I've
been covering the decision in the Pennsylvania COVID case and the court
filing in Ohio. They give us the templates for potential victories in
other states and countries.
In Pennsylvania, a federal judge just
ruled that Governor Wolf's COVID containment measures are
unconstitutional. The judge went further. NO emergency cancels the
Constitution. There is a line that cannot be crossed. The right to
assemble, to have freedom of movement, to earn a living---they can't be
wiped off the board by lockdowns for ANY reason.
This is, indeed, a heroic ruling. It affirms the unmistakable rays of light emanating from the basis of the American Republic.
In
Tom Renz's gigantic Ohio filing against Governor Mike DeWine, both the
Constitution and issues of fact/science are asserted. Facts mean
something. A declaration of emergency must undergo scrutiny, to
determine whether a clear and present danger justifies the declaration.
Otherwise,
a government can destroy the Constitution, the rule of law, and human
rights by falsely claiming danger when there is none. We would be back
in the time of Royal Edict, with the king's army as the "rationale."
In
2020, lunatic cultural proclivities, media propaganda, political
jockeying, pretensions of science, scare tactics, rigging of "facts,"
and profit motives are in the mix. They produce amnesia about basic
principles.
The law, when correctly applied, refreshes memory and
sweeps away a blizzard of claims and counter-claims. The law comes to
the point.
Using the law, one can say to governors and their
public health advisors, "You've been going on for months now about the
COVID spread and the emergency and the containment measures, but we want
to reduce this to basics: do you have the Constitutional right to strip
away our freedoms, and is there a factual reason to believe a state of
emergency is necessary---so we're going to court."
Or, putting it
another way: "Sir, you're holding a gun to my head while you're
explaining at length why I can't move. But you see, nothing has
happened in court yet. Meet my lawyer. Are you going to shoot us
both? Is that where you really want to go?"
In Ohio, attorney
Tom Renz, on behalf of his clients, and against the governor, is asking
for a jury trial. He wants citizens to hear the complex arguments about
COVID SCIENCE. He wants citizens to understand the con and the game
that is being played, in great detail. This is impressive. Renz
believes The People deserve to know and they are capable of
understanding.
From my nearly 40 years working as a reporter,
experience tells me attorney Renz is correct. When the truth is laid
out step by step, The People come to their senses. They cut through
their own malaise. They cut through media indoctrination. As if they
once took a voyage to an island called Logic, they suddenly remember
that voyage.
After all, the COVID lockdowns and the economic
destruction are being visited on the population at large, so let a dozen
of their members (OUR members) hear the case and adjudicate it.
I'm
not naïve about courts and judges and lawyers and juries. But I do
know that, among the denizens of that system, there are keen minds and
persons of good will. Persons who know that the Law, as it was once
enshrined by the Founders, is a beacon and a breakthrough.
It is a culmination, after centuries of struggle, which places freedom at the head of the table.
Freedom---not edicts, not lockdowns.
What
is COVID science? Has the virus actually been defined? Have case and
death numbers been drastically inflated? Is there a pandemic? Why is a
diagnostic test that has so many holes, that has never been properly
validated, being deployed? How many obfuscations has the CDC planted to
hide official secrets?
Let's go to court and turn on the lights and explore the rabbit hole.
~~~
(Links to the sources for this article can be found in this article posted on my blog.) |
No comments:
Post a Comment