First of all, as you know, my blog was taken down several weeks ago
by WordPress, with no warning or explanation. We still have no
communication from the WP censors.
We're in the process of restoring the blog onto another server.
Much work has been done. We're in the middle of resolving an unexpected
snag. Hopefully, that resolution will come soon.
Meanwhile, my email list of subscribers has expanded tremendously.
This list of people receives all my new articles. If you were forwarded a
copy of this this email, then the best way to get my daily articles is
go to my home page, NoMoreFakeNews.com and
sign up for the email list in the upper left corner. You'll get
articles in your inbox.
Thank you all for your support.
PART ONE:
This article should go a long way toward explaining the difference
between my basic position and the position of others who seek to improve
the condition of humanity. There is no effort on my part to diminish
the efforts of others---I only want to highlight
several bottom lines.
First of all, long-time readers know I have advocated and written on a
variety of issues that impact our future: harmful vaccines, fake climate
change, corporate pollution, the corporate State, elite socialists who
seek control of populations under the guide
of doing good, medical destruction of life, lying media, and so on.
The list is long. I support all sources of truthful information and all
positive activism on these issues. In 1994, I ran for a seat in the US
Congress based on several of these positions.
More basically, I have written much on the subject of The Individual,
his freedom, independence, creative power, and imagination.
I begin with the moral statement that the individual has unlimited
freedom, as long as he doesn't interfere with the freedom of another.
That said, the question becomes: how does the individual attain the
greatest possible degree of power and freedom---which are ends in
themselves.
And here I make a crucial distinction. I don't try to help increase
individual creative power so that a person creates what I think is most
important. In other words, I'm not trying to harness the creative power
of individuals so they do my bidding. To the
contrary: I would like to see individuals look for, find, and invent
their Most Profound Desires---and then create ways and paths toward
fulfillment of those desires.
I'm not in the business of cosmic meddling. I don't wish to interfere
in the self-chosen destiny of the sacrosanct individual. I'm not trying
to shape a particular system of the future. My image of the best
future is:
Simultaneous and side-by-side individual inventions of many realities.
Each invention by each individual expresses his most profound desires.
Otherwise, you get, at best, half-freedom, half-power, half-perception, half-satisfaction, half-energy, half-creating.
And you eventually get individuals bowing to "the needs of the group."
You get individuals meddling in their own futures in order to diminish them.
PART TWO:
ALL SPACES INVENTED FOR YOU BY OTHERS ULTIMATELY POINT TO YOUR
DECISION---THAT DECISION COMES DOWN TO: DO I WANT TO BE HERE? DO I WANT
TO GO SOMEWHERE ELSE? DO I WANT TO MAKE CHANGES IN THIS SPACE?
A space can be of any size or location.
What we call the universe is a space that was made, created, designed.
There are many spaces, many universes. They don't all operate on the
same principles and laws and rules. They don't all look and feel the
same.
This universe, the one we are in, is, like the others, a work of art.
That doesn't mean it has "holy content" or "holy direction." It's a
work of art.
What the individual comes to decide about this universe and other
universes has a great deal to do with how much of his creative power he
is deploying. Persons "at the height of their creative power" tend to
recognize the products of creativity (like spaces
and universes) more readily.
For example, consider this excerpt from a 1978 speech novelist Philip K
Dick gave, titled, "How to Build a Universe That Doesn't Fall Apart Two
Days Later":
"...today we live in a society in which spurious realities are
manufactured by the media, by governments, by big corporations, by
religious groups, political groups...So I ask, in my writing, What is
real? Because unceasingly we are bombarded with pseudo-realities
manufactured by very sophisticated people using very sophisticated
electronic mechanisms. I do not distrust their motives; I distrust their
power. They have a lot of it. And it is an astonishing power: that of
creating whole universes, universes of the mind.
I ought to know. I do the same thing."
When you create often enough and intensely enough, you begin to
outdistance certain aspects of mind control. You begin to see through
the premise, for instance, that this is the only universe. You begin to
realize that many systems are invented with the hope
that they will become little universes. At first, it might seem that a
universe is invented in order to give people something to do---go
there, inhabit it, and play along with its rules. Yes, that is so on
one level. But more than that, universes are invented
by the ton because individuals don't want to find more and more of
their own creative power. They would rather settle for fitting into the
operations of what others have designed...
No comments:
Post a Comment