by Michael E. Salla, Ph.D
Kona, Hawaii 10/19/2007 from Exopolitical Website Further photographic analysis has recently been completed on a series of five photos taken by an amateur astronomer on a San Francisco hill at 5:53 am on February 1, 2003, showing the Space
According to David Sereda, who conducted the photographic analysis, the length of the
five exposures conclusively show that it was not a form of 'super'
lightning that hit the Columbia, but an advanced plasma beam weapon
of some kind.
Sereda documented his analysis in a
recently released video,
From Here to Andromeda,
extracts of which were uploaded this week to YouTube (below video).
The series of five photos were
originally submitted to NASA to help it in its investigation of the
Columbia tragedy by the astronomer who chose to remain anonymous.
His submission of the photos to NASA was covered by
a reporter from
the San Francisco Chronicle and appeared in a story on February 5,
2003.
The reporter claimed:
NASA responded to the photographs by
claiming that the lightning was an artifact from camera wobble
despite the camera being on a tripod and showing features of the
shuttle clearly.
According to one researcher:
The apparent lighting strike did not figure in
NASA's official
explanation that the Columbia crash was due to a tile being
dislodged at launch that damaged the leading edge of the left wing
and the thermal insulation system, causing the Columbia to
disintegrate during re-entry.
The photos were also privately circulated to scientists and appeared on a few websites before being taken down for copyright reasons. One scientist argued that the lighting hitting the Columbia was an electrical discharge from the ionosphere, proving the existence of 'mega lightning' in the ionosphere. This is a phenomenon that conventional models of electrical activity in the upper atmosphere do not support.
The scientist nevertheless concluded:
While such an explanation enjoys support
from a few scientists promoting an electrical model of the universe,
it is not supported by NASA or most scientists who view lightning as
being discharged from the upper atmosphere downwards towards the
Earth, rather than in the ionosphere which was the altitude (63 kms)
where the Columbia was photographed.
Furthermore, there was no
lightning activity appearing below the Columbia as it was
descending, helping to eliminate mainstream scientific support for
the theory that a rare form of mega-lightning hit the Columbia.
In his analysis, Sereda dismisses the explanation offered by the few scientists arguing that it was a form of super or 'mega' lightning that hit the Columbia.
Sereda argues that the five still photographs
span a total of thirty seconds showing the purple lighting strike
corkscrewing as it zeroes in on the tail end of the Columbia for the
final dramatic hit.
A graphic depicting the trajectory of
the Columbia when it was hit by a 'lightning bolt' with an
accompanying analysis (click above image for source).
According to Sereda, lighting typically discharges in a fraction of a second. It
does not span the thirty second period observed in the five photos
shortly before the Columbia crashed.
Consequently, Sereda concludes
that it was not 'super' lightning that hit the Columbia in a freak
collision, but an
advanced plasma weapon.
Sereda (and other researchers in
a second video - watch it below) then go on to
discuss whether the plasma weapon was fired by extraterrestrial
vehicles engaging in some kind of ET vs. ET, or ET vs. secret
governmental conflict.
In either case, the Columbia was the victim
in an undisclosed war by space faring entities with advanced plasma
weapons.
In my very first
Exopolitics Comment on Feb 2, 2003,
I had proposed that the Columbia was shot down as a result of a
conflict between different factions of the secret government over
the Bush administration's Iraq policy.
This is what I wrote at the time:
Given the photographic evidence
conclusively showing that Columbia was hit by a bolt of lighting,
the real question is whether the lighting bolt was a freak plasma
discharge from the ionosphere, as supporters of
the electrical
universe model claim, or resulted from a plasma beam weapon. Since
there was no thunderstorm activity observed below Columbia, and due
to the long 30 second period of the plasma discharge, the evidence
supports Sereda's conclusion.
As to the question of whether plasma
beam weapons are real,
research conducted by Dr Douglas Beason
shows the feasibility and practicality of Directed Energy Weapons in
open source literature.
Furthermore,
video analysis of the 1991 STS-48 mission,
shows what appears to be a plasma beam weapon targeted at a UFO.
Whatever the ultimate explanation, it
is important for the general public to learn about,
The idea of
space based wars is no
longer a fiction, but is an undisclosed reality of the early 21st
Century.
References
|
Fluoride Information
Fluoride is a poison. Fluoride was poison yesterday. Fluoride is poison today. Fluoride will be poison tomorrow. When in doubt, get it out.
Saturday, March 10, 2018
Space Shuttle Columbia was Destroyed by a Plasma Beam Weapon
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment