British Home Secretary Has Signed Extradition Order To Send Julian Assange To US
By
Joe Martino
from Collective Evolution
Joe Martino
from Collective Evolution In Brief
- The Facts:British home
secretary Sajid Javid has signed the extradition order to send Julian
Assange to
the US. This now leaves the final decision to the courts. It's likely that the extradition decision process will take many months to decide in court. - Reflect On:Is this another step in harming the freedom of press? The freedom of revealing truth to citizens? Is this government overreach whereby they feel it's OK to pretend to the public that their knowledge of truth is not important?
The British home secretary, Sajid Javid, has just signed a request for Julian Assange to be extradited to the US where he faces an 18-count
indictment, issued by the US Department of Justice, for charges linked
to computer hacking and revealing government secrets in collaboration
with Chelsea Manning, formerly Bradley Manning. The charges all fall
under the Espionage Act.
“He’s rightly behind bars. There’s an extradition request from the US that is before the courts tomorrow but yesterday I signed the extradition order and certified it and that will be going in front of the courts tomorrow.” – Sayid Javid
Officially, Assange is accused of
soliciting and publishing classified information and conspiring to hack
into a government computer. “It is a decision ultimately for the courts,
but there is a very important part of it for the home secretary and I
want to see justice done at all times and we’ve got a legitimate
extradition request, so I’ve signed it, but the final decision is now
with the courts,” said Javid.
If you were to look entirely at the law,
you might say “yes, technically if he did these things, there is a case
to be made.” However, was Assange involved enough in this process to
prosecute him? Did he do something that was a disservice to the people?
Or did he do something that was a disservice to the powerful elite?
That is something for you to decide,
ideally without the manipulative rhetoric from the powerful elite and
the mainstream media they own. Attempts to suggest he threatens the
patriotism of the US and the national security of the US might be
something to observe as a clear sign of bait and switch: get upset at
this, instead of looking at what he revealed about the powerful elite in
the totality of the leaks he has put out.
Swedish courts had just recently
rejected an extradition request for Assange to be sent back to Sweden
for an alleged rape case dating back to 2010. Assange denies the
accusation and has since the beginning. The decision out of Upsalla to deny his request was fueled by the claim that Assange did not need to be detained.
advertisement - learn more
Assange is currently in jail for 50 weeks for skipping bail after he spent seven years in the Ecuadorian embassy in London. He was recently too ill to appear at
a hearing at Westminster magistrates court in relation to the US
request. The hearing has been rescheduled for Friday, June 14th, 2019.
Thomas Garner, an extradition lawyer at
Gherson Solicitors, said Javid’s certification of the request was “an
important though merely procedural step” to start the extradition
process.
“I would expect the court to set a preliminary timetable for the extradition process tomorrow,” he said. “It is likely to be many months before any hearing at the magistrates court and of course either side may then seek to appeal that decision in due course. Despite this, the Swedish authorities will be monitoring the process carefully as the further down the line the US proceedings get the harder it might become for the home secretary to give precedence to any competing request.”
The Takeaway
From a systematic standpoint, this is a
necessary procedural step in extraditing Assange to the US and it has
been granted. It could have been blocked but Javid felt it was necessary
for ‘justice to be served.’
As we can see, this is an example of a
spot where someone could have stood up and said “no I don’t support this
given what it does to protect the powerful elite and given what it does
to journalism and the maintenance of secrecy.” Obviously, Javid would
have faced much criticism if he had stood up, perhaps legal problems
too, we were not able to confirm that, but we are seeing a system play
entirely along with the power elite in this case.
In the video below, there is an
important discussion on some of the ‘Qanon’ ideas in relation to
Assange. My analysis on that is that it appears to be heavily misguided,
but you decide for yourself.
Help Support Collective Evolution
In order to stay truly independent, we need your help. We are not going to put up paywalls on this website, as we want to get our info out far and wide. For as little as $3 a month, you can help keep CE alive!
SUPPORT CE HERE!
No comments:
Post a Comment