Fluoride Information

Fluoride is a poison. Fluoride was poison yesterday. Fluoride is poison today. Fluoride will be poison tomorrow. When in doubt, get it out.


An American Affidavit

Monday, February 17, 2020

2306-2308: What's In a Name? from Lincoln County Watch


2306-2308: What's In a Name? from Lincoln County Watch


By Anna Von Reitz

People get attached to names.  They think that their name is the same as their own self, not a separate thing at all.  But it is a separate thing.  Ever since I was a small child I have had problems with my name, and cause to know that. .  

To begin with, I never liked it -- my name.  It was big and ugly-sounding and foreign and old and dusty as a certain hand-carved Black Walnut bed I also inherited--- and had to dust and polish every Saturday of my young life, too. . 

And then, being born in the wake of the Second World War, my name meant I was subject to a vague
and seemingly universal social disapproval, even though for Heaven's Sake, the Supreme Allied Commander was a man named Eisenhower?  Hello?  

All those wartime associations didn't make my relationship with my name any easier, though I wouldn't turn my back on it, for reasons too firmly rooted in my sense of honor and justice to deny it. 

My First Grade Teacher, Mrs. Larkin, was very clear that I couldn't possibly have such a name.  

Why not, I wondered?  

Anna Maria Wilhelmina Hanna Sophia Riezinger-von Reitzenstein von Lettow-Vorbeck.  

Well, it is a major mouthful, but I figured if I could say it and spell it, it was nobody else's business, right?  

So you see, right from the start of my life, I have had to consider issues of name, my name in particular.  And I had to come to terms with being called by different names, too, because my name wouldn't fit on any standard forms or records.  

My name, I realized dimly at age six, wasn't a name so much as it was a family record, a description or a pedigree, somewhat like a short list of the Begats in the Bible.    

And though I was regularly called by it in various permutations, and quite a number of nicknames, too, I had to face the fact that none of the verbiage used as my name at any given time ----- none of it was me. 

Worse, I didn't get to choose any of it. 

What a backwards situation, right? 

I always bridled up against it and yearned for freedom to be who I wanted to be. 

Who says I am not "Sally Brown" ---- Charlie Brown's little Sister?  

It would, I felt, be so much simpler to be her, some ditzy little blond girl in Suburbia who was slightly confused most of the time, and in love with a Philosopher.... 

I spent most of my teenage years feeling more like Snoopy in his "Vulture" persona, lurking around, watching intently, waiting for some unknown and unknowable roadkill to enter my life.  

A bit later, I turned into a female version of Joe Cool.  

Through it all, I knew that names were just names, masks, "persons" that could never really be me, or you.  

So I wasn't quite as slow on the uptake as most Americans when I saw "my name" spelled in all capitals: ANNA MARIA RIEZINGER.  That, whatever it was, wasn't any name I recognized as mine. 

No, I drew the line in the sand and stood behind it.  I knew and still know exactly how to style a Proper Name in English.  And that isn't it. 

Thank you, Mrs. McManners.  Thank you, Aunt Mary.  

Ironically, I am over sixty years old, and I have been fighting over my name my entire life.  

I suppose I have to have one for convenience sake, as a communications outpost with the rest of the world, but it should be mine --- mine to control, mine to recognize or disavow, mine to define.  

I copyrighted the name "Lady Flamolare del Chesa" in a fit of passion as I mentioned it once or twice in an article, deriding this whole nonsense of names and ownership of names and styles of names and even names expressed in certain type fonts.  

I promptly started getting mail addressed to "her", too.  Why not?  She's just as vaporous as "Anna Maria Riezinger" or "Anna von Reitz".  

In disgust, I started to look around for other people who have faced similar problems and hopefully, overcame them.  I found one.  And his name is familiar to everyone:  Picasso. 

Care to guess what his birth name was?  

Pablo Diego José Francisco de Paula Juan Nepomuceno María de los Remedios Cipriano de la Santísima Trinidad Martyr Patricio Clito Ruíz y Picasso.
Now we know that it was not the Spanish Civil War that drove him crazy. 
This has me sunk in reverie, absorbed in the mental challenge of collapsing "me" down to a single, splendid, brave word --- like "Picasso"?
But nothing comes to mind and nothing seems to fit, except maybe, "Grandma"? 

----------------------------

See this article and over 2300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 
How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Comment About....


By Anna Von Reitz




Yes, I read this a few days ago, but it doesn't check out, though neither does anything else.  

We've got a Harvard nano-tech expert arrested and involved in a nano-tech lab in Wuhan, who was also doing work for NIH and DOD...... 

Looks to me like they are trying to cover a small scale nano-assisted bioweapon corona virus or Nipah virus release and are trying to mask it by releasing normal corona virus --- so we have, essentially, two groups of victims ---- one group suffering from the bio-weapon as described in this report, and another group that has "normal" fever in hopes of providing them some natural immunity from the bio weapon version.  

It's a very tricky situation and many players holding their hands close to their chests for obvious reasons.  

His [the referenced Chinese Intelligence Officer's] use of the word "Agent" repeatedly indicates a GMO Transfer Agent --- nanotech used to artificially import the new DNA  from the virus. But if you were desperate enough to write this, why wouldn't you say exactly what the "Agent" was?   If you knew?  More questions than answers.  Could be real.  Could be reasons.  Could also be fear porn for a False Flag. Time will tell. 

What we do know for sure, is that a Top Tier US Nano Scientist, Charles Lieber, was working on a joint lab and with numerous Chinese Grad Students on various projects and he lied to Harvard, NIH, and DOD about all of it.  

We know that rogue CIA sources were bragging about a bait and switch they pulled on the Chinese and bragging about the expected death toll --- 45-75%, just before this hit.  They also said it was a Nipah virus --- not corona virus.  Nipah is a norovirus--- much tougher to knock out and  more infectious.   Some viruses carry RNA snippets and others carry DNA --- corona virus is an RNA carrier in nature, but initial scientific reports kept saying "DNA"--- which is another bit about this that doesn't make sense. 

We know that the symptoms reported (in this report above) indicate a hemolytic nerve poison  being manufactured as part of the virus-injected RNA or DNA component.  We don't know exactly what that poison might be, but the best known hemolytic nerve poisons come from poisonous snakes like cobras and from some species of spiders.  There are also some species of mushroom that produce hemolytic nerve poisons --- and that is where I would look for the culprit, because (1) we have more RNA and DNA in common with mushrooms, (2), they are easier to control and farm than snakes, and (3) extracting and replicating the RNA or DNA would be simpler.  The apparent original intention was to "poison people a little bit" --- enough to make them docile and dopey --- slow down their nerve synapses and logic functions, but not kill them.  But also apparently, as the virus continues to replicate, the amount of hemolytic nerve poison in the blood stream increases, too, and the body's metabolic system can't break it down fast enough.  It would be like dying from a cobra bite, but very slowly compared to a real cobra bite. 

At first glance that seems far-fetched, but is it, really?   If Monsanto can get corn plants to produce their own herbicides and insecticides --- why couldn't Charles Lieber use similar tech to create a virus vector to create hemolytic nerve poison in a mammalian cell?   It would have to be a fairly small molecular component, perhaps one that would fit a naturally occurring bridge protein.  

One thing is for sure --- you can't get far on fixing the problem until you isolate the vector and the process mechanism and know the end result in terms of chemical product. 

Here's what Mongoose just posted ----the 17 page affidavit from the FBI Agent that backed the warrant for Lieber's arrest. https://phibetaiota.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/FBI-Affidavit-Against-Lieber-Harvard-Wuhan.pdf  

It establishes probable cause, but doesn't go into any details or make any direct statements about what else the Federales know at this point, but if this isn't a set up, they certainly earned their oats and acted in a timely fashion.  Having Lieber and his Grad Students in custody gives us a fighting chance to find out exactly what this is, and assuming that they weren't stupid enough to dabble in such things without planning and knowing their own antidote in advance, there should be a way to stop it.  The question is-- how fast? 

----------------------------

See this article and over 2300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 
How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

CIA


By Anna Von Reitz

CIA = Cia =cia
RAM = Ram = ram
[Code for Satan, Baphomet]
ELLA = Ella = ella
[Code for "girl" -- looks harmless, weak, feminine]
CIA's Satanic "Girl"
Put it all together, and what have you got?
He looks like the boy next door. Some kid just out of college for a few years. Maybe an accountant.
It's not hard to figure out.
What's really amazing is just HOW stupid all these people have believed we are, all these years.
They use fake names.
They hide behind fake personas.
They pretend to be just the opposite of what they are.
They pass "Acts" as "Actors" in a play.
They have openly admitted that nothing they have done since 1860 counts, plainly stated it as the Enabling Clause they use as they publish their "Acts of Congress".
"This Act shall not effect any right thus previously established."
[But we are going to go ahead and pretend it does, until someone wakes up and stops us.]
Chief Justice Roberts is a rat.
I don't care what nastiness they have on him.
I don't care what his politics are.
He has betrayed Justice itself.
He has used terms and words of art to harm millions of people.
And worse.
Remember Obummer Care? It's a tax? Oh, really?
And for all of you who are standing around wondering what to do?
The solution is simple.
Self-Government.
Unfortunately, that means you have to take charge of yourself and declare your political status as an American.
That means joining and organizing your State Assembly.
That means filling your Jury Pools.
That means electing your County Sheriffs not THEIR County Sheriffs.
That means actively organizing politically and taking a stand against the fetid disgusting Corporate Feudalism they are trying to ram down our throats.
That means being proud again and making yourselves proud again.
As Americans.

----------------------------

See this article and over 2300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 
How do we use your donations?  Find out here.
  

No comments:

Post a Comment