Saturday, June 8, 2019
1859-1862: A Word to John Best from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
This is an official comment, directly from Anna von Reitz. John, with all due
respect, your comments are all wrong. First of all, you talk about "We, the
People" as many patriots do, without bothering to discover who or what the "People" being referenced are. Notice that the word "people" is capitalized? That "P" is there for a reason. The reason is that the "People" being referenced are acting in a specific capacity --- as the Lawful People governing the States of the Union. Correcting our political status records and acting in that capacity to assemble our actual States of the Union as "People" is exactly what I am teaching people to do ---contrary to your suppositions. I am, in fact, putting the pieces together to unite the People of this country to lawfully and peacefully self-govern. That is what The American States Assembly is all about.
People" as many patriots do, without bothering to discover who or what the "People" being referenced are. Notice that the word "people" is capitalized? That "P" is there for a reason. The reason is that the "People" being referenced are acting in a specific capacity --- as the Lawful People governing the States of the Union. Correcting our political status records and acting in that capacity to assemble our actual States of the Union as "People" is exactly what I am teaching people to do ---contrary to your suppositions. I am, in fact, putting the pieces together to unite the People of this country to lawfully and peacefully self-govern. That is what The American States Assembly is all about.
I am teaching people the basics of how their government is supposed to be
organized and I am pointing out the necessity of finishing the long overdue
"reconstruction" of the Federal States of States. There is nothing "nonsensical"
about it. It's the proper and lawful and established way for us to organize
ourselves and conduct our own government and direct our own business. You
suggest that we somehow use The Declaration of Independence to "remove our
government" --- but it's not our government sitting in Washington, DC. Our
government at the Federal level has been moth-balled for 150 years. What needs
to happen is for our actual Government --- of the people, for the people, by the
people --- to wake up and get organized and do the actual work of
self-governance. All that we could do by "exercising" The Declaration of
Independence is create another bloody war and blame others for our own ignorance
and sloth and as you put it, "mind-numbing stupidity". Granted that we have been
deceived and suffered constructive fraud, identity theft, Breach of Trust and a
host of other evils, but also note that we were not awake enough nor motivated
enough to do anything effective to prevent or even protest these crimes until
now. For the most part, we have just trundled along under the lash of the
tyrants and gone, "Oh, ho, hum, well, that's the way it is...." and paid more
taxes and put up with more harassment until it has finally come to this. Be
assured that this is not a "lie" and not a matter of "law". It is a matter of
fact. Calling me a "liar" because I am not preaching insurrection against what
is masquerading as "our" government is extremely irritating, most especially
because I am not lying and am in fact offering the only course of action that
doesn't lead to violence.
To finish this comment --- our opponents in this game would just LOVE for us to
blunder into their trap and "start something". They have been trying to get some
kind of violent insurrection going for years.
They have tried all the motivators there are ---- race, religion, politics, false
flags, you name it, and they have been trying to gin up something that would
cause riots and other disturbances that they could use as an excuse to attack us
all. Why? Because we are their Priority Creditors.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
States vs. States of States
By Anna Von Reitz
Why, you might ask yourselves, was it necessary for the fledgling government of this country to create multiple organizations of states?
We have the Union, The United States, formed of republican states occupying the national soil jurisdiction of this country.
We have the Federation, The United
States of America, formed of Sovereign States occupying the
international jurisdiction of the land and sea.
We have a Confederation of States of
States, the States of America, formed of commercial corporations,
occupying the global jurisdiction of the air.
If you look at this list you will
see the answer. Each of these different organizations--- The United
States, The United States of America, and the States of America---- all
serve in different capacities and occupy different jurisdictions.
Their member "states" are different
in nature, too. The national-level republican states and the
international States of the Union are defined by physical borders, but
the global States of States represented by the States of America
Confederation are commercial corporations.
So as you can see, each one of these
organizations operate in profoundly different capacities and in
different jurisdictions. A state is not the same as a State, and a
State is not a State of State [Confederate State].
We rarely have a reason to
differentiate between our states and our States, because soil and land
jurisdictions work so closely together that the evidence of one is
evidence of the other. General Session Laws of the State are supposed
to reflect the will of the republican state and people, whereas State of
State Statutes are supposed to "codify" and regulate the operations of
the Territorial Government and their corporate personnel on our
shores.
An important distinction needs to be made here and underlined in Day-Glo Orange Highlighter.
A State is corporate in that it is
partially fictional by virtue of having a name --- say, Wisconsin----
but it is a free-standing entity that is physically defined, much as a
man named Thomas Tinker is a free-standing entity that is physically
defined. Neither Wisconsin nor Thomas Tinker is incorporated as part of
some greater entity.
In keeping with the Law of Kinds, a State like Wisconsin, is operated by People, like Thomas Tinker.
A State of State, like the State of
Wisconsin, may be incorporated (chartered) by the greater,
free-standing entity --- the State, which is what our original plan was
when the Confederation of States was formed.
Or, a State of State could also be
chartered by a foreign government --- and merely set in place as a
"service provider" which is in fact what has gone on here since the
Civil War, when the British Government secretively came in here and
arbitrarily put a Scottish corporation in charge of our State of State
administration "for" us.
States are sovereign entities; States of States, by definition, are not.
Under the constitutional agreements,
our States agreed not to operate directly as States of States, which is
also part of the reason that we can be absolutely sure that none of our
actual States were involved in the Civil War, which was a commercial
mercenary fight among commercial corporations--- States of States, which
are also called "Confederate States" even though they are not actually
States at all.
Since World War II we have further
compounded the confusion between States and States of States by allowing
the deployment of Municipal STATES OF STATES on our shores. These
incorporated franchises are totally foreign and are chartered by foreign
governments in the business of providing essential government
services.
That is, the STATE OF WASHINGTON is
not chartered by nor operating under the auspices of Washington, the
State. It is a franchise of the foreign Municipal United States
Government and its infamous District of Columbia Municipal Corporation,
dba, the UNITED STATES.
So, we have our native States which
are corporate, but not incorporated, which are sovereign free-standing
entities with physically-defined borders, and then, we have a plethora
of foreign "service organizations" operating as Territorial States of
States and Municipal STATES OF STATES, none of which are actually
chartered by our States.
This is not the way our government is supposed to be organized or operated.
What should happen in a sane world
is that the State, such as Georgia, charters a State of State and
incorporates it to conduct business for Georgia.
The original States of State were
put out of commission by the Civil War and never "reconstructed" which
has led to this situation wherein foreign Territorial and Municipal
franchise organizations have been here on our soil conducting business
"for" us and recklessly spending our money and credit as if we ever
authorized them to do this.
To solve this conundrum requires us
to organize our actual States of the Union and to act in our capacity as
the People of this country, and to finish the so-called
"Reconstruction" that has been pending since the end of the Civil War.
Put simply, the People of Georgia need to re-charter The State of Georgia to conduct business for them.
We have been hampered from doing
this necessary work by the foreign-chartered government services
organizations on our shores arbitrarily conferring citizenship
obligations upon us. The British Territorial States of States claim
that we are United States Citizens. The Municipal STATES OF STATES
claim that we are Citizens of the United States.
It is up to us to thumb our noses at
these patently false presumptions and tell our subcontractors and their
employees that no, in fact, we are State Citizens and nothing else:
Virginians, Californians, Minnesotans and so on, for each of the fifty
States of the Union.
It is also up to us to act in our
own best interests and explicitly return to the land and soil
jurisdiction of our States which is our natural home --- and deny them
any excuse for their insupportable presumptions.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
52nd Anniversary of Israel’s Attack on the USS Liberty
Israel Is a Dictatorship, Not a Democracy
Paul Craig Roberts
Two days ago the US celebrated the 75th anniversary of D-Day with
accolades to the armed forces and thanks to surviving veterans. The
country stood strongly with the military. But today two days later is
the 52nd anniversary of a day of shame when Washington turned its back
on the US Navy.
The Act of 1871 -- A Correct Analysis by Team Law
By Anna Von Reitz
With all the hub-bub about The Act
of 1871 circulating in the patriot community, I felt it was time to
re-publish (for about the tenth time) the actual breakdown of what
happened to The Act of 1871 after its initial repeal in 1874 ----- and
to publish again the correct analysis of it all by Team Law, which was
finished some years ago:
1871 - Act of 1871 ---“An Act to provide a Government for the District of Columbia,” ch. 62, 16 Stat. 419, February 21, 1871 ---which
was repealed in 1874 and then passed piecemeal via these actions----
“An Act Providing a Permanent Form of Government for the District of
Columbia,” ch. 180, sec. 1, 20 Stat. 102, June 11, 1878, to remain and
continue as a municipal corporation (brought forward from the Act of
1871, as provided in the Act of March 2, 1877, amended and approved
March 9, 1878, Revised Statutes of the United States Relating to the District of Columbia . . . 1873–’74 (in
force as of December 1, 1873), sec. 2, p. 2); as amended by the Act of
June 28, 1935, 49 Stat. 430, ch. 332, sec. 1 (Title 1, Section 102,
District of Columbia Code (1940)).
When looking at the intent
of all this, given that the actual District of Columbia was set up in
1790 and fully chartered by 1801, the aim of the Act of 1871 is, it
appears, merely to set up “U.S. Corp”---
“That
all that part of the territory of the United States included within the
limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created
into a government by the name of the “District of Columbia”, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes … and exercise all other powers of a municipal corporation.” – Act of 1871 verbiage---
So the
Act of 1871 was to create a private corporation owned by the actual
government of the District of Columbia--- the infamous District of Columbia Municipal Corporation:
“Further, the only government created in that Act was the same form of private government any private corporation has within the operation of its own corporate construct....... U.S.
Corp is not merely an incorporated municipality (District of
Columbia); rather, it is a private corporation (District of Columbia Municipal Corporation) that was lawfully created by our original jurisdiction government.” ---- Team Law analysis.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
...
Dog Report and La-La-Land Again
By Anna Von Reitz
In all my life I can only remember
one rainy birthday. The first week of June is usually like the weather
of charmed Camelot, with wild roses in bloom, strawberries ripening in
the sun, and blue skies. It was certainly that way on my birthday this
year and again, today.
One of my college chums sent me a
gorgeous bouquet of roses and Gerbera Daisies and stocks. I charmed the
guests with my pound cake and fresh strawberries and fresh raspberries
(your choice) and whipped cream in lieu of a traditional birthday
cake.
I have my own world and time, when
everything is perfect and the music is gentle and the wine is smooth and
everyone smiles because the purity of the day is so undeniable and
sweet.
It's a great time of year to have a birthday--- after school is out, before the weather gets too hot.
The only sad note to a June 6
birthday is remembering D-Day; because of that long shadow, it is a
memorial day of its own. There's a quiet to it, an echo of cemeteries
instead of brass bands. A time of remembrance, I used to say,
and not just of a year gone by, or
the passing of my time. I stood in the doorway as the wind was rising
and listened to Pavarotti.
Evening came and storm clouds
gathered in the East, soon there was lightening and thunder and pouring
rain, and I went to sleep, snug and warm in my bed, listening to the
rain on the roof, smelling the fresh cool wind, feeling blessed.
My dog, who has survived so much, is
recovering nicely from surgery and our primary concern remains keeping
him quiet long enough to actually heal. His nature as a Labrador
Retriever is so exuberant --- his tail wags SO hard --- it's difficult
to keep him calm enough, even with the sedatives the vet provides. If
he makes it through the next two weeks, we can start to breathe easier
ourselves and count the operation a success. By all means, keep the
prayers and good thoughts coming.
With love and blessings and lots of
rest the next two weeks, he can hope for a few years more of bumping
along at my side, and snoozing with his nose on my foot as I sit at my
desk --- his proven method of knowing whenever I go anywhere or do
anything, the signal for him to get up and follow me wherever I might
go. This morning, only two days out of surgery, he was ready to hop in
my old Suburban, otherwise known as The Dog Car, and go snoop around at
the world.
Tonight, I pour a little oil of
lavender and oil of marjoram into my palms and rub it on the fur of his
golden ruff, and sense how the smell relaxes him and bids him to rest
and to sleep, rest and sleep. That is about all he can do or should do
for the next two weeks.
Also tonight, I was amused to read a
long and rambling expose by Sun-Tzu, who still imagines himself to be
Jesus and who just discovered the infamous Act of 1871.
How many generations of American
Patriots will it take to realize that the Act of 1871 was repealed in
1874? How often must we learn how it was passed piecemeal and how the
rats finally achieved their aims in 1878? And then, too, how long
before the worthwhile message of his meanderings comes through?
Yes, they incorporated everything,
including the Church. They reduced life to business franchises, dead
things without souls, without mercy: eating machines locked into a
single inflexible purpose: profit, profit, profit, profit at any cost,
profit by any means, including war.
So now they have their profit, but not their souls, their corruption but not their names.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
No comments:
Post a Comment