Who's destroying England? London attacks and the war against Brexit by Jon Rappoport
Who's destroying England?
London attacks and the war against Brexit
NOTE: Watch Paul Watson's shocking video, The Truth about 'Refugees'
by Jon Rappoport
June 4, 2017
"Here's
a great idea, boys. Gather around. We're going to build, on top of
every national government on the European continent, another government,
bigger, more bloated, more corrupt, more powerful. Who'll notice?
Who'll care?"
"Terrific. Love it. But ultimately we'll need to destroy all those
separate countries and rule the whole continent as one entity. We can
do that, yes. We'll open all borders and let in a massive flow of
immigrants and erase national identities. Terror attacks will
multiply. We'll put a lid on talking about immigrants as the cause of
the terror. Call it hate speech. We'll train the population of Europe
to accept terrorism as part of the glorious future. It makes no logical
sense, but so what? No top-down ideology ever made sense. We'll
preach unlimited tolerance and love. We'll be a de facto Church of
sorts. We'll hypnotize the whole continent..." (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)
As I was writing this article, multiple terror attacks were launched in
London. To say the human destruction "once again raised the question of
immigration" would be a vast understatement.
In the run-up to the Brexit vote in 2016, immigration came to the fore
as the key issue. But of course, the European Union has a policy of
opening borders of all member countries.
The EU wants one continent, no separate countries---and the way to
achieve that is by creating a massive flood of migrants. Destroy
traditions and cultures that define countries. In the process, accept
terrorism as "inevitable." Don't talk or write about the actual effects
of immigration. That would be "hate speech." Keep eyes and mouth
shut, and march straight ahead into a future of one European continent
ruled from above by the EU.
Ever since the UK vote to leave the unelected, terminally corrupt, and
rotting edifice known as the European Union, stall tactics and threats
have been launched at Brits.
First it was, "It's going to take a long time to untangle the UK from
the EU, it's very complicated." Actually, that tactic was predated by
Prince Obama traveling to England to warn the population they'd stand at
the back of the line in forming separate trade deals with the US, if
they left the EU. It's called interfering in the political affairs of
another nation. Now it's the EU and Queen Merkel beating the UK to the
punch by plotting trade deals with India and China, in order to leave
the British out in the cold.
But the basic question is, Is Britain a nation? Does it exist? It's a
question citizens are supposed to answer. Not Merkel, Obama, or the EU.
This issue, in case it's unclear, is all about Globalism. According to
that totalitarian political philosophy, of which the EU is a standard
bearer, there are no nations. There are only mega-corporations and
banks.
As the recently departed guru of the Rockefeller Trilateral Commission, Zbigniew Brzezinski, wrote in 1969, "[The]
nation state as a fundamental unit of man's organized life has ceased
to be the principal creative force. International banks and
multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far
in advance of the political concepts of the nation state."
This is not only a political and economic statement, it's a prescriptive
piece of psychological advice: Stop thinking of yourself as a citizen
of a country; you're a global citizen; you exist and function at the
pleasure of a new collaborative international order.
And the new order will triumph. Bow your heads and accept it.
Unless people get up on their hind legs and say no, which is what happened in the 2016 Brexit vote.
Defection. Decentralization. Independence.
Hideous words to the ears of Globalists.
Their basic strategy, since the end of World War 2, has been to spin a
highly complex network of political and economic relationships, from one
end of the world to the other---a labyrinth---from which escape is seen
as virtually impossible.
Trade deals like NAFTA, CAFTA, and GATT are only part of this system.
The EU itself keeps churning out thousands of rules, regulations, and
laws.
Build the maze; put national governments and populations in the maze.
Then more or less claim the planet would collapse without the maze.
European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker just issued a "maze statement" to President Trump after Trump rejected the Globalist Paris Climate (non-) Treaty: "Europe's
duty is to say: it's not like that. The Americans can't just leave the
climate protection agreement. Mr. Trump believes that [he can] because
he doesn't know the details...We tried to explain that to Mr. Trump in
Taormina in clear German sentences. It seems that our attempt failed,
but the law is the law, and it must be obeyed. Not everything which is
law and not everything in international agreements is fake news, and we
have to comply with it."
Supremely arrogant, Juncker was winging it and writing his own script,
because, in fact, the US didn't sign on to a treaty in Paris. Obama
tried to unilaterally bind the US to the climate pact, when a
two-third's vote by the US Senate is actually required for such
international agreements. And no Senate vote was taken.
But this is the EU's preemptive attitude toward defection, decentralization, and independence.
In the case of Brexit, climate change wasn't the issue. Immigration
was. The EU tried its best to chastise England for daring to insist
unlimited numbers of migrants might be too many. "You're in the maze,
stay in the maze."
And there is another vector of attack being launched at England:
reminders the nation is evil for its colonial practices, which can
never, ever be erased. But the covert leaders in that propaganda
effort, the EU and its Globalist bosses, feel entitled in their own
attempt to colonize the whole planet. "Your colonizing was bad, ours is good."
With an annual budget in the vicinity of $100 billion, the EU is
intractably corrupt and incompetent. It's estimated that $5 billion a
year is stolen from that budget. As for the other $95 billion, what is
it for? Nations can govern themselves. The EU could disappear tomorrow
and no one would catch a cold. The entire bloated structure, employing
between 30 and 50 thousand people (depending on how far the count is
extended) is a vast boondoggle.
It's astonishing that anyone in the UK would feel a sense of loyalty to the EU.
There is nothing strange about Brexit at all. It's a natural reaction:
One day, a house pet goes outside and wanders off into the woods and
never comes back. Who is really surprised?
The "system" called the EU insists that terrorism is somehow a price the
British people must pay for entering "a better future for all." Don't
ask what that future looks like. Don't think about it. The UK doesn't
have the right to set its own immigration policy.
The chaos and destruction that result from open borders are simply an
"adjustment period," after which things will settle down. A new and
better England and Europe will emerge. Diversity will triumph. How?
Don't worry about that, be happy.
You see, diversity is a high-minded principle, and by definition it
implies a more humane society. Therefore, there is no
counter-evidence. Facts are unimportant.
The
latest London attacks are a message to the British people: You may have
exited from the EU, but the EU policy on immigration still stands.
No it doesn't. Britain is free to set its own policy.
To do so, politically correct speech will have to be jettisoned. Facts
will have to be widely expressed. Lies will have to be widely exposed.
The EU will need to be named as a driving force in immigration, and the results of migration will need to be laid at its door.
The EU sees immigrant terrorism as its ticket to greater control over Europe.
The London attacks are a challenge thrown in Britain's face. Bow down and accept; or rebel.
Leaving the EU means LEAVING the EU.
How many times must British citizens witness these attacks and watch
police come in after the fact? How long before leaving means LEAVING?
How long before the British people realize that the flood of migrants is
not simply "a refugee crisis" created by the US and its allies, whose
imperialist policies of Empire and wars in the Middle East, Asia, and
Africa, initiate "blowback?"
How long before they see numbers of these "refugees" are just military-age young men who arrive with destruction on their minds?
How long before they see England is riddled with EU agents who are
"forwarding a humane immigration policy," come hell or high water?
One continent, under no liberty and no justice, with suffering and slavery for all.
How long before they leave THAT?
(For the links to the sources for this story, click here.)
The
author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM
THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US
Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a
consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the
expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he
has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles
on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin
Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and
Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics,
health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.
No comments:
Post a Comment