---As always, I suggest that readers go through my recent articles on
the China epidemic. I can't recapitulate all the relevant findings
every time I write a new piece.
This article is a kind of summary of where I stand, at this moment. A rather crowded snapshot.
Judging from the history of epidemics that turned out to be duds---West
Nile, bird flu, SARS, Swine Flu, and so on---and judging from my
research on these frauds---I see no reason to jump the gun and say,
"This one is different."
Every time one of these threatening clouds passes across the sun, all
sorts of people in both the mainstream and alternative press make dire
predictions, ranging from "this looks like a global pandemic," to "the
virus is a bio-weapon and will kill millions,"
to the ever-popular, "this is THE BIG ONE."
And then, when the dust clears, and the dud is exposed, amnesia about having made those predictions sets in.
Now we have a variety of people claiming they know the Chinese
coronavirus is a bio-weapon, for several different reasons. I have no
cause to rail against these people. As far back as 1988, I documented
astonishingly lax conditions in supposedly secure bio-research
labs, and the distinct probability of all sorts of germs escaping. I
devoted many pages in my book,
AIDS INC., to a history of bio-war research, grotesque animal
experiments, and incompetent safety precautions in labs. I have written
about US companies and government-connected organizations sending
bio-war materials to Saddam Hussein in the 1980s.
Proving that this Chinese coronavirus is a bio-weapon is a different
matter. If, as proposed, there are peculiarities in the genetic
sequence of the virus, and it has therefore been tinkered with by
humans...well, perhaps that is correct. I don't know. However,
I have deeper and more basic suspicions about published genetic
sequences of viruses, from which that assertion is derived. Meaning: I
don't automatically accept the published sequences as true or accurate
or real.
For example, my most recent article included a very troubling interview
that challenged the original isolation and identification of HIV---as
in, did researchers ever really find that virus? If they didn't, we
would be looking at fraud on a mind-boggling level...and
any so-called genetic sequencing of the virus would be impossible,
except as gross error or fraud. If you can't find the culprit and you
don't know what he looks like, how can you describe him?
To bolster this point---in past articles, I've detailed how, in the
cases of SARS and 2009 Swine Flu, the purported viruses seemed to
disappear. That is, they couldn't be found in patients. Yet, reported
case numbers of the "virus epidemics" continued to
expand. One very real possibility looms: the researchers never
actually found, located, isolated, and identified these viruses in the
first place. Therefore, any published genetic sequences of these
viruses were, to put in kindly, entirely irrelevant.
And therefore, to infer from those genetic sequences that such chimerical viruses were actually bio-weapons...well, that would be miles off the mark.
Many people would turn purple and apoplectic at the idea that published
genetic sequences could be con jobs, hustles, and giant errors. But
very early on, in the 1980s, I discovered how researchers will toe the
official line, out of fear. Imagine a mainstream
researcher contacting the World Health Organization, or a premier
medical journal, and saying: "Your genetic roadmap of Virus X...I'm not
getting the same result. My map is completely different from yours.
I'm not even sure I'm sequencing a virus. Will
you examine my finding? We need more independent work. What the hell
is going on?" Here today, gone tomorrow. That researcher would
suddenly find himself out in the cold in his underwear. No perks, no
publisher, no job, no reputation. And he knows this
UP FRONT. So he keeps his mouth shut and swallows his objections. For
instance, in 1987, I had a highly respected virologist tell me he KNEW
there was a serious problem in calling HIV the cause of AIDS, but he and
his colleagues were going to "take a pass
on this one." He saw the political landscape. He knew there was a
rig-job in progress. The human implications of naming a meaningless
item as the cause of illness and death? Did he even pause and think
about that? Regardless, he shrugged and turned his
attention to other matters. An overarching rule: the researchers who
disagree with the forced consensus don't get published in "respected
journals," so their colleagues and the public never hear about them.
Moving on---THE VIRUS is a fake propaganda idea that has traditionally
been used to cover up vast crimes and the destruction of human life in
ways that have nothing to do with germs. THE VIRUS is one of the
greatest cover stories ever invented. I've explained
how propaganda about viruses is made to stand in for corporate and
government crimes that make people sick and kill them: contaminated
water supplies; lack of basic sanitation; giant toxic agricultural
farms; industrial poison-pollution; hunger; starvation;
protein-calorie malnutrition; fertile farm land stolen from native
people by corporations and governments; toxic medical drugs and
vaccines; and now, in Wuhan and other Chinese cities, unprecedented
mixtures of toxic air pollution, causing lung damage. The
basic theme is: DON'T LOOK AT ALL THOSE CRIMES, JUST FOCUS ON THE VIRUS
AS THE ONLY PROBLEM. This is sheer invention.
Next: in fake epidemics, case numbers are always inflated by the devious
use of categories that label and count people who aren't sick, will not
get sick, will only experience something on the order of mild flu, or
who are only numbers in computer-modeled predictions.
I documented the astounding fraud perpetrated by the CDC in 2009, when
the overwhelming percentage of tissue samples from so-called Swine Flu
patients revealed they didn't have ANY KIND OF FLU. And the CDC went on
to estimate there were 22 MILLION cases of
Swine Flu in the US in 2009.
The most widely used tests used to diagnose and label people as "case
numbers of the virus" and "sick" and "infected" are inherently flawed.
For different reasons, the antibody and PCR tests do NOT prove that
people are ill or are going to become ill. This
fact, of course, leaves a gaping hole in the assessments of
"epidemics." It also forces patients into toxic treatments they do not
need. It puts a potent fearful diagnosis in their minds that is
entirely wrong.
There is now a rush to develop a new vaccine against the Chinese
coronavirus. I've warned readers that at least two of these vaccine
technologies---DNA and RNA vaccines---are experimental and have never
been openly licensed for use on the public. Therefore,
the population of Earth---if these vaccines are deployed---will
unknowingly step up to the plate in a vast guinea-pig test. DNA
vaccines alter the genetic makeup of recipients PERMANENTLY, in
unpredictable ways. RNA vaccines carry the admitted risk of causing
auto-immune reactions. Basically, this means the body would attack
itself. The vaccine is the hammer in this dangerous "epidemic" stage
play. It is one of the extreme payoffs for having fomented fear and the
desire to "obey authorities."
In this "epidemic" and past similar instances, friends and colleagues
have sent assessments up the flagpole which are far different from
mine. They are still my friends and colleagues. I make no attempt to
stir conflict among us. We agree on many vital issues.
We will continue to agree.
All right---that's my snapshot. This is where I stand, for the present,
on the China coronavirus situation. Every point I've made, in broad
strokes, in this article, is explained more fully in my recent articles.
I raise one more question for your serious consideration. If highly
toxic pollution in the air, in Chinese cities, is causing deep lung
damage, and if the Chinese government is covering that up with a story
about a virus---what is now happening to the millions
of Chinese people locked down, with nowhere to go, trapped in those
cities---breathing the air?
P.S. Several readers have sent me significant emails stating that Wuhan
is a global center of 5G technology and deployment. I have written
about the health dangers of 5G. Is this yet another non-coronavirus
vector for disease and damage? It would certainly
not surprise me. I have not had the time to look into this
thoroughly. For the present, at least, I leave the job to others.
Well, I thought I was through writing this piece, but I need to make
another crucial point. As you can see from the list of crimes I
mentioned above, where corporations and governments are making people
sick and killing them---and then using
the cover story of a virus to hide their crimes---illness and death can come and do come
from multiple causes. However, the public finds it
hard to accept and understand this. Most people would rather seek out
THE ONE THING that is the explanation. There is a deep psychological
need to discover THE ONE. That is a reason why
THE VIRUS cover story works so well. IT is portrayed as the single
cause and the single evil. It is the psychological magnet to which all
sorts of particles attach. This addiction has to be conquered. And
this paragraph is a short version of what would
be an 800-page book on the subject.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment