Jim Fetzer, Impeachment Nearing Conclusion: Recent Developments Point to Outcome
Jim Fetzer
The impeachment trial of Donald J. Trump
exemplifies the classic proverb, “You can’t make a silk purse from a
sow’s ear”. The Democrats have been out for his scalp even before his
inauguration, where the abuses of the FISA Court are unraveling with the
determination two of four warrants on which the surveillance of Carter
Page was based were invalid, which means that investigations
and prosecutions based on them qualify as “fruit of the poisonous tree”.
The “two hop”
rule allowed the FBI to investigate those who had direct
contact with Page and those who had direct contact with them, which
encompassed virtually the entire campaign.
This implies that the court cases that led
to the convictions of Paul Manafort, Michael Flynn and Roger Stone,
among others, are destined for reversal by the courts and that the
principals behind this abuse, including John Brennan, James Comey and
Andrew McCabe, will eventually be brought to account in (what may well
qualify as) the greatest political scandal in the history of the
United States, as the president himself is asserting (without
exaggeration). The failure of (what is known as “Russiagate”, which has
been thoroughly documented by Gregg Jarrett, The Russia Hoax: The Illicit Scheme to Clear Hillary Clinton and Frame Donald Trump (2018) and (now) Witch Hunt: The Story of the Greatest Mass Delusion in American Political History (2019), leave no doubt about it.
Russiagate fell apart when Robert Mueller
testified to Congress and did not know the contents of his own report.
The Democrats out of a sense of frustration rooted in “TDS” (Trump
Derangement Syndrome) conspired a new plot to bring him down using a
relatively innocuous phone call to the President of Ukraine as its
pivot. What may be most remarkable about the ongoing effort is that even
the key witnesses—Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, Ambassador to the EU,
Gordon Sondland, and Ambassador to Ukraine, Marie L.
Yovanovitch—testified that, although they disagreed with the president’s
policy toward Ukraine, they did not believe he had done anything
illegal.
That ought to have settled the matter, but
Nancy Peolsi, Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler, inspired by Al Green’s
observation, “If we don’t impeach this guy, he will get reelected!”,
continued on course to do as much political damage to Trump as they
could, in the awareness that they have no policies or candidates or
prospects of defeating him—save by interference, not from Russia, but by
Google. where the leading behavioral scientist, Robert Epstein, former
Editor-in-Chief of Psychology Today, has testified to Congress that in the election of 2016, Google’s search algorithms were utilized to shift between 2.6 and 10.4 million votes to support Hillary Clinton, that it shifted a minimum of 4.6 million more in 2018 and that the prospects for 2020, if not checked, are a virtual guarantee of a Democratic victory, no matter how strongly Trump might be supported by the people.
Among the most important proofs of the
contrivance of this impeachment is that the person who submitted the
initial complaint had no direct knowledge of the phone call and where
the form he submitted was revised from having required first-hand
(direct) knowledge in the past to allowing complaints based upon hearsay
(second or third hand) knowledge, which would be absurd were it to
stand in place, since every rumor, speculation or guess would require
time and effort to review which no serious agency would contemplate. He
has been identified as Eric Ciaramella, the former NSC Ukraine director, who during the Obama administration, facilitated a meeting between White House officials and Ukrainian prosecutors to discuss the Burisma investigation and Hunter Biden.
Indeed, were he to be called as a witness,
the Democrats’ case for impeachment would rapidly fall apart. The House
leaders, especially Adam Schiff, have sought to protect his identity,
false claiming to have had no contact with him prior to the submission
of his complaint, which has been exposed as inconsistent with the facts.
Moreover, even Joe Biden himself—in footage that has been played by the Defense—explained during a talk at the Council on Foreign Relations in 2018 that he told the Ukrainian government that, unless the prosecutor looking into Burisma were fired before he flew back to the US in six hours hence, $1 billion in foreign aid would be withheld,
which has even been playing on a billboard in Times Square 24/7 and
virtually guarantees his quest for the nomination of the Democratic
Party cannot possibly succeed. So Joe Biden is the loser, not Donald
Trump.
Among the latest developments in the impeachment trial:
- Senator Lamar Alexander has reported that, even though he believes the Democrats have proven their case, he will vote against considering additional witnesses, because he does not believe the case they have proven is impeachable.
- Senator Rand Paul tried to have the chief justice of the United States, John G. Roberts Jr., read a question aloud that included the name of Eric Ciaramella, widely thought to be the C.I.A. whistle-blower, which the Chief Justice declined to do.
- Several GOP senators, including Lisa Murkowski and Lamar Alexander, submitted a question that seemed to imply there was not need for testimony from John Bolton, casting doubt on the Democrats demands that witnesses be called.
- Senator Susan Collins announced that she supports calling witnesses on both sides, such as Joe Bide and John Bolton, the whistleblower and Hunter Biden, and perhaps two pair more, which the Democrats are almost certain to reject as too threatening.
Perhaps most significant, however,
Democratic Senators Joe Manchin of West Virginia, Kyrsten Sinema of
Arizona and Doug Jones of Alabama are undecided on voting to remove the
president from office. Insofar as the GOP has a 53-47 majority in the
Senate and the party is highly loyal to and supportive of the president,
his acquittal was never seriously in doubt. The odds now favor several
of these Democrats joining with the Republicans, where Trump now appears
to be on the verge of a bipartisan exoneration up to 56-44, which
should take place today or tomorrow.
James H. Fetzer, Ph,D., a former US
Marine Corps officer, is McKnight Processor Emeritus on the Duluth
Campus of the University of Minnesota and co-founder of moonrockbooks.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment