Revelations of German Pilot: Shocking Analysis of the “Shooting Down” of Malaysian MH17. “Aircraft Was Not Hit by a Missile”
-
The tragedy of Malaysian MH 017 continues to elude any light of clarity being cast over it.
The flight recorders are in England and are evaluated. What can come of it? Maybe more than you would assume.
Especially the voice recorder will be interesting when
you look at the picture of a cockpit fragment. As an expert in aviation I
closely looked at the images of the wreckage that are circulating on
the Internet.
First, I was amazed at how few photos can be found from the wreckage with Google. All are in low resolution, except one: The fragment of the cockpit below the window on the pilots side. This image, however, is shocking. In Washington, you can now hear views expressed of a “potentially tragic error / accident” regarding MH 017. Given this particular cockpit image it does not surprise me at all.
Entry and exit impact holes of projectiles in the cockpit area
Source for all photos: Internet
I recommend to click on the little picture to the left.
You can download this photo as a PDF in good resolution. This is
necessary, because that will allow you understand what I am describing
here. The facts speak clear and loud and are beyond the realm of
speculation: The cockpit shows traces of shelling! You can see the
entry and exit holes. The edge of a portion of the holes is bent
inwards. These are the smaller holes, round and clean, showing the entry
points most likely that of a 30 millimeter caliber projectile.
The edge of the other, the larger and slightly frayed exit holes
showing shreds of metal pointing produced by the same caliber
projectiles. Moreover, it is evident that at these exit holes of the
outer layer of the double aluminum reinforced structure are shredded or
bent – outwardly! Furthermore, minor cuts can be seen, all bent outward,
which indicate that shrapnel had forcefully exited through the outer
skin from the inside of the cockpit. The open rivets are are also bent
outward.
In sifting through the available
images one thing stands out: All wreckage of the sections behind the
cockpit are largely intact, except for the fact that only fragments of
the aircraft remained . Only the cockpit part shows these peculiar marks
of destruction. This leaves the examiner with an important clue. This
aircraft was not hit by a missile in the central portion. The
destruction is limited to the cockpit area. Now you have to factor in
that this part is constructed of specially reinforced material.
This is on account of the nose of any aircraft having to withstand the
impact of a large bird at high speeds. You can see in the photo, that in
this area significantly stronger aluminum alloys were being installed
than in the remainder of the outer skin of the fuselage. One remembers
the crash of Pan Am over Lockerbie. It was a large segment of the
cockpit that due to the special architecture survived the crash in one
piece. In the case of flight MH 017 it becomes abundantly clear that
there also an explosion took place inside the aircraft.
Tank destroying mix of ammunitionBullet holes in the outer skin
So what could have happened? Russia recently published radar recordings, that confirm at least one Ukrainian SU 25 in close proximity to MH 017.
This corresponds with the statement of the now missing Spanish
controller ‘Carlos’ that has seen two Ukrainian fighter aircraft in the
immediate vicinity of MH 017. If we now consider the armament of
a typical SU 25 we learn this: It is equipped with a double-barreled
30-mm gun, type GSh-302 / AO-17A, equipped with: a 250 round magazine of
anti-tank incendiary shells and splinter-explosive shells (dum-dum),
arranged in alternating order. The cockpit of the MH 017 has evidently
been fired at from both sides: the entry and exit holes are found on the
same fragment of it’s cockpit segment!Now just consider what happens when a series of anti-tank incendiary shells and splinter-explosive shells hit the cockpit. These are after all designed to destroy a modern tank. The anti-tank incendiary shells partially traversed the cockpit and exited on the other side in a slightly deformed shape. (Aviation forensic experts could possibly find them on the ground presumably controlled by the Kiev Ukrainian military; the translator). After all, their impact is designed to penetrate the solid armor of a tank. Also, the splinter-explosive shells will, due to their numerous impacts too cause massive explosions inside the cockpit, since they are designed to do this. Given the rapid firing sequence of the GSh-302 cannon, it will cause a rapid succession of explosions within the cockpit area in a very short time. Remeber each of these is sufficient to destroy a tank.
What “mistake” was actually being committed – and by whom?
Because the interior of a commercial aircraft is a hermetically
sealed pressurized chamber, the explosions will, in split second,
increase the pressure inside the cabin to extreme levels or breaking
point. An aircraft is not equipped for this, it will burst like a
balloon. This explains a coherent scenario. The largely intact
fragments of the rear sections broke in mid air at the weaker points of
construction most likely under extreme internal air pressure.
The images of the widely scattered field of debris and the brutally
damaged segment of cockpit fit like hand in glove. Furthermore, a wing
segment shows traces of a grazing shot, which in direct extension leads
to the cockpit. Interestingly, I found that both the high-resolution
photo of the fragment of bullet riddled cockpit as well as the segment
of grazed wing have in the meantime disappeared from Google Images. One
can find virtually no more pictures of the wreckage, except the well
known smoking ruins.
If you listen to the voices from Washington now who speak of a “potentially tragic error / accident”, all that remains is the question of what might have been the nature of this “mistake” perpetrated here. I am not given to hover long in the realm of speculation, but would like to invite others to consider the following : The MH 017 looked similar in it’s tricolor design to that that of the Russian President’s plane. The plane with President Putin on board was at the same time ”near” Malaysia MH 017. In aviation circles “close” would be considered to be anywhere between 150 to 200 miles. Also, in this context we might consider the deposition of Ms. Tymoshenko, who wanted to shoot President Putin with a Kalashnikov.
If you listen to the voices from Washington now who speak of a “potentially tragic error / accident”, all that remains is the question of what might have been the nature of this “mistake” perpetrated here. I am not given to hover long in the realm of speculation, but would like to invite others to consider the following : The MH 017 looked similar in it’s tricolor design to that that of the Russian President’s plane. The plane with President Putin on board was at the same time ”near” Malaysia MH 017. In aviation circles “close” would be considered to be anywhere between 150 to 200 miles. Also, in this context we might consider the deposition of Ms. Tymoshenko, who wanted to shoot President Putin with a Kalashnikov.
But that this remains pure speculation. The shelling of
the cockpit of air Malaysia MH 017, however, is definitely not
speculation.
Global Research Related Articles
Media Disinformation: East Ukrainian Rebels Allegedly Down Two WarplanesIn
Bloomberg's article, " Two Ukrainian Jets Shot Down, Three Dangerous
Explanations ," it claims two Ukrainian SU-25 ground attack warplanes
were shot down by rebels over Donetsk in eastern Ukraine, stating:
Ukrainian Defense Ministry spokesman told reporters in ... 
Malaysian Airlines MH17: US Escalates Threats against Russia over Ukraine CrashThe
Obama administration is intensifying its propaganda campaign against
Russia and pro-Russian separatists over the shooting down of Malaysian
Airlines flight MH17. Even as it is clear that the US does not know how
MH17 crashed or what role ... 
Korean Airlines KAL 007 Case Shows Parallels with Malaysian Airlines MH17This
is not the first time there has been a downing of a commercial flight,
and, as in most such cases, there is more to the story of Malaysian
Airlines MH17 than the first impression suggests. One particular case
... 
Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole
responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on
Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect
statement in this article. The Center of Research on Globalization
grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on
community internet sites as long as the text & title are not
modified. The source and the author's copyright must be displayed. For
publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms
including commercial internet sites, contact: publications@globalresearch.ca
www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.
For media inquiries: publications@globalresearch.ca
www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.
For media inquiries: publications@globalresearch.ca
Copyright © Peter Haisenko, anderweltonline.com, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment