The Rockefeller Files: Chapter Ten The People Planners by Gary Allen from archive.org

Chapter Ten 

The People Planners 

"It is Kissinger's belief ... that by controlling 
food, one can control people, and by 
controlling energy, especially oil, one can 
control nations and their financial systems. By 
placing food and oil under international 
control along with the world's monetary 
system, Kissinger is convinced a loosely knit 
world government can become a reality by 
1980." 

-Paul Scott 
nationally syndicated columnist 

The Rockefellers learned nearly a century ago that there are two standard ways for one of 
their companies to absorb another corporation. If the firm to be acquired is much smaller, 
a "take over" is the simplest procedure: buy em out. 

But if the competitor is more your equal, a merger- "must be arranged". 

The same principles hold true among nations. No matter how much this country sends 
abroad as foreign aid, technical assistance, loans that are never repaid, or other largesse, 
there is simply no way another country -or even a bloc of countries- can be made 
powerful enough to take us over. 

Recognizing this political fact of life, the master planners devised the strategy of a 
merger - a Great Merger - among nations. 

But before such a merger can be consummated, and the United States becomes just 
another province in a New World Order, there must at least be the semblance of parity 
among the senior partners in the deal - How does one make the nations of the world more 
nearly equal? The Insiders determined that a two-prong approach was needed, use 
American money and know-how to build up your competitors, while at the same time use 
every devious strategy you can devise to weaken and impoverish this country. The goal is 
not to bankrupt the United States, we must emphasize. Rather, it is to reduce our 
productive might, and therefore our standard of living, to the meager subsistence level of 
the socialized nations of the world. 



Only a fascist-socialist dictatorship would have the power to accomplish such a - 
redistribution.- Notice that the plan is notto bring the standard of living in less developed 
countries up to our level, but to bring ours down to meet theirs coming up. 

You may be assured, however, that the Rockefellers and their allies are not talking about 
reducing their own quality of life. It is your standard of living which must be sacrificed 
on the altar of the New World Order. 

The Rockefeller game plan is to use population, energy, food, and financial controls as a 
method of people control which will lead, steadily and deliberately, into the Great 
Merger. Much of the spade work for setting up this ploy is being done by Henry 
Kissinger, who was a personal employee of Nelson Rockefeller for a decade before 
Rocky placed him in the Nixon Administration. On numerous occasions Herr Kissinger 
has declared that his goal is to create a "New World Order." Syndicated Washington 
columnist Paul Scott reveals: 

It is Kissinger's belief, according to his aides, that by controlling food, one can control 
people, and by controlling energy, especially oil, one can control nations and their - 
financial systems. By placing food and oil under international control along with the 
world's monetary system, Kissinger is convinced a loosely knit world government 
operating, under the frame-work of the United Nations can become a reality before 1980. 

Common sense tells us that a Rockefeller hireling such as Kissinger would not be setting 
up an "international control" system which takes assets from the Rockefellers and gives 
them to someone else. Obviously, the game plan is to take other people's assets and put 
them under the umbrella of a Rockefeller-controlled World Government. 

This new strategy may be termed the crisis route to World Order. It runs parallel to and 
eventually will converge with the Atlantic Union treaty and regional government 
approach to the Universal State. Washington columnist Paul Scott calls this "the new 
strategy change from the direct to the indirect approach to bring about world government. 
"The plan, as publicly stated by the CFR's Richard Gardner, part-time State Department 
functionary and Columbia University Professor of Law and International Organization, 
amounts to this: Instead of trying to make the UN a complete world dictatorship 
immediately, the Establishment will identify different problems in different countries. 
Then they will propose a "solution," which can only be achieved by some kind of 
international agency, so that each country concerned will be forced to surrender another 
segment of its national independence. Gardner considers this piecemeal approach the 
practical road to the end of nationhood: 

We are likely to do better by building our "house of world order - from the bottom up 
rather than from the top down. It will look like a great - booming, buzzing confusion " to 
use William James' facetious description of reality; but an end run around national 
sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, is likely to get us to world order faster than the 
old-fashioned frontal assault. 



So this is what the Rockefeller gang, working through agents like Kissinger and Gardner, 
have in mind-an "end run around national sovereignty." Gardner continues, with obvious 
glee: 

The hopeful aspect of the present situation is that even as nations resist appeals for " 
world government- and "the surrender of sovereignty," technological, economic and 
political interests are forcing them to establish more and more far-ranging institutions to 
manage their mutual interdependence. 

One of the most obvious back-door approaches to World Order is through the control of 
food. The ploy is to establish a World Food Bank, with the necessary goodies supplied 
(naturally) by the United States. The concept was proposed at the International Monetary 
Fund Conference in Nairobi by long-time Rockefeller front man Robert 5. McNamara 
(CFR). R. Strange McNamara (yes, that really is his middle name) was made president of 
the World Bank after he had successfully completed his earlier assignment of crippling 
this country's military might. McNamara advocated the food-producing nations of the 
world surrender their surpluses to a " world authority," which would then take charge of 
redistributing the bounty to the 'have-not" nations. The topic was to be discussed at the 
UN's World Food Conference in Rome in November 1974. Between the time of the 
original proposal and the Rome conference, Richard Nixon was shuffled into an early 
retirement and was replaced by a compliant Jerry Ford. 

One of Ford's first official acts was to go before the UN General Assembly and assure the 
international flotsam gathered there that the voice of the Rockefeller's Charlie McCarthy, 
Henry Kissinger, was the very voice of America in all matters pertaining to international 
relations. Later, Ford announced that the Secretary of State would appear as keynote 
speaker on behalf of the United States at the upcoming World Food Conference, 
superseding the more logical choice, Secretary of Agriculture Earl Butz, who was the 
official head of the US delegation. Of the hundreds of political commentators around the 
country, only Paul Scott had the courage to assess the implications of Ford's actions: 

Whether he fully realizes it or not, President Ford has put his stamp of approval on 
Secretary of State Henry Kissinger's grand design foreign policy for the establishment of 
a loosely knit world government before the end of the 1970s. 

By calling for the development of a global strategy and policy for food and oil within the 
structure of the United Nations, the President clearly signaled his acceptance of the "new 
international order" being sought by Kissinger. 

Scott went on to point out that instead of using this nation's enormous food production as 
a weapon of US foreign policy, to promote the expansion of freedom throughout the 
world, Ford accepted Kissinger's plan of passing policy control over US food surpluses, 
"and eventually all US food " to a national food bank. 

Herr Henry made no bones about the fact that all of this is designed to further the New 
World Order. He told the delegates at Rome: "Weare faced not just with the problem of 



food but with the accelerating momentum of our interdependence." And "our-man in 
Rome went even further; he declared we should" make global cooperation in food a 
model, for our response to other challenges of an interdependent world - energy, 
inflation, population, protection of the environment. 

Agriculture Secretary Earl Butz admitted of the proposed food bank that "in the end it 
will be the American taxpayer who pays for it." Who else? And the fact that worldwide 
distribution of our food will inevitably create food shortages and skyrocketing prices in 
America has not been overlooked by the Rockefeller conspirators. That is part of the 
plan. 

And before you conclude that any such program would be emphatically rejected by an 
angry American electorate, remember this: by the time the plan is implemented, the UN 
will have an army to back up its looting of America! Doubtless the clan's minions in the 
bureaucracy and the media will refer to the planned food shortage as a mandatory 
national diet program. 

The whole thrust of the Rome gathering was that it is the obligation of the United States- 
which means you, the worker and taxpayer -to feed the world. This, despite the fact that 
for years America has supplied more than 80 % of the food given to foreign countries. It 
is such American giveaways that in recent years have provided over $25 billion in 
foodstuffs to such ingrates as Marxist India, now a dictatorship openly allied with the 
Soviet Union, where the bulk of our grains winds up feeding rats, not hungry people. 

* While US reserves of food and feed grains are already being depleted, Russia and 
Communist China have quietly been using part of their massive purchases of bargain- 
priced American grain to build up their stockpiles. Crews of US and foreign ships 
carrying US grain to Russian and Chinese ports have been told by Communist dock 
workers that every third or fourth shipment of US grain is being placed in permanent 
storage facilities as part of those countries' national reserves. 

At least $200 billion in such aid has been similarly squandered to more than 125 nations- 
including more millions now going to members of the OPEC cartel, which has 
quadrupled oil prices. To pay for all of these giveaways, the Insiders who run the show 
have used printing press inflation money to add hundreds of billions of dollars to our 
National Debt. This, coupled with the consequent reduction of domestic supplies, has 
sent our own food prices out of sight. - 

But, at least in the past our stupidity was of our own doing and under our own control. 
Informed Americans could have stopped it-and could still stop it today-by throwing the 
Congressmen who voted for the giveaways out of office. In the future, when the 
Rockefeller Kissinger plan for the international authority over food is implemented, our 
food supply will no longer be under our control. What then? 

Increasingly we hear plaintive bleats from the Rockefellers' sheep in the media, calling 
for Americans to make increased sacrifices to feed the rest of the world. Incredible as it 



may seem, the truth-twisters of the airwaves and press are attempting to make us feel 
guilty that we are not starving. 

None of these Rockefeller lackeys dares suggest, of course, that the difference between 
American agricultural production and the poverty levels of the so-called -have not- 
nations is the difference between individualism, with its reliance on private property and 
free enterprise, and feudalism- fascism- socialism-collectivism. It is the difference between 
incentives and a planned economy; between efficiency and wasteful boondoggles; 
between a million salesmen pushing the "too much - and a million ration clerks dividing 
up the "too little." 

This is not to say America's agricultural system is perfect. To the extent that we have 
instituted price supports and subsidies, paying men not to grow food, we have suffered. 
Nevertheless, the success of American agriculture under freedom is a model the rest of 
the world should be encouraged to copy. 

But if more nations achieved independence in food production, much of the impetus for 
world government would disappear faster than a freeloader when the check arrives. In 
order for the Rockefellers to achieve their New World Order, first they must create 
famines and the fear of further suffering. All that is required to create a famine is to put 
all agriculture under control of government bureaucracy, then wait awhile. The bigger the 
bureaucracy the shorter the wait, and international bureaucracy is the ne plus ultrain 
producing red tape instead of wheat. 

Intertwined with food production grab is the push for population control. People planning 
are an important tool in building the net that will drag us fishes into the New World 
Order. The -population bomb- real or exaggerated, is being used in conjunction with 
food, energy, and international money problems as part of the One-Big-Brother snare. 

Coinciding with the UN-sponsored conferences in Nairobi and Rome, the United Nations 
sponsored the World Population Conference at Bucharest, Romania in August 1974. 
Headlining the program was none other than John D. Rockefeller III, who proclaimed: " I 
come to Bucharest with an urgent call for a deep and probing reappraisal of all that has 
been done in the population field. 

I have changed my mind and now believe family planning alone is not adequate. " 

An Associated Press report explained: - Rockefeller ... has for years been one of the 
world's leading advocates of family planning. He donated millions of dollars toward 
population research and is founder and chairman of the Population Council, a private US 
organization funded largely by [millions of dollars] the Rockefeller and Ford 
Foundations." The wire service continued: "His speech reflected the viewpoint voiced at 
this conference by many members of the Third World and Socialist [that is, Communist] 
countries." John D. Ill obviously felt right at home behind the Iron Curtain, as he called 
for a redistribution of wealth and piously proclaimed that modern development should 
emphasize "inequitable distribution of the fruits of progress." 



In his remarks to the gathering of people planners, the eldest of the Royal Rockefellers 
made three main points: First, he echoed the Communist line that the rich must give their 
wealth to the -poor. Second, he asserted that voluntary family planning is inadequate and 
called for Big Brother to start dictating whether or not a couple is permitted to have a 
baby. Third, in calling for -moderate levels of consumption- in advanced nations, 
Rockefeller advocated that Americans voluntarily reduce their standard of living. 

The fact that it is a little incongruous-not to say hypocritical -for a man whose family is 
worth uncounted millions, who has thousands of servants, hundreds of luxurious homes 
and lives in an opulence unknown by the oriental potentates of yore, to ask the rest of his 
fellow citizens to scale down their living standards, went unnoticed in the New York 
Times. But to belabor the obvious, whose wealth do you think Rockefeller wants to share, 
yours or his? 

Going along with the call by Rockefeller (who claimed the -United Nations is the world's 
highest authority for governmental control over people), the conference set in motion the 
machinery to institutionalize the totalitarian demands of the Stop the Storkers. 

The Washington Post ,a chief Establishment mouthpiece, has discussed the Nazi like 
policies being advocated by the people planners: 

The day may be approaching when couples will have to prove eligibility and demonstrate 
qualifications before they are permitted to become parents. 

Or there may be baby ration cards for couples, group marriages, mass distribution of anti- 
fertility drugs, parent licensing, legal Polygamy, abortions on demand, more varied life 
options for women and more restricted ones for men-such as forced paternity leave for 
new fathers. 

Understand that such enforced infertility is not planned for India or Senegal, but for the 
United States, where zero population growth is already a fact. 

All this, despite the provable fact that there is ample room on earth for all of us- in fact if 
every man woman and child in the entire world moved to the State of Washington, 
(twentieth in size of all the states), each would have 490 square feet of space. 

But we are being led to believe that unless we give Big Brother total power over people's 
rights to have children, we will all be ankle deep in human beings within a decade. Such 
august organizations as the National Academy of Sciences are helping to hawk this 
Rockefeller line, with doomsday messages such as: "There can be no doubt concerning 
the long-term prognosis. Either the birth rate of the world must come down or the death 
rate must go up. 

This is not to discount the possibility that overpopulation, particularly in backward 
nations, cannot be a genuine problem. But, if the Rockefellers were truly interested in 
curbing population growth without enslaving everybody, there is a much better solution. 



When a country's standard of living goes up, the birth rate goes down-voluntarily. Assist 
nations such as India and Red China to benefit by the adoption of free market, private 
property principles, and the abundance produced by such newly free peoples would 
astound the world. The Rockefellers, however, are interested in more controls, not fewer 
problems. 

The specious Rockefeller argument that the world must accept Mao- style people control 
or perish is so phony that it is amazing the conspirators have gotten anyone to buy it. As 
Reverend R. J. Rushdoony points out in his excellent book, The Myth of Overpopulation: 

Socialism always creates ultimately an imbalance between the number of people living 
and their food supply, which results in hunger or famine. There is in this sense therefore 
always a problem of overpopulation under socialism. Socialism, moreover, affects both 
the food supplies, by limiting it, and also the population, by both expanding it at one 
stage and limiting it at another. 

To the Rockefellers, socialism is not a system for redistributing wealth - especially not 
for redistributing their wealth -but a system to control people and competitors. Socialism 
puts power in the hands of the government. And since the Rockefellers control the 
government, government control means Rockefeller control. You may not have known 
this, but you can be sure they do! 

When the Rockefellers join the UN's World Population Conference in calling for the 
promotion " of a new economic order by eradicating the cause of world poverty, by 
ensuring the equitable distribution of the world resources, by eliminating the injustices of 
existing world trade systems and exploitation perpetrated by capitalistic ... corporations, - 
something smells as fishy as an unwashed tuna boat. 

Curbing population growth is just part of the Rockefeller war on the American family. 
Abortion is another. According to John H. Knowles, president of the Rockefeller 
Foundation and one of America's foremost promoters of the slaughter of the unborn, the 
goal of the Foundation is to achieve the capacity in America for 1.8 million abortions 
every year. 

Not coincidentally, it was John D. Rockefeller III who was appointed by Richard Nixon 
as chairman of the newly created Commission on Population Growth and the American 
Future. In accepting the appointment, John D 111 pontificated: 

The average citizen doesn't appreciate the social and economic implications of population 
growth and what it does to the quality of all our lives. Rather than think of population 
control as a negative thing, we should see that it can be enriching. 

One of the early reports of the Rockefeller Commission recommended: 



... that present state laws restricting abortion be liberalized along the lines of the New 
York State Statute, such abortions to be performed on request by duly licensed physicians 
under conditions of medical safety. 

And the Commisssion further suggested that -federal, state, and local governments make 
funds available to support abortion services in states with liberalized statutes. "Rockefeller 
is so callous about individual beliefs that he would forcibly extract money from Catholic 
taxpayers, among others, to finance what their religion teaches is the murder of the 
unborn. Tough rocks, says the Rock: "Religious preconceptions must be overcome. " 

The New York model abortion law which chairman John enthusiastically applauded was 
passed, of course, under the leadership of brother Nelson. During the Vice Presidential 
confirmation hearings Dr. Charles Rice, Professor of Law at the Notre Dame Law 
School, characterized Nelson as "the incarnate symbol of the anti life movement - and 
said that Mr. Rockefeller"is perhaps the leading proponent of permissive abortion in the 
United States.- 

The Rockefellers have even financed the establishment of an abortion mill. In the 
summer of 1971, Planned Parenthood-New York City opened its first large scale abortion 
center -a prototype for the development of additional centers throughout the city, state, 
and nation. The center was originally designed to perform more than 10 000 abortions a 
year for an average fee of $80, with funds provided in many cases by Medicaid. The 
initial funds to establish the abortion mill came from a $200,000 pledge from The 
Rockefeller Brothers Fund. 

The past three generations of Rockefellers have not been notoriously considerate of other 
people's feelings and beliefs. When a group of pro-life activists picketed a speech by 
Nelson Rockefeller in Nebraska, the loveable old politician told a 15 - year old girl: 
"Don't knock it [abortion], girl, you might need one someday. 

In all wars this nation has fought, from the battle of Lexington in 1776 through the last 
fatality in Vietnam, American combat deaths totaled 668,226 men. Yet, in just the single 
year of 1972, 700,000 innocent babies were killed in this country, legally, before they 
could draw their first breath. (Current estimates are that this figure could increase to 1.6 
million abortions a year.) 

That is the price of the Rockefellers' promotion of easy abortion in the United States. But 
it is just part of the price all of us will pay (and pay, and pay), if the people planners 
succeed in herding all of us into their New World Order. 

Yes, the Rockefellers are planners. As John D.'s aide, Fred Gates, once confessed: "In our 
dreams we have limitless resources and the people yield themselves with perfect docility 
to our molding hands. "Now, thanks to the taxpayers, the Rockefellers have almost 
limitless funds. As a result, faceless bureaucrats in Washington whom you did not hire 
and whom you cannot fire -now tell you how to run your business, whom you may hire, 
where your children will be bussed to school, what products you can purchase, and even 



what foods you car and cannot eat. It is only a matter of time until the dictocrats tell you 
how many children you are permitted to have. 

There is nothing wrong with planning. The question is who is doing it. Our Founding 
Fathers believed people should be free to plan their own lives. The Rockefellers believe 
their agents in the federal government must plan your life for you. It is a simple choice: 
Will you run your own life, or will you be forced to obey the dictates of bureaucrats, 
social workers, college professors, sociologists, psychologists, and others who are 
fronting for the House of Rockefeller? 

Nelson is very candid about it. In an October 1975 interview in Playboy magazine, Rocky 
admitted: 'Tarn a great believer in planning. Economic, social, political, military, total 
world planning. "(Emphasis added.) 

When Big Brother arrives, he may well be wearing horn-rimmed glasses. 

Back to table of contents 



Chapter Eleven 

The Great Energy Swindle