Yes,
once again, dear reader, we buckle up and venture into the mad, mad
world where no one proved a new and unique coronavirus exists, but where
all leaders assume it does.
Brief background: once a person
accepts the notion that a new virus is exploding in epic fashion across
the world, he is committed to a few inescapable propositions that flow
from this assumption. The most important one: nothing will stop the
virus except the acquisition of natural immunity by the population.
And how would this natural immunity be gained? Through mass exposure to the germ. In other words, living life is the answer.
Not containment. Not lockdowns. The genie does not go back in the bottle.
During
lockdowns, millions of people would, sitting in their homes, percolate
the virus---and once let out of prison, the spread would escalate
unchecked. Everywhere.
If you don't think that is a correct
picture (of their "virus world"), read numerous public health and press
accounts detailing how quickly this supposed germ advanced across the
planet. A lightning strike here, a lightning strike there, a strike
everywhere.
For example, medicalxpress[dot]com, July 30, 2020,
reports on a CDC study published in The Lancet: "During the first 11
weeks of the COVID-19 outbreak, 32,459 COVID-19 cases were identified
from 99 countries and locations outside mainland China." Try putting
that back in the bottle.
Again---the only method for victory would be mass exposure, through living, leading to mass immunity.
This is the implication of accepting the notion of a new virus rushing out from a source.
So the Chinese regime achieved nothing by locking down 50 million people. Less than nothing.
Of
course, the mass lockdown model was soon copied by every nation on
Earth. Amidst bursts of ecstasy, the World Health Organization and the
CDC had their decades-long dream realized: CONTROL. Medical
dictatorship pressing down on billions of people.
There is more
to say about the Chinese lockdown. Even falsely assuming a new virus
was discovered, how did Chinese authorities diagnose the early cases?
They had a limited number of PCR test kits. Those they did have would
register many false positives, based on cross-reactions with harmless
coronaviruses---because that is what the PCR does.
On top of
that, Chinese researchers and doctors were claiming pneumonia was the
cardinal symptom of the new epidemic. But studies indicate roughly
300,000 people in China die every year of pneumonia---going back long
before the supposed emergence of the new virus.
Early in 2020,
China health authorities announced they were resorting to a different
diagnostic test: CT scans of the lungs. Really? To detect the presence
of a new virus? What test could be more irrelevant? It would be on
the order of walking around Beijing with a blindfold on searching for a
needle in a haystack in Detroit.
But nothing deterred the WHO/CDC
or Bill Gates or Anthony Fauci or Donald Trump or the motley collection
of political leaders around the globe. Lockdowns were laid on.
Still
more: If Chinese virologists working in their Wuhan labs trying to
characterize "the new coronavirus" had merely looked out the window,
they would have seen the cause of the pneumonia in the city: rank deadly
air pollution.
In the summer of 2019, risking arrest and
disappearance, residents of several large Chinese cities, including
Wuhan, had gone out into the streets protesting the air quality, which
contains an unprecedented toxic mix of early industrial and modern
industrial compounds.
But this fact was ignored. Instead, 50
million Chinese were imprisoned---ending those street protests, as well
as the Hong Kong rebellion.
Non-discovery of a new virus;
lockdown of 50 million people, the wrong action for producing immunity
against a virus; the emulation of that action across the world; and here
we are.
I decided to go back and comb through statements of
mainstream epidemiologists who are supposed to be on "the good side of
the argument." Of course, they all believe in the existence of the
virus.
I was not impressed by their remarks. At some point they
appear to gargle and choke and recommend half-measures. We should open
up this but lock down that. We could have put in place more stringent
measures early on. They dance around the fact that, once you accept the
existence of a new virus launching out into the world, there is only
one cure: the acquisition of mass immunity. And you get that by
living. Exposing yourself to the germ.
You can't dance your way out of it.
I've
never accepted the existence of a new virus. I've written close to two
hundred articles painting an entirely different picture of what is
going on, and I've presented a great deal of evidence for my view. I
continue to do that.
Postscript: I haven't forgotten about the
vaccination addicts who actually believe injecting seven billion people
is both doable and effective. Stepping into their world of fantasy and
pseudoscience, even their own experts are now claiming COVID
immunity---which they measure by antibody response---wanes quickly.
A
vaccine would need to be injected in annual boosters, just as the
seasonal flu vaccine is. So how are they doing with that flu vaccine?
They report millions of flu cases and hundreds of thousands of deaths
EVERY YEAR. If that's mass immunity, a chicken is a rocket ship.
They're
going to shoot up seven billion people every year and still not attain
immunity? A twisted pipe dream, even if you accept conventional vaccine
theory---and I don't.
We're not even getting into devastating vaccine "adverse effects," a subject I've been writing about and exposing for 30 years.
Suffice to say, Vaccine King Bill Gates is not only a raging sociopath, he's wrong about his own "science."
Judging
by the failure of the flu vaccine, the logic of his position would
drive him to the conclusion that a severe and permanent and forever
lockdown of the global population is necessary. Unless and until the
population could be reduced to an exceedingly minor fraction of its
present total.
Now, if a vaccination could accomplish THAT... |
No comments:
Post a Comment