Get ready.
Yahoo 7 News, Australia, reports: "A four-year-old who identifies as
transgender has begun to transition before their first day at school,
hoping to complete the full transformation by 2017."
"While the child is the youngest on Australian record to change their
gender, the New South Wales government has revealed 'hundreds' of other
children are being referred to the state's hospitals for gender
dysphoria."
"The four-year-old is reportedly being supported throughout the
transition by the education department, and is part of the Safe Schools
program."
Yes, the Safe Schools program. Safe for whom?
Deputy Secretary of School Operations Gregory Prior made this
announcement at a budget hearing, which presumable means the
four-year-old child is receiving public funds for the sex change.
No mention of how the parents of the four-year old came to their
decision. No mention of the "discussion" with the child that led to
this decision.
The New South Wales government doesn't just stand aside; it supports this madness.
A four-year old. He/she comes up with this idea out of the blue? He/she expresses it in what terms?
He/she is supposed to understand the medical procedures and the consequences?
The doctors go along with this?
"We have a four-year old coming in today to begin a sex-change."
"Good. The team will be ready."
Not a flicker of doubt.
Here is the Wikipedia definition of gender dysphoria: "Gender dysphoria
or gender identity disorder (GID) is the dysphoria (distress) a person
experiences as a result of the sex and gender they were assigned at
birth."
Assigned? This is supposed to be some sort of arbitrary labeling that
is handed to an infant? "We'll call this one a male. The next one will
be a female."
This whole social program has gained so much steam that many people are
paralyzed---they refuse to express outrage. They refuse to point out
the obvious. They knuckle under. The criminally delusional parents who
go along with the program for their own children consider themselves
enlightened. They're in a trance, and they feel good about the trance.
"Yes, our four-year old is undergoing gender transition and we think it's wonderful."
What coaching did these parents engage in with their very young child to push along this insanity?
A boy put on his mother's dress one day, and then the parents sat down with him and engaged in a deep conversation?
A four-year old is now the ruler of his/her own fate.
This is legalized mutilation and torture, undertaken as a "proper medical procedure."
The doctors should have licenses stripped, and they should be sent to
prison. They should share their cells with the government officials who
support this crime.
On some level, medical sex change for children is an outgrowth of the
obsession about children being "special." Ultra-special. The child's
wisdom extends to all sorts of insights he/she has about life.
A child does have a free and open attitude toward life, but this has
nothing to do with making decisions that have enormous consequences for
him/her. And the word "consequences" hardly begins to describe the
mutilation.
I'm tempted to ask the usual hollow question, "What has become of our
society?" But the answer is clear. There are masters and slaves. The
slaves are going along. The masters are psychopaths. But that leaves a
lot of middle ground, where parents, educators, and bureaucrats are
willingly cooperating in destruction. It's not simply a lack of
courage. It's self-induced brainwashing.
"This is freedom. Freedom is a good thing. What could be more free and
innovative than a child deciding to change his/her own sex at the age
of four? We're creating a better world."
Their eyes are bright. Their smiles are wide.
And if medical sexual mutilation of a child is gladly permitted, what
isn't permitted? What "voluntary" or mandated medical procedure would
be ruled out as too grotesque?
That's the question that should be asked.
No comments:
Post a Comment