material. However, we know the virus is there and
growing, because it is killing the cells…”
Wrong. There
is more than sufficient non-viral toxic substance in the soup that
could be doing the cell-killing. Further, the cells in the dish are
being starved of nutrients. That factor alone could produce cell
death. And obviously, “the virus” in the dish is surrounded by this mix
of material. It is far from isolated.
TWO:
The following hypnotic effect ropes in some of the brightest medical
and scientific professionals, who otherwise challenge all sorts of
medical dogma. It is: “The genetic sequence of the virus is well
established. Many studies confirm this.”
Well, sure. If experts have mapped out the genetic structure of the virus, the virus must exist. Right?
Wrong. The sequence is INFERRED. It is ASSUMED.
Inferred
from what? The genetic sequence could be cobbled together from several
sources: a piece or pieces of RNA that have been arbitrarily chosen as
“relevant clues”; chosen according to a bias in favor of a certain type
of virus.
Bias? What
does that mean? I’ll explain. When a few dozen people in Wuhan fell
ill, back in 2019, there were a million ways researchers could have
gone, in trying to figure out the cause.
Of
course, as I’ve written, they could have looked out their windows and
observed the horrific air pollution hanging over the city, and realized
these “unexplained cases” of pneumonia had a ridiculously simple
origin. But no.
The
researchers opted, as they always do, for a “new virus.” And, they
chose, without a shred of evidence, to “look for” a germ from the
coronavirus family. That was the pre-planned story. That was the bias.
From
that point on, the die was cast. The “genetic sequencing” involved
cobbling together, by assumption and inference, a collage of
INFORMATION, into code, which would satisfy the pre-ordained scenario.
They ASSEMBLED a genetic sequence that matched what they were going for: a coronavirus.
Don’t
imagine genetic sequencing is performed by people looking directly at a
virus through a cosmic microscope and jotting down the names of rows of
genes sitting side by side like cars in a supermarket parking lot.
THREE: The other hypnotic factor is the PCR test. “If the test exists to detect the virus, the virus must exist.”
Wrong. The
test---which has irreparable and fatal flaws, as I’ve documented---is
working, at best, from a fragment of RNA which is ASSUMED to come from
the virus. If the test appears to identify that fragment as “relevant,”
the test result clams the patient is “infected.”
People
believe the test must mean something. And the only thing it could mean
is: it finds the virus in a person, or the virus isn’t in that person’s
body. But either way, the virus is real.
Wrong.
The deck is stacked. The game is rigged. Welcome to the Deep Medical State.
As
in any truly deep operation, only a small number of elite professionals
understand the basic con. The rest are blind, and accepting. Some are
willfully blind. They see the truth in a flash of insight, and then they
shut up.
However,
in this mad COVID landscape, minds and doors are opening. The hypnotic
haze is receding. The truth is coming out. Doctors, scientists,
reporters, and members of the public are discovering and rejecting the
Big Con.
And now we move to on the first Smoking Gun:
Where is the coronavirus? The CDC says it isn’t available.
The CDC document is titled, “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel.” It was originally published in February, 2020, and re-published in July.
Buried
deep in the document, on page 39, in a section titled, “Performance
Characteristics,” we have this: “Since no quantified virus isolates of
the 2019-nCoV [SARS-CoV-2] are currently available, assays [diagnostic
tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with
characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA...”
The key phrase there is: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV [virus] are currently available…”
Every
object that exists can be quantified, which is to say, measured. The
use of the term “quantified” in that phrase means: the CDC has no virus,
because it is unavailable. THE CDC HAS NO VIRUS.
One
of the two most powerful public health agencies in the world can’t
obtain the virus from anywhere. Why? Obviously, because no one has it.
A further tip-off is the use of the word ‘isolates.” This means NO ISOLATED VIRUS IS AVAILABLE.
Another way to put it: NO ONE HAS AN ISOLATED SPECIMEN OF THE COVID-19 VIRUS.
NO ONE HAS ISOLATED THE COVID-19 VIRUS.
THEREFORE, NO ONE HAS PROVED THAT IT EXISTS.
As
if this were not enough of a revelation to shock the world, the CDC
goes on to say they are presenting a diagnostic PCR test, in that very
paper I’m citing, to detect the virus-that-hasn’t-been-isolated…and the
test is looking for RNA which is PRESUMED to come from the virus that
hasn’t been proved to exist.
And
using this test, the CDC and every other public health agency in the
world are counting COVID cases and deaths…and governments have
instituted lockdowns and economic devastation using those case and death
numbers as justification.
If
people believe “you have the virus but it is not available,” and “you
have the virus except it is buried within other material and hasn’t been
extracted and purified and isolated,” these people believe the moon is
made of green cheese.
This
is like saying. “We have the 20 trillion dollars, they are contained
somewhere in our myriad accounts, we just don’t know where.” If you
don’t know where, you don’t know you have the money.
“The
car keys are somewhere in the house. We just don’t where.” Really? If
you don’t know where, you don’t know the keys are in the house.
“The
missing cruise missile is somewhere in the arsenal, we just don’t
where.” No. If you don’t know where, you don’t know the missile is in
the arsenal.
“The
COVID-19 virus is somewhere in the material we have---we just haven’t
removed it from that material. But we know what it is and we’ve
identified it and we know its structure.” NO YOU DON’T. YOU ASSUME THAT.
Science is not assumptions.
“But…but…there is a study which says a few researchers in a lab isolated the virus…”
They
say they did. But they didn’t. “The virus” is inseparably mixed with
other material. The scientists are changing the meaning of the word,
“isolate.” They’re lying.
Science is not assumptions. Or lies.
The pandemic is a fraud, down to the root of the poisonous tree.
And
now, I’ve discovered ANOTHER key document. This one apparently formed
the basis for the first PCR test aimed at detecting the COVID virus all
over the world.
READ
WHAT THIS STUDY SAYS. These quotes should be engraved in stone above
the entrance to a museum dedicated to the history of medical fraud.
“We
aimed to develop and deploy robust diagnostic methodology for use in
public health laboratory settings without having virus material
available.”
TRANSLATION: We want to develop a test to detect the new COVID virus without having the virus.
“Here
we present a validated diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV [SARS-CoV-2]
its design relying on close genetic relatedness of 2019-nCoV with SARS
coronavirus, making use of synthetic nucleic acid technology.”
TRANSLATION:
We HAVE developed a diagnostic test to detect the new COVID virus. We
ASSUME this new virus is closely related to an older coronavirus. We
ASSUME we know HOW it is related. We ASSUME, because we don’t have the
new COVID virus. Therefore, all our assumptions are made out of
nothing. Actually, we have no proof there is a new coronavirus.
“The workflow reliably detects 2019-nCoV, and further discriminates 2019-nCoV from SARS-CoV.”
TRANSLATION:
Our new test to detect the new virus? We don’t have the new
virus. We’ve never observed it. We can’t study it directly. There is no
proof it exists. But we will use the test to detect it.
The study is titled, “Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR.” [Euro Surveill. 2020 Jan;25(3):2000045. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045.]
Those
quotes from the study are astounding. A diagnostic test for the virus,
but there is no virus. No standard against which to compare the
reliability of the test.
The
authors blithely assume they can somehow infer that the virus exists in
the first place, without having an isolated specimen.
Then they assume they can understand the structure of the virus that isn’t there.
The
virus isn’t there. It has NOT been isolated. It has NOT been separated
out from other material. Therefore, it has not been observed and its
existence has not been proved.
And
yet, the test which these authors have developed is launched, all over
the world, to detect that virus; to promote the unproven notion that
there is a pandemic; to form the basis for counting COVID case numbers;
and ultimately to justify all the lockdowns which have crashed the
global economy and destroyed millions upon millions of lives.
A
great deal of confusion has been created, because scientists are now
talking about the “new virus” as if they understand its structure and
sequence. No. They’ve INTERPRETED that genetic structure. And once
they’ve made their interpretations, they gibber about what it means.
And now:
The fake coronavirus and the missing study: the secret in plain sight
NOTE:
Readers have sent me electron microscope images of what are claimed to
be “isolated COVID virus.” An image here, an image there---this is NOT
the way science is done, as I will explain fully.
Now
I want to reveal the study that should have been done, at the outset,
when scientists were first claiming there was a pandemic based on the
discovery of “a new virus.”
Here’s
what you would do if you were an actual scientist: you would line up a
minimum of 500 people who have been diagnosed with the epidemic
illness. From each of them, you would extract tissue samples.
Then
you would correctly and meticulously put each sample through a
procedure that would result in 500 viewable electron microscope
photographs---one from each patient. You would lay all these photos side
by side.
You
would answer three burning questions: do you see, in each and every
photo, MANY particles of the same virus? Do you see, in all 500 photos,
that same virus? Do you see, in all 500 photos, a virus you’ve never
seen before?
If
your answer to any of these questions is no, you go back to the drawing
board. You haven’t found sufficient evidence of a new virus that is
causing widespread illness.
If
your answer is yes to every question, other researchers will then line
up 500 new volunteers who have been diagnosed with the epidemic illness,
and they will perform this same experiment, in order to confirm or deny
the findings of the first team of scientists.
If
they, too, answer every burning question with a yes, then a third team
of researchers performs their own experiment on 500 more volunteers. And
if their answer to every question is yes, then you have something. Then
you have an indication, according to conventional and traditional
methods, that a new disease could be on the rise.
People
continue to send me an occasional electron microscope photo from a
research study on “the coronavirus.” Of course, as you can see, that is
not what I’m talking about at all. A single photo from here, from
there---irrelevant.
If
you were an honest medical researcher, would you claim the result of
giving a new drug to three patients justified the approval of that drug
for use on a few hundred million patients? Not a chance. The same basic
principle applies here.
The
study I just described, with 500 patients each time, done several times
with new teams, is what the scientific method demands: large studies;
clear results; and then confirmation or rejection of the initial
finding, by more scientists employing the same methods and materials.
One
critic, after reading my description of the proper way to do a study on
the purported “new coronavirus,” said, “This wouldn’t work because it
is extremely labor-intensive.” Well, guess what? The result of declaring
a pandemic caused by a virus that isn’t there…and the ensuing lockdowns
and economic and human destruction stemming from that declaration…is
“labor-intensive” to a far greater degree.
Stopping
the production engine of the world on the pretext of finding a new
virus, when no new virus has been correctly found and isolated, is a
crime that supersedes the sweat and effort of doing proper science.
As
far as what is actually going on in labs where researchers are fiddling
with genetic sequences of this and that and making vast assumptions and
proclamations; don’t talk to me about science. Talk to me about
liability and prison.
Final
notes: At the site, fluoridefreepeel[dot]ca, you will find a number of
FOIA requests to public health agencies. These requests are asking for
records showing that SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated. The repetitive and
routine reply is: “We have no records at this agency.” Taken together,
they paint a picture of egregious fraud.
Mainstream
scientists will make two claims: one, we have isolated the virus; and
two, it is not necessary to isolate the virus, because we’ve discovered
its genetic sequence. Both claims are false.
From
reading the arcane language surrounding claims of having sequenced the
virus, I see an apparent multi-layered scam composed of leaps of
unwarranted assumptions. The researchers say they are using tools that
allow them to closely approximate the structure of SARS-CoV-2, even
though they don’t have the virus in hand. This is absurd.
It’s
like saying: There is a new planet in the solar system. We don’t know
where it is or what it looks like. We don’t know what processes are at
work on this new planet. But we do know the moon is a very close
approximation of the planet. Therefore, we can know everything we need
to know about the new planet from our knowledge of the moon.
And
a rabbit is spaceship. And there are condos for sale on Jupiter. And
new element #267587, which no one has ever seen, is almost an exact copy
of Philadelphia Cream Cheese.
The science is settled.
(The link to this article posted on my blog is here -- with sources.) 
No comments:
Post a Comment