Imagine this.
A cutting-edge technology, which has applications for weaponry,
transportation, medicine, artificial intelligence, surveillance, mind
control...is being openly shared between the US and China.
As just one example, tiny sensors would, up the road, be placed inside
the human body. These sensors automatically monitor and report
thousands of changes, in real time, in the body---as a way of diagnosing
diseases.
The sensors will transmit all this information, through the emerging
Internet of Things---using the 5G pipeline---to medical centers---where
AI corporate and government analysts will confirm the disease diagnoses
and prescribe treatments.
Eventually, a few billion people (patients) would, through these sensors
in their bodies, be hooked up to the 5G Internet of Things.
However, as I've reported many times in these pages, the standard
definitions of diseases and disorders are often incorrect, or even
invented. But because the future system I've just sketched is
automated, the patient is enclosed in a fake and dangerous bubble.
Among other problems, the disease treatments, the drugs, are toxic.
What is the technology that is on the way to producing these body sensors?
Nanoscience. Nano-engineering.
One of the leading nanoscience researchers in the world was recently
arrested on a charge of concealing his connections to China.
Major US science star busted by the feds.
Charles Lieber, now suspended by Harvard, is the University's chairman of the chemistry department.
I have read two articles from a foreign news outlet headlined with the
claim that Lieber stole and smuggled the "new coronavirus" from the US
to China. In both cases, the text of the articles mentioned nothing
about such a theft. Click bait? I'm not writing
this article about "coronavirus." I've been writing many articles
rejecting the premise of an "epidemic" caused by the "virus."
I decided to look into this situation, because Lieber does apparently
have big-time connections to China. Sharing research on his specialty,
nanoscience, with China would be one more case of "technology sharing."
Bloomberg News, February 12, 2020, "The U.S. Government's China Crackdown Comes to Harvard":
"Lieber's arrest on Jan. 28 came in connection with his dealings in
China. He hasn't been charged with any type of economic espionage,
intellectual-property theft, or export violations. Instead, he's accused
of lying to U.S. Department of Defense investigators
about his work with the People's Republic..."
"...by targeting Lieber, the chairman of Harvard's chemistry department
and a veritable ivory tower blue blood, prosecutors struck at the
crimson heart of the academic elite, raising fears that globalism, when
it comes to doing science with China, is being
criminalized."
"According to a government affidavit, signed by a Federal Bureau of
Investigation agent named Robert Plumb, Lieber signed at least three
agreements with Wuhan Technology University, or WUT, in central China.
These included a contract with the state-sponsored
Thousand Talents Plan---an effort by Beijing to attract mostly
expatriate [Chinese] researchers and their know-how back home---worth a
total of about $653,000 a year in pay [to Lieber] and living expenses
for three years, plus $1.74 million [to Lieber] to
support a new 'Harvard-WUT Nano Key Lab' in Wuhan. The government
offered no evidence that Lieber actually received those sums... Lieber
also deceived Harvard about his China contracts, the [federal] affidavit
said."
"Whatever extracurricular arrangements Lieber may have had in China, his
Harvard lab was a paragon of U.S.-China collaboration. He relied on a
pipeline of China's brightest Ph.D. students and postdocs, often more
than a dozen at a time, to produce prize-winning
research on the revolutionary potential of so-called nanowires in
biomedical implants. Dozens of Lieber's 100 or so former lab members
from China have chosen to stay in the U.S. Many now lead their own
nanoscience labs at top universities, including Duke,
Georgia Tech, MIT, Stanford, University of California at Berkeley, and
UCLA."
I'd say that's pretty big technology-transfer WOW right there.
"In the 1990s and 2000s, as Lieber's achievements and stature were
taking off, U.S. research institutions and grant makers pumped money and
moral support into expanding the burgeoning collaborations between
scientists in the U.S. and other countries, particularly
China. The new paradigm was globalization, China was an emerging
economic power, and Lieber's lab became an exemplar of pan-Pacific
collaboration. "
Another WOW. Not a leak of information. A flood.
"A more controversial Lieber protégé is Liqiang Mai, the international
dean and chair of materials science at WUT, the little-known school in
Wuhan that prosecutors allege recruited Lieber to be a 'strategic
scientist' in 2011, for $50,000 a month. Mai, who
hasn't been named in any U.S. filings against Lieber, earned a
doctorate at WUT in 2004 and worked as a postdoc in Lieber's lab from
2008 to 2011, according to Mai's WUT online bio..."
How big a star is Lieber? Wikpedia: "Charles M. Lieber (born 1959) is
an American chemist and pioneer in the field of nanoscience and
nanotechnology. In 2011, Lieber was recognized by Thomson Reuters as the
leading chemist in the world for the decade 2000-2010
based on the impact of his scientific publications. Lieber has
published over 400 papers in peer-reviewed scientific journals and has
edited and contributed to many books on nanoscience. He is the principal
inventor on over fifty issued US patents and applications,
and founded the nanotechnology company Nanosys in 2001 and Vista
Therapeutics in 2007. He is known for his contributions to the
synthesis, assembly and characterization of nanoscale materials and
nanodevices, the application of nanoelectronic devices in biology,
and as a mentor to numerous leaders in nanoscience. In 2012, Lieber was
awarded Israel's Wolf Prize in Chemistry."
Chemistry and Engineering News, January 28, 2020, "Harvard chemist Charles Lieber charged with fraud":
"In addition, Lieber allegedly signed a contract that obligated Harvard
to become part of a cooperative research program that allowed WUT
[Chinese] scientists to visit the university up to two months each year.
The [federal] complaint says he did not inform
university officials of the agreement, which was for 'advanced research
and development of nano wire-based lithium-ion batteries with high
performance for electric vehicles'."
Another "technology transfer" of great value.
"...the NIH [US National Institutes of Health, a federal agency] asked
Harvard about whether the university or Lieber failed to disclose his
financial relationship with China. Lieber has been a principal
investigator on at least three NIH grants totaling $10
million since 2008. After interviewing Lieber, Harvard [incorrectly,
supposedly based on Lieber's statements] responded to the NIH that he
[Lieber] had 'no formal association with WUT [Wuhan Institute of
Technology]' and 'is not and has never been a participant
in' the [Chinese] Thousand Talents program."
NIH has strict regulations about its researchers disclosing their
conflict-of-interest connections. The feds obviously believe Lieber has
failed to report his China connections to NIH. This may become a
factor in his prosecution.
Lieber was operating a robust center at Harvard: Lieber Research Group.
Its focus is nanoscience and nanotechnology. So it's natural to ask,
what kind of research findings would be shared with China?
On the Group's website, there is this, right off the bat: "We are
pioneering the interface between nanoelectronics and the life
sciences...sensors for real-time disease detection..."
Hence, the picture of the future I sketched at the beginning of this article.
I may report further on nanoscience. Of course, the ominous
technological innovations apply to both China and the US, and the rest
of the world...
The Chinese government has the clout, will, force, and intent to impose,
without hesitation, every sort of possible control on its 1.4 billion
citizens. It is in the process of building many new "smart cities."
These centers will be models of wall-to-wall
surveillance. AI, Internet of Things, 5G, the works. If nanoscience
can achieve much more intimate access to people, through implanted
sensors, why wouldn't the central government jump at the chance to
deploy it? The rationale and the cover story are obvious:
WE MUST HAVE EARLY KNOWLEDGE OF NEW VIRUS EPIDEMICS. WE WILL DETECT
THEM DIRECTLY FROM THE BODIES OF OUR PEOPLE IN REAL TIME.
All hail, Globalism and technocracy.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment